[Dri-devel] Re: Re: Downloadable Radeon Driver and libGL compatability

2002-03-11 Thread Mike A. Harris
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Jens Owen wrote: I've moved this field to the end of the structure and the libGL.so compatability issue appears to be fixed. Hmmm, that might be good enough, but I'm not 100% certain. I'm worried that my hack of moving it to the end could possibly end up writing over

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 DMA

2002-03-11 Thread Robert Lunnon
On Monday 11 March 2002 01:55, Frank C. Earl wrote: On Sunday 10 March 2002 11:44 am, Jos? Fonseca wrote: I really don't know much about that, since it must happened before I subscribed to this mailing list, but perhaps you'll want to take a look to the Utah-GLX and this list archives. You

Re: [Dri-devel] First cut at downloadable Radeon TCL driver suite

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Spott
-duisburg.de/Radeon/FlightGear-20020311.tar.gz It will appear there in about half an hour. You may skip /usr/local/lib/ and /usr/local/lib/, it's only for building the stuff. The binary is statically linked against libmk4. You should place .fgfsrc into you home directory. If you encounter

Re: [Dri-devel] First cut at downloadable Radeon TCL driver suite

2002-03-11 Thread Martin Spott
I'm placing a ready to run binary package on: Sorry, forgot two things: - The binary you want to run is /usr/local/FlightGear/bin/fgfs - Yes, you really _need_ all that stuff in /home/fgfsbase (or put it elsewhere and change the location in ~/.fgfsrc), Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly

[Dri-devel] mach64 binaries: do not work

2002-03-11 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
Hi all There are problems with the bleeding edge binaries: 1. First of all, the kernel module cannot be loaded because of some unresolved symbols. And even when I do rm *.o, make, the resulting mach64.o has some unresolved symbols (on depmod)! I do not know how it is possible. insmod -f manages

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 binaries: do not work

2002-03-11 Thread Jose Fonseca
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 14:37, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: Hi all There are problems with the bleeding edge binaries: 1. First of all, the kernel module cannot be loaded because of some unresolved symbols. And even when I do rm *.o, make, the resulting The .o shouldn't be packaged, or even

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Downloadable Radeon Driver and libGL compatability

2002-03-11 Thread Brian Paul
Jens Owen wrote: Brian Paul wrote: Jens Owen wrote: Jens Owen wrote: It looks like a new field was recently added to the GLXContextRec xc/lib/GL/glx/glxclient.h:407 GLXDrawable currentReadable; I added that last summer when I was implementing the

[Dri-devel] Friendly neighborhood #dri-devel meeting reminder.

2002-03-11 Thread Mike A. Harris
Just a reminder of the weekly #dri-devel meeting on irc.openprojects.net at 4pm EST today. That's 2100 UTC, and 1pm PST. -- -- Mike A. Harris Shipping/mailing address: OS Systems Engineer 190

[Dri-devel] Keithp's radeons are wedging

2002-03-11 Thread Keith Packard
I've got two radeons: Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a couple laptops Radeon RV200_QW in a desktop that I'm having troubles with. On the desktop machine, I'm running the TCL-0-0 branch from DRI, built yesterday glxgears shows a black window with a reasonable frame rate

[Dri-devel] DRI based X drivers; SMP testing

2002-03-11 Thread Andrew James Richardson
Hello there, I have just finished parrallelisation of Mesa vertex transformation and found that as the Vertex buffer is quite small (~100 verticies to the nearest order of magnitude) twhen using SMP vertex transformation you get no noticable performance gain because of the parrallelisation

Re: [Dri-devel] Keithp's radeons are wedging

2002-03-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 21:17, Keith Packard wrote: I've got two radeons: Radeon Mobility M6 LY in a couple laptops Radeon RV200_QW in a desktop that I'm having troubles with. XFree86 4.2 doesn't have the cool features of the CVS code you're running but has been very solid

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI based X drivers; SMP testing

