Re: merging mach64 upstream yet again.

2009-02-04 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 04:42 -0800, Dave Airlie wrote: So marcheu reminded me of my laziness and I built mach64 but I took a quick look at its API and its not 32/64 compliant by any reach. So I'd like to merge it with a version 3.0.0 API which fixes all the API issues I could fine,

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Please provide a way to get software rendering

2008-11-16 Thread José Fonseca
You already can do it with an environment variable: LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/path/to/mesa/software/only/libGL your-app Jose On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 00:03 +0100, Philipp Klaus Krause wrote: I think it would be useful if one could choose software rendering without having to uninstall hardware

Finer grained is_format_supported in gallium.

2008-07-19 Thread José Fonseca
I've just pushed a interface change to gallium. A finer grained pipe_screen::is_format_supported was needed. Namely, it needed to distinguish among different pipe_texture_targets, as hardware some times has limitations in the formats that can be used for cubemaps and texturemaps. The same thing

Eliminating pipe_texture-cpp and pipe_surface-cpp in gallium

2008-06-27 Thread José Fonseca
In order to properly represent the compressed textures and (yuv formats to some extent) it is necessary to abandon the chars-per-pixels concept in gallium, and use instead the concept of pixel blocks (in p_format.h): /** * Describe accurately the pixel format. * * The chars-per-pixel concept

Re: Eliminating pipe_texture-cpp and pipe_surface-cpp in gallium

2008-06-27 Thread José Fonseca
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Jakob Bornecrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:57 PM, José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In order to properly represent the compressed textures and (yuv formats to some extent) it is necessary to abandon the chars-per-pixels concept

Re: gallium (was Re: radeon r6xx DRM...)

2008-06-06 Thread José Fonseca
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Younes Manton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think this would be a good time to speak up. My GSoC project involves writing a state tracker for XvMC, aside from the mesa state tracker I understand this is the only other public state tracker around. I don't have any

Re: gallium (was Re: radeon r6xx DRM...)

2008-06-06 Thread José Fonseca
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Younes Manton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:12 AM, José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Younes Manton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As an aside, is there any preferred directory structure people would like

git and CR+LF

2008-02-27 Thread José Fonseca
On a cross-platform source tree there are files that: (a) should keep their unix LF line endings (e.g., shell scripts), (b) should keep their DOS CR+LF line endings (.inf files), and (c) should switch whatever the user prefers and have CR CR+LF treated indiscriminately (C/C++ source files). For

Re: Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-18 Thread José Fonseca
On 2/14/08, José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll dedicate some time now to reorganize gallium's code build process. This is stuff which has been discussed internally at TG several times, but this time I want to get it done. My objectives are: - leaner and more easy to understand

Re: Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-15 Thread José Fonseca
/p_*.h includes. Jose On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 15:38 +0900, José Fonseca wrote: I'll dedicate some time now to reorganize gallium's code build process. This is stuff which has been discussed internally at TG several times, but this time I want to get it done. My objectives are: - leaner

Re: Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-15 Thread José Fonseca
rather than rebase in order to get my changes into the new organization -- apologies for the bubble in the history. Keith José Fonseca wrote: Just to let you know that the first step, file shuffling, is finished. The rest will take more time but changes are less pervasive. Once you

Re: Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-14 Thread José Fonseca
On 2/15/08, Kristian Høgsberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 1:38 AM, José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll dedicate some time now to reorganize gallium's code build process. This is stuff which has been discussed internally at TG several times, but this time

Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-13 Thread José Fonseca
I'll dedicate some time now to reorganize gallium's code build process. This is stuff which has been discussed internally at TG several times, but this time I want to get it done. My objectives are: - leaner and more easy to understand/navigate source tree - reduce (or even eliminate) merges

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Gallium code reorganization

2008-02-13 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, 2008-02-14 at 08:50 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote: On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 03:38:45PM +0900, José Fonseca wrote: 3. Using scons, enhance the build system to support all platforms we are interested (i.e., linux and win32, atm), http://lwn.net/Articles/188693/ 'There were major

