On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:35:22PM -0400, John Li wrote:
I'm not sure if this qualifies as a bug, but I think it's
unexpected/non-optimal behavior.
Example setup:
Laptop screen at 1024x768 with a separate LCD at 1280x1024 positioned on
the left of the laptop. Here's a geom for that:
/*
I don't have a dualhead setup to test, but in case you cannot move the
mouse pointer out of the monitor borders you have a very easy
solution: wrap the mouse to the nearest window corner at the begining
of movemouse() (I wrote a patch for this once), then you will always
align your windows with
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 12:08:06PM +0200, yy wrote:
I don't have a dualhead setup to test, but in case you cannot move the
mouse pointer out of the monitor borders you have a very easy
solution: wrap the mouse to the nearest window corner at the begining
of movemouse() (I wrote a patch for
Polls are stupid.
All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rather a
matter of popularity, not sanity.
Dwm got off course and needs some clear objectives again!
hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polls are stupid.
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
development process. Shame on me!
All these recently added features seemed to me as if they are rather
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
development process. Shame on me!
At the beginning dwm was Anselm's baby, and he said it shall only fit
his needs. He made this very clear and I
On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's do a poll!
you meant technical discussion
this is not fashion or politics
hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is this stupid idea called democracy (just in case you heard of
it) and I tried to establish just a tiny fraction of it here in the dwm
development process. Shame on me!
At the beginning dwm was Anselm's baby, and he said it shall only fit
his
Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's do a poll!
you meant technical discussion
this is not fashion or politics
You don't do polls in fashion - normally it's unconsciously communicated
dictatorship.
Well and in politics (at
Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain framework
of course - you can't come along and expect someone to integrate cairo
or so). And this is why we have to make clear what exactly sucks less.
I mean the term itself suggest that we're not developing software on a
solid
1 unnecessary space after Layout definition
2 some may need lt in their config (eg i use lt-isfloating in my
pushup/down algo)
--- a/dwm.c Mon May 05 20:06:43 2008 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Mon May 05 20:26:51 2008 +0200
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
const char *symbol;
void
hiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain framework
of course - you can't come along and expect someone to integrate cairo
or so). And this is why we have to make clear what exactly sucks less.
I mean the term itself suggest that we're
2008/5/5, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
I want a Porsche and a new x61 tablet. And some Icecream. Also I
consider wanting some candy. How about a new flatscreen TV? Yes, I
also want a flatscreen TV.
--
On 5/5/08, Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
-1
i personally don't use multihead
keep the code clean
Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-05-05, 20:58):
I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
-1
i personally don't use multihead
keep the code clean
I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and
Good evening.
Am Mon, 05 May 2008 20:35:38 +0200
schrieb Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
1.) A voting register for classifying the voting population
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to
try and comprehend all the new DEFGEOM stuff (and neither I see a
reason).
Hence I vote -1
Christoph Lohmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good evening.
Hi,
Am Mon, 05 May 2008 20:35:38 +0200
schrieb Matthias-Christian Ott [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I want commented votes (as previously illustrated by example).
Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
1.) A
Come on it's enough now. Do you remember how this pointless discussion
started:
| Polls are stupid.
I just wanted to involve the users a bit on this issue. And in fact this
statement is stupid and not polls.
Yes, of course. And this has to be discussed (with a certain framework
of
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:57:04PM +0200, Mate Nagy wrote:
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:06:54PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
I've found running separate dwm instances on subdisplays entirely
sufficient for my multihead needs. I don't even have time and will to
try and comprehend all the new
Why not using dzen2 instead of dwm bar? xmonad folks use it that way.
They just pipe stdout from xmonad into dzen. But you're not able to
click on the tags to switch between them.
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Henrik Holst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think an implementation of EWMH would make
I revised the list:
Things we need for establishing such a democratic system:
1.) Anselm to implement one
I hope he doesn't.
--
# Kurt H Maier
22 matches
Mail list logo