2002-03-11 Thread Timothee Besset
Q3A and RTCW don't take advantage of SMP on Linux yet. I have some patches that need to be applied and a bit of testing to do first. Things got delayed, but I'm still planning on releasing this. regards TTimo -- Linux technology contract - Id Software inc. On Mon, 11 Mar 2002 20:10:50 +

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64 binaries: do not work

2002-03-11 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
The .o shouldn't be packaged, or even built. I'll have to check why this is happening. Well, hope the next version will be free of these wrong object files. Could you please past the output of insmod to see what are the failed symbols? Well, now it is OK. Sorry for disturbing on this issue.

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI based X drivers; SMP testing

2002-03-11 Thread Ian Romanick
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:45:20PM +0100, Timothee Besset wrote: Q3A and RTCW don't take advantage of SMP on Linux yet. I have some patches that need to be applied and a bit of testing to do first. Things got delayed, but I'm still planning on releasing this. Heh...people have been waiting

Re: [Dri-devel] DRI based X drivers; SMP testing

2002-03-11 Thread Gareth Hughes
Brian Paul wrote: One question to ask is: regardless of the vertex buffer size, typically how many vertices are issued between glBegin/End or state changes? Does Q3 (for example) render any objects/characters with 1000 vertices? Never. The maximum size of any locked array from the Q3

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: tcl-0-0-branch)

2002-03-11 Thread Jens Owen
Keith Whitwell wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: Jens Owen wrote: Michael Fitzpatrick wrote: Log message: Fix arrayelts color processing, vtxfmt_x86 Color4ubv function (red snow problem in Tuxracer) Good work Michael. You got the Red Out! :-) I am seeing

Re: [Dri-devel] Texture compression on mach64?!?

2002-03-11 Thread José Fonseca
On 2002.03.11 21:41 Gareth Hughes wrote: Seriously guys, this kind of thing is the last thing you should be worrying about, at least until you have a working DMA implementation and a fully-featured Mesa 4.x driver... Just my 2c. -- Gareth Gareth, it's not a question of worrying. I

[Dri-devel] Re: CVS Update: xc (branch: tcl-0-0-branch)

2002-03-11 Thread Michel Dänzer
On Mon, 2002-03-11 at 20:37, Michael wrote: If I run X at 640x480, 800x600 or 1280x1024 I get about 86.5 fps with q3demo running @ 640x480 (86.5 because I've got debug code to print out the total texture size which was 5mb so that's not an issue) If I run X at 1024x768 (q3 still at

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: tcl-0-0-branch)

2002-03-11 Thread Brian Paul
Michael wrote: On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 11:53:19PM +, Michael wrote: At the moment 1024x768 (which I expected to get the biggest benefit) hits lack of texture space and/or maybe depth clears / lack of hierarchical z, even with the pixmap cache set to 1 page and low texturing - at

[Dri-devel] i830/Radeon Mobility

2002-03-11 Thread Lachlan Mulcahy
Heya, I have a Radeon Mobility M6 LY running on a notebook using the i830 AGP Chipset.. I was wondering is support for the i830 chipset rather flakey at the moment, or is the radeon not well supported at this stage? I have been able to get DRI/3D going but not consistently.. anytime I run the X

Re: [Dri-devel] Keithp's radeons are wedging

2002-03-11 Thread Keith Packard
Around 20 o'clock on Mar 11, Keith Whitwell wrote: 7500's aren't working with the driver in at least two different ways. The first is the 'black window' problem - depth clears aren't working, the lockups are yet to be investigated. Thanks muchly. I'd offer to help, but I'm afraid I would

[Dri-devel] odd 1024x768 behaviour was Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: tcl-0-0-branch)

2002-03-11 Thread Michael
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 08:34:15PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote: Is this windowed or fullscreen? It's actually both, but the testing and figures above were fullscreen. glxgears is about 200fps slower in 1024x768 v 1280x1024 et al. Hmm, having thought about it, I'm pretty sure that this didn't