On 2015-07-27, at 11:31, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 10:59, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
See how stupid this whole copyright law swamp is?
What if I reuse just the basic structure of sentences in the docstrings,
like in Subject + verb + preposition +
Hi Dmitry,
org-mode has the following format for links:
[[file-name::text-to-search][link text]]
What should I do, if text-to-search contains ']' symbol? Like this:
$form['input']
Not sure it helps in your case, but this
* Heading containing [brackets]
* Other heading
Here is a
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com writes:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
Hi all,
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a
On 2015-07-27, at 11:46, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 11:05, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
Frankly speaking, I'm rather astonished at your and Eric's answers.
I treated my question as a formality, and expected answers like Of
course you can do it, don't
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com writes:
If anywhere in your code there's (require 'org), you have to release
your code under GPL.
Are you sure about that? By this logic, *any* .el file should be GPL as
they use (defun ·), implicitly loaded from byte-run.
Rasmus
--
Lasciate ogni speranza o
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com writes:
If anywhere in your code there's (require 'org), you have to release
your code under GPL.
Are you sure about that? By this logic, *any* .el file should be GPL as
they use (defun ·), implicitly loaded from byte-run.
I'm
On 27/07/15 14:42, Greg Troxel wrote:
Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net writes:
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
copy). Such things should
Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes:
These packages all depend on R itself.
So isn't this the same as in emacs / elisp? Isn't an exporter / .el file
the same as a package in R, something which enhances the original
product using a provided interface (the functions) but does not change
Hi all,
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
writing a tutorial on them, and I consider publishing a
Andreas Hilboll li...@hilboll.de writes:
On 27.07.2015 15:09, Greg Troxel wrote:
Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes:
These packages all depend on R itself.
So isn't this the same as in emacs / elisp? Isn't an exporter / .el file
the same as a package in R, something which enhances the
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
I'm preparing a tutorial on writing Org-mode exporters. To this end,
I'm writing a (simplistic) Oddmuse/WikiCreole exporter. Rather
obviously, I'm modeling it on existing exporters (mainly ox-latex),
which seem to share a lot of structure (function
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
I will assume that you
Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net writes:
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
copy). Such things should definitely be in PD.
[many excellent
On 27/07/15 14:25, Oleh Krehel wrote:
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com writes:
If anywhere in your code there's (require 'org), you have to release
your code under GPL.
Are you sure about that? By this logic, *any* .el file should be GPL as
they use (defun
On 2015-07-27, at 15:09, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes:
These packages all depend on R itself.
So isn't this the same as in emacs / elisp? Isn't an exporter / .el file
the same as a package in R, something which enhances the original
product using
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
Hi all,
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
writing a
On 2015-07-27, at 14:16, Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
Hi all,
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd.
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
copy). Such things should definitely be in PD.
As yourself pointed out in one of your emails, in many legal
Thanks Rasmus and Eric!
1) subtitle
The git version has a #+subtitle keyword. See the git version of the
manual for supported backends (most).
Where the git install instructions say you should edit local.mk to
point to the appropriate install location, how do I find out where this
is?
Hello Marcin,
On 27/07/15 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
writing a tutorial on them, and I consider publishing a *tutorial* with
GPL'd code a Bad
On 27.07.2015 15:09, Greg Troxel wrote:
Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes:
These packages all depend on R itself.
So isn't this the same as in emacs / elisp? Isn't an exporter / .el file
the same as a package in R, something which enhances the original
product using a provided
Hi Erik,
Erik Hetzner e...@e6h.org writes:
I previously hooked up org with recoll with pretty good results.
...
http://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/
Thanks for the link. I tried it, and it actually works great on my
system (unlike swish-e). And I did no configuration of mimeinfo, I only
On 07/27/2015 08:10 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Please refrain from comments about my stupidity or stupidity of the
so-called IP law. And please understand that if I'm sounding a bit
angry in this email, it's because I'm *very* angry about this whole
lawyer mafia restricting my freedom
Hi.
