Re: [Dx4win] support for FT4

[John, K9EL]

DX4Win implemented FT4 as a sub-mode of MFSK based on the ADIF specification.   
The ADIF group said the original classification of FT8 as a “mode” was a 
mistake and decided to do FT4 properly.

73, John K9EL


On Jun 1, 2020, at 8:26 AM, Mike Cizek W0VTT  wrote:

Hello George,

FT4 is a sub-mode of MFSK.

--
73,
Mike Cizek W0VTT 

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of George
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 08:21
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] support for FT4

I don't see support for the FT4 mode?

George  K


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for FT4

[Mike Cizek W0VTT]

Hello George,

FT4 is a sub-mode of MFSK.

--
73,
Mike Cizek W0VTT 

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of George
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2020 08:21
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] support for FT4

I don't see support for the FT4 mode?

George  K


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] support for FT4

[George]

I don't see support for the FT4 mode?

George  K


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] Support For Comparing VUCC Credits

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:21 PM Bud Governale W3LL wrote:

> "Yesterday, I updated the Compare DX4WIN to LoTW utility to support
> comparing VUCC credits.  I intend to release this update no later than
> the weekend of January 11/12, 2020."

Sorry, Bud.  I've just been too busy at work and have not had any time
to finish it.

Maybe April...

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] Support For Comparing VUCC Credits

[Bud Governale]

Been away and was wondering if this was released:

"Yesterday, I updated the Compare DX4WIN to LoTW utility to support
comparing VUCC credits.  I intend to release this update no later than
the weekend of January 11/12, 2020."

73,

Bud W3LL
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] Dx4win] DX4WIN Support

[Bruce Blackley]

Glad you got your problem solved Alan.  



I have been using Dx4Win since version 6.xxx and it has proven to be one of
the most stable programs I have ever used.  Paul certainly has done his
homework.  Very powerful but easy to use.  I would never change logging
programs.  



73



Bruce



WD4LBR 

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] DX4WIN Support

[Alan Zack]

I just wanted to give Paul a big shout out for his very quick and
accurate fix to my DX4WIN program crash.
Yesterday afternoon I had performed some QSL functions and closed the
program. Later that evening I tried to open DX4WIN and it crashed. A
little window opened concerning the crash and asked if I wanted to
send a text stating my problem (bug report). I replied in the
affirmative, my email opened, and the text was sent. I went to bed
wondering what had caused the crash and what I will need to do to fix
it.
 
This morning when I opened my email there was a message from Paul
telling me what to check for and what to do to fix the crash. His
advice was right on, I followed his instructions and am now 100
percent back in business.
 
For you inquiring minds the crash was caused by my country.dat file in
my SAVE folder going away. (I don't know why or how). Paul told me to
look for a copy in my BACKUP folder. I found it and copied and pasted
it into my SAVE folder. WaLa, DX4WIN now opened and performed normally
and all my changes made yesterday were still in place. I did a quick
HELP>UPDATE which gave me the current country.dat file that makes me
all current.
 
Thanks for the BIG help Paul!
 
Alan Zack
Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ
Official USCG Auxiliary Comm Station
Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Delta Rocket Quality Engineer, The Boeing Company, Retired
Aviation Chief Warrant Officer,  U.S. Coast Guard, Retired
http://www.qrz.com/db/K7ACZ
  http://gocoastguard.com
  http://www.uscgradio.net
  http://www.comm-one.club
 
http://oldbluejacket.com/USCG_CoastiesRule.htm
 
 
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
Message delivered to arch...@mail-archive.com

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] Support for FT-817

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Björn Ekelund SM7IUN wrote:

> I enclose a .rig file for FT-817 addressing a number of issues with
> using the FT-857 .rig file as a substitute:

The file is now available from:

http://dx4win.ad1c.us/radios/

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, , http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] Support for FT-817

[Björn Ekelund]

Hi all,

I enclose a .rig file for FT-817 adressing a number of issues with
using the FT-857 .rig file as a substitute:

1. The tuning is no longer locked after starting Dx4win
2. "DIG" is now recognized as RTTY, not SSB
3. "PKT" is now recognized as PACK, not SSB

Does anyone know how to make CWR be interpreted the same as CW?
Currently it is interpreted as the defaut: SSB.I havent figured this
one out.

The CAT code for CW is 2 and for CWR 3.

Thanks,

Björn
SM7IUN
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be wrote:

 There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
 Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

 YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode
 So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware
 It is impossible

So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it only has
one VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex
operation is better than nothing, right?

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[Lou Dietrich]

Guy and Jimand Paul (if you are listening)

For the FT3K, this would probably workI've been trying to get Paul's 
attention since before he moved to incorporate that in the DX4WIN code...


RC;  -Clear Clarifier
MD00;  -Set Mode VFO A
AB;  - Let A =B
FT1; FR0; -Set Split
Set FA;- Set A frequency
Set FB;- Set B frequency

So even if you can't set VFO B's mode, set A mode firstthen let 
A=B...what ever was in the A mode goes into the B mode...then set up 
your split...


This 'should' work(famous last words!)...

73/ Regards

Lou N2TU


On 4/8/2013 9:54 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be wrote:


There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode
So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware
It is impossible

So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it only has
one VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex
operation is better than nothing, right?

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[Paul van der Eijk]

This radio 'stuff' is easy to try; especially when you have the
radio connected to your computer.

The .rig file is a fairly simple text file that is interpreted by the DX4WIN
program. Look at the rig file for the Yaesu ft-1000D; there we set the
A VFO (mode, frequency split etc) Copy from A to B, and repeat for
the A VFO again. The program  'likes' this sequence when the
 A-B command is available because it is so simple!

--Paul, KK4HD



On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Lou Dietrich n...@roadrunner.com wrote:

 Guy and Jimand Paul (if you are listening)

 For the FT3K, this would probably workI've been trying to get Paul's
 attention since before he moved to incorporate that in the DX4WIN code...

 RC;  -Clear Clarifier
 MD00;  -Set Mode VFO A
 AB;  - Let A =B
 FT1; FR0; -Set Split
 Set FA;- Set A frequency
 Set FB;- Set B frequency

 So even if you can't set VFO B's mode, set A mode firstthen let
 A=B...what ever was in the A mode goes into the B mode...then set up your
 split...

 This 'should' work(famous last words!)...

 73/ Regards

 Lou N2TU



 On 4/8/2013 9:54 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:

 On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be wrote:

  There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
 Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

 YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode
 So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware
 It is impossible

 So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it only has
 one VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex
 operation is better than nothing, right?

 --
 Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
 __**__**__
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: 
 http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/dx4winhttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


 __**__**__
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: 
 http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/dx4winhttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




-- 
~
DX4WIN logging software
Paul van der Eijk, KK4HD
BrookHill Data Systems LLC
http://www.dx4win.com
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[ON4AOI]

Jim,
I can rename the FTDX5000 to FTDX3000 and send to you,
But that doesn´t change the fact if you double click on a spot
With SPLIT that THE MODE in VFOB is not correct.

There is no mode cmd for a second VFO available because there is no
Second VFO in the FTDX3000 its only a second stack  

From my previous posting 

MODE command Cat manual page 12 FTDX5000 shows
P1 0: main (VFO-A)
P1:1: sub (VFO-B)

FTDX5000 cmd = MD0; = in this case reads mode from VFO-A
FTDX5000 cmd = MD1; = in this case reads mode from VFO-B

For setting the modes on FTDX5000 its something similar

FTDX5000 cmd = MD01; = in this case sets mode from VFO-A to LSB  
FTDX5000 cmd = MD11; = in this case sets mode from VFO-B to LSB

First number is for the VFO selection and second number(or letter not yet
supported by dx4win) for the mode.