TextChas on the DRI Wiki

2008-01-17 Thread José Fonseca
I've just enabled TextChas on the DRI Wiki: http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/HelpOnTextChas http://moinmo.in/TextCha It is now necessary to answer a question when creating an user account and editing pages. The questions consist in GPU manufacturer and model names -- something than a normal

Weekly/nightly Doxygen HTML documentation

2007-12-11 Thread José Fonseca
Hi, I've restarted the periodic generation of doxygen HTML documentation from the Mesa's git repository: - Mesa (master branch) documentation is being generated weekly into http://dri.freedesktop.org/doxygen/mesa/ - Gallium (gallium-0.1 branch) documentation is being generated nightly into

Re: ATI Mach64 DRI status

2007-12-08 Thread José Fonseca
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007 20:59:16 +, José Fonseca wrote: On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:27:37 +0100, Pascal Vincent wrote: Hello, can you please indicate the current ATI mach64 DRI status. In fact, http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIMach64 page is not so clear so i don't have the clear responses

Re: ATI Mach64 DRI status

2007-12-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 00:27:37 +0100, Pascal Vincent wrote: Hello, can you please indicate the current ATI mach64 DRI status. In fact, http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/ATIMach64 page is not so clear so i don't have the clear responses to - is mach64 is now secure ? this means : - is it

Using Eclipse for Xorg/DRI development

2007-11-30 Thread José Fonseca
I've never learned to use Emacs. I love vim, but it doesn't scale for me when editing more than three files at the same time or projects with more than one directory. After two years using Eclipse for Python and Windows C++ development, I've been using almost exclusively Eclipse for Xorg/Mesa/DRI

Profiling DRI drivers

2007-11-20 Thread José Fonseca
. The hotter the colour of a function is, more time is spent on that function and its children. José Fonseca - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT

Re: [Dri-devel] Savage and nVidia DRI drivers

2002-10-31 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Oct 31, 2002 at 11:39:42AM +, Alan Cox wrote: On Thu, 2002-10-31 at 02:16, José Fonseca wrote: People which are interested in having these drivers see the light of day (I know that the Savage chip is common on laptops and AFAIK there no nVidia proprietary drivers for non-Linux non

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Copying DMA buffers in Mach64

2002-10-30 Thread José Fonseca
Alan, On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:40:09AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:01:39AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: ... I would expect to want to prefetch the input data (please trust copy_from_user to do this right, it doesn't do a good job yet but its the business of that code to do

Re: [Dri-devel] Merge

2002-10-22 Thread José Fonseca
in stages to try and minimize the disruption. Jose - it may be worth disabling the automated builds for a few days. Done, Alan. Only the non-trunk -- bleeding-edge mach64 and s3virge -- builds are enabled now. José Fonseca --- This sf.net emial

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Copying DMA buffers in Mach64

2002-10-22 Thread José Fonseca
and copy should be done at the same time or in distint steps, which relates to benefit of prefetching and/or uncached-writes (which isn't even clear if are actually a benefit or not). José Fonseca --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Copying DMA buffers in Mach64

2002-10-22 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:01:39AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 00:19, José Fonseca wrote: [...] I'm not sure what you mean with cache above, but the Mach64 has a ring buffer with all the pending DMA buffers, so there will be DMA transfer simultaneously with the copy/verify

[Dri-devel] Re: Copying DMA buffers in Mach64

2002-10-21 Thread José Fonseca
will be a little complicated. We have to carefully think of the API (i.e., the IOCTLs) to allow everything play nice with each-other - inside and outside of the DRM. José Fonseca willmore I just wanted to answer his question on the mailing list about copying/verifying DMA buffers. Copy first

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach 64 and zsnes bug.