I'm playing a little bit with R code blocks in babel and calling them
in different parts of my document (e.g. showing output in the main
part and the code in the appendix).
With most code blocks (e.g. setting some variables or outputting a
LaTeX table with xtable) this works as expected
There is also a helm-recoll package available. I came across recoll a
few weeks ago when I saw that package! It also basically worked as
advertised and I am just looking forward to some free time to figure out
how to get the super focused search I worked out for swish-e.
Has anyone tried using
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 15:55, Xiha wrote:
Thanks Rasmus and Eric!
1) subtitle
The git version has a #+subtitle keyword. See the git version of the
manual for supported backends (most).
Where the git install instructions say you should edit local.mk to
point to the appropriate install
On 2015-07-27, at 15:05, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having
On 2015-07-27, at 17:13, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
And I see no reason to impose GPL on them.))
[...]
And please understand that if I'm sounding a bit angry in this email,
it's because I'm *very* angry about
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
And I see no reason to impose GPL on them.))
[...]
And please understand that if I'm sounding a bit angry in this email,
it's because I'm *very* angry about this whole lawyer mafia
restricting my freedom (again). (Note: I'm
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 18:01, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
And what if I explicitly want people to be able to use my code in
a proprietary software? Or if I just want to use the Unlicense? Or
if I don't want to use GPL on principle? (And if I still consider Emacs
You are perfectly
Marcin Borkowski writes:
I'm preparing a tutorial on writing Org-mode exporters. To this end,
I'm writing a (simplistic) Oddmuse/WikiCreole exporter. Rather
obviously, I'm modeling it on existing exporters (mainly ox-latex),
which seem to share a lot of structure (function names and
Hi Oleh,
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:19:35 -0700,
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Erik,
Erik Hetzner e...@e6h.org writes:
I previously hooked up org with recoll with pretty good results.
...
http://www.lesbonscomptes.com/recoll/
Thanks for the link. I tried it, and it
On 2015-07-27, at 18:12, Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
And what if I explicitly want people to be able to use my code in
a proprietary software?
Then you're out of luck. Just like thousands (millions) of programmers
are out of luck when
On 2015-07-27, at 14:52, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 14:42, Greg Troxel wrote:
Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net writes:
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain
Hi Marcin,
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
as I mentioned, I'm writing a simple exporter. However, I stumbled on
something apparently simple. How to get the current list level within
org-whatever-item transcoder?
I ran into this problem once; the solution I found was to just walk
On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live in. (Mind
you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm very far from that. But this system
is almost unbearable.)
This
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
And what if I explicitly want people to be able to use my code in
a proprietary software?
Then you're out of luck. Just like thousands (millions) of programmers
are out of luck when they want to examine the code of a closed source
proprietary software.
On 2015-07-27, at 15:58, Scott Randby sran...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/27/2015 08:10 AM, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Please refrain from comments about my stupidity or stupidity of the
so-called IP law. And please understand that if I'm sounding a bit
angry in this email, it's because I'm *very*
On 2015-07-27, at 18:54, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 18:01, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
And what if I explicitly want people to be able to use my code in
a proprietary software? Or if I just want to use the Unlicense? Or
if I don't want to use GPL
On 2015-07-27, at 14:39, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
Hello Marcin,
On 27/07/15 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
writing a tutorial on
On 2015-07-27, at 14:17, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
copy). Such things should definitely be in PD.
On 2015-07-27, at 14:50, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
I'm not sure that using an interpreter for running some code classifies
as linking, but I don't know of any official statement on the subject.
On the other hand, Elisp is an extension language for a GPL program,
thus it may
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-07-27, at 14:39, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
Hello Marcin,
On 27/07/15 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few
On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live in. (Mind
you: I'm not an anarchist, and I'm
On 2015-07-27, at 14:42, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net writes:
On 27/07/15 13:52, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
I disagree. Licensing a tutorial with GPL is a stupid thing to do.
