So does this mean that your gonna end up with something that already exist
in my code? You forgetting that the advanced widgets use a combination of
simple widgets to work. This means that you are still relying on the user
knowing which files are required and what order they must be included
Ever tried my ccreation.layerpos.js widget. I use it for dynamic layouts like this
(inside the head tag):
DynAPI.setLibraryPath('dynapi/src/lib/')
DynAPI.include('dynapi.api.*');
DynAPI.include('dynapi.event.*');
DynAPI.include('dynapi.gui.label.js');
DynAPI.include('dynapi.gui.loadpanel');
D
Just wanted to tell you about my widget writing. First of all although some
of you who hoped this would bring new widget blood to the dynapi some coder
will have to make this at least a little more java like because I decided to
go all the way. Already I have written two widgets(this in about 1 ho
That sounds great Eytan.
I'd say, get a rough frame-work up and running, and the get in touch with
Jordi about setting up a CVS branch for this.
(If Dan, Jordi, Robert or others feel this is not possible, please say so
now)
It would be good though, if you designed your widget-pack to work with the
- Original Message -
From: "Laszlo Teglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If you want you can be in charge of the css. All I ask is that you keep my
> class definitions. Feel free to change anything inside the curly brackets.
> Also try to stick to the browser friendly color palate.
Ok, we'll see
You have to include dynapi.ext.inline.js if you want to retrieve
inline layers. I'm guessing that the getAll() lines are causing an
error which causes the execution to stop. If you include inline.js it
should fix the problem.
Robert
On 11/28/2001, Quang Nguyen wrote:
> //This will make all thre
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html
Robert
On 11/28/2001, Doug Melvin wrote:
> Hey Lazlo, chill out dude.
> Maybe someone could post a link to each license we can make a better
> decision.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laszlo Teglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Doug Melvin" <[
Am I the only crazy extremist in this joint? If so give me an ultimatum
before you start bombing. I do not want to share in the fate of the Taliban.
I will surrender and become your POW. At which point further hostile actions
will be governed by the Geneva convention, and constitute a war crime,
s
//This will make all three layers appear on IE5.5 and NS6.2(winNT)
DynAPI.onLoad = function()
{
myLayer2 = new DynLayer(null,100,100,80,50,'red',true)
myLayer2.setHTML("myLayer2")
DynAPI.document.addChild(myLayer2)
layer1 = this.document.getAll()['layer1']
> Hey Lazlo, chill out dude.
> Maybe someone could post a link to each license we can make a better
> decision.
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html
Stephan
PS: I'm still waiting for a response to my question...
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
Hey Lazlo, chill out dude.
Maybe someone could post a link to each license we can make a better
decision.
- Original Message -
From: "Laszlo Teglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Dan Steinman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November
Have you read the BSD style license. Have any of you read the license. I
hardly think you could have read it and seriously contemplated it in the
short amount of time this has been discussed. How can any one second a move
as serious as changing the license without, first contemplating it? Changing
Laszlo is certainly correct here. There are a number of other open
source projects (Xbasic for instance) that use the LGPL, and that support
the release of commercial software that uses the project libraries in the
way Laszlo has described.
What cannot be done is someone deciding to make their
I second the move to a BSD style license
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Steinman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: [Dynapi-Dev] Re: Widget Discussions, License issues
> Thanks for your support Raymond!
>
> As it stands now y
Dan,
It would be nice if you could also give some bonus
themes with your commercial widget pack. Probably you
need to start a company or hier a graphic artist to
create great looking themes for your widgets. You
could also sell theme packs (packages of themes with
images, colors, etc) so a user c
>who owns this ? Dan ? All of us who have a line of code in there ? Nobody
at
>all ?
This is public domain. It belongs to humanity. No one individual can reclaim
any line of code they have contributed to this project. People can build
their own extensions, their own applications based on DynAPI.
Hello All,
Anyone For BSD? This is very important to the
commercial community, were we can't distribute
application code under LGPL or GPL'd.
PLEASE SAY SOMETHING!
:`)
--
Raymond
--- Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Exactly my point. Even though your app has nothing
> directly t
>As it stands now you won't be able to use the DynAPI for your CD media
unless
>every line of code in the application is released under the LGPL - which is
>likely not possible since it probably includes a lot of other code and
>information that can not be publically redistributable.
This is simp
Forget about Dan's widgets: he can do what he wants with them because
they are his work. When it comes to the DynAPI as it is now, what
includes, what has been done so far and what will be improved in the
future needs to be under any license that allows it to be used in
commercial software. Ev
Hi Dan,
> As it stands now you won't be able to use the DynAPI for your CD media unless every
>line of
> code in the application is released under the LGPL - which is likely not possible
>since it
> probably includes a lot of other code and information that can not be publically
> redistributab
Exactly my point. Even though your app has nothing directly to do with DynAPI, the
act of distributing the dynapi files along with an application forces the whole
application ("A work based on the library" from the LGPL) to be LGPL or GPL'd. I'd
love to be able to say to you "yes no problem t
Well I can't copyright an idea. Other people can write a button widget that looks the
same way that mine does - but my version will most likely be replications of other
styles (XP, 95, Java etc). As long as someone doesn't up and lift my code and copies
it, I'm fine with it.
