The building guide in the DRI wiki
(http://dri.freedesktop.org/wiki/Building) states the following under
section 1.3.:
snip
Note: libdrm installs to /usr/local/lib by default. To install in
/usr/lib run:
./configure --prefix=/usr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a MSI 845GL-P barebone,
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Integrated Graphics Device (rev 01)
and do use it with 2.4.22, i830 and agpgart kernel modules and
4.3.0-0pre1v1 xfree86-xserver (debian package).
Unfortunat
Ronny V. Vindenes wrote:
Something in the last week or two broke the r200 driver. After I cvs
update'ed and recompiled yesterday, I get this error:
[...]
Card is 9000/128mb under linux 2.6.0-test9 (athlon64 running in pure
32bit mode) with an lcd connected to dvi.
just wanted to let you know that
Hello,
if I try to use Xv (via mplayer, or with xawtv using the v4l-module)
with current cvs (trunk) the X server crashes. I'm using a r200-based
card (Radeon 8500).
When I check out cvs from just before the mergedfb-merge (i tried
2003-10-07, 4:30:00), I get no problems, so the merge might have
Jonathan Warren wrote:
I just purchased an ati 8500dv and would like to get the dir project
and the gatos project running on my system. I am trying to identify
what I need to do to make everything work together.
AFAIK you can't have Gatos- and DRI-drivers at the same time. Both
projects use diffe
Martin Spott wrote:
Michel D?nzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could try to set the environment variables RADEON_NO_CODEGEN,
RADEON_NO_VTXFMT and RADEON_TCL_FORCE_DISABLE [...]
BTW, I just aquired a Radeon9100 clone to see if serveral 'features'
r
John S. Chalice wrote:
I just last night downloaded the newest CVS from dri.sourceforge.net..
and tried compiling it..
it went smoothly.. no errors.. *BUT*.. none of the kernel modules were
created.. for *any* of the video drivers listed in the host.def file..
Any ideas?
well, you can alway
Willy Gardiol wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
few days ago i was trying to play ut2003 on my Rage128 but, off course, with
no luck (s3c missing), is this feature one of the new things going to be
implemented in the near future?
VIA/S3 has been contacted several times
Erdőfi Tibor wrote:
Hello
A one question :)
support the 9100 radeon on dri?
hmm, it should be supported in principal, as its the same hardware as
the 8500 cards
maybe the driver doesnt "know" the card yet?
what does lspci say?
you could try the following:
force the Chip-ID to one of a 8500QL-
Ian Molton wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:51:33 +0100
Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it's a Q3A 1.32 bug fixed in 1.32b.
OK, I'm downloading now.
where do I get 1.32b?
quake3arena just says 1.32
ftp://ftp.idsoftware.com/idstuff/quake3/linux/linuxq3apoint-1.32b.x86.run
Frank Steiner wrote:
Alexander Stohr wrote:
The drivers should run on Linux/x86 with glibc 2.2,
some common kernel modules do come precompiled and
a build environment for gcc2.96 and gcc3.2 is included,
thus making that drivers compatible with
e.g. RedHat(R) Linux(R)/x86 8.0 or 7.3 versions.
Hi!
I've done some more testing on the mesa-4-1-branch (checked out and
compiled yesterday)
All in all everything runs quite nicely and stable. I successfully tested:
-quake (quakeforge-0.5.2): works, but quite sluggish, especially when
there are lots of light effects
-quake2 (quakeIIforge 0.1
Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brian Paul wrote:
>
>
>>Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
>>
>>>So I decided to give the mesa-4-1-branch a whirl and do some
testing... I
>>>grabbed it from CVS:
>>>
>>>$ cvs -z3 co -r mesa-4-1-branch xc
>>>
>>>And then I did a Make world. Unfortunately, it di
Major A wrote:
I heard a while ago that some company was sponsoring the development
of a proper DRI driver for the ATI R200 -- can someone briefly update
me as to what the status of that driver is in the latest release and
in CVS? Is it a worthy replacement (in OpenGL performance and
stability) fo
David Balazic wrote:
Hi!
How is the Radeon 9000(/pro) support ( for linux/x86 ) ?
2D and 3D should work (there were some patches and some discussions
about 9000-support on the mailing-list recently, check the ml-archives)
That is the rv250 chip, right ?
yes
Is radeon 9000 much/any faster
Jacek Pop?awski wrote:
I've installed 4.2.99 extras and tdfx driver from directory bleeding edge:
(WW) TDFX(0): Failed to set up write-combining range (0xe800,0x200)
(II) TDFX(0): vgaHWGetIOBase: hwp->IOBase is 0x03d0, hwp->PIOOffset is 0xbd00
(II) TDFX(0): Changing back offset from 0x005
Ayahuasca wrote:
Hi all.
I know this is not exactly the perfect list for this, but then again it
does have a lot of people who know how the Radeon ticks, so...