Page 11 from the FTDX 3000 CAT manual shows now a BIG PROBLEM
P1 = 0:fixed

Yaesu claims now also like Icom is doing over the years that there are not 2
VFO´s
Because there are not 2 receivers but only one inside the radio for them its
only a second VFO A with different stack 
and not a real VFO B

Maybe with the cmd AB -- VFO A to VFO´A´(vfoB) it could work but
Need a radio here to test that out before any release   

Guy  

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: jjreis...@gmail.com [mailto:jjreis...@gmail.com] Namens Jim Reisert
AD1C
Verzonden: maandag 8 april 2013 15:55
Aan: ON4AOI
CC: j...@w9rpm.com; DX4WIN Reflector
Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be wrote:

 There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file Not from me or Paul 
 or anyone else.

 YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode So as long 
 there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware It is impossible

So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it only has one
VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex operation is
better than nothing, right?

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[Joe Subich, W4TV]

 For the FT3K, this would probably work

Or one could use the same procedure as has been used for years with the
FT-990 and similar rigs by other software:

 RC;   - Clear Clarifier
 MD#;  - Set Mode
 FA#;  - Set Frequency (use split frequency)
 AB;   - move frequency/mode to VFO B
 FA#;  - Set VFO A frequency
 FT1;  - enable Split

On the other hand, I do not see any significant differences between
the documented FT-950 and FT-3000 command sets.  Has anyone tried used
using the FT-950 driver/setting or is the FT-950 driver making use of
some undocumented capability and thus likely to fail without notice
after a firmware update?

73,

   ... Joe, W4TV


On 4/8/2013 10:05 AM, Lou Dietrich wrote:

Guy and Jimand Paul (if you are listening)

For the FT3K, this would probably workI've been trying to get Paul's
attention since before he moved to incorporate that in the DX4WIN code...

RC;  -Clear Clarifier
MD00;  -Set Mode VFO A
AB;  - Let A =B
FT1; FR0; -Set Split
Set FA;- Set A frequency
Set FB;- Set B frequency

So even if you can't set VFO B's mode, set A mode firstthen let
A=B...what ever was in the A mode goes into the B mode...then set up
your split...

This 'should' work(famous last words!)...

73/ Regards

Lou N2TU


On 4/8/2013 9:54 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be wrote:


There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode
So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware
It is impossible

So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it only has
one VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex
operation is better than nothing, right?

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[Lou Dietrich]

Paul,

As I mentioned in my emails, A B is available for the FT3K

I will have a FT3000 borrowed from the Yaesu hamfest show stock and it 
will be in my shack today/ tomorrow and I will beta any new rig file or 
code change you come up with


Additionally, this 'problem' of VFO B not being set properly may also be 
in the FT950/ 450 rig file as well...as the FT950/ 450 CAT MD command 
has the first digit fixed at(0) ...zeroso a MD10 isn't valid for the 
FT950or the FT450...


From the DX4WIN FT950 and FT450 rig file:

[RC-Set Mode B]
CSTR=MD10;

Unless you have incorporated something into your code which is a work 
around for the FT950/ 450, setting the VFO B mode may not work there. I 
do not have a FT950/ 450 to test this...


Yaesu's commands have been mostly standardized since the FT9000 PEP, 
except for such nuances radios with either one or two receivers.


As I mentioned in my previous emails, you write and I'll test it!

73/ Regards...

Lou N2TU




On 4/8/2013 10:45 AM, Paul van der Eijk wrote:

This radio 'stuff' is easy to try; especially when you have the
radio connected to your computer.

The .rig file is a fairly simple text file that is interpreted by the 
DX4WIN

program. Look at the rig file for the Yaesu ft-1000D; there we set the
A VFO (mode, frequency split etc) Copy from A to B, and repeat for
the A VFO again. The program  'likes' this sequence when the
 A-B command is available because it is so simple!

--Paul, KK4HD



On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Lou Dietrich n...@roadrunner.com 
mailto:n...@roadrunner.com wrote:


Guy and Jimand Paul (if you are listening)

For the FT3K, this would probably workI've been trying to get
Paul's attention since before he moved to incorporate that in the
DX4WIN code...

RC;  -Clear Clarifier
MD00;  -Set Mode VFO A
AB;  - Let A =B
FT1; FR0; -Set Split
Set FA;- Set A frequency
Set FB;- Set B frequency

So even if you can't set VFO B's mode, set A mode firstthen
let A=B...what ever was in the A mode goes into the B mode...then
set up your split...

This 'should' work(famous last words!)...

73/ Regards

Lou N2TU



On 4/8/2013 9:54 AM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:

On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 10:31 PM, ON4AOI on4...@skynet.be
mailto:on4...@skynet.be wrote:

There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode
So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware
It is impossible

So why can't there be a driver that treats the radio like it
only has
one VFO?  The ability to read the current VFO and assume simplex
operation is better than nothing, right?

--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu
mailto:jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net
mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list:
http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




--
~
DX4WIN logging software
Paul van der Eijk, KK4HD
BrookHill Data Systems LLC
http://www.dx4win.com



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[George]

Is there any support for the new Kenwood TS-990 in the works? I'm using the
radio KENWOOD and it works but not quite right. It does not handle split
packet spot clicks properly.
Thanks.

George  W2YJ
Sent from my Windows 8 Desktop



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[John, K9EL]

I am using the Kenwood 870 settings and split packet spots work fine with my
TS-990.

73, 
John K9EL
DX Marathon Manager
www.dxmarathon.com
Join the DXMarathon Group on Yahoo Groups!
 

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of George
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 9:35 AM
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

Is there any support for the new Kenwood TS-990 in the works? I'm using the
radio KENWOOD and it works but not quite right. It does not handle split
packet spot clicks properly.
Thanks.

George  W2YJ
Sent from my Windows 8 Desktop



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[W9RPM]

Still waiting for FT3000 support also. John
On 4/7/2013 9:34 AM, George wrote:

Is there any support for the new Kenwood TS-990 in the works? I'm using the
radio KENWOOD and it works but not quite right. It does not handle split
packet spot clicks properly.
Thanks.

George  W2YJ
Sent from my Windows 8 Desktop



__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


--
EMAIL: j...@w9rpm.com
WEBPAGE: http://www.w9rpm.com/
Wisconsin VHF/UHF County Hunters: http://www.wivuch.com/
DX and CONTEST CLUB: http://www.w9idx.com/
La Crosse Hams: http://www.lacrossehams.org/
AOL IM: W9RPM
YAHOO: W9RPM

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

[ON4AOI]

JOHN,

I WROTE IT A FEW TIMES BEFORE 

There can´t be any support for the FT3000 rig file
Not from me or Paul or anyone else.

YAESU left OUT the cat commands for VFO-B and related Mode 
So as long there are no commands in the ft3000 firmware 
It is impossible

GUY ON4AOI 

-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
Namens W9RPM
Verzonden: zondag 7 april 2013 18:39
Aan: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] support for the new Kenwood TS-990

Still waiting for FT3000 support also. John On 4/7/2013 9:34 AM, George
wrote:
 Is there any support for the new Kenwood TS-990 in the works? I'm 
 using the radio KENWOOD and it works but not quite right. It does not
handle split
 packet spot clicks properly.
 Thanks.

