CE marking Directives cover safety or health
* There are no CE marking Directives that cover environmental protection
* The rules don’t apply to products “sold”, they apply to products “placed
on the market” – there doesn’t need to be a monetary exchange, and the lack of
one does not put
===
>
> Ralph
>
> From: Charlie Blackham
> Sent: Saturday, October 7, 2023 1:17 AM
> To: rmm.priv...@gmail.com; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: RE: [PSES] AW: [PSES] Directives that require the
, experts, or legal counsel
knowledgeable about the specific product and its applicable regulations to
ensure compliance with CE marking requirements. Incorrectly applying the CE
mark can lead to legal consequences, including fines and product recalls
A nice example of why ChatGPT won’t put us all out of a job just yet
Point 9 is wrong – you may not use the CE mark to demonstrate compliance with a
“non CE marking” Directive, that is one that does not contain the provision for
CE marking within its Articles or Annexes
Point 3 does not make
tion takes precedence.
9. CE Marking: While the GPSD does not require products to bear the CE
marking (a conformity marking indicating compliance with EU safety
standards), manufacturers may choose to use it to demonstrate compliance
with the directive.
10. Harmonized Standards: Manufacture
Hi Brian
Unless it is for use in an explosive atmosphere, then I can’t see that any CE
marking legislation will apply.
If it is intended for consumers or likely, under reasonably foreseeable
conditions, to be used by consumers even if not intended for them, then the
General Product Safety
Id3>)
that covers any product intended for consumers. As far as I know, the GPSD
does neither require a CE Declaration of Conformity, nor CE marking on the
product. An overview of EU Directives and applicable harmonized standards may
be found at Harmonised Standards
(europa.eu)<https://sing
like
to see the CE Marking on products. They feel it makes things sell better
and it avoids uneducated customers from asking why there is no CE marking
on the product.
Thanks for any advice, ideas, information, or suggestions.
The Other Brian
I have worked with H.V. power supplies in the past, and there is a point
where IEC-based standards simply run out.
In most cases, I found certifying agencies are accepting of IEC 61010-1 (or
national derivatives) using the tables in Annex K (2010 edition). You still
need to pay attention to the
, other than the equipment and phenomena listed
in Annex II.
Thanks for your help !
Greetings,
Bart
Van: Gert Gremmen
Verzonden: donderdag 18 augustus 2022 21:59
Aan: bart.de.gee...@telenet.be; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: Re: [PSES] CE marking of a high voltage output supply
uestions, send mail to:
> Jim Bacher
> David Heald
> --
>
> To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
> https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC=1
>
> --
> Independent Expert on CE marking
> EMC Consultan
tions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher
David Heald
To unsubscribe from the EMC-PSTC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=EMC-PSTC=1
--
Independent Expert on CE marking
EMC Consultant
E
Dear experts,
A client is looking for regulatory guidance to CE certify a high voltage output
supply (with regular AC mains 230V/50Hz input).
The supply has an output voltage upto 25kV (upto 50kHz) output. It concerns a
supply to be used for plasma reactor applications.
As the output
com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows
From: Douglas E Powell<mailto:doug...@gmail.com>
Sent: 22 October 2021 19:47
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU CE Marking Exemptions for Military Equipment Query
There are other examples
: Re: [PSES] EU CE Marking Exemptions for Military Equipment Query
Philip
> They have informed us that there is a CE Marking Exemption for Military
> Equipment in France and Germany for these products
I suspect what they mean is “our customers in France and Germany are not asking
for e
| GBE<mailto:matthew.wil...@gbelectronics.com>
Sent: 22 October 2021 11:34
To: Philip Stevenson<mailto:pw...@hotmail.co.uk>;
EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG<mailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Subject: RE: [PSES] EU CE Marking Exemptions for Military Equipment Query
It’s old now but this art
s old now but this article, written by someone working for TUV SUD, was
> handy for me when needing to deal with the ‘military exempt argument’ a
> while ago.
