whitman wrote:
> Wiim have a new forum at a new site, and the discussion about adding
> LMS/Squeezelite capability to its Mini (and forthcoming Pro) has been
> given a new thread there. Would be good if we added some more posts
> there to encourage Wiim to get on with this!
>
>
That's the idea.
Paul Webster
author of \"now playing\" plugins covering radio france (fip etc),
planetradio (bauer - kiss, absolute, scala, jazzfm etc), kcrw, abc
australia and cbc/radio-canada
and, via the extra \"radio now playing\" plugin lots more - see
I have put more info about the current options for using the WiiM Mini
with LMS into 3rd Party Hardware -
https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?116997-Wiim-Mini-and-Pro
Basically it can be made to work with LMS as it stands with both the
AirPlay bridge and uPnP bridge but as usual both
alfista wrote:
> Curious, what's the model number of the device?
You mean the programmer I'm using? That's a MiniPro TL866 (CS), a rather
cheap but really capable device, along with a stack of adaptors for
TSOP48 chips that I probably bought from AliExpress, and still it was
about 40 USD. The
Sorry for being vague, shouldn't have formulated a question before my
first cup of coffee. I was thinking of the model of the memory device.
But from your answer I can deduce roughly what kind of Flash it is.
Flash of that generation usually have pretty much no data retention
problems, but heat
philippe_44 wrote:
> If you need Ethernet, then the SqueezeAMP is not going to work without a
> fair bit of hardware tinkering, so I would not recommend it
Appreciate the reply and guidance. Cheers.
MrC's Profile:
alfista wrote:
> Sorry for being vague, shouldn't have formulated a question before my
> first cup of coffee. I was thinking of the model of the memory device.
> But from your answer I can deduce roughly what kind of Flash it is.
> Flash of that generation usually have pretty much no data
Too lazy to dig up the datasheets for those memories but I suspect they
are rated at 10,000 or even 100,000 erase cycles. I feel it is unlikely
wear should be an issue when used in this application.
Since the erase operation is rather slow, sometimes you don't erase and
overwrite when using this
