Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

2015-12-03 3:02 GMT+08:00 Behcet Sarikaya : > Hi Jouni, > > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen > wrote: > > As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is > a > > feature that we still lack.. > > > > Are you

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

mPCoAfailure detection is adressed > > -Praveen > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > pierrick.se...@orange.com > Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:22 AM > To: sarik...@ieee.org; Jong-Hyouk

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi Suresh, > -Message d'origine- > De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Suresh Krishnan > Envoyé : jeudi 10 décembre 2015 00:39 > À : Dapeng Liu; dmm > Objet : Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming- > 02 > >

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

; > -Original Message- > > From: dirk.von-h...@telekom.de [mailto:dirk.von-h...@telekom.de] > > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:06 PM > > To: pierrick.se...@orange.com; dmm@ietf.org > > Cc: alexandre.petre...@gmail.com > > Subject: RE: [DMM] Call for adoption c

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

t revision. Thanks, Pierrick > Thanks a lot! > > Best Regards > Dirk > > -Original Message- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > pierrick.se...@orange.com<mailto:pierrick.se...@orange.com> > Sent: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

al Message- > > From: pierrick.se...@orange.com [mailto:pierrick.se...@orange.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 5:02 PM > > To: Mingui Zhang; dirk.von-h...@telekom.de; dmm@ietf.org > > Cc: alexandre.petre...@gmail.com > > Subject: RE: [DMM] Cal

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

dmm@ietf.org > Cc: alexandre.petre...@gmail.com > Subject: RE: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > > Hi, > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Mingui Zhang [mailto:zhangmin...@huawei.com] Envoyé : mercredi 9 > > décembre 20

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi, > -Message d'origine- > De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Erunika > Envoyé : mercredi 9 décembre 2015 05:13 > À : dmm@ietf.org > Objet : Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming- > 02 > > Hi, >

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

>>> >>> >>> >>> Do you mean that using DSL and LTE together is a BBF trademark? ... >>> come on. :-).. anyway, I don't care about using another example... why >>> not WiFi and LTE... is it ok? Is there any SDO which claims >>>exclusivity on this >>use-case ;-) ? > Ok, no problem. Now, I guess,

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi, I also support the adoption. However, I have a slight concern.I find Figure 1 little too specific and it might mislead the audience. Maybe the wording should be changed in order to emphasize that this is just an instance. Or else, I think the use case should be dropped. However, having

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

ted version to address the issues we've > found. > > Thanks, > Mingui > >> -Original Message- >> From: dirk.von-h...@telekom.de [mailto:dirk.von-h...@telekom.de] >> Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:06 PM >> To: pierrick.se...@orange.com; dmm@ietf.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

ks, Mingui > -Original Message- > From: dirk.von-h...@telekom.de [mailto:dirk.von-h...@telekom.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2015 6:06 PM > To: pierrick.se...@orange.com; dmm@ietf.org > Cc: alexandre.petre...@gmail.com > Subject: RE: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > dr

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

[mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > pierrick.se...@orange.com > Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 5:16 PM > To: Muley, Praveen V (Praveen); sarik...@ieee.org; Jong-Hyouk Lee > Cc: dmm > Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > >

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

d. > >Thanks, >Mingui > >> -Original Message- >> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of >> pierrick.se...@orange.com >> Sent: Friday, December 04, 2015 5:16 PM >> To: Muley, Praveen V (Praveen); sarik...@ieee.org; Jong-Hyouk Lee >> Cc:

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi, I support adoption. One little note: the -rg- in filename makes think of Research Group. It would make sense to change the filename to avoid the use of -rg-, if it's not too complicated. Alex Le 25/11/2015 17:22, Dapeng Liu a écrit : Hello all, In IETF94, we initiated the call for

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Good point... moreover, "rg" means nothing here... > -Message d'origine- > De : dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Alexandre Petrescu > Envoyé : vendredi 4 décembre 2015 12:02 > À : dmm > Objet : Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > dr

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

> For me (as an individual contributor) the I-D gives a standard way to >register multiple transport connections/tunnels between a MAG and a LMA, potentially over different technologies (wired, wireless, ..) on the transport network side without needing to rely on engineering solutions Ack.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

As an individual contributor I support the adoption of the draft as a WG draft. Lyle On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Dapeng Liu wrote: > Hello all, > > In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Behcet, 12/3/2015, 10:43 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: Hi Jouni, On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: Behcet, 12/2/2015, 11:02 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: Hi Jouni, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

I, obviously, support adoption of this I-D. ___ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

I support the adoption of draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming as. WG document. The ability for the MAG to register multiple transport end points with the LMA is a basic protocol semantic. How a system architecture uses this extension is a deployment consideration. Sri

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

of a possible solution. Besides the >> > care of addresses, there are many other gaps that have not been >> > touched: per-packet traffic classification and recombination, >> > performance measurement, the bypass requirement, etc. From the draft, >> > we cannot fig

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi Jouni, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: > As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is a > feature that we still lack.. > Are you sure? MCoA is solved in Netext Flow Mobility draft,

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Behcet, 12/2/2015, 11:02 AM, Behcet Sarikaya kirjoitti: Hi Jouni, On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote: As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is a feature that we still lack.. Are you sure? MCoA is solved in Netext

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

rikaya > Envoyé : mardi 1 décembre 2015 18:18 > À : Jong-Hyouk Lee > Cc : dmm > Objet : Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming- > 02 > > Hi Jong-Hyouk, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Jong-Hyouk Lee <jonghy...@gmail.com

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is a feature that we still lack.. The document itself still needs quite a bit of work. For example, I wonder if the caption for Figure 2 is correct. Also, Section 4.1. option fiels descriptions are somewhat broken it seems.

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

ut a clear architectural > overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much. > > Hence, I oppose its adoption. > > Thanks, > Mingui > > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM > To: dmm > Subject: [DMM] Call for

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi, I support the adoption of this draft. Regards, /Danny - A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

s, and used access links don’t exhibit similar high security ? Thanks! Best Regards Dirk From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu Sent: Mittwoch, 25. November 2015 17:22 To: dmm Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 Hello

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

i > > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM > To: dmm > Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 > > Hello all, > > In IETF94, we initiated the call for a

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

figure out a clear architectural overview. Section 3 doesn’t help much. Hence, I oppose its adoption. Thanks, Mingui From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dapeng Liu Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:22 AM To: dmm Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg

[DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hello all, In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 : http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 Hello all, In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft: <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-mu