On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "only gracefully handles home networks"..
It was designed with the 80/20 rule...the vast majority of our users
have an WAN and a LAN and that's it.
> My setup is using the OPT1 inteface bridged to the WAN interface, I ha
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nope, 0.84.. Sorry, thought I mentioned that several times. Maybe not..
>
> Any way I can get my old file back?
Copy this file into /usr/local/www/wizards
http://cvs.pfsense.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/pfSense/usr/local/www/wizards/traffic_shaper_wizar
I installed once with the WRAP install and once with the hard drive
install. I'm not super familar with the software yet but I think in
the WRAP install there was no way to add applications. I hope to use
squid and I'm reading about some of the other apps. In the hard disk
version it was straight f
Not sure what you mean by "only gracefully handles home networks"..
My setup is using the OPT1 inteface bridged to the WAN interface, I have
nothing on the LAN interface and I don't want to use NAT for my Asterisk
server because that causes other issues with SIP.
So, I guess then that the onl
Nope, 0.84.. Sorry, thought I mentioned that several times. Maybe not..
Any way I can get my old file back?
I am not ready to update to 0.85 yet because I am still trying to prove out
some issues with hardware on 0.84 and I don't want to change the software
the same time I am changing the hard
Nope, at this time the wizard only gracefully handles home networks.
I ripped out that functionality a while back cause it was causing
problems - I now have a workaround and need to rewrite it. I'd expect
it to take a couple weeks and probably won't be in place for the 1.0
release as we're really
Hmmm, I can't duplicate that error. Is this the PC or wrap version?
You are running 0.85 (or 0.85.2) right (taht function was introduced
in 0.85)?
--Bill
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to have done some bad stuff to my install.
>
> Fatal error: Call to undefined f
The errors that were scrolling across my screen went away after I clicked on
them.
I don't see them in the logs or anywhere else, so not sure what they were.
Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Mojo Jojo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [
Sorry, my question was not asked correctly..
Should have been:
Since my Asterisk server is on not on the LAN interface and is on the OPT 1
(DMZ) interface with the
rest of my servers, will I really benefit from the traffic shaping that will
be setup by this wizard?
- Original Message ---
Also, I was looking through this file
/usr/local/www/wizards/traffic_shaper_wizard.xml...
When looking at the VOIP section I see a section that mentions the source
WAN and LAN but no mention of OPT 1 or any of the other optional interfaces.
So, my question is this..
Since my Asterisk server
This seems to have done some bad stuff to my install.
Fatal error: Call to undefined function: is_altq_capable() in
/usr/local/www/wizard.php(140) : eval()'d code on line 1
is all I get when I click on the wizard.
I also have some errors scrolling across the top of the GUI, some about my
rul
I just bought a WRAP for testing and I am waiting for it to arrive.
Can someone tell me the benefits of having a hard drive install inside a
beefier PC over a slimmed down install in a WRAP type device?
I initially thought a hard drive install would be better because I thought I
would get al
Cool, thanks.. You guys rock!
--Todd
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic Shaper
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry Scott, I don't follow..
Are y
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry Scott, I don't follow..
>
> Are you saying this will download a file that you tweaked and basically
> update my PfSense install?
>
> Once I do this the ports I mentioned will be added to the wizard including
> the IAX and IAX2 ports?
yes and
Sorry Scott, I don't follow..
Are you saying this will download a file that you tweaked and basically
update my PfSense install?
Once I do this the ports I mentioned will be added to the wizard including
the IAX and IAX2 ports?
Thanks for the clarification.
--Todd
- Original Message -
update_file.sh /usr/local/www/wizards/traffic_shaper_wizard.xml
Rerun the traffic shaper, pick Asterisk, set the bandwidth to 1.5 megabit.
Then that is added.
Scott
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks but what about this part :)
>
> > 1- Is there any reasonably easy way f
Thanks but what about this part :)
1- Is there any reasonably easy way for me to add the IAX (5036) and IAX2
(4569) ports to the prioritization after I run the wizard?
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Marquette" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 6:14 PM
Sub
hey scott, sorry! i lied; it's actually -i ,
(comma-seperated)
ntop loads with the one i tried but only uses the last interface.. d'oh!
beau.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Thanks, this is fixed now!
Scott
On 9/24/05, Beau Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if you select two interfaces in t
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also, I assume the wizard only prioritizes the SIP port? Does it
> > prioritize
> > any other ports like the IAX ports, RTP and so on?
> >>
> >>The asterisk setting prioritizes
> >>UDP 5060-5069
> >>and
> >>UDP 1-17226 (no idea why - SIP mayb
Thanks, this is fixed now!
Scott
On 9/24/05, Beau Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you select two interfaces in the pfsense ntop GUI (say LAN and WAN)
> and submit it will change /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ntop.sh to use a command
> line of the format:
>
> -i
>
> ntop will error out with thi
if you select two interfaces in the pfsense ntop GUI (say LAN and WAN)
and submit it will change /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ntop.sh to use a command
line of the format:
-i
ntop will error out with this config, it should be of the format:
-i -i
i changed ntop.sh myself to get it working but this
Also, I assume the wizard only prioritizes the SIP port? Does it
prioritize
any other ports like the IAX ports, RTP and so on?
The asterisk setting prioritizes
UDP 5060-5069
and
UDP 1-17226 (no idea why - SIP maybe?)
This may help:
http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20f
A Rossi wrote:
I've narrowed it down to 2 possible sites:
http://www.auditmypc.com/
and
https://www.grc.com/x/ne.dll?bh0bkyd2
neither gave me anything out of the ordinary behind m0n0wall or pfsense.
first one found my private IP address **GASP** Oh no!;)
-cmb
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, since I have most of PfSense setup the way I want, I am now ready to
> dive into traffic shaping.
>
> Traffic shaping is a big reason we went with PFSense.
>
> We have a softswitch (Asterisk) on site behind our PfSense box.
>
> We are looking t
On 9/24/05, Mojo Jojo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Currently if our bandwidth on our T1 gets soaked 1.55 mb or so, our calls go
> to crap.
>
[snip]
> I noticed if I tweaked the "Bandwidth:" setting under "VOIP specific
> settings" from the default of 32k to 96k, my call was fine. Seems that
OK, since I have most of PfSense setup the way I want, I am now ready to
dive into traffic shaping.
Traffic shaping is a big reason we went with PFSense.
We have a softswitch (Asterisk) on site behind our PfSense box.
We are looking to do some QOS (traffic shaping) for our VOIP in and out of
On 9/24/05, sai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On a more fundemental level, I would question having a virus scanneron the same machine as the firewall. Shouldn't you have antivirus ,anti spam etc on separate machines from your main firewall? You get asingle point of failure with increased possibiliite
> I totally agree with Chris. in my personal experience, viruses enter the
> lan mainly through web traffic and emails. So, I ma trying to develop an
> appliance that could filter this kind of traffic directly on the gateway!
> Using squid, you should be able to stop viruses (in downloaded files,
28 matches
Mail list logo
