Hi Dirk,
I agree. It will take some efforts to do the content merge.
Regards
Sri
On 1/14/13 6:12 AM, "dirk.von-h...@telekom.de"
wrote:
>Hi Sri and all,
>Although it's too late (sorry for that) I agree with you and others who
>commented similarly that it's impossible (for me) to judge - both
>
Folks,
The WGLC has concluded already some time ago. In a meantime we (chairs) and
the respective authors of both documents have had some constructive discussions
on the background.
Based on the poll [2] got more "rough consensus" i.e. about 2/3 ;) However,
as indicated by several WG members, m
and merge ...
Best regards
Dirk
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] Im Auftrag von Sri
Gundavelli (sgundave)
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. Januar 2013 00:39
An: dmm@ietf.org
Betreff: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices an
; dmm@ietf.org; Jouni Korhonen
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Seok-Joo Koh
mailto:sj...@knu.ac.kr>> wrote:
Happy a new year to everyone !
[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
I've reviewed both the documents and here is my feedback.
1. Both the documents are well written and many points are valid and
equally many points are also debatable, but is not a blocker for the draft
adoption.
3. Given the efforts put in by the Authors of both the documents, I'd hate
to pick one
I support [2] draft-liu as basis for WG item, because it first abstracts
the common functions of mobility protocols.
And, a combination of the two could only be better, right?
Alex
Le 19/12/2012 21:25, Jouni Korhonen a écrit :
Folks,
We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) a
Hi all,
Sorry for my last minute comment. In comparing the two documents, [1]
gives a detailed analysis of 3GPP technologies, but may be too much
focused on one SDO. [2] analyzes WiFi networks as well as 3GPP, which
provides somewhat a good balance for an IETF document by mentioning
multiple acces
alf Of
> |Jouni Korhonen
> |Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05
> |To: dmm@ietf.org
> |Cc: Julien Laganier
> |Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
> |analysis" document
> |
> |
> |Folks,
> |
> |Just a reminder
: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
|Jouni Korhonen
|Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05
|To: dmm@ietf.org
|Cc: Julien Laganier
|Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
|analysis" document
|
|
|Folks,
|
|Just a reminder
Dear all,
I support [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-03 draft as basis for the
WG document.
Br
Antonio
--
--
Antonio de la Oliva
aol...@it.uc3m.es
Departamento Ing. Telematica
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
__
2012 5:25 AM
> To: dmm@ietf.org
> Cc: Julien Laganier
> Subject: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
> analysis" document
>
>
> Folks,
>
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for
> that. The next ste
-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
|Jouni Korhonen
|Sent: jueves, 03 de enero de 2013 13:05
|To: dmm@ietf.org
|Cc: Julien Laganier
|Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
|analysis" document
|
|
|Folks,
|
|Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice
t;
> ** **
>
> ************
>
> Seok-Joo Koh****
>
> sj...@knu.ac.kr****
>
> ** **
>
> *Subject:* Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
> analysis" document
>
> ** **
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Joun
Hi Jouni, all,
I do support draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 as the base document for the DMM
gap analysis. In my opinion this document is more complete, better structured
and documented, broadly covering the purpose of reviewing existing protocols
and analyzing how they fit on the DMM framew
-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 as the base document, and
to merge [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 into [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 appropriately.
Cheers,
Seok-Joo Koh
sj...@knu.ac.kr
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a
Hi Jouni & Julien,
|[1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
|[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
After going through the two drafts, I think that [2] is in much better shape as
it stands now to form the _basis_ for a WG document, as it includes a gap
analysis that is more sober, t
Dear all,
I support [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01, which provides
clear current practices of IP mobility protocols and gap analysis.
Cheers.
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
> Folks,
>
> We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologie
f.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni
Korhonen
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2013 12:05 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Cc: Julien Laganier
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document
Folks,
Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice
Dear all,
As I already mentioned during previous email discussions, I think that
draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 [1], describes well several
mobility protocols considered for gap analysis and it describes a clear
identification of their limitations!
Therefore I am in favour of adopting this d
Dear all,
After going through the 2 documents, my opinion is that [1] has an
improved technical completeness (e.g. number of mobility protocols
considered for best practices description, and clear identification of
respective limitations) against that of ]2}. It also seems to have a
more logi
igine-
De : dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Jouni
Korhonen
Envoyé : jeudi 3 janvier 2013 13:05
À : dmm@ietf.org
Cc : Julien Laganier
Objet : Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document
Folks,
Just a reminder that
Folks,
Just a reminder that ~one more week time to voice your preference!
- Jouni
On Dec 20, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
>
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
> wrote:
>
>> Dear chairs,
>>
>> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-a
On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:05 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
wrote:
> Dear chairs,
>
> We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis,
> addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the last
> meeting. Main changes from -02 are:
>
> - New section on 3GPP mob
Dear chairs,
We have been working on an update of draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis,
addressing the comments received on the mailing list and during the last
meeting. Main changes from -02 are:
- New section on 3GPP mobility.
- New section on functional analysis.
- New section on combined solution an
Folks,
We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for that.
The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" document to
serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two documents on
this topic to choose from:
[1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-ana
25 matches
Mail list logo