>
>
>
>
> https://www.newelectronics.co.uk/electronics-technology/the-military-ce-marking-conundrum/64803/
>
>
>
Philip
> They have informed us that there is a CE Marking Exemption for Military
> Equipment in France and Germany for these products
I suspect what they mean is “our customers in France and Germany are not asking
for evidence of CE compliance”
That’s perfectly fine – the customer has n
It's old now but this article, written by someone working for TUV SUD, was
handy for me when needing to deal with the 'military exempt argument' a while
ago.
https://www.newelectronics.co.uk/electronics-technology/the-military-ce-marking-conundrum/64803/
It agrees with your stance, which I
Dear All
I am contacting this forum for advice on whether there are any EU CE Marking
Exemptions for Military Equipment in France and Germany?
My reason for asking is that the manufacturers of Military off the shelf
equipment (MOTS) who are based in France and Germany that we incorporate
Hi all
The products is a voltage stabilizer for power plants.
What EMC standard apply for CE certification?
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list,
Dear Bernd,
Many thanks for your clear pointer! I looked into the delegated
regulations incorrectly.
Best regards,
Scott
On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 14:24, Dürrer Bernd wrote:
> Hi Scott,
>
> Article 5 of ErP Directive 2009/125/EC requires CE marking (
> https://eur-lex.eur
Hi Scott,
Article 5 of ErP Directive 2009/125/EC requires CE marking
(https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32009L0125=EN#d1e903-10-1).
Kind regards,
Bernd
Von: Scott Xe
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. September 2020 07:53
An: EMC-PSTC
I have learnt that ErP Directive requires CE Marking as compliance with the
Directive. I could not find this requirement in the Directive like others
such as LVD, EMC, etc. Can someone advise if I got incorrect info or where
to document this requirement.
Thanks and regards,
Scott
com> wrote:
> Regan
>
>
>
> CE marking of course applies to all products manufactured on an ongoing
> basis, and the requirement you refer to is in the Directives
>
>
>
> Quoting from the LVD as an example (Annex III, Module A)
>
>
>
> *3. Manufacturin
viation to the product
design/documentation that originally supported their CE marking
testing/declaration.”
HTH
Matthew Wilson,
Technical Director,
GB Electronics (UK) Ltd.
Disclaimer:This email and any files transmitted with it are
confidential and intended solely for the use of the
that originally
supported their CE marking testing/declaration.”
HTH
Matthew Wilson,
Technical Director,
GB Electronics (UK) Ltd.
Matthew Wilson
Technical Director
GB Electronics (UK) Ltd
matthew.wil...@gbelectronics.com
https://gbelectronics.uk
+44 (0)1903 244 500
Ascot House//Mulberry Close
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: Wednesday, 15 January 2020 09:05
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking quality manufacturing requirements
Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. DO NOT CLICK
on links or open attachments unless you recognize
Regan
CE marking of course applies to all products manufactured on an ongoing basis,
and the requirement you refer to is in the Directives
Quoting from the LVD as an example (Annex III, Module A)
3. Manufacturing
The manufacturer shall take all measures necessary so that the manufacturing
Greetings team members,
I seem to recall somewhere either in a directive or the blue guide where it
states (or implies) that part of the CE marking requirements entails that
the manufacture must have a product quality system/production
control..and this is where I need clarification
Great Michael,
I'll check out these standards.
BR
Amund
Fra: micha...@acbcert.com
Sendt: 11. oktober 2019 08:19
Til: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Emne: Re: [PSES] ETSI standard for device with LTE (CE-marking RED)
Hi Amund,
You should look at EN 301 908-1 and EN 301 908
Hi Amund,
You should look at EN 301 908-1 and EN 301 908-13.
Also, EN 301 489-52 for the LTE (and EN 301 489-17 for the BLE)
Thanks,
Michael.
From: Amund Westin
Sent: 11 October 2019 06:27
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] ETSI standard for device with LTE (CE
A wireless sensor contains BLE and LTE chips.
