The same here, but the trojan was JS/Exploit.Agent.AFH George HA5WA
> - Original Message - From: Mark Robinson To: k4...@arrl.net ;
> wbeye...@cfl.rr.com ; DX List... Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 1:51 AM Subject:
> Re: [DX-CHAT] Question I started looking at the Acom
3:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
http://www.hfpower.com/
At 02:20 PM 5/18/2009, William Beyer wrote:
Hello Group:
Any one get a photo of the NEW Acom VFD wattmeter? @ Dayton Hamvention.
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
DXCC Honor Roll
QCWA OOTC
"Celebrati
http://www.hfpower.com/
At 02:20 PM 5/18/2009, William Beyer wrote:
Hello Group:
Any one get a photo of the NEW Acom VFD wattmeter? @ Dayton Hamvention.
Jack Hartley
K4WSB / VP2MSB
DXCC Honor Roll
QCWA OOTC
"Celebrating 50 years in Ham Radio"
--
Any help with locating any QSL route or info for EL2DX
I worked on CW back on 9 July 2004? I have sent QSLs
to K8SJP and receive no answers. Any help
appreciated.
Gary, N5PHT
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protec
From: "Jerry Keller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
We're giving the freebanders and intentional QRMers entirely too much
attention and too much publicity. Going back 40+ years I can't remember a
ot;Ron Notarius WN3VAW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Ron,
I must add one more as I know this for a fact. Now that we are near the
bottom of this sunspot cycle, some of those Freeband Nuts in Europe and
the US that have
At 11:05 03/19/06, Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
6. The net or alleged net or sked or alleged sked that "always"
operates on
or around this frequency and time, thus giving them hypothetical ownership
of the frequency range, who either demand that the DX move, the pile-up
move, or who blunder o
Do you really believe that much of the same trash would be
eliminated?
Those who QRM now may hesitate to do the same on the frequencies used in
"the good old days." However, that hesitation won't last
very long. Some will use CW...Others won't care about what section
of the band they are using.
us WN3VAW" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 11:05 AM
Subject: RE: [DX-CHAT] Question
Peter,
Hmmm. Not a bad idea, but I'm not so sure how well it would work.
Remember, at the time that US Phone privileges started at 14.200, the
14.1 -
14.2 part of the b
And how about CW DX going back to 14001-14002?
Bill W5EC
Why not go back to what we had back in the " good old days ", when the
rare
DX transmitted down around 14115-14125
Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems
http://njdxa.org/dx-chat
To post a message, DX related items only,
z ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:53
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
>What about intentional qrmers?
These guys have now found another way to make it difficult for DX'ers in
a "split" pile-up. They quickly
.
If I recall, 14195 became the DX frequency because it was a place
where DX stations could TX but that Americans could not (US
privileges started at 14200 for the longest time). Maybe it's time to
revive that tradition and make 14145 the new default DX frequency on
20 SSB. It could have the added
73
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Peter W2IRT
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
At 10:01 03/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>What is the solution to the qrm on t
g
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 4:39
PM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Many times through the years when a DX
station has asked for "up" several times and is ignored they have immediately
gone QRT.look forward to this in the future also.
73 Norm
K1
At 10:01 03/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the solution to the qrm on the DX frequency? Well, if
someone doesn't know the DX is woking split, or by accident is on
the wrong VFO, or whatever, it would be no problem if ppeople had
the smallest amount of self control. If the offending
nt: Sunday, March 19, 2006 10:01
AM
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Question
Assuming the Dx station moves around and answers callers on their own
frequency, and does not work more than one caller on a particular frequency-
The DX operator has no way to communicate to the pileup as a whole.
Assuming the Dx station moves around and answers callers on their own frequency, and does not work more than one caller on a particular frequency- The DX operator has no way to communicate to the pileup as a whole. They will be listening on their own frequency for the Dx to answer them, not listeni
On Sat, 18 Mar 2006, David Johnson wrote:
> Gentlemen DXers,
>
> Here is a hypothetical situation and a question. I am on a dxpedition
> to a top 10 entity and lets say I'm operating on 20 meters. I'm
> transmitting at 14.195 and listening 200 to 220. I tune down to my
> transmit frequency
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is that then you would have no way to communicate with the
pileup as a whole. Newcomers would not know your listening range and
the pile would spread farther and farther, causing much problems with
other users of the band. Chaos.
73,
Duane, WV2B
"Noth
The problem is that then you would have no way to communicate with the pileup as a whole. Newcomers would not know your listening range and the pile would spread farther and farther, causing much problems with other users of the band. Chaos.