The value in my
--- Dan Steinman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As it stands now you won't be able to use the DynAPI
> for your CD media unless every line of code in the
> application is released under the LGPL - which is
> likely not possible since it probably includes a lot
> of other code and information that c
Thanks for your support Raymond!
As it stands now you won't be able to use the DynAPI for your CD media unless every
line of code in the application is released under the LGPL - which is likely not
possible since it probably includes a lot of other code and information that can not
be publical
Hello,
Maintening a widget pack takes a lot of time and
effort, not to mention the documentation. I'm in total
agreement with Dan on the subject about commercial
widget packs. If we need quality widgets and support
why not pay a fee for it! It's very good when you can
turn to the developer and re
While where at it, a grid-bag layout manager would be nice..
- Original Message -
From: "Laszlo Teglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: [Dynapi-Dev] Questions of Direction
> Good Points!
>
> >Finding a way of developin
Inspired by whoever it was who complained about the weight of our widgets
instead of making the TComponent pack a translation of our current
widgets(quite easy as it is only +- 3 lines of code for each widget). I
actually started from scratch so I anyone is interested I'm using my
inheritance stuf
IMHO
I think that the widgets that are included provide a good example of how to do
widgets, so if you would want to keep them as examples, if nothing else, I think that
would provide the reader with some good information. I personally learn best by
example, and once I get the basics out of t
Good Points!
>Finding a way of developing a leaner/more customisable set of widgets is
>something that really interests me, same goes for the animation code - but
>as things stand at the moment I don't feel confident that anything I could
>contribute would actually ever make it into part of the p
In what way was fasttreenode not working?
Did anyone see this behaviour in IE6 under any other circumstances?
I recomended the patch to the group(at work) and now I am getting shit on as
they can't find the bug to begin with.
> Category: DynAPI 2 Layer
> Group: None
> Status: Open
> Resolution: N
:o)
well spotted!
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Melvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Dynapi-Dev] Scrollbar (or scrollpane) doesn't display in ns6 /
bug 423938
>
>
>
> > Its a dynimage problem
Hello Richard,
Thanks for the feed back. I am not hooked on the color scheme I have picked.
So I don't mind if we switch back to your colors, or change the font size as
you recommended. I didn't really spend to much time on the style sheet. The
only reason I have included a css so far, is because
> Its a dynimage problem. Its not setting the correct width and height
> of the images. DynImage needs to be rewritten badly.
I don't know about therest of you,but wouldn't be better if it were
rewritten well?
:-)
___
Dynapi-Dev mailing list
[EMA
Its a dynimage problem. Its not setting the correct width and height
of the images. DynImage needs to be rewritten badly.
Robert
On 11/28/2001, Alain AITOULHA wrote:
> Hello,
> If you try dynapi/examples/dynapi.gui.scrollbar.html
> in netscape 6.2, you can see that scrollbars are not
> display
Hello,
If you try dynapi/examples/dynapi.gui.scrollbar.html
in netscape 6.2, you can see that scrollbars are not
displayed. I see the problem in the bug 423938
(14/05/2001). With a refresh, the problem still
appear. Do you have any suggestion or correction for
this problem ?
Thanks for your respon
How about opening a second project - DynAPI Widgets - like many other projects have
when they become large and well established? Just a thought though...
BTW I'm working on my Comic Creation community for real now (using PostNuke
CMS/Weblog) and will probably be updating and working out some n
Yeah, we really need to check for instances of background-images in moving
layers, and remove them.
I'll do it as soon as I have a moments time.
(I want to test any changes thoroughly now, to avoid errors like in v2.5.6)
cheers,
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: "Colin Thompson" <[EMA
Yeah, this behavior seem by design, but I was wondering about it too,
doesn't seem logical.
Maybe it was for memory-leak reasons, but otherwise it would be much better
that a layer could be re-used.
Can we look into changing this, or not?
Cheers,
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: "Col
Hi,
Dan, great news that you're putting a commercial widget-pack on the market,
and nice that it's free for personal use. It's this kind of approach that
will allow dynAPI to be used by people who are less acquainted with the
inner-workings of DynAPI.
Only problem I see, is how to avoid discussio
Hi
Ok Laszlo, a few comments on the documentation proposal:
The basic layout scheme seems good. I guess some of the parts will change as
they are filled in, but this offers an idea of what still needs to be done.
I'm not so keen on the color choices, I can not really read the red on
orange text,
40 matches
Mail list logo