2002-10-13 Thread José Fonseca
picturing exactly what you mean with 2 times the right side off the screen. Could you provide a screenshot? José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock

2002-10-11 Thread José Fonseca
to strip anything out of it. I hope this helps to discover the Sig11 problem. José Fonseca On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 01:22:13AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Fre, 2002-10-11 at 00:24, José Fonseca wrote: [...] Michel, what does exactly this mean? We don't have a way to find out the version

[spyro@f2s.com: Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock]

2002-10-11 Thread José Fonseca
- Forwarded message from Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 22:11:50 +0100 From: Ian Molton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock To: José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 20:31:53 +0100 José

Re: [Dri-devel] Mesa viewport transformation and depth scaling

2002-10-10 Thread José Fonseca
Keith, I'm curious to know how you reminded after so long (7 months)! Did you actually writed it now or was it stuck in a mail queue all this time? By now I got to more or less to those answers, but thanks anyway. As saying goes: it's better late than never! Regards, José Fonseca On Thu

Re: [Dri-devel] snapshot radeon-20021009 problem report: radeon_unlock

2002-10-10 Thread José Fonseca
(the signal 11) go away if libxaa.a was included in the binary snapshots? José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: problems with radeon

2002-10-08 Thread José Fonseca
from the ones provided on SourceForge. I use another unofficial Xfree deb-mirror, is this 4.1/4.2? DRI CVS snapshot packages, so based on 4.2.0. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http

[Dri-devel] Ann: I830/i845 snapshots available

2002-10-08 Thread José Fonseca
Binary snapshots for the Intel i830/i845 chipsets are now available from the usual place, http://dri.sourceforge.net/snapshots/ . Please report any problems with the driver installation to me and/or dri-users mailing list, and problems with the drivers themselves to dri-devel. Jose Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] install.sh bug

2002-10-07 Thread José Fonseca
Jens, On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 09:55:10AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: José Fonseca wrote: Next snapshots (which are now fully automated again) have this already. Notify if you run into problems. Jose, or anybody interested in creating an 830/845 package? TG has released many bug fixes

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-users] problems with radeon-20021001,2 and 4 and Radeon Mobility M6

2002-10-06 Thread José Fonseca
so I'm forwarding to there too. I can already advance that the full XFree86.0.log would be nice to see if a message regarding the XAA versioning pops up or not. Jose Fonseca On Fri, Oct 04, 2002 at 04:08:47PM -0400, John Jasen wrote: On Fri, 4 Oct 2002, José Fonseca wrote: Was any error message

Re: [Dri-devel] install.sh bug

2002-10-05 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 02:38:51PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 09:01:16AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: It looks like there is some type of problem when the GL subdirectory is empty. Here's what the script tries to do when it get's to an empty GL portion of the install

[Dri-devel] New snapshots available - please test (Was: Snaps for gcc3, glibc-2.2)

2002-10-04 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:02:44PM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: José Fonseca wrote: Anyway, I already have the minimum chroot environment setup. I just need to test it with a few snapshots, and arrange so that everything can be automated from a cronjob again. Ok. I've just finished building a set

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-03 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 05:06:38PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 19:29 schrieb José Fonseca: On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: [...] The RedHat 8.0/glibc-2.3 problem is simple. Stay away from it before glibc-2.3 is in wide spread

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available (I'm going to smack redhat)

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
snapshots. I surely can't make one for each system out there. And if the others distros don't also upgrade to glic-2.3 then I think the best is to completely stop the snapshots builds and replace them with a nice set of scripts which people can use to make their own customized snapshot. José

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available (I'm going to smack redhat)

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:35:50PM +0200, Michael Thaler wrote: On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: You don't need to build for every system, just against an older version of glibc. I am not using these binary snapshots, but I appreciate this work. But please do not

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
. This is no surprise since the snapshot lacks some of the libraries which DRI has updated. If I can put together a binary snapshot with the right libraries that will work with a stock installation, I'll be happy to supply these, since they should be like the old snapshots that José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] Snaps for gcc3, glibc-2.2