For BLE, the standard ETSI EN 300 328 applies. But which standard should we
dig into because of the LTE?
BR
Amund
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety
c product that I want to place on the market in
> Europe, and the product is made up of several individual electronic devices
> each powered by AC mains (packaged and sold together), do I place the CE
> marking on only one of the devices or all devices?
>
> And if the answer is
components the customer is purchasing
to expanding the functionality of a product they already own. Components
intended for further incorporation in to a final product tend not to be
directly in scope of many/most/all CE marking directives. The Customer, then,
is on the hook for re-assessing
in
Europe, and the product is made up of several individual electronic
devices each powered by AC mains (packaged and sold together), do I
place the CE marking on only one of the devices or all devices?
And if the answer is "all devices", then do I need a DoC for each
device or will one
If I have an electronic product that I want to place on the market in
Europe, and the product is made up of several individual electronic devices
each powered by AC mains (packaged and sold together), do I place the CE
marking on only one of the devices or all devices?
And if the answer is &quo
drawn up the technical documentation, that the apparatus bears the CE marking
and is accompanied by the required documents, and that the manufacturer has
complied with the requirements set out in Article 7(5) and (6).
Where an importer considers or has reason to believe that apparatus
Hi James,
It is quite normal attitude for an oem or odm manufacturer. They have over
hundred buyers to keep their business alive and lack of resource to meet
all standards of their buyers. In order to meet your requirements, you
have to actively educate them for what they have to supply in
ger, Dave
To: EMC-PSTC
Sent: Thu, Aug 30, 2018 12:24 pm
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
Not true in my experience. The same lab may do certification reports for EU
declarations in addition to NRTL certification/report. The NRTL listing report
is specific to
John,Yes, there are many very clever ways to cheat in life. In this case
no NRTL mark invalidates the acceptability of the CE marking downstream; the
importers QA inspection is needed. My suggestion only works if the folks
downstream who are on the hook legally for the Euro
: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
A NRTL tests to ALL the equipment ratings even if they include EU ratings.
Rich
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 10:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
That's a bit
to the US government. (FAA and
military)
Gregory H. McClure
Lexmark Product Safety
Product Safety Team Lead
859-232-3240 office
*From:*John Woodgate
*Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2018 2:38 PM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
Ah
ratings.
Rich
*From:*John Woodgate
*Sent:* Thursday, August 30, 2018 10:57 AM
*To:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
That's a bit dodgy, Pete. The EU product must be for 230 V mains, so
the NRTL won't cover safety test with 230 V 50 Hz
A NRTL tests to ALL the equipment ratings even if they include EU ratings.
Rich
From: John Woodgate
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2018 10:57 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
That's a bit dodgy, Pete. The EU product must
-08-30 17:46, Peter E Perkins wrote:
James & PSnet folks,
I could envision a scenario that could be more comfortable for
all. If the same product was sold worldwide and bore a US NRTL (UL,
etc) mark along with the CE marking then the importer would know that
the factory was having quart
James & PSnet folks,
I could envision a scenario that could be more comfortable for all. If the
same product was sold worldwide and bore a US NRTL (UL, etc) mark along with
the CE marking then the importer would know that the factory was having
quarterly construction inspect
Head in hands - and liability insurance paper in back pocket (hopefully)!
From: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Sent: 30 August 2018 13:18
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
Charlie, John, thanks
Charlie, John, thanks for the insightful feedback as always.
The latest email from the manufacturer doesn't do much to inspire
confidence!
James
From: Charlie Blackham
Sent: 30 August 2018 10:29
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
From: John Woodgate
Sent: 30 August 2018 10:01
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
Run, do not walk, away from this manufacturer. Either they are dangerously
unaware of the EU requirements, or they are deliberately avoiding commitment.
Run, do not walk, away from this manufacturer. Either they are
dangerously unaware of the EU requirements, or they are deliberately
avoiding commitment.
