> On Jan 28, 2019, at 9:59 PM, Ni, Ray wrote:
>
> Hello,
> I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
>
> ==Overview =
>
> 1. Separate Industry standard definitions from UEFI and PI interfaces.
Ray,
>From a big picture point of view
On 1/31/2019 3:51 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
The POC code is inhttps://github.com/jyao1/edk2/tree/ReOrg.
It basically split the EDKII common code to three directories:
Core/, Device/, and Feature/.
I'm not sure I like the 'Device' name, but that's not that important
at this stage - I like that
On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 08:09, Ni, Ray wrote:
>
> On 1/29/2019 10:21 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> > Hi Ray,
> >
> > First of all, thank you for restarting this discussion, and putting
> > the effort in for a POC.
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:59:35AM +, Ni, Ray wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> I'd
On 1/29/2019 10:21 PM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
Hi Ray,
First of all, thank you for restarting this discussion, and putting
the effort in for a POC.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:59:35AM +, Ni, Ray wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
Hi Ray,
First of all, thank you for restarting this discussion, and putting
the effort in for a POC.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 05:59:35AM +, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
>
> ==Overview =
>
> 1.
mer, Vincent ; Wolman, Ayellet
>> ; Cetola, Stephano ;
>> Kinney, Michael D
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs
>> Regarding the benefits, I agree that we need clearer / finer grained
>> assignments
>> between modules / packages and maintainers.
ey, Michael D
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Proposal to split Pkgs
>
> Hi Ray,
>
> On 01/29/19 06:59, Ni, Ray wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
> >
> > ==Overview =
>
Hi Laszlo,
Managed to spot this before I sent my own reply :)
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 12:11:51PM +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Hi Ray,
>
> On 01/29/19 06:59, Ni, Ray wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
> >
> > ==Overview
Hi Ray,
On 01/29/19 06:59, Ni, Ray wrote:
> Hello,
> I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
>
> ==Overview =
>
> 1. Separate Industry standard definitions from UEFI and PI interfaces.
> 2. Separate UEFI and PI interfaces from
Hello,
I'd like to propose to split today's BIG packages in following ways:
==Overview =
1. Separate Industry standard definitions from UEFI and PI interfaces.
2. Separate UEFI and PI interfaces from implementations.
a. Separate UEFI and PI interfaces to different
10 matches
Mail list logo
