RMS was smart and have envisioned the GNU kind communication
guidelines, for GNU to remain apolitical, with only politics being
free software politics and human rights in computing.
That is quite clear. Some find it hard to understand.
As soon as the Thoughtpolice Squad started punishing RMS and
Jean Louis, Pedro:
Welcome to the movement!
https://twitter.com/GNUcgraph/status/1184585271410614278
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 2:08 PM Jean Louis wrote:
>
> You have no good intentions, and your intention is harassing and
> defaming Dr. Richard Stallman for the sake of GNU Guile project, for
>
On 16/10/2019 17:25:40 Europe/Paris Jean Louis wrote:
> File not found. Better link?
oopsie, try again
https://www5.zippyshare.com/v/7dKJ52VQ/file.html
___
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
Oct 16, 2019, 19:14 by dan...@pocock.pro:
>
>
> On 16/10/2019 16:23, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
>
>> What is this shit? It won't come out! The link sucks!
>>
>
> Is this the link?
>
> https://fsfe.org/picturebase/events/201910-fsfe-ga-meeting-participants.jpg
>
> They look so happy. Maybe they
Oct 16, 2019, 19:14 by dan...@pocock.pro:
Is this the link?
https://fsfe.org/picturebase/events/201910-fsfe-ga-meeting-participants.jpg
If that's the link, then that's not the evidence from the subject. Then it's a
much shittier link than I thought. And I know myself now really with shit from
Oct 16, 2019, 17:46 by anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de:
Ignorant, but a strong opinion.
I'm not ignorant! How can you say that! I don't want to get so upset again, so
I'll attribute it to your youthful recklessness. You still have a lot to learn,
but if you have as much experience as I have,
On 16/10/2019 16:23, ahil...@keemail.me wrote:
> What is this shit? It won't come out! The link sucks!
Is this the link?
https://fsfe.org/picturebase/events/201910-fsfe-ga-meeting-participants.jpg
They look so happy. Maybe they were so inspired by that €150,000
bequest that they did
Let me then cross-post to this mailing list, as it was probably
censored on the other one.
This is response to:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2019-10/msg5.html
As of now I do not see it published.
Dear Andy,
No, I do not think that
Am 16.10.19 um 17:53 schrieb ahil...@keemail.me:
I don't know what an E.V. is, but I'm sure the members are filling
their pockets.
Ignorant, but a strong opinion.
A common fashion nowadays. O tempora, o mores.
Kind regards
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Oct 16, 2019, 15:37 by bugs@gnu.support:
Yes, and I think it does happen for money. Each of those inside of the
e.V. or German non-profit also receive some money from foundation,
That's it. This scumbag Florian Sow claimed to get a negative salary from FSFE.
This is ridiculous! How is that even
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 18:35]:
> > What is fellowship? Any reference to it?
>
> https://fsfellowship.eu/2018/09/08/who-were-the-fsfe-fellowship.html
Thank you, that is good that you are trying to make it transparent. In
fact the FSFE would get more supporters with more transparency. To say
File not found. Better link?
Jean
* wikile...@mailo.com [2019-10-16 20:43]:
>
> heres the proof
>
>
>
> https://file.io/tTMyxr
>
>
>
> pococks write, fsfe done 15 years of backstabbing, this is the end-game
>
>
>
> when the time comes please don't shoot all of us
>
>
>
> remarkable
What is this shit? It won't come out! The link sucks! You're trying to get
Daniel's good names dirty by posting fake links on his list. Daniel would never
do that! Leave us alone, you hideous creature. Probably you are also paid by
Google. A whole army of mercenaries this is. But it's no
heres the proof
https://file.io/tTMyxr
pococks write, fsfe done 15 years of backstabbing, this is the end-game
when the time comes please don't shoot all of us
remarkable that rms and fsfe both go down at the same time. fsfe has no more
reason to exist when there is nobody left to
On 16/10/2019 14:40, Anco Dapo wrote:
For example, do you know how many people made secret
recordings of the FSFE annual meeting with their phones? I
believe one of them was even
using a Free Software app that I contributed to:
>>>
>>> I call your bluff. Publish the
> >> For example, do you know how many people made secret
> >> recordings of the FSFE annual meeting with their phones? I
> >> believe one of them was even
> >> using a Free Software app that I contributed to:
> >
> > I call your bluff. Publish the recording or shut up.