 George  W2YJ
 Sent from my Windows 8 Desktop



 __
 DX4WIN mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
 list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

--
EMAIL: j...@w9rpm.com
WEBPAGE: http://www.w9rpm.com/
Wisconsin VHF/UHF County Hunters: http://www.wivuch.com/ DX and CONTEST
CLUB: http://www.w9idx.com/ La Crosse Hams: http://www.lacrossehams.org/ AOL
IM: W9RPM
YAHOO: W9RPM

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
DX4WIN mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:DX4WIN@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] Dx4win support

[ik1MDF]

PLease help.
I installed into my FLYBOOK the new release 8.01. The installation run 
correctly, but when I launch it the X error message appear.
APPLICATION NOT CORRECTLY INIZIALIZED (0xc0150002). PRESS OK TO CLOSE 
IT
Tried many times, same error.

Can you explain it? The FLYBOOK is working under XP HOME SP3 - 512 RAM - 995 
MHZ CLOCK.
The relase 5 was working correctly.

Please note that I use 8.01  on my Dektop PC and on my Ibm Notebok with no 
problerm.

Many thanks for supporting.


73 Lorenzo ik1mdf


- Original Message - 
From: dx4win-requ...@mailman.qth.net
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:07 AM
Subject: Dx4win Digest, Vol 64, Issue 48


 Send Dx4win mailing list submissions to
 dx4win@mailman.qth.net

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 dx4win-requ...@mailman.qth.net

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 dx4win-ow...@mailman.qth.net

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Dx4win digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: I'm scare to start with Version 8 (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   2. Re: I'm scare to start with Version 8 (Bob)
   3. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   4. Ver. 8.1 at start. (Stefano Cipriani)
   5. Re: Ver. 8.1 at start. (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   6. Ver.8.1 - Groups - Import - Unexpected selection.
  (Stefano Cipriani)
   7. Re: Ver.8.1 - Groups - Import - Unexpected selection.
  (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   8. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Terry Dunlap)
   9. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (David Tilley)
  10. BandMap wildly wrong freq? (Rick Murphy)
  11. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Jim Reisert AD1C)
  12. Re: BandMap wildly wrong freq? (Mel)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:32:10 -0600
 From: Jim Reisert AD1C jjreis...@alum.mit.edu
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] I'm scare to start with Version 8
 To: Marc Wullaert ON4MA marc.wullae...@telenet.be
 Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID:
 806a89db0908121532p5b8a6466pab7736481814b...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 Hi Marc,

 You have the option to install 8.01 in a directory separate from your
 old version.  If you run into bad problems with 8, just go back to the
 previous version until they can be resolved.

 The biggest problems are in the report manager, and the conversions of
 name, QTH and frequency. If you wait to do the conversion and can live
 with the small report problems, then you will probably be pretty
 happy.

 73 - Jim AD1C

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Marc Wullaert
 ON4MAmarc.wullae...@telenet.be wrote:
 Hi folks 


 I'm scare to switch over to version 8. I have the new key but i see in my 
 mailbox more than
 300msg to read about '' dx4win ver 8.0.

 Is it working ?

 marc ON4MA

 -- 
 Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us


 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:09:05 -0400
 From: Bob robertlar...@att.net
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] I'm scare to start with Version 8
 To: Marc Wullaert ON4MA marc.wullae...@telenet.be
 Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: 4a834b91.5080...@att.net
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 Hi Marc,

  Since you already have purchased the key it is OK to
 install it.   It will install in a separate directory in the root
 directory . My old version ( 5.02)  was and still is in a directory
 under the program files.   So both versions are  available and run from
 separate shortcuts on my desktop.

   I have an issue with the reports but in many ways are
 happy with the new reports.  I feel my issues will be addressed and they
 are not a show stopper.

   Back it up before you start and follow these notes and
 you should be just fine with both version.


 http://dx4win.ad1c.us/appnotes/upgrade.htm

 73,
 Bob
 K2TK


 Marc Wullaert ON4MA wrote:
 Hi folks 


 I'm scare to switch over to version 8. I have the new key but i see in my 
 mailbox more than
 300msg to read about '' dx4win ver 8.0.

 Is it working ?

 marc ON4MA







 --

 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:12:34 -0600
 From: Jim Reisert AD1C jjreis...@alum.mit.edu
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit
 To: W9RPM j...@w9rpm.com
 Cc: DX4WIN Reflector dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID:
 806a89db0908121612n2c19aa8dn66de93ea5b103...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:09 PM, W9RPMj...@w9rpm.com wrote:

 Jim, How do I change this to valid DX. I worked them, but put them down 
 as
 invalid DX. Thanks- John

 Expand the QSO window using F5 until you see the award flags.

 Use F8 to search for 7O1YGF.

 If you're using 8.01, change all three DXCC 

Re: [Dx4win] Dx4win support

[Rick Murphy]

On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:58 AM, ik1MDFik1...@aruba.it wrote:
 PLease help.
 I installed into my FLYBOOK the new release 8.01. The installation run
 correctly, but when I launch it the X error message appear.
 APPLICATION NOT CORRECTLY INIZIALIZED (0xc0150002). PRESS OK TO CLOSE
 IT
 Tried many times, same error.

This problem has been identified and a fix is available on Jim's site.
Go to http://dx4win.ad1c.us/ then look for the link Click HERE for
the solution.
-Rick
-- 
Rick Murphy, CISSP-ISSAP, K1MU/4, Annandale VA USA
__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] Dx4win support

[Mel]

This bug has been reported... it's an issue with a missing library...

here is the fix from K8UT:

I downloaded and installed DX4W801 and encountered an error message upon
launching the program:
The application failed to initialize properly (Oxc0150002). Click OK to
terminate the application
Most users will not have this problem. DX4Win801 installed properly on 2
PCs
here but failed on my Ham Shack PC. After some troubleshooting I determined
that DX4Win needed the Microsoft Visual C redistribution library, which 
can be downloaded from:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=200b2fd9-ae1a-4a14-
984d-389c36f85647

DX4Win801 is now working properly on my Ham computer.



ik1MDF wrote:
 PLease help.
 I installed into my FLYBOOK the new release 8.01. The installation run 
 correctly, but when I launch it the X error message appear.
 APPLICATION NOT CORRECTLY INIZIALIZED (0xc0150002). PRESS OK TO CLOSE 
 IT
 Tried many times, same error.
 
 Can you explain it? The FLYBOOK is working under XP HOME SP3 - 512 RAM - 995 
 MHZ CLOCK.
 The relase 5 was working correctly.
 
 Please note that I use 8.01  on my Dektop PC and on my Ibm Notebok with no 
 problerm.
 
 Many thanks for supporting.
 
 
 73 Lorenzo ik1mdf
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: dx4win-requ...@mailman.qth.net
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 3:07 AM
 Subject: Dx4win Digest, Vol 64, Issue 48
 
 
 Send Dx4win mailing list submissions to
 dx4win@mailman.qth.net

 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
 dx4win-requ...@mailman.qth.net

 You can reach the person managing the list at
 dx4win-ow...@mailman.qth.net

 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
 than Re: Contents of Dx4win digest...


