Re: [DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:27:06AM +, Lican Huang wrote: > When Ipv4 addresses will be Exhausted in the near future and the next > generation Intenert( Ipv6) will take over, DNS names will also be exhausted > soon with the increase of hosts and users. Lenny Foner has pointed > other d

Re: [DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00

When Ipv4 addresses will be Exhausted in the near future and the next generation Intenert( Ipv6) will take over, DNS names will also be exhausted soon with the increase of hosts and users. Lenny Foner has pointed other disadvantage in the today's DNS. Please see the section of "What's b

[DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-05.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : Preventing Use of Recursive Nameservers in Reflector Attacks Author(s) : J. Damas, F.

[DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution

Hello, I have read the documents, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00, and draft-licanhuang-dnsop-distributeddns-02. In the DNSOP meeting today, participants were asked to comment on the first of those documents. Hence this email. I have a number of questions about your documents. To beg

Re: [DNSOP] Request for Adoption: draft-larson-dnsop-trust-anchor-02.txt

On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Peter Koch wrote: > There is a request to adopt > "DNSSEC Trust Anchor Configuration and Maintenance" as a DNSOP WG item. > The topic is covered by our charter. This document RECOMMENDS that a trust anchor be specified as a DS RR. [...] Using a DS RR is al

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

Mark Andrews wrote: > We should be looking at mechanisms to allow the root zone to > be distributed to every iterative resolver in the world. Zone transfer is the mechanism. > You then don't have to use AS112 to absorb the load. The local > resolver will answer the query

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

Mark Andrews wrote: We should be looking at mechanisms to allow the root zone to be distributed to every iterative resolver in the world. You then don't have to use AS112 to absorb the load. The local resolver will answer the query. For the last two years w

[DNSOP] Request for Adoption: draft-larson-dnsop-trust-anchor-02.txt

Dear WG, we've done this twice now in face to face meetings, but let's double check on the list: There is a request to adopt "DNSSEC Trust Anchor Configuration and Maintenance" as a DNSOP WG item. The topic is covered by our charter. Now is the time to support or oppose adoption as a WG item.

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

> William F. Maton Sotomayor (wmaton) writes: > > > > I think it very may well be suited to that task, but are we crossing a lin > e > > here that may result down a path we might regret later on. I think what > > would need to be worked out is what criteria would be used to declare a > >

Re: [DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00

Mohsen Souissi wrote: I have read the I-D as well and I second Joe's point of view and his arguments below. +1. Brian Mohsen. On 03 Dec, Joe Abley wrote: | Hi, | | I have read your draft, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00. | | The question was raised just now in the dnsop wo

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: I cannot find another report about the TLDs most often queried at a root name server. Other reports I've seen aggregated data, while this small glimpse, however partial, at least *names* the TLDs. All the non-exi

Re: [DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00

I have read the I-D as well and I second Joe's point of view and his arguments below. Mohsen. On 03 Dec, Joe Abley wrote: | Hi, | | I have read your draft, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00. | | The question was raised just now in the dnsop working group meeting in | Vancouver a

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

William F. Maton Sotomayor (wmaton) writes: > > I think it very may well be suited to that task, but are we crossing a line > here that may result down a path we might regret later on. I think what > would need to be worked out is what criteria would be used to declare a > local or nonsens

Re: [DNSOP] AS112 for TLDs

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: I cannot find another report about the TLDs most often queried at a root name server. Other reports I've seen aggregated data, while this small glimpse, however partial, at least *names* the TLDs. All the non-existing TLDs queried are local domain

[DNSOP] draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00

Hi, I have read your draft, draft-licanhuang-dnsop-urnresolution-00. The question was raised just now in the dnsop working group meeting in Vancouver as to whether the content of this draft was suitable for adoption as a working group item. The question was triggered by the presence of "dn

[DNSOP] reflectos-are-evil proposed changes for -05

This 05pre version address most of discuss raised during last-call as presented during the IETF70 meeting. ftp://ftp.registro.br/pub/drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-05pre.txt ftp://ftp.registro.br/pub/drafts/draft-ietf-dnsop-reflectors-are-evil-05pre-from-4.diff.html This and other m

[DNSOP] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dnsop-default-local-zones-04.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF. Title : Locally-served DNS Zones Author(s) : M. Andrews Filename: draft-ietf-d

[DNSOP] Latest Agenda for Vancouver

Dear WG, the latest agenda for today's meeting is available at , also attached here for archival purposes. -Peter - WG:DNS Operations (dnsop) Meeting: IET