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2018-08-30 08:48, James Pawson (U3C)
Hello all,
I'm working with a company who are importing some IT products from China to
the EU. The Chinese manufacturer is taking a very much "hands off" approach
to approvals, expecting the importer to draw up the DoC and perform much of
the testing. However access to the parts of the
@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> Look for relevant Type B and specific Type C EN standards.
>
> John E Allen
> W.London, UK
>
> From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
> Sent: 02 August 2018 13:29
> To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
> Subject: [PSES
> *From: *"Pete Perkins" <0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org>
> *To: *"EMC-PSTC"
> *Sent: *Thursday, August 2, 2018 7:28:39 AM
> *Subject: *[PSES] CE marking of machinery that moves about
>
> Colleagues, I’ve been dealing wit
, 2018 7:28:39 AM
Subject: [PSES] CE marking of machinery that moves about
Colleagues, I’ve been dealing with CE marking of machinery for some time but
now am interested in a variation on that theme, machinery that moves. Think of
a fork-lift or front loader each of which lifts a load and moves
@ieee.org> wrote:
>
> Colleagues, I’ve been dealing with CE marking of machinery for some
> time but now am interested in a variation on that theme, machinery that
> moves. Think of a fork-lift or front loader each of which lifts a load and
> moves it before s
Look for relevant Type B and specific Type C EN standards.
John E Allen
W.London, UK
From: Pete Perkins [mailto:0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: 02 August 2018 13:29
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CE marking of machinery that moves about
Colleagues
Colleagues, I've been dealing with CE marking of machinery for some
time but now am interested in a variation on that theme, machinery that
moves. Think of a fork-lift or front loader each of which lifts a load and
moves it before setting it down again. What additional requirements
as one or two new folks. I’ve passed along
contact information to the people concerned.
Doug Nix
d...@ieee.org
+1 (519) 729-5704
On 17-May-18, at 16:22, Doug Nix wrote:
I am looking for an industrial CE Marking consultant with expertise in at least
the following Directives:
MachineryLow
:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2018 3:40 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking HDMI Cables
Hello Scott,
I believe that line voltage wires and cables used for electrical distribution
within buildings fall under the Low Voltage Directive
Scott
By affixing the CE mark the manufacturer is declaring compliance against all
applicable directives – if a particular directive isn’t applicable then it
doesn’t matter.
Whilst lots of people like seeing UL marks on things, it has no meaning within
EU legislation, anymore that CE marking
Douglas [mailto:sdouglas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 7, 2018 12:31 PM
To: Ted Eckert <ted.eck...@microsoft.com>; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking HDMI Cables
Ted,
I sent the the RoHS FAQ and they agree the cables need to be RoHS. They resist
CE Marking b
Ted,
I sent the the RoHS FAQ and they agree the cables need to be RoHS. They
resist CE Marking because the cables have UL approvals for use inside
walls (read flammability). They claim there are "matching" safety
requirements in the EU and these were not tested for. So they can
d
> training and they all say not required.
>
>
> Am I the only one that thinks these HDMI cables need to be CE Marked? Or
> am I missing something? Like maybe not required today but required to be
> marked at some future date like 2019 maybe?
>
> Last, assuming I am not on
, the cable does not need the
CE marking. If the cable is sold on its own, the CE mark is required for RoHS.
See pages 15 and 16 in the European Commission guidance document.
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/rohs_eee/pdf/faq.pdf
Ted Eckert
Microsoft Corporation
The opinions expressed are my own
not on some good psychedelics and CE Marking is
required on or for HDMI cables, can I get away with putting the CE
Mark on the single unit package, like a label on the poly bag it is
sealed in?
I thank everybody that helps answer the question and keeps me from
consuming more of those pink
Hi Scott,
Which Directives do you think should apply?
From: Scott Douglas [mailto:sdouglas...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2018 7:00 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CE Marking HDMI Cables
I am going around with an ODM making a HDMI cable for us. Standard
psychedelics and CE Marking is
required on or for HDMI cables, can I get away with putting the CE Mark on
the single unit package, like a label on the poly bag it is sealed in?