 Today's Topics:

   1. Re: I'm scare to start with Version 8 (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   2. Re: I'm scare to start with Version 8 (Bob)
   3. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   4. Ver. 8.1 at start. (Stefano Cipriani)
   5. Re: Ver. 8.1 at start. (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   6. Ver.8.1 - Groups - Import - Unexpected selection.
  (Stefano Cipriani)
   7. Re: Ver.8.1 - Groups - Import - Unexpected selection.
  (Jim Reisert AD1C)
   8. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Terry Dunlap)
   9. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (David Tilley)
  10. BandMap wildly wrong freq? (Rick Murphy)
  11. Re: 7O1YGF Approved for DXCC Credit (Jim Reisert AD1C)
  12. Re: BandMap wildly wrong freq? (Mel)


 --

 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 16:32:10 -0600
 From: Jim Reisert AD1C jjreis...@alum.mit.edu
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] I'm scare to start with Version 8
 To: Marc Wullaert ON4MA marc.wullae...@telenet.be
 Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID:
 806a89db0908121532p5b8a6466pab7736481814b...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 Hi Marc,

 You have the option to install 8.01 in a directory separate from your
 old version.  If you run into bad problems with 8, just go back to the
 previous version until they can be resolved.

 The biggest problems are in the report manager, and the conversions of
 name, QTH and frequency. If you wait to do the conversion and can live
 with the small report problems, then you will probably be pretty
 happy.

 73 - Jim AD1C

 On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Marc Wullaert
 ON4MAmarc.wullae...@telenet.be wrote:
 Hi folks 


 I'm scare to switch over to version 8. I have the new key but i see in my 
 mailbox more than
 300msg to read about '' dx4win ver 8.0.

 Is it working ?

 marc ON4MA
 -- 
 Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us


 --

 Message: 2
 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 19:09:05 -0400
 From: Bob robertlar...@att.net
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] I'm scare to start with Version 8
 To: Marc Wullaert ON4MA marc.wullae...@telenet.be
 Cc: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: 4a834b91.5080...@att.net
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

 Hi Marc,

  Since you already have purchased the key it is OK to
 install it.   It will install in a separate directory in the root
 directory . My old version ( 5.02)  was and still is in a directory
 under the program files.   So both versions are  available and run from
 separate shortcuts on my desktop.

   I have an issue with the reports but in many ways are
 happy with the new reports.  I feel my issues will be addressed and they
 are not a show stopper.

   Back it up before you start and follow these notes and
 you should be just fine with both version.


 http://dx4win.ad1c.us/appnotes/upgrade.htm

 73,
 Bob
 K2TK


 Marc Wullaert ON4MA wrote:
 Hi folks 


 I'm scare to switch over to version 8. I have the new key but i see in my 
 mailbox more than
 300msg to read about '' 

[Dx4win] DX4WIN Support For The Ten Tec Argonaut V Tranceiver

[Bill Bridwell]

I have two Ten Tec transceivers, an Omni VI Plus and a Argonaut V (Model 516).  
I am using DX4WIN version 7.07.02 on two computers, one a desktop running Vista 
Home Premium the other a laptop also running Vista Home Premium.  I am using a 
Keyspan USB Serial Adapter, set for COM Port 4, with both computers to 
communicate with the transceivers, since neither computer has a serial port.  

In the DX4WIN Preferences screen, under the Radio button, I have selected 
Ten Tec which shows in Notes for radio Paragon II  Omni VI 2.22+ 
compatibility.  I selected a Baud Rate of 1200, which I also set in the Omni VI 
Plus.  Using this configuration, DX4WIN works correctly for the Omni VI Plus 
using both computers, however I cannot communicate with the Argonaut V with 
either computer.

Is there another radio under the DX4WIN Preferences screen that will me allow 
me to communicate with the Argonaut V or is there something I am missing in the 
setup?  Ironically, I am feeding the output from the Argonaut V AUX 1 jack into 
the sound card of my laptop and decoding PSK31 signals from the Argonaut V 
using DX4WIN.

Bill B.
__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?

[ON4AOI]

Hi George,
Did the new 7600 rigfiles I sended you yesterday work? Because
It is not clear in your mail if you used those that I wrote 

Concerning MMTTY,
I only have a solution for FSK to work via the USB connection
Not for AFSK, for FSK you need to put a dll in the mmtty directory
And use EXTFSK in mmtty setup, If you don´t find the dll on the mmtty
Webpage I can sent it to you

Guy   


 -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
 Van: george [mailto:goofy...@rochester.rr.com]
 Verzonden: zondag 28 juni 2009 20:34
 Aan: Guy Dewaelhens
 Onderwerp: Re: [Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?
 
 Guy;
 I got the 7600 talking to my computer through the USB connection. The
 packet
 clicks work fine to change the frequency and mode.
 Now I'm trying to get MMTTY working with this set up. I can receive
 RTTY
 fine but cannot send AFSK to the 7600 using the MMTTY program. MMTTY
 apparently does not like the virtual Com port assigned by the Icom
 driver
 which is Com7.
 I also have two sound cards in my computer so I suspect this may be my
 problem.
 By the way I also have the same problem with PSK31 DigiPan. It receives
 fine
 but no audio from the computer to the 7600 in transmit.
 I guess this USB/7600 stuff is kinda new and I'm blazing a trail.
 Thanks for your help.
 George W2YJ

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?

[george]

I'd like to get my IC-7600 going with my DX4WIN version 7 going. 
The Icom IC-7600 is not one of the choices in the radio preferences..
Is there a sub? 
Thanks.
George W2YJ

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?

[K0CF]

George,

I don't know if this is really the right way, but it worked
for me...

In the DX4Win main window, go to File|Databases, then select 
Radios.  In the box that appears, select Icom 756 Pro III,
from the Radio model drop-down list. Then from the Radio 
menu, select Copy. The name in the box will change to
ICOM 756 Pro III. Edit this name to read ICOM 7600.
(Be sure to delete the  from the beginning of the name.)
Now, in the Default Address box, change the 6E to 7A.
Don't change anything else. Finally, select the File menu
and click on Save Changes and Exit.

Now you will have the IC-7600 as a radio choice in the 
Preferences dialog. All I had to do was select that and 
everything worked!

I hope you are enjoying your IC-7600 as much as I am. What a
great radio, especially on CW. Best QSK I have ever used.

73,
Craig, K0CF


 

-Original Message-
From: dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:dx4win-boun...@mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of george
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 3:47 PM
To: DX4WIN Reflector
Cc: DX4WIN Reflector
Subject: [Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?

I'd like to get my IC-7600 going with my DX4WIN version 7 going. 
The Icom IC-7600 is not one of the choices in the radio preferences..
Is there a sub? 
Thanks.
George W2YJ

__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

Re: [Dx4win] ICOM IC-7600 DX4WIN support?

[Mel]

Tell me the default hex address and I'll send you a rig file that should 
work.

george wrote:
 I'd like to get my IC-7600 going with my DX4WIN version 7 going. 
 The Icom IC-7600 is not one of the choices in the radio preferences..
 Is there a sub? 
 Thanks.
 George W2YJ
 
 __
 Dx4win mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 
__
Dx4win mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Dx4win@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Dx4win] support for COM ports above COM8

[Kostas SV1DPI]

I will add that i have not find a way (i believe dx4win doesn't support 
right) to use the ptt of the keyer with my markv. Not big problem on cw as i 
activate the vox, but big one on mmtty where i use another interface just 
for it. By the way writelog does it fine...

