No changes found, the numbers I noted earlier still apply.
Peter Eijlander (PA0PJE) schreef:
As Wayne just said it should not change anything when the instructions
are met but I have the necessary equipment to check.
Peter Eijlander (PA0PJE) schreef:
however I took great care not to touch the
Dick, you wrote: I will eventually move the isolation balun between the
KAT100 and the K2/100.
It doesn't seem to be a good idea. You may get potential difference between
the two. Here is much about it: http://www.w8ji.com/rfi_rf_grounding.htm
http://www.w8ji.com/rfi_rf_grounding.htm
regards
Tnx
Barry W2UP
--
View this message in context:
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Any-way-to-block-the-spammers-who-discovered-Nabble-recently-tp7576545.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft
I am looking at the K3-Remote / RemoteRig system. A few questions:
(1) I recall hearing something about a K3/0 with a smaller case. Was this
just a prototype or is it headed for production? The current K3/0 case must be
mostly empty.
(2) How much work is it to switch the remote (base) K3
My simple solution:
Use a decent mail client and not a third party service like Nabble.
Don W3FPR has given a good explanation on using Mozilla Thunderbird and
I second that.
72/73,
Peter
Barry schreef:
Tnx
Barry W2UP
--
View this message in context:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:17 AM, William Hein bill.aa...@gmail.com wrote:
I am looking at the K3-Remote / RemoteRig system. A few questions:
(1) I recall hearing something about a K3/0 with a smaller case. Was this
just a prototype or is it headed for production? The current K3/0 case
Peter wrote: Don W3FPR has given a good explanation on using Mozilla
Thunderbird and
I second that.
This is timely for me. I have been looking for a decent email client to use on
my Windows7 computer. I find Windows Live Mail hard to work with. I like
Outlook Express because it is fast and
Thunderbird is, indeed, actively supported. I've used it as an email
client for several years. Combined with Gmail, it's remarkably effective
at keeping the spam off my screen.
We now return to our regularly-scheduled discussion, already in progress...
--
73 de N5ILN
Alan
NAQCC # 6139
ARES
Yes, Mozilla officially no longer supports Thunderbird, but there are
still occasional updates, strange as it may seem. Current version is
17.0.7. It's an excellent mail client, and has a plug-in calendar and
scheduler. My preferred mail client prior to switching to Thunderbird
was Eudora...
On 7/10/2013 9:04 AM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
I have been looking for a decent email client
I've been using Thunderbird for at least five years, and like it a lot.
I read a lot of email reflectors, and Thunderbird makes it very easy to
automatically sort each mail from each list into its own
Except you can't change fonts in XP. It just ignores changes you try to
make. This has gone on for years and apparently there is no motivation
to fix it.
73 de Brian/K3KO
On 7/10/2013 16:45, Jim Brown wrote:
On 7/10/2013 9:04 AM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
I have been looking for a decent email
Hi All,
I got a copy of the software for running the OSB nulling from elecraft the
other day, and
it seems to work well. It does not have a very informative U.I. All you do is
set the com ports
for the generator and the radio, and then turn it loose. About 20 or so min.
later it
Dick,
I am surprised to hear that.
Is there a statement from Mozilla itself (reference please) or is that
just another rumor on the internet?
Mine is up to date (thanks to Mozilla) and is more functional for my
email and calendaring (Lightning plug-in) than MS Outlook Pro.
73,
Don W3FPR
On
I can choose whatever font available on my PC in the TB settings.
I ditched Live for Thunderbird years ago for it could not spell check in
my native language and Microsoft refused to do something about it so...
Now my OS of choice for daily work is Debian Linux
And XP is nearly history too.
Don,
In my view it is...
72,
Peter
Don Wilhelm schreef:
or is that just another rumor on the internet?
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post:
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 00:12:45 -0800
To: Wayne Burdick n...@elecraft.com
From: Edward R Cole kl...@acsalaska.net
Subject: Re: K3 6/10M pre-amp
Wayne,
I re-tested on 50.120 and was able to reduce the -107 dBm signal
from the XG3 down to -135 dBm at 2.8-KHz bw. Correcting for
bw=500-KHz
I just loaded Thunderbird today, on my XP machine. I was able to set
the font of my choice. I guess I don't understand the problem.
Dave - K9FN
Brian Alsop als...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Except you can't change fonts in XP. It just ignores changes you try to
make. This has gone on for years and
Thunderbird is not exactly dead, but doesn't exactly have a promising
future, either. From the horses mouth:
http://blog.mozilla.org/beyond-the-code/2012/07/09/about-the-future-of-thunderbird/
73,
Scott, N9AA
On 7/10/13 1:31 PM, Peter Eijlander (PA0PJE) wrote:
Don,
In my view it is...
