Hi, I have a quick question regarding easy_install and MacPorts. I
tried easy_installing nose while using MacPorts (Python 2.6.7 /
py26-distribute @0.6.24_0 / MacPorts version 2.0.3) --
sudo python -m easy_install nose
This worked, except it installed the nosetests script into--
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article
caotb1wf9jpwbtxqwmf8ghmc1v3vmhmkdeo7rejeoysnxy_p...@mail.gmail.com,
Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I have a quick question regarding easy_install and MacPorts. I
tried easy_installing nose
Hi, I have one more question for the time being. This regards how the
easy_install script works.
I use Mac OSX, and my /usr/bin directory contains three versions of
the easy_install script: easy_install, easy_install-2.5, and
easy_install-2.6.
Based on some debugging lines I tried inserting,
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Paul Ivanov pivanov...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
Based on some debugging lines I tried inserting, when I execute the
script called simply easy_install, the script seems to execute just
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
Hi, I have a quick question regarding easy_install and MacPorts. I
tried easy_installing nose
This worked, except it installed the nosetests script into--
/opt/local/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.6/bin
Hi, I'm trying to use pip to install an older, specific version of a
package in PyPI (specifically simplejson v2.0.9):
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/simplejson/2.0.9
I've tried a few variations of the syntax below, but it always seems
to install the newest version (v2.5.0). I don't know if this
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Carl Meyer c...@oddbird.net wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 04/02/2012 12:50 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to use pip to install an older, specific version of a
package in PyPI (specifically simplejson v2.0.9):
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/simplejson/2.0.9
Hi Carl (or others),
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Carl Meyer c...@oddbird.net wrote:
Also, you may want to be aware that the -E flag is deprecated and is
already removed in the latest pip release (1.1) because it does not
handle isolated virtualenvs correctly. Instead, create a virtualenv
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a question regarding the proper use of the use_2to3 feature of
Distribute's test, as described here:
[1]
http://packages.python.org/distribute/python3.html#distribute-as-help-during-porting
My tests run
I have a few questions about including data files when running
python setup.py test
with Distribute while using Python 3 and the use_2to3 keyword argument.
Some of my test files are in a subdirectory of my project outside of
the package directory. I'm able to have the test files copied
I'd like advice on what instructions to provide to users (if any) to
avoid what might be a common user error.
I maintain a project written in Python 2, and I recently added support
for Python 3 via 2to3 and the installation process. Recently, a
Python 3 user got the source code, manually
I have an open-ended question about the idea of creating two setup
scripts for a project: one for end-users (e.g. installing), and
another for all other use cases (e.g. project development).
Here are a few reasons I came across for considering something like this:
The first is that if the
is a worthy goal).
Thanks,
--Chris
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
I have an open-ended question about the idea of creating two setup
scripts for a project: one for end-users (e.g. installing), and
another for all other use cases (e.g. project
Hi, is there a recommended way of building and deploying a private
Python application from many loosely coupled internal packages or
modules as opposed to a single large package? Should this be done
with a private PyPI server with each module/package having its own
setup.py, or is zc.buildout (or
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
The version requirement is use the latest version of all packages that work
with the Python version under test and the changes I've suggested would mean
that on Python 2.6 and 2.7, the latest version of
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Holth dho...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd like to take this moment to note how awesome importing from
zipfile is. Did you know you can execute a zip file with Python, and
if it has a __main__.py in the root it will be executed, with the
zipfile's contents on the
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Skip Montanaro s...@pobox.com wrote:
Marius Gedminas marius at pov.lt writes:
Not distutils, but setuptools (or its fork distribute).
The EASY-INSTALL-ENTRY-SCRIPT comment is a hint.
...
Thanks for the hint. I will admit to just using this stuff blindly.
I
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Making
sure the necessary metadata for the build step is provided as part of
the sdist is the responsibility of the Archiver.
We don't really *care* what format the Archiver uses to gather info
from the user, so long as
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Ronald Oussoren
ronaldousso...@mac.com wrote:
On 12 Feb, 2013, at 9:33, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Ronald Oussoren ronaldousso...@mac.com
wrote:
PEPs 426 and 427 between them should achieve the first objective,
[In this e-mail I'm combining comments to a few of the e-mails in this thread.]
