Hello group,
Where can I find the latest list of mandatory products that must be marked
with the China Energy Label (CEL).
Best regards
Helmut Koester
PSi Engineering GmbH
mailto:h.koes...@psi-engineering.de
-
This message is
Hi Helmut,
The list has been updated for 9 times and will still be updated timely.
There are totally 29 products require China Energy Label now.
I have the list but it's in Chinese.
So maybe you can let me know your product and I can check whether it
requires CEL.
Paul Wang (王卫波)
GM
Hello Paul,
We are interested to know if printers are inside this list of mandatory
products for CEL marking.
Regards
Helmut Koester
PSi Engineering GmbH
mailto:h.koes...@psi-engineering.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Im Auftrag von
Hi all,
please give a look here:
http://www.energylabel.gov.cn/en/Resources/list-1.html
Daniele Conforti
Indesit Company
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Paul Wang [mailto:paulw...@gmcompliance.com]
Inviato: lunedì 15 luglio 2013 15:15
A: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Oggetto: [PSES] 答复:
Group,
I'm in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a RTTE
device doesn't need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard when
the previous is withdrawn.
ETSI EN 300 228 V1.7.1 loses the presumption of conformity in 2014 (December
I think). Customer is installing
Carl,
The lab is incorrect. Any product on the market in the EU must meet the
current version of standards. If the new one has already been listed, use it.
That way you don't have to re-test when the DoW rolls around. You are on the
right track.
Ghery S. Pettit
From: emc-p...@ieee.org
You are correct Carl. The device always needs to be 'assessed' to the
latest 'requirements'.
...and the easiest way to do this, is to 'test' to the latest 'standard'.
If they are following the harmonised standard route, then they will need to
show compliance with EN 300 328 V1.8.1 before
In message 000c01ce8174$b2b997e0$182cc7a0$@gmail.com, dated Mon, 15
Jul 2013, Carl Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes:
I?m in a debate with a lab and a manufacturer that insist that a RTTE
device doesn?t need to be re-evaluated against a new revision standard
when the previous is withdrawn.
Carl
You're correct, and there's no such thing as certification for the EU.
The relevant part of the Directive are:
Article 10
Conformity assessment procedures
4. Where a manufacturer has applied the harmonised standards referred to in
Article 5(1), radio equipment not within the scope of
Hello Brian - It turns out that chambers used for emissions testing are not
suitable for antenna/rx sensitivity type of
measurements due to excessive reflections. OATS and chambers are considered
suitable for EMC
work if the chamber calibration is met with a +/- 4db spread for emissions and
Thanks all. I know that this is compliance 101, but I needed to do a sanity
check in case there's a clause in the RTTED that I'm missing. I've
reviewed it and don't see any such thing (article 5).
John- you're absolutely correct. I used DoW because I can never remember
how many cs are in
Power plugs for Australian/New Zealand cord-connected equipment must comply
with AS/NZS 3112.
QUESTION: does the approval number (e.g., V100063) need to be molded onto or
otherwise marked on the plug? This is not required by clause 2.12.1 in my old,
2000 copy of AZ/NZS 3112, but it looks
In the Machinery Directive
1. If a manufacturer has designated an Authorized Representative, the AR
name must be marked on the machine (ref Annex I, 1.7.3 1st indent).
2. A person must be identified in the Declaration of Conformity who is
established in the EU and is
The BIS view at the last Machinery Directive Notified Bodies meeting I went to
(in May) was that there were unlikely to be any revisions to the Machinery
Directive for at least five years.
Nick.
On 15 Jul 2013, at 23:25, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com wrote:
In the Machinery
Hi Helmut,
Yes, printer is in the category.
It applies to printers powered by 220V 50Hz power grid, print speed less than
70 pages/min and standard size.
Paul Wang (王卫波)
GM Compliance,Inc.Beijing Office
Tel:86-10-58203318
Cell:86-13810026747
-邮件原件-
发件人: H.Köster
Hi Mike,
The ‘approval number’ (e.g. V100063) is a regulatory approval number so the
electrical safety regulations specify where and how that must be placed on the
device not eth standard called up by the regulations. Although AS/NZS 3112 is
called up by the regulations it is a voluntary
In message
1421038395.1290798.1373925947564.javamail.r...@sz0110a.emeryville.ca.mai
l.comcast.net, dated Mon, 15 Jul 2013, msherma...@comcast.net writes:
QUESTION: does the approval number (e.g., V100063) need to be molded
onto or otherwise marked on the plug? This is not required by clause
In message
617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac5322b1a...@by2prd0310mb389.namprd03.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Mon, 15 Jul 2013, Crane, Lauren
lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes:
Does anyone know if the MD anomalies marking the AR on the machine and
indicating in the DoC the person authorized to
18 matches
Mail list logo
