> Oh, there's a readme? I'd forgotten :-)
>
> Crashes feel bad, but they can be caused by some minor glitch.
>
> Let's see if we can debug it at some point, and figure out how bad it
> really is.
Be happy to, but it may have to wait a bit. Probably until at least the
RC, just so we don't have
Hi Charlie,
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 00:58, Charlie Russel wrote:
>
> The key to Bill's problems were the requirement for full administrative
> privileges, I'm sure. (I _thought_ that was called out in the readme,
> but maybe not. Have to look.) And the requirement that the setupx64.cmd
> file run
> Cool, I didn't know that. I was worried that we might be facing
> *another* port to AMD-64 :)
No, no worries there. There are a very few things that one or the other
does slightly differently, and probably only the Intel compiler knows
what they are. AMD64 completely caught Intel by surprise, the
Hi Charlie,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 19:37, Charlie Russel wrote:
> There's no difference in Windows binary between AMD64 and EM64T. The Intel is
> simply a clone of AMD64.
Cool, I didn't know that. I was worried that we might be facing
*another* port to AMD-64 :)
> Bill - try this:
>
> Run the
9 10:52 AM
> To: DQSD users mailing list
> Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] DQSD Install Problems - Vista 64
>
> Hi Charlie,
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:37:53 -0800, you [Charlie Russel] wrote:
>
> }That should work. At least it did here. (and no, I'm now on Win7 and
> th
Hi Charlie,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:37:53 -0800, you [Charlie Russel] wrote:
}That should work. At least it did here. (and no, I'm now on Win7 and that
breaks it again. I've about given up. Unless we create a Gadget for Vista/Win7,
I think we're doomed to be playing hopeless catchup.
Thanks fo
Charlie.
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim Gräsman [mailto:kim.gras...@gmail.com]
> Sent: February-10-09 6:16 AM
> To: bill.hew...@sentex.net; DQSD users mailing list
> Subject: Re: [DQSD-Users] DQSD Install Problems - Vista 64
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 15
Bill,
Glad to hear you got it working! We definitely need to document the
steps for installing the x64 build...
- Kim
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 16:37, wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:38 +0100, you [Kim Gräsman] wrote:
>
> }SourceForge didn't have any generic 64-bit available, so w
Hi Kim,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:38 +0100, you [Kim Gräsman] wrote:
}SourceForge didn't have any generic 64-bit available, so we had to
}pick AMD-64 to signify that it was a 64-bit build. We've tested it on
}Intel, as far as I remember, so it should work.
Well, it does...
}Try starting up a co
Hi Bill,
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 15:12, wrote:
> Hi Kim,
>
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:49:52 +0100, you [Kim Gräsman] wrote:
>
> }Did you use the dqsdx64-4100-beta.zip from:
> }http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42081&package_id=34145
>
> Not exactly, the URL got mine from was as
Hi Kim,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:49:52 +0100, you [Kim Gräsman] wrote:
}Did you use the dqsdx64-4100-beta.zip from:
}http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42081&package_id=34145
Not exactly, the URL got mine from was as above with
'&release_id=618124' added to it. They both appear
Hi Bill,
Did you use the dqsdx64-4100-beta.zip from:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42081&package_id=34145
?
We could've done a better job on documentation, but you're supposed to
unpack that zip to a temp directory, and then run the embedded
setupx64.cmd batch file to ins
Hi,
I have just moved to a Vista 64 system and am finding it 'difficult'
to install DQSD.
I have tried both the 32 and 64 (even though it says for AMD) bit
betas and the latest release version.
All seems to go well during the install. DQSD appears as an option in
the toolbars, but when ticked d
13 matches
Mail list logo