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
My overarching ambition is to encourage migration to a model where
Archivers create sdists from source control, Builders create wheels
from
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:42 AM, Vinay Sajip vinay_sa...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Another question arises - what is to be done when directories, which are
meant to be deleted during uninstallation, contain files which were not put
there during installation of the distribution being removed? It would
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
Maintainer (optional)
-
A string containing the maintainer's name at a minimum; additional
contact information may be provided.
Note that this field is intended for use when a project is being
suggests that PyPI already supports
it if distutils were updated (but I haven't confirmed):
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=3396924group_id=66150atid=513503
--Chris
On Feb 23, 2013 10:51 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:10 AM
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Donald Stufft donald.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
I *don't* like the idea of (== 1.3) and (== 1.3.0) being equivalent
when (1.3) and (1.3.0) are substantially different, though. Instead,
I'll reinstate a
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Donald Stufft donald.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Remember, part of the goals of both PEP 386 and PEP 426 is to tighten
up cases where setuptools is considered too permissive, because it's
guessing in
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Donald Stufft donald.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
In [45]: l = [x for x in releases if any([y for y in x[1].split(.) if
y.startswith(0) and y.isdigit() and not y.endswith(0)])]
In [46]: len(l)
Out[46]: 1162
Note this doesn't check if they have confusing versions,
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Jeremy Gillick j_gill...@yahoo.com wrote:
I wrote a valid (as far as I can tell/test) reStructuredText README file,
but on pypi it's just shown as plain text. I have run the file through the
rst2html.py tool and it works without errors and appears to be
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 2:15 PM, PJ Eby p...@telecommunity.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Paul G. paul.l...@isrcomputing.com wrote:
1. What format should I use in my README.txt file for my package's content
to be displayed on its package page?
It's not the README file; it's the
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Here’s the list of dependency links for the projects that still use them
in their latest releases:
https://gist.github.com/dstufft/7185162
A good number of them are either bogus, are pointing directly to PyPI, or
are
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Here’s the list of dependency links for the projects that still use them in
their latest releases:
https://gist.github.com/dstufft
Why don't you study what's happening in the offending lines of code
and see where things are going wrong? For example, in this file:
/Users/dpo/.virtualenvs/test/lib/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools/command/egg_info.py
see what's showing up as a tuple rather than a string. You can add
debug
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 Jan 2014 17:15, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
Fyi, the Python Packaging User Guide has moved from bitbucket to github.
The new project home is here:
https://github.com/pypa/python-packaging-user-guide
and
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org wrote:
Am 23.01.2014 10:05, schrieb Paul Moore:
On 23 January 2014 08:28, Thomas Heller thel...@ctypes.org wrote:
I'm trying out to submit a wheel to testpypi.python.org and then
install it from there with pip. It doesn't
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Today (Sat Jan 25, 2014) the Infrastructure team has migrated PyPI to new
infrastructure.
The old infrastructure was:
- a single database server managed by OSUOSL
- a pair of load balancers shared by all of the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 3:41 AM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:23 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
As I recall, it was in the original version of the PEP/spec and it was
always an intended feature. The wheel file for the wheel project
itself is
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Noah Kantrowitz n...@coderanger.net wrote:
On Feb 9, 2014, at 1:13 AM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 9 February 2014 19:28, Noah Kantrowitz n...@coderanger.net wrote:
On Feb 8, 2014, at 6:25 PM, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
However, after thinking a little more on the challenge, I believe the
lower level legacy content should fit right in as a new subsection in
the distutils docs at http://docs.python.org/3/distutils/index.html.
There's 3
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, I noticed that PUG's Installation Packaging Tutorial
[1] is one section. Shouldn't those be separate tutorials? IIRC that
information was in separate sections before (one for installing and
one for
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
So there's an ongoing debate over pip's behaviour around disallowing
external hosting by default (see thread pip: cdecimal an externally
hosted file and may be unreliable over on python-dev for the latest
round).
It
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I just uploaded a new pyramid_sqlalchemy package to PyPI. Looking at the
distribution page at https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pyramid_sqlalchemy PyPI is
not rendering ReST. I can’t figure out why though: according to both
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 13 Jul 2014, at 21:36, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I just uploaded a new pyramid_sqlalchemy package to PyPI. Looking
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 15 Jul 2014, at 11:22, Richard Jones rich...@python.org wrote:
Hi, I just want to note that I'm aware of this issue and I have do
something about it in my long TODO.