73,
Duane, WV2B "Nothing great is ever achieved without e
-Here is a hypothetical
situation and a question. I am on a dxpedition to a top 10 entity and
lets say I'm operating on 20 meters. I'm transmitting at 14.195 and
listening 200 to 220. I tune down to my transmit frequency and hear all
kinds of intentional QRM. It's so bad
Gentlemen DXers,
Here is a hypothetical situation and a
question. I am on a dxpedition to a top 10 entity and lets say I'm
operating on 20 meters. I'm transmitting at 14.195 and listening 200 to
220. I tune down to my transmit frequency and hear all kinds of
intentional QRM. It's so ba
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Fred Stevens K2FRD wrote:
> At 11:21 -0700 05/10/03, John and Mari Minke wrote:
> >Art RX9TX wrote:
> >>
> >> HI9/K8WK, definitely. I think it is one of IARU recommendations.
> >> Europeans and JA's always use only that method.
> >
> >Actually, I thin
Ron Notarius WN3VAW wrote:
Steve,
I'm not sure what you mean by "correct" method.
Once upon a time YourCall/PortablePrefix was the way "everyone" did it, be
it a different domestic call area (ie K8WK/3 or F9ABC/8) or DX (ie
K8WK/VP9). (Although in some DX entities, a "/p" to indicate portable
paqso.html
Look for N3SH - Allegheny County, WA3SH - Fayette County, and NP2SH -- US
Virgin Islands!
For more information see www.washarc.org
- Original Message -
From: "Fred Stevens K2FRD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 6:57
At 11:21 -0700 05/10/03, John and Mari Minke wrote:
Art RX9TX wrote:
HI9/K8WK, definitely. I think it is one of IARU recommendations.
Europeans and JA's always use only that method.
Actually, I think it would be what the license says. U.S. stations
operating in Canada use their call appende
- Fayette County, and NP2SH -- US
Virgin Islands!
For more information see www.washarc.org
- Original Message -
From: "litwins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 1:12 PM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] question?
I should know the answer t
Art RX9TX wrote:
>
> HI9/K8WK, definitely. I think it is one of IARU recommendations.
> Europeans and JA's always use only that method.
Actually, I think it would be what the license says. U.S. stations
operating in Canada use their call appended by the proper Camadian
prefix and vice vers
Hello dx-chat,
Sunday, October 5, 2003 litwins wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
l> to the Dom Rep to operate in the summer as hi9/k8wk ---or--- as the license
l> was issued to me k8wk/hi9.
l> Which is the "correct" method? hi9/k8wk or k8wk/hi9.
HI9/K8WK, definitely. I think it is one of IAR
I should know the answer to this but am not sure where to look, so I'll
ask...
This question is in ref to portable identifiers attached to call signs and
pertains to LOTW for additional call signs...such as, for my call when I go
to the Dom Rep to operate in the summer as hi9/k8wk ---or--- as the
He probably meant qsl via Buro 100 percent... Goood luckk W3BJ
On Sun, 22 Dec 2002 12:29:36 -0800 (PST) Gary Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Hi,
>
> I worked CP1UU on cw and he said to qsl via the buro
> 100. He repeated this a few times. Does that mean to
> send a $1 with the card to the
Hi,
I worked CP1UU on cw and he said to qsl via the buro
100. He repeated this a few times. Does that mean to
send a $1 with the card to the Buro ? Can you do
that?
Does anyone have a qsl route on cp1uu. He was on 15
meter cw this afternoon (Sun - 22 Dec) with a good sig
into Texas.
73 de N5
Has anyone used the e-mail dx spots through dx-central.com? I tried
filtering them so that I would only get U.S. spots on certain bands, but I
am getting spots from all countries on all bands. Maybe someone can help
me set the filters properly. For example, I don't want spots for 160 or 80
meter
than I need for all of my Ham programs. I paid $60!!
73
Bill N4NX
- Original Message -
From:
Sherman
Harrison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:47
AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Question?
I have all of my logs & a friends logs that I am a
>
> In the interim, I'd suggest picking up a used older computer that is
> running Windows 9x (98SE preferable) and use that system for your logs,
> assuming that an upgrade path for your software and/or data is not
> available. (I still keep my logs in dBase IV routines I wrote 10+
> years ago,
y standing over me saying, "How do I reload this damn
thing?"
- Original Message -
From:
Sherman
Harrison
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 10:47
AM
Subject: [DX-CHAT] Question?
I have all of my logs & a friends logs
that I am a Qsl Mg&#
I have all of my logs & a friends logs that I am a Qsl Mg'r
fer.
My main purpose in ham radio is DXing which I dearly luv, having 7
programs on my computer: logging, bearings, etc.
None of my Dos-based programs will now open, as well as my TelNet program
which isn't dos.
Everything was great on m
37 matches
Mail list logo