In your question now. I believe that if you change this situation inside 
windows you will solve the problem.
Startcontrol panelsystemdevice managerports
rename com5 to com11 and com11 to com5. Windows will tell you that it is 
problem but i have done it with no problem. If it doesn't work make the 
reverse. I don't think you loose something. My opinion, your risk

Kostas sv1dpi

- Original Message - 
From: Steve Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] support for COM ports above COM8


 I have a new K1EL Winkeyer USB on COM11.  ( Plug for the gizmo:  This is a 
 nice kit and went together without a hitch in just a couple of hours. 
 Price is right, too.)

 To get the feature support
 for this recent addition to my station, I just placed an order for the 
 upgrade from
 6.04 to 7.03 on the DX4WIN web site.

 It would be rather challenging  ... as in, not really possible ... to
 reconfigure this new WinKeyer to a lower COM port designation.

 I have
 two hardware UART COM ports on COM1 and COM2 (which can't be moved), and
 then a Digi USB-serial box on COM 2 through COM10, inclusive.  Also fixed.

 It looks like DX4WIN V7.03 only supports COM ports up to COM8.

 How can I get my Winkeyer to operate with DX4WIN V7.03?




 
 
 Be a better friend, newshound, and
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

 

[Dx4win] support for COM ports above COM8

[Alan Braun]

I use a laptop as my primary computer. I use both WinKeyer and a 
USB-to-serial converter, for CW and for controlling the radio. I've 
found that if I ever boot up the machine away from home, without those 
cables connected, and then bring it back home again to reconnect them, 
both devices get assigned to new Com ports, frequently above com8. The 
trick described below works fine. You must be logged in as an 
administrator for this to work.  The place you want to change is found 
at startcontrol panelsystemdevice managerportspropertiesport 
settingsadvanced.  You have to separately reconfigure a port for each 
device you're going to use; I've found that Windoze warnings 
notwithstanding, com4 and com5 are perfectly safe to use. Once you're 
finished, I think you have to reboot for it to take effect. An 
additional point is that once you've done this once, you can save a 
profile. Do this once you've made changes, rebooted  found that they 
work. The place to do that is startcontrol panelsystemhardware 
profiles. It will allow you to save your current profile with a specific 
name - I did mine as Radio setup - radio 4 winkey 5 so it's perfectly 
obvious what's going on. There are some other options that are 
self-explanatory; once you've done this you'll see a menu every time you 
boot up that allows you to pick either the default profile or the one 
you set up for the radio; if you don't select one in a specified amount 
of time (default is 30 seconds) it will choose the default for you. Hope 
this helps - it worked great for me. Of course, you have to remember to 
reconfigure your logging program(s) afterwards so they see everything. 
They're all different but I can help with N1MM, DX4Win and Ham Radio 
Deluxe (a really nifty freeware program that controls every conceivable 
function of most radios far better than any of the contest or general 
loggers do!)

Alan Braun NS0B/V31EV



Kostas SV1DPI wrote:
 I will add that i have not find a way (i believe dx4win doesn't 
 support right) to use the ptt of the keyer with my markv. Not big 
 problem on cw as i activate the vox, but big one on mmtty where i use 
 another interface just for it. By the way writelog does it fine...

 In your question now. I believe that if you change this situation 
 inside windows you will solve the problem.
 Startcontrol panelsystemdevice managerports
 rename com5 to com11 and com11 to com5. Windows will tell you that it 
 is problem but i have done it with no problem. If it doesn't work make 
 the reverse. I don't think you loose something. My opinion, your risk

 Kostas sv1dpi

 - Original Message - From: Steve Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 8:26 PM
 Subject: [Dx4win] support for COM ports above COM8


 I have a new K1EL Winkeyer USB on COM11.  ( Plug for the gizmo:  This 
 is a nice kit and went together without a hitch in just a couple of 
 hours. Price is right, too.)

 To get the feature support
 for this recent addition to my station, I just placed an order for 
 the upgrade from
 6.04 to 7.03 on the DX4WIN web site.

 It would be rather challenging  ... as in, not really possible ... to
 reconfigure this new WinKeyer to a lower COM port designation.

 I have
 two hardware UART COM ports on COM1 and COM2 (which can't be moved), and
 then a Digi USB-serial box on COM 2 through COM10, inclusive.  Also 
 fixed.

 It looks like DX4WIN V7.03 only supports COM ports up to COM8.

 How can I get my Winkeyer to operate with DX4WIN V7.03?





 
  

 Be a better friend, newshound, and
 know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now. 
 http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win




 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun Jan  6 18:22:54 2008
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Braun)
Date: Sun Jan  6 18:23:42 2008
Subject: [Dx4win] Unhappy with DX4WIN
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a serious pain in the a** with DX4Win. I've commented about it 
several times to Paul with no response, and to Jim AD1C who 
commisserates but isn't much help as he isn't the programmer. I've 
always wondered why previously logged contacts can't be sacred, as you 
put it, the way they are in most of the contest loggers. Also I wonder 
why exceptions, where for example you change a country reference to 
match where a station really is, can't be saved to a separate file 
rather than put into the main country database, so that you don't lose 
them every time you update the database. (Like what some word processors 
do when you update the dictionary - that programming

[Dx4win] Re: Please use reflector, E-mail for DX4WIN support

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

Hi Gang,

I'm starting to settle into the new QTH in Brighton, CO.  We still have a lot
of unpacking to do!  The 2000-mile drive across country was uneventful, and the
three cats made it just fine.  Even the oldest one had stopped crying by the
time we reached the NY border.

We are up and running on a Qwest DSL connection until Comcast can dig a cable
to our house later this week.  I will probably NOT be bringing my CC Cluster
node back up, as I currently have no real need for it (HOA prevents me from
erecting an antenna at the new QTH).  I'm not sure what my new home node will
be, but it will be a CC cluster node.

I have a few new entries for the country file, but I can't yet say when I'll be
doing another release, but certainly before the end of June.

I hope the transition to 7.03 went well for most folks.  I have seen very few
complaints about unfixed bugs or things that stopped working.

73 - Jim AD1C

--- Jim Reisert AD1C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Folks,
 
 I'm moving from MA to CO starting next week.  I will have very limited
 Internet access beginning Monday, 21 May until probably June 1.
 
 Please don't send me any direct support requests, I may not have the ability
 to see them.  Please use the reflector, or [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I'll stay
 subscribed to the reflector and can read all the messages when I am back on. 
 My E-mail address will NOT change, so feel to keep sending me input for the
 country file.


--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Jun  6 00:18:28 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duane A Calvin)
Date: Wed Jun  6 00:23:02 2007
Subject: [Dx4win] (no subject)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I've stumbled across what looks like a problem.  In preparing a DXCC
submission, I find the following:
 
1.  First, set preference to use only card in hand, then do a DXCC
Submission.  Result?  ~32 cards selected
2.  Clear all DXCC submission flags.
3.  Set Confirmed QSO preference to Card and Upload and do a DXCC
Submission.  Result  ~ 80 QSO's listed (OK, so far)
4.  Clear all DXCC Submission flags.
5.  Set confirmed QSO pref to Upload and do a DXCC Submission.  Result?
314 QSO's!!  Clearly wrong.
 
Obviously DX4WIN is somehow not counting the already submitted cards when
it does uploads.  Since these all relate to the same DXCC award, this
would appear to need some work.
 
Another item:  Where is version 7.03 on the US web site?  I had to go to
ON4AOI's site to pick it up so I could update my version.  
 
73, Duane
 
--
Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
 
http://www.ac5aa.com
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Jun  6 00:52:56 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Reisert AD1C)
Date: Wed Jun  6 00:56:28 2007
Subject: [Dx4win] (no subject)
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

At 10:18 PM 6/5/2007, Duane A Calvin wrote:

Another item:  Where is version 7.03 on the US web site?  I had to go to
ON4AOI's site to pick it up so I could update my version.

