Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-16 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Hi Alan, Due to visitors arriving tomorrow, I must make this my last post on the subject we have been discussing. I believe that this discussion started after Jack had warned that a square wave source can get you into trouble if used to make 2nd and 3rd intermodulation measurements, and noted

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Hi Alan, Indeed, most receivers do have some form of filter up front in the front end, and therein lies one source of IMD measurement error if harmonics are present in the applied test signals. While the MiniCircuits application note AN-00-008 which Jack mentioned points out that harmonics

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Alan Bloom
Hi Geoff, I guess I don't understand. Filters are linear devices. How can they cause IMD? If the signal generator's harmonics are removed by the receiver filters then it is the same as if the sig gen were clean, no? 73, Alan N1AL On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 11:54 +0100, Geoffrey

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Jack Smith
Only to a first approximation are filters linear. Usually the major source of non-linearity is in the inductors. Even powdered iron is non-linear to some degree. Ferrite is worse, of course. Air is pretty close to perfect. Capacitors are also non-linear at some level, as C is not constant with

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Of course, if we didn't want to be able to copy with equal clarity over a 100 dB input signal range, we could dispense with a lot of this. AND do that with signals of the extremes separated by a mere 250 Hz. We are so picky. Why does anyone put up with us :) You selling that T-shirt in bulk?

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Alan Bloom
Sure, but if the filters are non-linear that's a whole different problem that has nothing to do with harmonics in the signal source. The question was whether signal generator harmonics are normally a problem when measuring a receiver. I claim they are not because they are removed by the filters

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Ellington
Is there any other communication system that requires the kind of close-in dynamic range we do? It certainly wouldn't make much sense to design a commercial system with such requirements. It seems likely we hams have the toughest receiver dynamic range requirements on the planet. Scott

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Hi Alan, Sorry that I was not here to reply to your previous e-mail. With respect, filter non-linearity and the level of harmonics coming from the signal sources are related in terms of the amplitude of the IMD products seen at the output of the filter. If the receiver being tested is perfect

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Al Lorona
Geoff, you're right. But I gather you're talking about two closely-spaced sources? I think the original question was whether harmonics from a *single* source would be a real problem. After all, this thread was originally about the XG3. Generally, any harmonics aren't going to be a real big

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Alan Bloom
Hi Geoff, The case we're considering is where the test signal(s) are near the receiver tuned frequency so they are well within the passband of the input filters. If the receiver's in-band dynamic range is significantly affected by non-linear filters in the front end, then that is a serious

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-15 Thread Wes Stewart
Getting a little far afield here and maybe a little pedantic (can you be just a little pedantic?) mixer technology has progressed to the point that the mixer no longer has to be the limiting factor. Input filters and post mixer crystal filters are now the focus. After having concentrated on

[Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread John Ragle
The more I have glanced through the specs for this device, the more puzzled I have become. I grew up on signal generators that put out a (good approximation to a) sine wave. This device is described as an RF square wave generator, which I take to mean that the output wave shape is a

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Wes Stewart
Good questions. I had them myself, especially #2. Wes --- On Thu, 4/14/11, John Ragle tpcj1...@crocker.com wrote:      The more I have glanced through the specs for this device, the more puzzled I have become. I grew up on signal generators that put out a (good approximation to a) sine

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of John Ragle Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:15 AM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] XG3 device... The more I have glanced through the specs for this device, the more puzzled I have become. I grew up

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Tony Estep
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire r...@cobi.biz wrote: A square wave's frequency Ron, I think John is aksing about the calibrated power (John, correct me if I'm mis-stating here). If there are infinite harmonics each with amplitude = 1/N, then 1/2 of the total energy will

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Robert Friess
All XG3 amplitude references refer to the amplitude of the fundamental frequency component only. Bob, N6CM On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Tony Estep estept...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Ron D'Eau Claire r...@cobi.biz wrote: A square wave's frequency Ron,

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Alan Bloom
Question 1: The frequency is based on the period of the square wave, in other words, the frequency of the fundamental. If you program a frequency greater than the maximum 200 MHz, software automatically selects the proper fundamental so that the harmonic comes out at the desired frequency.

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Scott Ellington
It's implicit in Alan's posting, but note that symmetrical square waves have only odd harmonics. The even harmonics will be very, very weak, present at all only because the square wave isn't quite perfectly symmetric. Scott K9MA Scott Ellington Madison, Wisconsin USA On Apr 14, 2011, at

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Jack Smith
Alan: One are where a square wave RF source can get you into trouble is 2nd and 3rd order intermodulation measurements. Mini-Circuits Ap Note 8 discusses the reason why. http://www.minicircuits.com/pages/pdfs/AN8.pdf I usually use an outboard low pass filter on my HP 8657A signal

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Alan Bloom
Hi Jack, You're right that when testing a wide-band device like an amplifier you have to filter out the generator harmonics in order to get a valid third-order IMD test. But when testing a narrow-band device like a receiver the harmonics are normally not an issue. Those Coilcraft low-pass

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Jack Smith
Alan: Coilcraft is direct sales only - no minimum quantity for internet orders and they are pretty good about free samples if you have a business name and address. Jack K8ZOA On 4/14/2011 5:58 PM, Alan Bloom wrote: Hi Jack, You're right that when testing a wide-band device like an

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Geoffrey Mackenzie-Kennedy
Hi Al, You did say normally not an issue, but when making even or odd order intermodulation measurements on a receiver the use of RF sources whose harmonic content is significant can and usually will lead to invalid results. 73, Geoff GM4ESD On April 14, 2011 at 22:58 +0100, Alan Bloom

Re: [Elecraft] XG3 device...

2011-04-14 Thread Alan Bloom
Hi Geoff, Most receivers have bandpass and/or low-pass filters in the front end that would filter out the harmonics of a square-wave test signal. I could dream up some unusual situations where the harmonics could cause a problem, but normally it would not be an issue. Alan N1AL On Fri,