Hi Shawn,
> > I've been thinking - maybe we could place DQSD in its own Internet
> > Explorer Zone - is that possible?
>
> Possible? Yes.
> Do we want to do it? I don't think so. For one, we'd *really*
> have problems explaining to people how to manage their own
> security settings for DQSD, a
Hi Kim,
> ...(XmlHttp is probably the most necessary one)...
By far.
> I've been thinking - maybe we could place DQSD in its
> own Internet Explorer Zone - is that possible?
Possible? Yes.
Do we want to do it? I don't think so. For one, we'd *really* have
problems explaining to people how to
Hi Shawn,
> Question: What's the consensus for creating a method of the
> dqsdtools object that provides the ability to create activex
> objects in the same manner as CreateObject(sObject)?
>
> This has the potential to be a one-off security issue if the
> user is convinced to install a malic
Shawn asks:
> Question: What's the consensus for creating a method of the
> dqsdtools object that provides the ability to create activex objects
> in the same manner as CreateObject(sObject)?
> This has the potential to be a one-off security issue if the user is
> convinced to install a malicious
Hi Kim,
> I'd be especially careful with enabling ActiveX
> controls willy-nilly, that's a spyware disaster
> waiting to happen. At least set it to prompt,
> so you know when a page is trying to use external
> code.
Question: What's the consensus for creating a method of the
dqsdtools object tha
D] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
>
> I'm with Charlie - if we don't actually _fix_ the SP2 problem
> **without** decreasing the security of the system then we didn't
> "fix" anything.
NO! You're with *Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:dqsd-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shawn K. Hall
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 12:59 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
>
> I'm with Charlie - i
I'm with Charlie - if we don't actually _fix_ the SP2 problem
**without** decreasing the security of the system then we didn't
"fix" anything.
Maybe roll up a release but leave the SP2 'fixes' that we're
currently toying with out. I do not want to change the registry and
give any special rights to
The Rev Chuck Baker states:
>
> I downloaded the "comx" and "racetv" searches and they both worked for
me.
> and my calendar works too. and I do have SP2 installed. so if other
people
> are having problems with these searches it is probably because activeX
is
> disabled by default in SP2. But you
Original Message---
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 11/19/04 08:01:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
Chuck Baker wrote:
>
> I used the Registry workaround to take care of the SP2 problem and
>everything seems to work. the calendar works for
Chuck Baker wrote:
I used the Registry workaround to take care of the SP2 problem and
everything seems to work. the calendar works for me. But I can't find any
the "comx" and "racetv" searches that are made referenced to in the posting
here and I have the most recent version of DQSD.
These are s
I had removed the convertstylestoinline() in both comx and racetv some
time ago. It loaded a ton of css that wasnt needed or used for a
simple html page.. You might have old versions of these..
Monty
> (has anyone tried the comx
> or racetv searches which spawn an extra window to see if thes
52:11
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
Monty and all,
> [calendar]
I was confused, there. I typed 'calendar', but I was thinking of the
help window. That's another dead feature, IIRC. The problem with that
is, the majority of code runs i
At 12:35 18/11/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Hi Kim,
> Opinions? What's more important - new release or new
> release working with SP2?
IMHO, we ought to have something SP2-compatible first.
I don't think it does us any good to push out a new version when our
primary 'new' audience still can't use it.
Tha
Monty and all,
> [calendar]
I was confused, there. I typed 'calendar', but I was thinking of the
help window. That's another dead feature, IIRC. The problem with that
is, the majority of code runs inside explorer.exe, so the registry fix
takes care of that, but the help window and some popup win
ED]] On Behalf Of Kim Gräsman
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 11:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
>
> Hi Brent,
>
> > > It'd be great if we could work around these problems, so we
> > > can get a
&
Hi Kim,
> Opinions? What's more important - new release or new
> release working with SP2?
IMHO, we ought to have something SP2-compatible first.
I don't think it does us any good to push out a new version when our
primary 'new' audience still can't use it.
Regards,
Shawn K. Hall
http://Relia
> I assume all the cal code can be
> left in but the binding to right-click could be removed.
I wish I could help more on this one because I'd really like to see a
complete solution. But Don't remember that there is an option to launch the
calendar with double-click (not just right-click).
JB
At 13:08 18/11/2004 -0800, you wrote:
I too use the calendar quite frequently and would hate
to see it missing. I also don't think we should have
two separate builds. Is it that big of a pain to
click on the toolbar and say allow it in WinXP? It's
only once when it starts up right?
I agree with
I too use the calendar quite frequently and would hate
to see it missing. I also don't think we should have
two separate builds. Is it that big of a pain to
click on the toolbar and say allow it in WinXP? It's
only once when it starts up right?
Brent
--- Monty Scroggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
>
> Opinions? What's more important - new release or new release working with
> SP2?
>
> Kim
Thats kind of a dilemma. I had committed the recent mod to search.htm the
other day. We can:
1. Wait for a workaround for the calendar issue (has anyone tried the comx
or racetv searches which spawn an
Hi Brent,
> > It'd be great if we could work around these problems, so we
> > can get a
> > new release out the door, but I'm swamped with work, and severely
> > lacking competence, so I'm counting on the rest of you.
>
> Also, Kim - I think you, Glenn, and David are the only ones
> that has t
---
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of
> > Lee Hasiuk
> > Sent: den 18 november 2004 02:23
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
> >
> > Yep that's it. Oh w
other popup windows won't work.
Cheers,
Kim
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Lee Hasiuk
> Sent: den 18 november 2004 02:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
>
&g
iginal Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Monty
>Scroggins
>Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:20 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
>
>Man thats outstanding!.. many thanks Lee.. It wor
CTED]
Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
Man thats outstanding!.. many thanks Lee.. It works great..
I made the source change and checked it in to CVS.
Monty
Lee Hasiuk wrote:
(Please forgive me if this message has already made it to your mailing
list.
rkR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Monty
Scroggins
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] Fix for XP SP2 Problem
Man thats outstanding!.. many thanks Lee.. It works great..
I made t
Man thats outstanding!.. many thanks Lee.. It works great..
I made the source change and checked it in to CVS.
Monty
Lee Hasiuk wrote:
(Please forgive me if this message has already made it to your mailing list. I
tried submitting it without joining, and I tried sending email to David Bau,
b
28 matches
Mail list logo