That link is malformed in any case - docutils
FWIW, as a community member it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to
expect that a certain amount of advance notice be given for changes
like this, *especially* given that the tools are undocumented.
Also, there's a difference between notifying people and running it
by people (for permission). I
, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
Changes like what exactly? This was a fairly minor change which is why there
wasn't more notice.
On Sep 1, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, as a community member it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to
expect
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014, at 08:15 PM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
I don't know exactly. I'd say a change that in your judgment you
think has a non-trivial chance of breaking existing tools. Holger is
probably in a better position
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Donald Stufft don...@stufft.io wrote:
On Sep 14, 2014, at 1:58 PM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
Hi Donald, all,
I sometimes have doubts that the download numbers as shown by
pypi.python.org are correct. Here is one case where i am pretty sure
Would this also affect the ability to update the readme information
for a version on PyPI (i.e. the information displayed on the default
home page generated by PyPI for the release) once the version has
already been uploaded to PyPI?
There are sometimes issues encountered with the display of that
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:28 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 02:21:11PM -0700, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
Would this also affect the ability to update the readme information
for a version on PyPI (i.e. the information displayed on the default
home page generated
Hi,
I was curious what others do for the following packaging tasks, or if
you have any recommendations otherwise. There is also a code
organization question at the end.
1) For starters, it's very easy to make mistakes in one's MANIFEST.in,
so I hacked the sdist command in my setup.py to list
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:44:09PM -0700, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
I was curious what others do for the following packaging tasks, or if
you have any recommendations otherwise. There is also a code
organization question
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 09:15:54AM -0700, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
Lastly, as these setup-related tasks grow larger and more complicated,
I found it helped
I have a suggestion. Holger obviously feels he has something very
important to say, and a lot of e-mails have already been sent back and
forth. Is there some way that Donald, Nick, and Holger could perhaps have
a conference call or hangout of some sort just for the purpose of
understanding
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:59 AM, holger krekel hol...@merlinux.eu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 16:45 -0400, Daniel Holth wrote:
I liked it because I agree with the TOML author that the YAML spec
gives rage; YAML seems to be defined as a bunch of things that the end
user is supposed to think
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
Hello,
I guess I am doing something wrong, but what?
(I took linux_x86_64 after PEP 427 and 425)
$ twine upload dist/llvmlite-0.1-py2.py3-none-linux_x86_64.whl
Uploading distributions to
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Marius Gedminas mar...@pov.lt wrote:
I keep getting 503 errors from PyPI that go away after I clear my
cookies.
The entire cycle is as follows:
1. Visit PyPI, log in (because I need to do some maintenance or
something of my packages).
2. Things
and MAY reject them entirely when strict version
matches are used inappropriately.
Prefix matching may be requested instead of strict comparison, by
appending a trailing .* to the version identifier in the version
matching clause.
--Chris
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Chris Jerdonek
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
tshep...@gmail.com wrote:
Why the jump from 1.5.6 to 6.0?
The release notes say (under 6.0):
PROCESS Version numbers are now simply X.Y where the leading 1 has
been dropped.
(from https://pip.pypa.io/en/latest/news.html )
I'm guessing
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com wrote:
* 1.7.1 matches 1.7 (previously it did not)
This sounds like a straight up bug fix in the packaging module to me - the
PEP 440 zero padding should apply to *all* checks, not just to equality
checks, as you can't
2014.09.01 should or shouldn't match
=2014.09?
This is an example of the case I mentioned at the end of my previous email.
--Chris
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Chris Jerdonek
chris.jerdo...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Marcus Smith qwc...@gmail.com
javascript
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:01 AM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
* for those cases (like date-based versions) where excluding releases with
an additional numeric suffix is the right thing to do, an explicit prefix
exclusion will still be possible, and will have the advantage of failing
Sorry if this isn't the best list on which to bring this up, but it came up
for me during the recent PEP 440 discussions.
