On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>>>
>>> As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board?
>>> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
>>
>> .
On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Mike Axiak wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> So, if we were to integrate a code review tool, it would only be to
>> support case 3. I don't have any concrete numbers to back me up, but
>> my gut feeling is that case 3 isn't
On Friday 30 April 2010 19:22:33 Idan Gazit wrote:
> FWIW, I spoke with Alex the other week about turning piano-man into
> a more finished product.
>
> So long as core guarantees that they'll at least take a look at
> whatever is made, I'm +1 on rolling our own, and am willing to
> champion this p
Owen,
The file is only created once, so the compression only happens once.
Only when any of the files being aggregated is changed does the file
get recreated.
In other words, the process is automatic, but it has no performance
penalty.
Silvio
On Apr 30, 10:27 am, Owen Nelson wrote:
> In this c
Is it worth upgrading to the 0.11.X branch with Trac 0.12 scheduled to
be out the door within a couple weeks?
On the one hand, a brand new Trac release would be more likely to
contain bugs than a bugfix branch that's now on it's 7th revision. The
configurable workflows and per-user permissions wer
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Gabriel Hurley wrote:
> I'd also be interested in working on this, as long as I'm not alone on
> it. Have you and/or Alex set up any kind of mailing list for it? Do
> you plan to use git's issue tracker or something else? What's the
> process plan for getting devel
I'd also be interested in working on this, as long as I'm not alone on
it. Have you and/or Alex set up any kind of mailing list for it? Do
you plan to use git's issue tracker or something else? What's the
process plan for getting development kick-started on it?
- Gabriel
On Apr 30, 11:22 am,
On Apr 30, 8:02 am, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> I haven't heard one proposed. I'll take a look at RedMine and/or
> steal ideas from launchpad -- but writing a new tracker isn't the
> problem I'm trying to solve.
FWIW, I currently use (and administer) Redmine for my company. I'd say
it's only a margi
On Apr 30, 2010, at 9:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4
> to 0.11.7 would buy us? If not, I can go read changelogs.
>
> Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take
> to do the upgrade.
>
> Who has access
FWIW, I spoke with Alex the other week about turning piano-man into a
more finished product.
So long as core guarantees that they'll at least take a look at
whatever is made, I'm +1 on rolling our own, and am willing to
champion this project.
I think having something we can easily shape to meet o
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
> So, if we were to integrate a code review tool, it would only be to
> support case 3. I don't have any concrete numbers to back me up, but
> my gut feeling is that case 3 isn't a time sink for me.
There is an added benefit to having a
On Apr 30, 2010, at 10:56 AM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote:
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck
wrote:
As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
...
5) The patch is missing some critical component like tests or docs
...
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board?
> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
I'm not sure.
Like Alex, I've never used reviewboard itself. I have used
codereview.appspot to review some patches (mostly because Alex
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take
> to do the upgrade.
To the best of my knowledge, the only things standing in the way of a
Trac upgrade are:
* Enthusiasm
* Time
The available quantities of these resou
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board?
> http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
>> Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4
>> to
As long as I'm here, how much interest is there in review board?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4
> to 0.11.7 would buy us? If not, I can go read changelogs.
>
> Sepa
Does anyone have crib notes on what upgrading from (presumed) 0.10.4
to 0.11.7 would buy us? If not, I can go read changelogs.
Separate from that, I'd like to open discussion on what it would take
to do the upgrade.
Who has access to the server? What do I need to do to convince to let
me upgrad
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
wrote:
...
>>> I'm not a huge fan of Trac - it's
>>> got lots of quirks and bugs that annoy the bejezus out of me,
>> ...
>> Perhaps upgrading would get us some distance?
>
> Possibly. Was that you volunteering to become our Trac jockey? :-)
>
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Stephen Wolff
> wrote:
>>> I recognize running tests w/ regressions pass would be useful, but
>>> it's getting into CI-land -- once we have some CI infrastructure in
>>> place, I'd be happy to use that.
>>>
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:37 PM, yml wrote:
...
> While spending some more time looking at launchpad.net I stumbled upon
> another very neat feature you can also sort the bug by heat [1].
Thanks for this -- I'll be reading it shortly.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to t
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Stephen Wolff wrote:
>> I recognize running tests w/ regressions pass would be useful, but
>> it's getting into CI-land -- once we have some CI infrastructure in
>> place, I'd be happy to use that.
>>
>>
>
> In case you missed it, there already is some CI infrastru
In this case you're compressing at runtime... or am I missing something?
I think I'm just going to burrow for a little while and prototype some
helpers. I've got a project coming up shortly with some room for R&D on
this front, so hopefully I'll be able to put them into production for a
while bef
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Joshua Partogi
wrote:
> I've noticed that the mailing list name 'django-developers' always
> creates confusion for first time users.
You aren't the first person to make this suggestion. Here's the most
recent discussion about the topic that I could find:
http://g
I've noticed that the mailing list name 'django-developers' always
creates confusion for first time users.
Kind regards,
Joshua
--
http://twitter.com/scrum8
On Apr 28, 9:51 am, Alex Gaynor wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Kiko Griffin wrote:
> > Hello All,
>
> > Thanks for reviewing a
24 matches
Mail list logo