Find the link to 7.02, then change '2' to '3'

73 - Jim AD1C


-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C/0, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us

[Dx4win] Please use reflector, E-mail for DX4WIN support

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

Hi Folks,

I'm moving from MA to CO starting next week.  I will have very limited Internet
access beginning Monday, 21 May until probably June 1.

Please don't send me any direct support requests, I may not have the ability to
see them.  Please use the reflector, or [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I'll stay
subscribed to the reflector and can read all the messages when I am back on. 
My E-mail address will NOT change, so feel to keep sending me input for the
country file.

Paul and Steve are probably heading off to Dayton soon.  I wish I could too,
but too much to do to get ready for the move.

73 - Jim AD1C


--
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue May 15 14:26:56 2007
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (WD0M)
Date: Tue May 15 14:35:01 2007
Subject: [Dx4win] Please use reflector, E-mail for DX4WIN support
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Welcome to CO, Jim!

73,

Joe
WD?M
Pagosa Springs

At 12:15 PM 5/15/2007, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
Hi Folks,

I'm moving from MA to CO starting next week.  I 
will have very limited Internet
access beginning Monday, 21 May until probably June 1.

Please don't send me any direct support 
requests, I may not have the ability to
see them.  Please use the reflector, or [EMAIL PROTECTED]  I'll stay
subscribed to the reflector and can read all the messages when I am back on.
My E-mail address will NOT change, so feel to keep sending me input for the
country file.

Paul and Steve are probably heading off to Dayton soon.  I wish I could too,
but too much to do to get ready for the move.

73 - Jim AD1C

[Dx4win] DX4WIN Support

[Jim Reisert AD1C]

Hi people,

Please do not send DX4WIN support questions to me directly.  Instead,
your first choice should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the reflector.  If I
see the question on the reflector and have the time, I will try to
answer it.

There is a lot of information described on my web site:

http://dx4win.ad1c.us/

I have a lot of irons in the fire right now and may not return
personal questions right away.

Thanks for your cooperation.

73 - Jim AD1C

-- 
Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Sun Jul 30 17:33:26 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Bondarev)
Date: Sun Jul 30 17:44:48 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] dx4win can't read data from IC-756pro3
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Hello, friends! I was out of the reflector for some time. Sorry if this
question already discussed here. My setup is Icom IC-756PRO3
connected to my notebook via Icom CT-17 and RS232-USB interface cable.
DX4WIN wersion is 7.02, and it don't read data
if in Add-Real time mode. It's mean that I always have SSB in Mode window
and 20m in Band window. No matter how many times I push F9. Only if I'm
trying to announce DX to DX-cluster (Alt-A), it's read data from the
TRX, but very often QRG is incorrect with some idiots digits like 414
403,00 instead of 14 144.03. If switching to 7.01 all is fine with
Band window, but Mode is still incorrect. The other software like Ham 
Radio Deluxe work perfect.
Any solutions please?

Regards, Mike RL3BM

[Dx4win] Support of FTDX-9000D

[Sergei Kulyov]

Dear users:

any idea on does DX4WIN support the FTDX-9000D?

Thanks

73, Sergei UA3AP

[Dx4win] Support for IC-7800

[Art - W6KY]

The IC-7800 CT-17 code is 6Ah. I would try that using
a
756PRO series with that code and see what happens...
73, Art  W6KY


--- Larry Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 The IC-7800 is not in the pull down menu of
 supported rigs in the latest
 version of DX4WIN. Is there a rig in the pull-down
 that is closest to the
 7800 and might work? 
 
 Larry Burke WI5A
 Lima, Ohio
 
 
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 


I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member.
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Mon Feb  6 00:16:00 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (john paul)
Date: Tue Feb  7 05:45:12 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] Problem
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I just got a message when I tried to log on using my DX4WIN
version 6.03.
The following message came up and keeps coming up
each time I try to open my logs.

DX4WIN V6
Access.Violation of Address 005B3E2A in module 'DX4WIN.EXE'
Read of Address 

When I click OK
it shows this message
A fatal error occurred i reading the logfile.

When I click OK
on that one I get the following message
Unknown Version of Logfile.

How do I get this reset?

I am lost and can't find this in the help files.

Thanks 
JohnPaul/AB4PP
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb  7 08:24:19 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (john paul)
Date: Tue Feb  7 08:27:32 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] Problem Solved
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks to wonderful Tech Support.  As usual, Steve
came through and found my problem.
Short phone call and he analyzed what had happened
and he had seen this corrupted Config file occurrence
and he talked me through getting the problem solved
and I am up and running again.

Now, the important part about this is that I regularly,
and I repeat, REGULARLY create and keep a backup
file with all my data on it.  I refresh it as often as I can
and this seemed to have helped me get back all the
info and all I needed to do was re-add some of the QSL
info and cards received since the last backup and I was
back up to speed.

Again, a BIG THANKS for the help and guys, the tech
support is there.  With other programs I have used this
would have been a nightmare, and might have taken
some time to even figure out.

Thanks STEVE for the help.

JohnPaul/AB4PP
Raleigh, NC
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb  7 16:09:07 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Duane A Calvin)
Date: Tue Feb  7 16:14:18 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] Orion (I) FSK as Pack?
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Jim,
There is an edit you need to make in the rig file to change it
from Pactor to FSK.  I don't have the information with me here at work
but I have it at home.  I'll try to remember to send it to you this
evening.  (You can also change the CW mode chosen when pouncing on a spot
from LCW to UCW.)

73,  Duane


On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:32:01 -0800 (PST) Jim Reisert AD1C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 I am trying to set up an Orion (Classic) for FSK.  When the Orion 
 is in FSK mode, DX4WIN tells me the mode is PACK.  How do I make 
 the mode RTTY automatically?  Is this a problem with the rig 
 driver?
  
 Thanks - Jim
  
 -- 
 Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863 
 USA +978-251-9933, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.ad1c.us 
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 
 


Duane Calvin, AC5AA
Austin, Texas
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Tue Feb  7 22:41:31 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry P. Greenberg)
Date: Tue Feb  7 22:44:45 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] CW Keying  Radio Interface
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I have a laptop connected to a Ten-Tec Omni Vi Plus through a serial cable.  
Can I also key my radio through the same serial port.  I noted in the Ten-Tec 
manual that radio control is done through serial port pins 2 and 3 plus the 
ground on pin 7.  The serial port CW keying interface using a resistor and a 
2N only connects to pin 20 (DTR) and pin 7, the ground.  Has anybody tried 
this?  

Larry P. Greenberg  WA9MAG
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed Feb  8 00:27:29 2006
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ted Huddle)
Date: Wed Feb  8 02:12:22 2006
Subject: [Dx4win] 7800 Rig file
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

All,

 

Attached is a rig file for the Icom 7800. Put it in the radios folder and
it will show up in the pull down for available rigs. It runs at the default
address of 6A and at 9600 bps.

 

73, Ted  W4CID

[Dx4win] support for K2

[n3drk]

Does any version of dx4win support the Elecraft K2. I have version 6.03 
and it does not.
Thank You

John-n3drk
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed May 25 20:23:50 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Morgan)
Date: Wed May 25 20:34:23 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] support for K2
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

n3drk wrote:

 Does any version of dx4win support the Elecraft K2. I have version 
 6.03 and it does not.
 Thank You

 John-n3drk
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

John,
Try the generic Kenwood selection.