For a while I've noticed a serious problem when viewing PEP doc pages like
the following on my iPhone:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/
It's a bit maddening, so I
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 8:43 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
On 25.01.2015 16:34, Donald Stufft wrote:
On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:32 AM, M.-A. Lemburg m...@egenix.com wrote:
I think you ought to make a more prominent announcement on
c.l.p, c.l.p.a and perhaps a distutils blog (if there
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 11:45 AM, Randy Syring ra...@thesyrings.us wrote:
I'd like to pick up a conversation that was happening on another thread:
I've only been on this list for about a year. This PEP (and others
like it) has been in motion for quite a while. I think the blog would
miss far
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Skip Montanaro skip.montan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
Based on the messages, my guess is that you are not using the most
recent version of pip and/or you may be trying to use it with an older
version of
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hi All,
A couple of buglets I've noticed while using picky in anger:
1. pip freeze doesn't include a line for pip itself, why is that?
2. pip freeze doesn't include packages provided by the standard libary (ie:
On Thursday, October 8, 2015, Thomas Güttler
wrote:
> This is a follow up to the thread "Where should I put tests when packaging
> python modules?"
>
> I have never used tox up to now. But reading the mails of the thread, it
> seems
> that tox is the current state
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 December 2015 at 16:40, Glyph Lefkowitz <gl...@twistedmatrix.com> wrote:
>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>
Hi,
I have a development workflow question I was wondering if people on
this list had a recommended solution for.
Say you're working on a web application that you deploy using a
requirements.txt file. And say you have a set of "abstract
dependencies" that your application depends on.
What are
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Luís de Sousa
wrote:
> $ twine upload dist/hex-utils-0.2.sdist
> Uploading distributions to https://pypi.python.org/pypi
> ValueError: Cannot find file (or expand pattern): 'dist/hex-utils-0.2.sdist'
>
> $ ls -la dist
> total 12
>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:07 AM, Reinout van Rees wrote:
> Situation: I'm experimenting with docker, mostly in combination with
> buildout. But it also applies to pip/virtualenv.
> ...
> Now local development: it is normal to mount the current directory as
> /code/, so that
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> Are you suggesting that my current vagrant provisioning script "ensure x is
> installed":
>
> ensure_x.sh:
> #!/bin/sh
> pip install x
>
> Which IIUC does not currently check the network if x is already installed, is
> no
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:34 PM, Fred Drake wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 2:06 AM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>> Are these tools unable to realize that supporting a particular minor
>> version implies support for the corresponding major version?
>
> Should
Hi,
I have a local development workflow question I'm looking for feedback
or suggestions on. It relates to installing things in editable mode in
conjunction with syncing source files to a VM.
I'm developing a Python project that is deployed / runs inside a
Docker container. I do my local
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Ionel Cristian Mărieș
<cont...@ionelmc.ro> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> When developing locally, however, the sync process mounts the synced
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 31 March 2016 at 10:00, Ionel Cristian Mărieș <cont...@ionelmc.ro> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Chris Jerdonek <chris.jerdo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>&g
The issue tracker on PyPA's GitHub repo for the proejct seems alive and well:
https://github.com/pypa/setuptools/issues
--Chris
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Chris Withers wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Where's the best place to report setuptools issues now?
>
> I see 25.1.2 was
Hi, this seems like a simple question, but I haven't been able to find
the answer online:
What is the current recommended way to get (1) the name of a project,
and (2) the names of the top-level packages installed by a project
(not counting the project's dependencies). You have access to / can
I was interested in working on the following issue but thought it
would be worth asking this list about first:
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/4507
If pip-installing a dependency from a VCS url of the following form:
git+https://myvcs.com/some_dependency@sometag#egg=SomeDependency
and
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:29 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> I'm sorry that you're frustrated. You're not the only person who's
> frustrated, and in fact I'd bet a lot of the people who are trying to get
> this stuff to work seamlessly and perfectly for you are at least as
>
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 18 August 2017 at 12:17, Ian Hartley wrote:
>> I recently installed python 3.6.2, and I want to know how to transfer the
>> numerous modules I have on 3.6.1 to the newest version, usable by an
>>
A couple comments:
1) Would it make sense to provide a way for build tools to specify
what encoding they use (e.g. if not using the default), instead of
changing their encoding to conform to a standard? It seems like that
could be easier, although I know this doesn't address problems like
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Ugh, sorry, fat-fingered that. Actual reply below...