A tutorial may contain code which people naturally mimic (or even
copy).
On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-07-27, at 14:39, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
Hello Marcin,
On 27/07/15 14:10, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode
Oleh Krehel ohwoeo...@gmail.com writes:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
And what if I explicitly want people to be able to use my code in
a proprietary software?
Then you're out of luck. Just like thousands (millions) of programmers
are out of luck when they want to examine the
On 27/07/15 18:59, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
On 2015-07-27, at 14:39, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
Therefore, the only extensions to org-mode that can exist (and be
distributed, if you write code and keep it for yourself you are not
affected by the licensing terms) must be GPL.
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 19:04, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
Nope. As stated by someone here (Oleh, I guess), if I (require 'org),
or possibly even just write Elisp, and want to distribute it, it has to
be GPL.
I do not think this is true. I would like to see a proper reference
where it
On 27/07/15 20:20, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD might be
that I explicitly state that I object the legal system I live
On 2015-07-27, at 20:30, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 20:20, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
On 2015-07-27, at 20:02, Daniele Nicolodi dani...@grinta.net wrote:
On 27/07/15 19:42, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
That I've already learned. OTOH, one of the reasons to use PD
Hi Marcin and all,
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
after a short discussion in a recent thread, I have a serious technical
question.
Assume that (for some reason) I want to write an Org-mode exporter which
won't be GPL'd. (Use-case: having written a few custom exporters, I'm
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Nobis stefan...@snobis.de writes:
Hi.
I'm playing a little bit with R code blocks in babel and calling them
in different parts of my document (e.g. showing output in the main
part and the code in the appendix).
With most code blocks (e.g. setting some variables or
Hi Pascal,
alternatively you could have installed ditaa and point ob-ditaa to it:
#+BEGIN_SRC elisp
(setq org-ditaa-jar-path /usr/bin/ditaa)
#+END_SRC
Not an answer to your actual question, though.
Regards,
Bernhard Pröll
On Sat, 18. Jul 12:34, Pascal Lorenz wrote:
Hi!
When I tried to
I create the RSS feed for my blog with a file that #+include:'s the
various blog posts; this way, when I export it to RSS using ox-rss.el,
the full text of each blog post is in the feed. The feed is generated
from a file called /rss.org, and the blog posts themselves are
located in
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 00:06, Christopher W. Ryan wrote:
Using org-mode 8.2.4-1 on Linux Mint.
Below is a minimal working example of my problem. The trouble is that
the Berlin theme is not applied--it remains the default theme.
Do you need to export a sub-tree? I have no experience in
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
writes:
FWIW, it seems that people who played with different LaTeX engines used
the LATEX_CMD property, as adviced on Worg [1]. Doesn't matter if we
change that, but just a reminder of some already common usage.
I didn't know that worg page. Just to
On Sunday, 26 Jul 2015 at 15:04, Xiha wrote:
2) I have #+OPTIONS: H:9 num:9 because explicit level structure is
important for this document. I would like to have more control over
For LaTeX export, this will not work (AFAIK) as LaTeX only supports 4 or
so levels of headings.
how this is
Hi all,
I'm preparing a tutorial on writing Org-mode exporters. To this end,
I'm writing a (simplistic) Oddmuse/WikiCreole exporter. Rather
obviously, I'm modeling it on existing exporters (mainly ox-latex),
which seem to share a lot of structure (function names and docstrings in
particular).
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
I reuse parts of GPL'd code (as I mentioned, quite generic ones, but
still). Is it fine, or should I expect a visit from EFF lawyers or
something?
My guess would be no. You should ask the FSF lawyers.
Rasmus
--
What will be next?
Thomas S. Dye t...@tsdye.com writes:
Add a clause to indicate some languages don't support multiple Babel
sessions.
Thanks. Pushed!
--
Dobbelt-A
Hello,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
I have a few other questions:
- how does one change the variant when doing a subtree export? By
setting EXPORT_LATEX_VARIANT?