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 06:50:50PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 18:35 schrieb Andy Dustman: [...] Which is it, then: Snapshots or no snapshots? The current snapshots (for linux-i386) don't work unless you have Red Hat 8.0 and/or glibc-2.3; I'm not even sure that

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available (I'm going to smack redhat)

2002-10-02 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:33:11AM -0700, Russ Dill wrote: [...] But I see rough times ahead for the binary snapshots. I surely can't make one for each system out there. And if the others distros don't also upgrade to glic-2.3 then I think the best is to completely stop the snapshots builds

[Dri-devel] Re: SIS630 - Support?

2002-10-01 Thread José Fonseca
Andreas, On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 06:57:52PM +0200, Andreas Allacher wrote: Hi, Will you add (or will there be in future) also DRI-support for the graphic device SIS630. If yes do you know a not exactly date? I'm not 100% sure of the current state of the SIS chips DRI drivers so I'm CC'ing my

Re: [Dri-devel] gcc-2.96 radeon snapshot fails

2002-09-30 Thread José Fonseca
snapshots almost twice as large? As Felix pointed out, it seems that the new gcc uses a different debug format. If that alone is the single reason is the mistery... José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

[Dri-devel] [jkay@cox.net: Re: [Dri-users] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available]

2002-09-29 Thread José Fonseca
- Forwarded message from John Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Date: 28 Sep 2002 23:34:22 -0400 From: John Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Dri-users] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available To: José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 13:02, José Fonseca wrote: I just

Re: [Dri-devel] knobs to turn?

2002-09-29 Thread José Fonseca
to the site as well. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

Re: [Dri-devel] snapshots

2002-09-28 Thread José Fonseca
changes happening here: XAA binary compatibility and gcc 3.2. I'll announce it when done. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

[Dri-devel] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available

2002-09-28 Thread José Fonseca
snapshots please test and report back to the dri-devel mailing list. If there is a difference then I'll make them available on a regular basis. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote: I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem

[Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-24 Thread José Fonseca
Hi guys. Yep, vacations ended. I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled with the

Re: [Dri-devel] install.sh bug

2002-09-24 Thread José Fonseca
On Sat, Aug 31, 2002 at 09:01:16AM -0600, Jens Owen wrote: It looks like there is some type of problem when the GL subdirectory is empty. Here's what the script tries to do when it get's to an empty GL portion of the install. Ok. The problem is at: echo -nGL GLU

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: mach64 multitexture bug

2002-07-16 Thread José Fonseca
again. I'll get back again as soon as I have further clue. José Fonseca On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 07:29:53PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: The problem only appears when the procedural texture in the center of the octagon is clipped by the window edge. Here's a shot of it unclipped: http

Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 flatshading

2002-07-16 Thread José Fonseca
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:54:02AM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Allen Barnett wrote: 2. clipping.c: In this program, a cube is drawn using a flat shaded quad strip with different colors for each pair of vertices. If a face of the cube is clipped by an edge of the X

[Dri-devel] Re: [Xpert]Problems with a Radeon mobility M6 and RH 7.3

2002-07-16 Thread José Fonseca
gnome-name-server[1424]: name server starting Jul 16 17:41:45 Coke gnome-name-server[1426]: starting José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: Error flushing vertex buffer: return = -11

2002-07-15 Thread José Fonseca
development, but I hope you still keep your insterest on the DRI development. Thanks for all the help you've given, Felix! José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: Error flushing vertex buffer: return = -11

2002-07-15 Thread José Fonseca
while looping around the ring, reading the first entry. My guess is that the engine was already busted somehow... Jul 15 13:16:48 viking kernel: [drm] BM_COMMAND = 0x4000 Jul 15 13:16:48 viking kernel: [drm] [...] José Fonseca

Re: Binary packages (Was: Re: [Dri-devel] R200 testing)