>
>
> Use your real name
Daniel,
> you are trying to put all the attention on me personally
Because it is an issue with you personally.
> For example, do you know how many people made secret
> recordings of the FSFE annual meeting with their phones? I
> believe one of them was even
> using a Free Software app that I
On 16/10/2019 14:04, Anco Dapo wrote:
> Daniel,
>
>> Romans used lions and tigers to kill their slaves, now it is email
>> lynchings but isn't it the same mindset?
>
> All I can see is that they removed a disruptive element from their
> organization. That is sensible.
>
>
>>> It is
On 16/10/2019 13:49, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 18:03]:
>> It isn't just the FSFE. Back in Roman times they would demote people
>> to be non-citizens and take away their vote, like demoting the Fellows
>> to be Supporters. Every now and then they would kill some slaves
Daniel,
> Romans used lions and tigers to kill their slaves, now it is email
> lynchings but isn't it the same mindset?
All I can see is that they removed a disruptive element from their
organization. That is sensible.
> > It is unlikely that all these organizations who kicked you out did so
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 18:03]:
> It isn't just the FSFE. Back in Roman times they would demote people
> to be non-citizens and take away their vote, like demoting the Fellows
> to be Supporters. Every now and then they would kill some slaves to
> keep all the other slaves in fear.
>
>
On 16/10/2019 12:00, Anco Dapo wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> all you have are emails you decorated with images and lists of subject
> lines, but nothing about the content.
The subject lines you mention[1] make the point.
In many cases, I deliberately obscure names because these are not
personal
What's the matter with you? Daniel was very good to us here and tries to save
us all. Maybe he has good reasons not to show so far. Maybe he is afraid for
his life. I wanted to raise money for a bodyguard, but nobody here answered.
Are you a FSF* troll? You are exposed. Maybe you also work for
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:10:41AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> When Kirschner asserts[1] that free software and open source are the
> same thing, he appears to be demoting and subverting the philosophy,
> denying it is important, maybe even ridiculing it.
He doesn't. He says they refer to the
Daniel,
> then extending the 2 year term of Matthias Kirschner
That is not uncommon and I think it is a good thing to have these elections
regularly.
> Let's hope it is all fake news.
It's coming from you, so it most likely is.
> Here is what Obama tells us:
I don't know what you're
Daniel,
You keep on making those bold statements but you never have anything to back it
up. Your blog is full of such false statements and all you have are emails you
decorated with images and lists of subject lines, but nothing about the
content. The few times you did publish information, it
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 14:41]:
> When he uses the FSF*derivative name and his title to demote the
> philosophy, that is rather unpleasant. People see the FSF* name and
> some think it represents the same philosophy as FSF.
Promotion of free software philosophy is not for FSFE in first
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 14:41]:
>
>
> On 16/10/2019 08:21, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Am 16.10.19 um 09:06 schrieb Jean Louis:
> >
> >> I would not bash them for that, but then we shall promote free
> >> software philosophy without politics.
> >
> > IMO that is not
On 16/10/2019 08:21, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am 16.10.19 um 09:06 schrieb Jean Louis:
>
>> I would not bash them for that, but then we shall promote free
>> software philosophy without politics.
>
> IMO that is not possible.
>
> May be one thinks, (s)he can promote "open
* Daniel Pocock [2019-10-16 12:26]:
>
> I hear that the FSFE annual meeting recently decided to make various
> changes to their constitution, removing Richard Stallman's name and
> inserting Open Source, then extending the 2 year term of Matthias
> Kirschner indefinitely so he can be president
I hear that the FSFE annual meeting recently decided to make various
changes to their constitution, removing Richard Stallman's name and
inserting Open Source, then extending the 2 year term of Matthias
Kirschner indefinitely so he can be president for life.
Let's hope it is all fake news.
31 matches
Mail list logo