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Donald Stufft wrote:
>>>
>>> To be
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:08 PM, xoviat wrote:
> In any case, we're going to need this for prepare_metadata, so the question
> you should ask is: what are the reasons for *not* merging this? I haven't
> heard any so far but that doesn't mean that they don't exist. If there are
>
.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 5:11 PM, xoviat <xov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also if someone with pip write access could please discuss and hopefully
> merge my initial PR on pip, I would very much appreciate it. Paul seems to
> be short on time.
--Chris
>
> On Sep 4, 2017 8:19 PM,
On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 5:17 PM xoviat wrote:
> Whatever it was, removing it seems to have had no effect on the tests. I
> will remove it unless someone has an objection.
>
Just FYI, I wouldn't take the tests still passing as a major signal. I've
noticed there are even common
What kind of project is it? For example, is it a software library e.g. to
put on PyPI, or a website application for a company to run? The answer to
this question will help people answer your question because it has a big
impact on what practice will be best for you.
—Chris
On Sun, May 6, 2018 at
I haven’t yet seen pyenv mentioned in this discussion. Having the ability
to switch between Python versions for interactive exploration seems like an
important piece for
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:18 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > The tox model is the one we
t 12:57 PM, Chris Jerdonek
<chris.jerdo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I haven’t yet seen pyenv mentioned in this discussion. Having the ability to
> switch between Python versions for interactive exploration seems like an
> important piece for
>
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 11:18 AM Bar
PS - this is the pyenv / tox compatibility issue I had in mind:
https://github.com/pyenv/pyenv-virtualenv/issues/202
And this I have found is the simplest workaround:
https://github.com/pyenv/pyenv-virtualenv/issues/202#issuecomment-284728205
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 1:04 PM, Chris Jerdonek
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Robin Becker wrote:
> I am a bit confused about the meaning of 'backfilling'. Does it mean that a
> particular manylinux will evolve in time so an early manylinux2010 wheel
> will differ from a later one?
I think it just means that, say,
I'm not sure how relevant it is, but this issue was recently filed on
pip's issue tracker ("Reproducible installs"):
https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/5648
Is there any overlap?
There is also an older (closed) pip issue that might be relevant
("Preserving timestamps on copy"):
On Sat, Aug 4, 2018 at 1:08 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 at 08:35, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
>> So both are different issues, and I agree with both: during the source
>> extraction and build process, you want to preserve timestamps as much as
>> possible. But for the installation,
Does this proposal mean that .pyc files would need to be regenerated after
installing from a wheel (because the timestamp inside the .pyc file would
no longer match the .py file from which it came)? I could be wrong, but it
seems like it’s a desirable feature that .pyc files be generated and up to
don’t involve that.
—Chris
> "[Distutils] Announcement: Pip 10 is coming, and will move all internal
> APIs"
> https://groups.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/pypa-dev/JVTfS6ZdAuM
>
>
>
> On Monday, August 20, 2018, Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I
eplying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Distutils-SIG digest..."Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: pipenv and pip (Dan Ryan)
> 2. Re: pipenv and pip (Dan Ryan)
>
> From: Dan Ryan
> Subject: [Distutils] Re: pipenv and pip
> Date:
Hi,
Can someone explain to me the relationship between pipenv and pip,
from the perspective of pipenv's maintainers?
For example, does pipenv currently reimplement anything that pip tries
to do, or does it simply call out to pip through the CLI or through
its internal API's? Does it have any
on pip, packaging, and setuptools to connect the
> dots, retrieve package info, etc.
>
> Dan Ryan // pipenv maintainer
> gh: @techalchemy
>
>> On Aug 20, 2018, at 2:41 AM, Chris Jerdonek wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can someone explain to me the relationship b
Hi,
Interesting write-up! A couple comments / questions:
1) Can you list in the document the non-Python dependencies and what
they're used for to give people an idea?
2) I don't know how Certbot is architected, but would it be possible
to put the "meat" of Certbot inside a Docker container
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Brad Warren wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2018, at 6:52 PM, Chris Jerdonek
> wrote:
>
> 2) I don't know how Certbot is architected, but would it be possible
> to put the "meat" of Certbot inside a Docker container (ideally
> including most of
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 7:39 PM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 5:48 PM, Brad Warren wrote:
>>
>> Not wanting to install a lot of extra software to use Certbot is certainly
>> fair and we’d obviously prefer our packaging solution to be as lightweight
>> as possible. Thanks for
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo