On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 09:11, andy pugh wrote:
> Anyway, the problems continued last night, but have changed.
> It basically does what I want, except that I get f-error shut-downs
> when switching to jog mode. Which seems rather strange.
It seems less strange now that I have realised that my
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 09:04, andy pugh wrote:
> True, but the axis limits would be very difficult to express in an INI
> file as the limits are not a cuboid, and the tool angle limits depend
> on where the tool point is inside the complex shape too.
Anyway, the problems continued last night,
On Tue, 13 Oct 2020 at 02:43, Frank Tkalcevic
wrote:
>
> > Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and joint
> > limits?
>
> A robot arm will have joints and axis that completely different.
True, but the axis limits would be very difficult to express in an INI
file as the
> Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and joint
> limits?
A robot arm will have joints and axis that completely different.
___
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
On Monday 12 October 2020 16:02:50 andy pugh wrote:
> I feel that this is the sort of question that I would expect to be
> answering, not asking, but...
>
> Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and
> joint limits? The INI config docs don't really say, and in fact use
>
On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 21:02, andy pugh wrote:
> This sort-of works, but I keep getting soft limit errors when the
> machine is nowhere near the physical joint limits.
Part of this might be because I am using a non-identity kins declaring
as KINEMATICS_IDENTITY, but this was meant to be a minor
I feel that this is the sort of question that I would expect to be
answering, not asking, but...
Under what sort of circumstances would you have different axis and
joint limits? The INI config docs don't really say, and in fact use
"axis" in the "joints" section to add to the confusion.
I am