I have been using the Radeon Framebuffer driver in the kernel. I use it
mainly for mplayer, as my card (VIVO) only puts a signal out t
Brian Paul wrote:
Stefan Lange wrote:
Hi there,
If I set "R200_NO_TCL=t" I get flickering and/or missing textures in
"Return to Castle Wolfenstein". With hw-TCL, everything looks fine.
With current dri-trunk rendering is fine with both hw- and sw-TCL.
I'm using a R
Hi there,
If I set "R200_NO_TCL=t" I get flickering and/or missing textures in
"Return to Castle Wolfenstein". With hw-TCL, everything looks fine. With
current dri-trunk rendering is fine with both hw- and sw-TCL.
I'm using a Radeon 8500QL and mesa-4-1-branch from Monday. Can anyone
reproduce
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
i'm using a kernel 2.4.20-pre11 with a radeon module compiled from CVS. I have a
radeon 8500 LE (r200 QL), and every time i want to switch from X to VT, i've got
a blank screen and my computer is frozen... This means i can't halt|reboot
properly as i can't reach conso
Hi!
I'm currently using cvs-code from the dri-trunk from today. I got
several crashes of the xserver (system was still running stable). Once,
however, I got a complete lockup. Examining the log-files after
rebooting, I found tons of these messages:
in XFree86.0.log:
---
Stefan Lange wrote:
[...]
I attached the complete
server-log, in case that helps.
forgot to add the attachment, as usual...
XFree86.0.log.old.bz2
Description: Binary data
I cvs-updated both Mesa and mesa-4-1-branch today, and I don't get any
more FPE's with R200_NO_TCL=1. Thanks!
Stefan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
[...]
>> hmm, that's odd. I still get floating point exceptions for almost
>> every GL-app. with TCL disabled.
>>
>> Demos that _do_ work with TCL disabled include:
>> clearspd, drawpix, gamma, glinfo, lodbias, readpix, winpos
>>
>> Maybe this can give you a clue, why some are working and some ar
Brian Paul wrote:
> Brian Paul wrote:
>
>> Stefan Lange wrote:
>>
>>> My experiences from testing:
>>>
>>> Wolfenstein (single-player): works, about same speed as dri-trunk,
>>> but not completely stable (exited with Signal 4 in one run, an
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Russ Dill wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2002-10-15 at 10:01, Stefan Lange wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Q3A: stable (at least for the time I tested), but not very fast. In
>>> fact it shows the same symptoms I got with earlier versions of
>>>
Brian Paul wrote:
[...]
I did some testing with the mesa-4-1-branch today on my r200. Compiling
was less trouble than I expected, everything was pretty much straight
forward ;-)
>
> I'd appreciate it if people could start testing this branch, esp the
> drivers I haven't tested. One thing in
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> OK, the IRQ stuff seems working currectly on my dual Athlon SMP box.
I can second that, q3a works fast and stable for me, too, now!
The 50-FPS-limit I used to experience is gone, and overall performance
is a lot better, too
demo four now gives me about 48 FPS (1280x1024@2
[...]
> Well, I managed to run the newest binary snapshots by installing the
> newest r200-snapshot (yesterday) and copying radeon_drv.o from 0924
> into my XFree-dir. It works. I even have Xv.
> That leads me to another question: what exactly is in radeon_drv.o?
>
It's the 2D-driver, the 3D-par
[...snip...]
>
> This assuming, of course, that these snapshots are indeed the promised
> holly graal. Please test.
>
seem to work fine for my system
(i tried the r200-package, on debian unstable, gcc is 2.95.4 on my system)
nice work
> José Fonseca
>
--
>
> I'm getting quite similar results:
> with xmms running in background: ~150 FPS
> with xmms paused: ~130 FPS
> after i unpause xmms, FPS will drop down very low (~10 FPS or s.th.) for
> about 1 or 2 seconds (system load is almost 100% during that period),
> and then go up to 150 again (with
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Dieter Nützel wrote:
>
>> Keith,
>>
>> after your latest r200 IRQ merge "setenv R200_NO_USLEEPS 1" is badly
>> needed, again?
>>
>> gears is lower than ever
>>
>> Mesa/demos> ./gears
>> r200CreateScreen
>> 550 frames in 5.019 seconds = 109.584 FPS
>> 566 frames in 5.016
Alex Deucher wrote:
> I'm pretty unfamiliar with OpenGL programming. I have an idea for an
> xfree module that I suspect would not be too hard to implement, but I
> wanted to get some other opinions on it. What I'd like to do is create
> a module called perhaps ogl-xv or glx-xv that would provid
Franklin Kingma wrote:
>
>> Second, yesterdays r200 build seems to have some profiling display on
>> the upper left on the screen consisting of a white bar and some green
>> squares. Is there any info about what this means (or where it might be
>> disabled)?
>
>
> it does the same at my free
Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Can someone out there check this quickly?