It seems to work at least to the point that the right engine is written to
the file:
#+LATEX_VARIANT: xelatex
* pdflatex
On 2015-07-27, at 10:16, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
I reuse parts of GPL'd code (as I mentioned, quite generic ones, but
still). Is it fine, or should I expect a visit from EFF lawyers or
something?
My guess would be no. You should ask the FSF
Hi all,
as I mentioned, I'm writing a simple exporter. However, I stumbled on
something apparently simple. How to get the current list level within
org-whatever-item transcoder?
TIA,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 10:06, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'm preparing a tutorial on writing Org-mode exporters. To this end,
I'm writing a (simplistic) Oddmuse/WikiCreole exporter. Rather
obviously, I'm modeling it on existing exporters (mainly ox-latex),
which seem to share a lot
Vikas Rawal vikasli...@agrarianresearch.org writes:
Thanks all. I was not familiar with this way of defining local variables. Just
checked the relevant part of the manual. Very useful.
And, finally, one solution exposed on Worg:
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#using-xelatex-for-pdf-export
On 2015-07-27, at 10:46, Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl wrote:
On 2015-07-27, at 10:17, Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl wrote:
Hi all,
as I mentioned, I'm writing a simple exporter. However, I stumbled on
something apparently simple. How to get the current list level within
On 2015-07-27, at 10:42, Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk wrote:
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 10:06, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
Hi all,
I'm preparing a tutorial on writing Org-mode exporters. To this end,
I'm writing a (simplistic) Oddmuse/WikiCreole exporter. Rather
obviously, I'm modeling it
On 2015-07-27, at 10:35, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-07-27, at 10:16, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
I reuse parts of GPL'd code (as I mentioned, quite generic ones, but
still). Is it fine, or should I
Hello,
Rainer M Krug rai...@krugs.de writes:
Eric S Fraga e.fr...@ucl.ac.uk writes:
On Friday, 24 Jul 2015 at 15:07, Rainer M Krug wrote:
In an org document, I want to change the text colour of two words
{\color{red} red line } to red in a sentence and the rest should be
normal colour.
I
Fabrice Niessen fni-n...@pirilampo.org writes:
I've begun writing such generic macros for basic and advanced formatting
(see [1]), though they are currently limited to the HTML backend:
LaTeX has textcolor via (x)xcolor (AFAIR). odt it probably pretty easy to
get from LO trials.
Rasmus
--
Hi,
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com
writes:
(I'm hesitant to allow arbitrary scripts).
I agree. Just stick to the basic need, which is to be able to easily
change of LaTeX engine.
I'd however also like to allow some flags, e.g. -shell-escape/write18 for
minted. I cannot think of
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 10:59, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
See how stupid this whole copyright law swamp is?
What if I reuse just the basic structure of sentences in the docstrings,
like in Subject + verb + preposition + object? Do I have to use GPL
then, too? ;-)
And what if I reuse
On Monday, 27 Jul 2015 at 11:05, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
[...]
Frankly speaking, I'm rather astonished at your and Eric's answers.
I treated my question as a formality, and expected answers like Of
course you can do it, don't be silly.
Oh, sorry! I thought you actually did want to get some
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
On 2015-07-27, at 10:16, Rasmus ras...@gmx.us wrote:
Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl writes:
I reuse parts of GPL'd code (as I mentioned, quite generic ones, but
still). Is it fine, or should I expect a visit from EFF lawyers or
something?
My
On 2015-07-27, at 10:17, Marcin Borkowski mb...@mbork.pl wrote:
Hi all,
as I mentioned, I'm writing a simple exporter. However, I stumbled on
something apparently simple. How to get the current list level within
org-whatever-item transcoder?
By inspecting values of org-whatever-item's
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com writes:
FWIW, it seems that people who played with different LaTeX engines used
the LATEX_CMD property, as adviced on Worg [1]. Doesn't matter if we
change that, but just a reminder of some already common usage.
I didn't
77 matches
Mail list logo