Tony W7GO
From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Wed May 25 21:56:14 2005
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Steve-KF2TI)
Date: Wed May 25 22:07:03 2005
Subject: [Dx4win] Curious
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Perhasp it's just me, but when using Ver 6.whatever, I couold stay 
connected to an Internet cluster for days on end,.  I just 
successfully upgraded with no problems at all (yea me!!) however, I 
notice that I can onlly stay connected for an hour or 2 or 3.

Is it me?  None of the router settings have been changed and as far 
as I now, nothing new was added.

Perhaps I am missing something?

Other than that, all went well.  I was especially nice to me all the 
DX4WIN guys in person, busy though they be.  Nice to be able to place 
a face with a keyboard e-mail poster

Steve
a DX4WIN user since 1997

[Dx4win] DX4WIN support

[Steve Bookout]

Hello all,

Just to make it absolutely clear...

I do not, have not and do not intend to do any support thru reflector requests.

As it has always been in the past, if you want or need support, send an 
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The first time I had anything sent directly to the 'support' address 
regarding a packet connection problem was on 31 May (today.)  The inference 
in the email, which I have seen posted here, was that support was asked for 
a week ago, but not given.  This is not the case.
If you want help, ask, but you do actually need to ask.

I do not have time to monitor the reflector, and I don't.  I just catch up 
on events when I get the time.
The reflector is intended for the users for their DX4WIN discussions, and 
not any official email route to me.  I may eventually see the email, but it 
may not be in a timely manner.

Have a good holiday.

Steve

-
-Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F)
Rapidan Data Systems

'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
Free demo at http://www.dx4win.com

[Dx4win] Support

[Steve Bookout]

Hello all,

Most of what I said still previously is still accurate.

John sent his Emails to Paul, not me.

Paul sent me an Email about Johns problem, which I saw,  but put it with 
some one else (wrong John.)

Enough fault to go around for all.

73 de Steve, NR4M



-
-Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F)
Rapidan Data Systems

'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
Free demo at http://www.dx4win.com

[Dx4win] Support

[n3drk]

Not trying to put the blame on anyone there Steve. Just glad to get this
excellent program working to its full potential. Just frustration on my end.
Anyway the problem was something very simple and right in front of the
monitor.
73's
john-n3drk


- Original Message - 
From: Steve Bookout [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 8:11 PM
Subject: [Dx4win] Support


 Hello all,

 Most of what I said still previously is still accurate.

 John sent his Emails to Paul, not me.

 Paul sent me an Email about Johns problem, which I saw,  but put it with
 some one else (wrong John.)

 Enough fault to go around for all.

 73 de Steve, NR4M



 -
 -Steve Bookout, NR4M (ex NJ4F)
 Rapidan Data Systems

 'DX4WIN...The way logging programs should be!'
 Free demo at http://www.dx4win.com


 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[Steve]

How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ?

And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the beta and actually inform software
developers of their strategic direction then modifications may be made
rather than a change for change sake !

Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here recently and I'm of
the old school  if it aint broke don't fix it !!.

This aint a flame - just an observation   ;-)

Steve  ZC4BS / G4KIV



Homepage:  http://www.stevebb.com
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[Mel]

LOTW is out of Beta for some time now.

And the reason for the bandwidth is because there is a real issue
tracking award status with the program as it stands, if you use LOTW,
and there is a real possibility that DX operations may adopt LOTW as the
primary way of providing credit for DXCC as it's cost free and fast...

There is similar discussions on other logging software reflectors also.
You just can't get away from it Steve ;-)


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve
 Sent: October 25, 2003 14:17
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Support for LOTW
 
 
 How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ?
 
 And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the beta and actually 
 inform software developers of their strategic direction then 
 modifications may be made rather than a change for change sake !
 
 Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here 
 recently and I'm of the old school  if it aint broke don't 
 fix it !!.
 
 This aint a flame - just an observation   ;-)
 
 Steve  ZC4BS / G4KIV
 
 
 
 Homepage:  http://www.stevebb.com
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[Paul van der Eijk]

Steve,

I agree to some degree; I would like the discussions about LOTW
to be limited to the DX4WIN context.

Paul

At 07:16 PM 10/25/03 +0100, Steve wrote:
How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ?

And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the beta and actually inform software
developers of their strategic direction then modifications may be made
rather than a change for change sake !

Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here recently and I'm of
the old school  if it aint broke don't fix it !!.

This aint a flame - just an observation   ;-)

Steve  ZC4BS / G4KIV

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[Mel]

OK As I see it...

I don't think you need to do anything about eQsl... It isn't
necessary... It stands on it's own and keeps track of it's own awards.
I've been using eQsl for quite a long time... And all you need is an
easy way to upload the QSOs. Batch mode ADIF is fine... In future a
real-time upload could be considered, QSO by QSO... But let's see what
LOtW does about this and you can kill 2 birds with 1 stone... Besides
you have to save something for ver 7 ;-)

I believe ADIF needs to be fixed up for satellite QSOs (I forwarded you
some info on this), as well as perhaps standardizing the modes to make
life easier all around.

We need a flag to indicate uploaded to LOtW and then confirmed LOtW...

Perhaps we should have a separate procedure to create an ADIF file that
keeps track of dates submitted, and updates the LOtW uploaded flag.

We need to be able to read the ADIF output from LOtW to update award
status and the LOtW confirmed flag...

This will hold us until a real-time interface is defined and debugged...
Which may be a while yet.

And of course, you should create fields for frequency, Operator's name
and QTH in the database... ( and don't forget the PTT configuration
issue for Roger and others...) None of this has absolutely nothing to do
with LOtW, but I thought I would remind you ;-) 

And, since I've broached the subject or ver 7 (Dayton `04 would be a
good target), it might be time to reconsider one of the cornerstones of
DX4Win`s design... The `in memory` file was a terrific idea in the days
of slow hardware... I'm sure it was part of the reason that DX4Win was
considerably faster than competing logging programs. But I think, with
much faster hardware the norm, that the need for speed has been
superseded by security concerns... Perhaps it's time to adopt a more
conventional approach and read/write directly to disk...

OK, I'll shut up now...

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul van der Eijk
 Sent: October 25, 2003 13:57
 To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [Dx4win] Support for LOTW
 
 
 Hi,
 
 I have been reading most of the exchanges about this topic, 
 and came up the following ideas / questions.
 
 1. Support for a few more 'confirm flags'; see below
 
 2. Add a function to the logbook import mechanism to use the 
 QSOs to set the confirm flag in the existing log. The 
 imported QSOs will not be added to the existing log, they are 
 only used to change the confirmation flag.
 
 3. Some small changes are needed in the ADIF export 
 (mode=PSK31 and one band needs a different format. (These 
 changes have been made already)
 
 4. I have no immediate plans to integrate LOTW functionality 
 INSIDE DX4WIN (Key management, sending / receiving logs etc.) 
 Many of you have already exported a log to ADIF and used that 
 log to upload QSOs. The LOTW software makes the required 
 steps simple. 
 
 Confirmation flags:
 
 Currently, we only have Yes / No, and the Yes flag implies 
 that you have the QSL card in your possession. With services 
 like the LOTW, we will need an extra status to indicate an 
 electronic confirmation.  
 
 Some issues / questions:
 
 I assume 'Card in hand' and 'electronic confirmation' need to 
 co-exist, ie 
 all four combinations are possible. 
 