>
> In radeon.h in the 2d driver, the size of the radeon mmio area is
> defined as 0x8 - however, on my r200 at least, /proc/pci shows the
> area as being 1/8th that size:
>
> Bus 1, device 0, function 0:
> ... (omitte
[...]
>>
> Which makes perfect sense for Michal Kozlowski problem, old chipset
> (no / buggy fast write support) and new graphics card (with fast
> write support).
>
>
This issue is also present for me, I get the same behaviour (X-server
crashes, and blanks the screen) on my box, even thoug
Ian Molton wrote:
> Is the Hercules 3D Prophet 8500 a good card? (is the 2D stable at
> 1600x1200, unlike my 7500 VIVO which has a noticeable 'noise' so that
> vertical lines arent smooth, but somewhat rough looking)
>
i think it's a fairly decent one. but there are rumors that some
hercules 85
Mike Mestnik wrote:
> If you man ascii, which on a hunch I did, you will find that...
> Hex Char
> 51Q
> 57W
> 4CL
> 45E
>
> Hence QW 0x5157, QL 0x514C, and the LE would have Product ID 0x4C45 this product ID
>is not on
> file.
> I'll look into why the Xserver it equating 0x4C4
Michal Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi Stefan, good to hear someone got it working. I'll give the
> r200-0-1-branch a shot, see if I can compile it and get it running. Would
> there be a problem if I had the radeon_dri modules still in the module/dri
> directory (I'll try removing it)
>
if you recompile
Hi Michal!
I'm also playing around with the r200-branch at the moment, and I've got
better results than you (I tried both jose's snapshots and building from
cvs). X starts up fine for me, and 3D also works to some extent
(glxgears, glx-screensavers work for example, but q3a, wolf and so on
cr
[...]
>
> Yes. Keith said he successfully tested it on a 8500, maybe it depends on
> the other patch.
>
>
OK, i had another look into my problem: I noticed that only
radeon_xv-2002-03-29-19.diff applies cleanly on the r200 branch. the
other patch gives me errors. So I first tried to edit the
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 14:55, Stefan Lange wrote:
>
>>on more comment: xv seems to be broken, it only gives me a black overlay
>>window with mplayer. are there plans to merge with gatos some time?
>
>
> http://www.keithp.com/~keithp/download
Hi!
I just checked out and compiled the r200-0-1-branch:
>> glxgears: ~ 1650 fps
>
> I've just commited a small optimization that gears benefits from. It
> may be quite close now...
its about 1720 now ;-)
[...]
>
> A large part of this difference is presumably due to HyperZ - something
Kareem Dana wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have an ASUS P4S533 motherboard with the sis645dx chipset. I need agpgart support
>for dri to work correctly, so in my kernel I enabled agpgart support (made the /dev
>entry) and enabled Generic SiS Chipset support under it.
>
> When my kernel boots up it comp
German Gomez Garcia wrote:
> Hello, I have some money to spend (finally!!!) so I'm thinking
> of replacing my old G400MAX for a new card, as I prefer open source, I
> have to choose between ATI and Matrox, and the optios (for me) are
> the new Parhelia 512 or the AIW Radeon 8500 DV, I'll buy
Dieter Nützel wrote:
> On Monday 24 June 2002 13:09, Alexander Stohr wrote:
>
>>Or you are try out the current closed source drivers
>>for X11 and the ATI FireGL 8700/8800 - they do run
>>on the "BUILT BY ATI" Radeon 8500 boards as well.
>>The board indicates this compatibility by a PCI
>>Subvend
>
>Another question. I am using the Gatos driver for hardware accelerated
>DVD watching. Can I use them together with the DRI Mach64 drivers?
>
I doubt that mixing these drivers will work, because gatos uses its own
drm-module (correct me if I'm wrong). You'd probably have to merge both
codeba
Peter Soetens (Kaltan) wrote:
> Hi,
[...]
> Anyway about the FireGL stuff :
>
> On Sunday 02 June 2002 20:45, Garry Reisky wrote:
>
>>If there are any 8500 owners out there that have been longing for 3d in
>>linux, you can download the firegl 8800 drivers and install them . They
>>will work . Th
from your dmesg:
...
...
CPU0
mtrr: v1.40 (20010327) Richard Gooch ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
mtrr: detected mtrr type: Intel
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfb430, last bus=1
...
...
this is probably not related to your problems, but I'm just wondering why your mtrr is
detected as `type: Intel'
--snip---
>>
>> Maybe I should send it to Gareth with that beer I owe him. :)
>Excuse me, but WHAT's the problem here ??
>I'm using a Hauppauge TV card (BT878 based) together with the DRI and >it
>run PERFECTLY well !!!
>This is using the tdfx driver on a V5.
yeah, same goes for me, bt878 card
>>> "Marc Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/30 4:09 >>>
>Ok, perhaps I'm really dense, but what's the advantage of using this over
>just using Branden's X debs? I have 3d acceleration and working DRI for
>both my V3 and my G450 as it stands, without adding any further software.
>
>And I can turn
51 matches
Mail list logo