72,
Don,
I took me awhile to find it again. I see in this link they use the word
'developing' instead of 'supporting' as is sometimes mentioned. Here is the
link; (See item 2)
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2027870/four-desktop-email-clients-that-can-improve-your-gmail-experience.html
There may
It's not necessarily a rumor. It may have been created by a
misunderstanding of a statement from Mozilla in 2012. Mozilla will
maintain, and even update Thunderbird, but it no longer will allocate
the programming resources on innovating or enhancing the mail client.
Maintenance updates
Yes. Once again, this sentence makes me wary: We have a solid plan to support
Thunderbird until the second half of 2013 and are discussing how we support it
beyond that date.
- Original Message -
From: Scott Manthe
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Ed,
Bypassing the ATU did not change the level so I guess the ATU was
already adjusted to 50-ohms.
I have not checked the KX3 schematic but based on the K2 and K3
bypassing the ATU only adjusts it to a stored condition that the CPU
'thinks' represents 50 Ohms. I've seen several of the other
On 7/10/2013 11:05 AM, Don Allen wrote:
It's not necessarily a rumor. It may have been created by a
misunderstanding of a statement from Mozilla in 2012. Mozilla will
maintain, and even update Thunderbird, but it no longer will allocate
the programming resources on innovating or enhancing
Based on sales history over the past 14 months, I estimate that we have
about a 13 month supply of Headers kit remaining, and about a 19 month
supply of Mic Adaptor kits. (Although it's possibly they could last twice
that long or sell out in half that time.)
As our inventory becomes critical, we
I did the mod on factory built KX3 #1099 in about 15 minutes. Most of the time
consumed removing and reinstalling the batteries.
I tested with no antenna to see worse case. Noise is gone on 20 Meters to 160
Meters VFO NR OFF. There was some noise discernible above 20M but totally gone
with
Dick,
That article is over a year old, and if the upgraded (not just updated
for security) Thunderbird versions that have occurred over the past year
is any indication, they are still doing serious development work on it.
Look at the major version number - those are upgrades. Other releases
I've deleted the lead to this thread, so I'm not sure what the issue is,
but for what it's worth, I recommend the Headers kit for the K2. I built
my K2 from scratch with the Headers, and I found that over the long haul
that was a very good decision. Greater flexibility, much lower hassle.
1-The K3/0 mini production date has not been announced yet. But hope it
isn't too far out.
2-There are several cables that have to be switched for the change over. I
need to get the plans for a relay box out of my head and down on paper and
built so that I can do it with software and remotely.
Agreed, little snips at a time. Mine works FB as well. Used it last weekend
with a 31' fiberglass push-up pole.
Tighe
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 9, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Fred Smith m...@totalhighspeed.com wrote:
I have one also about all I can add is to cut very little off at a time till
I performed the mod tonight. Less than a couple of minutes. No noise. I am
on a very early board and found it to be absolutely quiet with no antenna.
Way to go Wayne and CO!!!
73,
Bill
K9YEQ
K2 FT, KX1 FT, KX3 FT, KAT500 FT
From: k...@yahoogroups.com [mailto:k...@yahoogroups.com] On
I agree. I've been using Thunderbird through many versions; probably
longer than five years.
73 de Jim - AD6CW
On 7/10/2013 9:45 AM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 7/10/2013 9:04 AM, Richard Fjeld wrote:
I have been looking for a decent email client
I've been using Thunderbird for at least five
Well, it's stable enough for me, and has all of the features that I
need, plus many more.
I'm currently running V17.0.7 under Windows 7.
73 de Jim - AD6CW
On 7/10/2013 10:50 AM, Scott Manthe wrote:
Thunderbird is not exactly dead, but doesn't exactly have a promising
future, either. From the
I've trimmed several PAR EFHW antennas over the past few years and don't cut
anymore...I just fold the wire back on itself essentially shortening or
lengthening the wire until I hit the sweet spot.
Saves some heartburn if you make a mistake and take a little too much off of
the top (grin).
Greetings, all.
For some time I've suspected my K2 of being partially deaf (ie. not as
sensitive as it should be). I bought an XG3 a while ago and finally sat down
to check my K2.
I set up the K2 following the XG3 manual. Volume control set to was slightly
before 12 o'clock so I had maximum
Guys,
A good tool to sort out the wheat from the chaff is Mailwasher from
Firetrust. It finds all the pump and dump scam emails and puts them
into Junk Mail leaving me to process mostly good stuff. It, so far,
is not so good at picking up those emails ostensibly from list members,
but
Kevin,
There is one possibility that your 51 ohm load (measured at DC) is not a
good 51 ohm pure resistance at the frequency you were measuring. Borrow
an antenna analyzer and test your load at the frequency of operation.
If that load does measure as a 51 ohm pure resistance (X value equals
On 7/10/2013 7:42 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
There is one possibility that your 51 ohm load (measured at DC) is not
a good 51 ohm pure resistance at the frequency you were measuring.
Borrow an antenna analyzer and test your load at the frequency of
operation.
There's also the simple issue of
37 matches
Mail list logo