2002-07-15 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:35:46PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote: On Sunday 14 July 2002 16:15, José Fonseca wrote: [...] What the install scripts additionally does is `modprobe agpgart`. Could it be that agpgart was forgotten to be added to /etc/modules.conf? It should read this way

Re: Binary packages (Was: Re: [Dri-devel] R200 testing)

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
script loads the module with `modprobe radeon`, i.e., without the .o, so it should pick the installed one. What the install scripts additionally does is `modprobe agpgart`. Could it be that agpgart was forgotten to be added to /etc/modules.conf? José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-20020704: gltestperf lockup on Zsmooth triangles

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:49:32PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 12:58:13PM -0500, David Willmore wrote: I had a lockup on an older version of the mach64 DRI driver, so I thought I'd retest with a newer one. gltestperf locks up (no response to keyboard, but mouse still

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-20020704: gltestperf lockup on Zsmooth triangles

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
but it wouldn't prevent that an application generated a wild number of triangles per frame and this would happen again, so I already fixed it on CVS. Of course that frame throttling has merits on its own so we should eventually look into it. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: Error flushing vertex buffer: return = -11

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 08:12:26PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Leif Delgass wrote: On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, José Fonseca wrote: But the fact remains that the reads from GUI_STAT aren't reliable. I wonder if the chip creats some transient values... I wonder

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: mach64-0-0-5-branch)

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 03:04:19PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: I assume you didn't mean to read GUI_STAT twice in a row here, right? 8-O Right... It's already on CVS. Thanks for spotting that out! José Fonseca --- This sf.net email

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: Error flushing vertex buffer: return = -11

2002-07-14 Thread José Fonseca
On Sun, Jul 14, 2002 at 10:09:44PM +0200, Felix Kühling wrote: On Sun, 14 Jul 2002 19:59:08 +0100 José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] Felix, please try the patch attached. I'm also gonna see if I can Ok, I will apply it. But since the errors were very rare, it will take some

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: Error flushing vertex buffer: return = -11

2002-07-13 Thread José Fonseca
problems. Maybe other programmes have the same problem but I didn't test them that thoroughly ;) BTW, I'm also trying to figure out a problem reported by David Willmore is always reproducible on gltestperf, which seems to happens due to excess rate of tris/sec. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] My experiance with DRI and gcc-3.0(.4)

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
with a different versions than the rest. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Dri-devel] My experiance with DRI and gcc-3.0(.4)

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
-a then the modprobe fixes this... I was thinking that maybe this depmod -a should be included in the script. Is this a bad idea? No, it's a good idea alright, and I've just add '/sbin/depmod -a' to the install.sh script after installing/restoring the kernel modules. The next snapshots will have it. José

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: multi texture crash with after last update

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
' instruction and that the 'rep' prefix just added the conditional jump... Thanks. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64: multi texture crash with after last update

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
that esi and edi are decremented. On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 11:51:13 +0100 José Fonseca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...] I though that the %ecx decrement was already handled by the 'movsl' instruction and that the 'rep' prefix just added the conditional jump... I missed the start

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
didn't manage to test bigger points - now I know why! Oh, I also fixed polygon stippling to work as a software fallback. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http

[Dri-devel] Microsoft IP claims over OpenGL

2002-07-12 Thread José Fonseca
that these are features very important in the current and next generation of graphics cards. I would like to know your opinion about the influence this may have for the DRI and Mesa3D projects in particular, and for the OpenGL API in general. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2002-07-11 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:34:40PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Brian Paul wrote: Leif Delgass wrote: I just discovered that the glean failures in blendFunc, logicOp, orthoPosRandTris, orthoPosRandRects, orthoPosTinyQuads, and polygonOffset are the result of

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64

2002-07-10 Thread José Fonseca
issues which have been neglected so far, and which can be the cause behind of some of these problems. At any rate your cases will help to determine that. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http

[Dri-devel] IRC Meetings ML notification

2002-07-09 Thread José Fonseca
just on the meeting start. Anyway, I'm going to see next week I don't forget it again (and with some luck even send the notification myself!) José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Stuff, things, and much much more. http

Re: [Dri-devel] BZFlag causes X lockup on mach64-0-0-5

2002-07-08 Thread José Fonseca
. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Oh, it's good to be a geek. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Dri-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists

[Dri-devel] Duplicate/redundant DRM files in trunk (Was: Radeon drivers don't install...)