 I'm not sure if we need more than one electronic confirmation 
 flag (to 
 distinguish between LOTW and eQSL for example) Does this really 
 add value or does it add confusion? To distinguish between 
 LOTW and eQSL for example leads to eight combinations. 
 
 I can also see that other 'awards issuing organizations' may 
 establish their 
 own electronic logbook services. 
 
 Do we need to distinguish what type of confirmation (card or 
 electronic) 
 can be used for an award? 
 
 Interested in your ideas,
 
 Paul
 
 
 
 
 Paul van der Eijk (KK4HD)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.dx4win.com
 
 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win
 

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[WC7N]

Hi Steve.  There is a LOtW reflector.  What I believe you saw here is
concerns that are limited to use with DX4WIN.

Rod WC7N
- Original Message - 
From: Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 11:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Dx4win] Support for LOTW


 How about a separate reflector just for LOTW ?

 And when LOTW and ARRL move on from the beta and actually inform
software
 developers of their strategic direction then modifications may be made
 rather than a change for change sake !

 Sorry but LOTW is taking up a lot of bandwidth on here recently and I'm of
 the old school  if it aint broke don't fix it !!.

 This aint a flame - just an observation   ;-)

 Steve  ZC4BS / G4KIV



 Homepage:  http://www.stevebb.com
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[Larry Alkoff]

On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 13:56:38 -0400, Paul van der Eijk wrote:

Hi,

I have been reading most of the exchanges about this topic, and
came up the following ideas / questions.

1. Support for a few more 'confirm flags'; see below

Absolutely.  Probably only LOTW to begin with since
eQSL's are not accepted by ARRL.  

2. Add a function to the logbook import mechanism to use the QSOs to set
the confirm flag in the existing log. The imported QSOs will not be added to 
the
existing log, they are only used to change the confirmation flag.

Yes.

3. Some small changes are needed in the ADIF export (mode=PSK31 and one
band needs a different format. (These changes have been made already)

4. I have no immediate plans to integrate LOTW functionality INSIDE DX4WIN
(Key management, sending / receiving logs etc.) Many of you have already
exported a log to ADIF and used that log to upload QSOs. The LOTW software
makes the required steps simple. 

As long as we can export and import and set the LOTW confirm flag by hand
where necessary I don't see any need for additional support.


Confirmation flags:

Currently, we only have Yes / No, and the Yes flag implies that you have
the QSL card in your possession. With services like the LOTW, we will
need an extra status to indicate an electronic confirmation.  

Some issues / questions:

I assume 'Card in hand' and 'electronic confirmation' need to co-exist, ie 
all four combinations are possible. 

I'm not sure if we need more than one electronic confirmation flag (to 
distinguish between LOTW and eQSL for example) Does this really 
add value or does it add confusion? To distinguish between LOTW
and eQSL for example leads to eight combinations. 

I can also see that other 'awards issuing organizations' may establish their 
own electronic logbook services. 

Do we need to distinguish what type of confirmation (card or electronic) 
can be used for an award? 

It's going to be a real can of worms.


Interested in your ideas,

Paul




Paul van der Eijk (KK4HD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dx4win.com

___
Dx4win mailing list
Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win



Larry Alkoff N2LA - Austin TX

[Dx4win] Support for LOTW

[WC7N]

Paul keep it sweet and simple.  If when I printed out the countries list it
told me if it was electronic or card in hand I would be real happy.

Rod WC7N

- Original Message - 
From: Paul van der Eijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dx4win@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: [Dx4win] Support for LOTW


 Hi,

 I have been reading most of the exchanges about this topic, and
 came up the following ideas / questions.

 1. Support for a few more 'confirm flags'; see below

 2. Add a function to the logbook import mechanism to use the QSOs to set
 the confirm flag in the existing log. The imported QSOs will not be added
to the
 existing log, they are only used to change the confirmation flag.

 3. Some small changes are needed in the ADIF export (mode=PSK31 and one
 band needs a different format. (These changes have been made already)

 4. I have no immediate plans to integrate LOTW functionality INSIDE DX4WIN
 (Key management, sending / receiving logs etc.) Many of you have already
 exported a log to ADIF and used that log to upload QSOs. The LOTW software
 makes the required steps simple.

 Confirmation flags:

 Currently, we only have Yes / No, and the Yes flag implies that you have
 the QSL card in your possession. With services like the LOTW, we will
 need an extra status to indicate an electronic confirmation.

 Some issues / questions:

 I assume 'Card in hand' and 'electronic confirmation' need to co-exist, ie
 all four combinations are possible.

 I'm not sure if we need more than one electronic confirmation flag (to
 distinguish between LOTW and eQSL for example) Does this really
 add value or does it add confusion? To distinguish between LOTW
 and eQSL for example leads to eight combinations.

 I can also see that other 'awards issuing organizations' may establish
their
 own electronic logbook services.

 Do we need to distinguish what type of confirmation (card or electronic)
 can be used for an award?

 Interested in your ideas,

 Paul



 
 Paul van der Eijk (KK4HD)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.dx4win.com

 ___
 Dx4win mailing list
 Dx4win@mailman.qth.net
 http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/dx4win

[Dx4win] Support QLS net

[Paul van der Eijk]

Hi,

This message was supposed to go to all users, but I never saw it.

Just in case, I'm repeating the message below.

Paul
-
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 22:45:49 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Alan L. Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: QSL.NET Info

Greetings,

It's been a while since I contacted all users of QSL.NET. I hope things have 
been going well for you and that you are using your QSL.NET web site and e-mail 
address. If for some reason you no longer need it please let me know your ham 
call so I can delete your site.

We are at a critical time for funding. Donations have been almost non-existent 
for the last 6 months. I need to remind you again that QSL.NET exists only with 
your support, if you use a web page, list server or e-mail here then help us 
keep it on-line and free. If we do not get financial help like all good things 
it will disappear as we know it today. I realize it is easy to take QSL.NET for 
granted but please help us keep it free by sending a donation 
immediately.next month may be to late.

Our immediate needs are to build 2 mirror web servers as we have had offers to 
co-locate them gratis, this will help our reliability. The mail server and FTP 
server need to be replaced as they have been spinning for over 2 years and are 
seriously overloaded. Again this will only be done with your help.  The costs 
of  bandwidth is still our largest expense over $1600 a month.


ANNOUNCING THE FIRST QSL/QTH RADIO GIVE AWAY.

A generous user has donated 4 of the NEW MODEL Yaesu VX-150 HT's ($150 value). 
QSL.NET will give these radios away on June 1st 2003 to four lucky users. Take 
a look at the radio at this link.

http://www.yaesu.com/amateur/vx150.html

How to enter the drawing? Just make a contribution to QSL.NET during the month
of May. For every $10 you donate you will get one chance for the radio.

$10 one chance
$20 two chances
$30 three.etc.

Through the PayPal service we can now accept donations in the following:

U.S. Dollars
Canadian Dollars
Euro's
Pounds Sterling
Yen

If you are not a PayPal user it is recommended you take a look at their
services...Fast, Secure and Reliable


If you can contribute, please do it today.

By Credit Card http://proxy.qsl.net/donation
   PayPal  http://www.paypal.com   (account [EMAIL PROTECTED])
   BidPay  http://www.bidpay.com   (account [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Donations by mail:
  QSL.NET
  34087 Old Hickory Road
  Laurel, Delaware 19956



73 and keep in touch,

Al  K3TKJ





Paul van der Eijk (KK4HD)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dx4win.com