2002-07-08 Thread José Fonseca
r128_cce.c r128_drm.h r128_drv.h r128_state.c radeon.h radeon_cp.c radeon_drm.h radeon_drv.h radeon_state.c from .../linux/drm/kernel? José Fonseca On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:09:01AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: This is the same

Re: [Dri-devel] Duplicate/redundant DRM files in trunk (Was: Radeon drivers don't install...)

2002-07-08 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:16:55PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote: On Mon, 2002-07-08 at 21:49, José Fonseca wrote: I've determined what was breaking the binary snapshots DRM: there are several files in .../linux/drm/kernel which are later symlinked from .../shared/drm/kernel. The current script

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)

2002-07-06 Thread José Fonseca
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 02:23:49PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 01:51:50PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: [...] Yes, that seems cleaner, since I won't have to bother eliminating the compiled stuff away. Yep. What does 'uname -s' return on NetBSD and FreeBSD

Re: [Dri-devel] Argggg so close with S3 Virge/MX, yet so far...

2002-07-06 Thread José Fonseca
to the drivers? It shouldn't be very difficult. I don't know how deep is the complexity of a agp bridge, nor the legal implications this, but in the lack of interest from the vendor, reverse engineering the Window drivers might be feasible last resort option. José Fonseca

[Dri-devel] Missing () in Mesa macros

2002-07-04 Thread José Fonseca
macros. José Fonseca Index: mmath.h === RCS file: /cvsroot/dri/xc/xc/extras/Mesa/src/mmath.h,v retrieving revision 1.24.12.1 diff -u -r1.24.12.1 mmath.h --- mmath.h 27 Jun 2002 22:03:50 - 1.24.12.1 +++ mmath.h 4 Jul

Re: [Dri-devel] dlabs pm3/2 gamma+pm3 support (1) (patch #577344)

2002-07-04 Thread José Fonseca
, it's normal because the DRI CVS doesn't contain the full XFree86 code. If you want a different ProjectRoot then you must first create that directory and then `lndir` from the directory where you have X installed (usually /usr/X11R6) to that one. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] mach64-20020704: gltestperf lockup on Zsmooth triangles

2002-07-04 Thread José Fonseca
. ;) Patient: Doctor, it hurst when I do this. Dr. Well, then don't do that. :-) Cheers, David José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Caffeinated soap. No kidding. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template PPC fp format

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 07:34:31AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: José Fonseca wrote: Preliminary support Mach64 native vertex buffer template was added to CVS. The measures on the increase of performance in doing this are rather marginal unfortunately: I got an increase of 800 poly/sec (over 35400

[Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re-occurrence of macros arguments within its definition in Mesa headers

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 07:43:40AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: José Fonseca wrote: [...] I think this is a bug in Mesa. First because a macro should generally behave as an ordinary function, unless there is a very special reason not to do so. Hmm, not really, this is something people

Re: [Dri-devel] Mach64 native template PPC fp format

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 11:37:59AM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote: José Fonseca wrote: [...] Indeed! Here are the results of the 'b' and 'B' benchmark with the default settings before: Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 205098 fps: 28.5771 Benchmarking... Result: triangles/sec: 204282 fps

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Mesa3d-dev] Re-occurrence of macros arguments within its definition in Mesa headers

2002-07-01 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jul 01, 2002 at 06:32:18AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote: Keith Whitwell wrote: José Fonseca wrote: [...] I suggest two things: 1. Put a comment where INTERP_F is defined, noting that some parameters are evaluated twice. I'll do this. 2. Change this: INTERP_F( t, (*dst++).f, (*out

[Dri-devel] Mach64 native template PPC fp format

2002-06-30 Thread José Fonseca
architectures, and therefore a doubt that I came about: is it necessary to swap bytes when writting a IEEE fp number on a bigendian machine, or is the IEEE fp number stored independently of that? José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: mach64-0-0-5-branch)

2002-06-30 Thread José Fonseca
. Both of these things appear to had contribute to a further improvement of the poly/sec in ipers. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [Dri-devel] R200 kernel interfaces

2002-06-29 Thread José Fonseca
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 10:08:42AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote: On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 12:09:02AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: On 2002.06.17 23:19 Keith Whitwell wrote: We could overcome the GLX difficulties in the same way we do now in libGL with the direct rendering. But I still

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: S3 VIRGE DRI in CVS now

2002-06-27 Thread José Fonseca
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 11:54:53AM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote: [...] 3) Did you set backbuffer size and texsize in XF86Config like I suggested in the README? Max, where can I find that README? I would like to put it in the same place as the binary snapshots. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] trunk merge in mach64-0-0-5-branch is done

2002-06-27 Thread José Fonseca
writing new drivers easier and remove significant amounts of duplicated code. Maybe this should be updated. Yep. This is way old (I think it refers to mach64-0-0-1-branch). José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you

[Dri-devel] Failure to build the s3virge-0-0-1-branch

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
xf86drmS3V.o And the packaging script fails since it can't find libdrm.a. Max, is there any file related to i830 missing or outdated in the s3virge branch? Or perhaps the i830 driver should be disabled on this branch. José Fonseca

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: s3virge-0-0-1-branch)

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
the branch number too. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! JabberConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http://www.jabberconf.com/osdn

[Dri-devel] Re: Merging trunk changes into mach64 branch

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:52:00PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:16:15PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: [...] Jose, I think now would be a good time for us to merge the trunk into a new Mach64 branch. Brian released Mesa 4.0.3

[Dri-devel] Re: Merging trunk changes into mach64 branch

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:26PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, José Fonseca wrote: [...] Yep. That's it. Basically one needs to checkout the trunk, tag it with the new mach64-0-0-5-branch, and then merge from the old branch (by doing cvs update -r mach64-0-0-4-branch

Re: [Dri-devel] RE: Dri-devel S3 VIRGE DRI in CVS now

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:51:18PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote: On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 16:48, José Fonseca wrote: Are the ProSavage docs you have enough to get a good start on Savage4? their 3D engine is nearly identical. Er, I forgot, I got Savage4 docs too from S3/VIA. I am definetly

[Dri-devel] Re: [Dri-patches] CVS Update: xc (branch: s3virge-0-0-1-branch)

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
errors after. Perhaps something was forgoten when commiting? José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc. Don't miss the IM event of the season | Special offer for OSDN members! JabberConf 2002, Aug. 20-22, Keystone, CO http

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: Merging trunk changes into mach64 branch

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:22:07PM -0400, Leif Delgass wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:44:14PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: Alan, hint? (Or How have you just done now with the s3virge branch?) cvs update -j HEAD and resolve the conflicts

[Dri-devel] Annouce: S3 Virge binary snapshots (Was: CVS Update: xc (branch: s3virge-0-0-1-branch))

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:04PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:38:03PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:04:27AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote: o.k. it's builds now, max needs to check it runs o.k. ... Perhaps something was forgoten when

Re: [Dri-devel] Parhelia vs. Radeon 8500

2002-06-26 Thread José Fonseca
the development of DRI drivers: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/09/0236221 . The choice [as always] depends entirely on which factors you value the most. I hope this helps. José Fonseca --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber Inc

  1   2   3   4   >