I thank everybody that helps answer the question and keeps me from
consuming more of those pink pills.
Happy New Year to all.
Scott
We are looking for CE Marking and Consultation services for CE
products.Consultant services can be in US or Europe.
Our products are Wifi AP and switch, RF expertise for CE products is preferred,
User manual, Label, warning statements.
for more info you can find on https://www.ubnt.com
V.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Address requirement of Product Label for CE Marking
Sent from my iPad
Begin forwarded message:
From: STEVENSON Philip <philip.steven...@uk.thalesgroup.com
<mailto:philip.steven...@uk.thalesgroup.com> >
Date: 23 January 2017 14:56:13 GMT
To: "'EMC
TC@listserv.ieee.org<mailto:EMC-PSTC@listserv.ieee.org>>
Cc: STEVENSON Philip
<philip.steven...@uk.thalesgroup.com<mailto:philip.steven...@uk.thalesgroup.com>>,
"pw...@hotmail.co.uk<mailto:pw...@hotmail.co.uk>"
<pw...@hotmail.co.uk<mailto:pw...@hotmail.
tive? I'm thinking no
because it has no function on its own.
3. Does it require its own CE marking and Declaration of Conformity (at least
for RoHS) if it provided exclusively as a consumable for use with professional
equipment and is not available on the general consumer market? The user of
the pr
http://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/index_en.htm
> On 25 Aug 2016, at 21:45, Jim Hulbert <jim.hulb...@pb.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in understanding how stringent the enforcement of CE marking
> directives is within the
d EU wide Market Surveillance reports for R on
http://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/electrical-engineering/rtte-directive_en
Regards
Charlie
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: 25 August 2016 21:46
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EU Enforcement of CE Marking Directives
: 510-540-4670
From: John Woodgate [mailto:jmw1...@btinternet.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 2:55 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EU Enforcement of CE Marking Directives
The stringency, and the enforcement procedures, vary in the different Member
States. For example
yleigh England
Sylvae in aeternum manent.
From: Jim Hulbert [mailto:jim.hulb...@pb.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:46 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] EU Enforcement of CE Marking Directives
Hi,
I am interested in understanding how stringent the enforcement of CE m
Hi,
I am interested in understanding how stringent the enforcement of CE marking
directives is within the EU. Is there someplace where we can find enforcement
actions that have been taken against companies for placing products on the
market that don't fully meet the applicable Directives? I
identification
marking, and then put the CE marking on that part;
- Make sure that the product documentation going to the customers clearly
states that the product will only be compliant with all relevant CE
Directives and the DoC when assembled and installed according to the
detailed instructions you
). The set of component packages that comprise the product are
imported into the EU from the USA. The UK distributor has asked that
all packages have the CE Marking on the box. I'm reluctant to sign-up
to this procedure in view of the fact that the CE Marking should not be
applied to most sub
the CE
Marking on the box. I'm reluctant to sign-up to this procedure in view of
the fact that the CE Marking should not be applied to most sub-assemblies.
I've reviewed the 2014 Blue Guide, Regulation (EC) No 765/2008, and
768/2008/E seeking guidance on this scenario but find nothing
In message op.x301folc835bzt@cesllc, dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Carl
Newton emcl...@gmail.com writes:
The UK distributor has asked that all packages have the CE Marking on
the box. I'm reluctant to sign-up to this procedure in view of the
fact that the CE Marking should not be applied to most
: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:39 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components
Group,
I'm dealing with a scenario in which a storage assembly that includes some
electronic functionality is assembled
Carl
Personally, I would:
- Decide what is the most major part of the product which has a visible
external surface which be carrying all the other product identification
marking, and then put the CE marking on that part;
- Make sure that the product documentation going to the customers clearly
In message 119fa9545c6e264b830c4582886d1190c534d...@quimby.dw.local,
dated Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Mark Schmidt mark.schm...@dornerworks.com
writes:
In regard to your statement Another package may include plastic panels
with no inherent standalone function In this case there are no
harmonized
applies to you sub-assemblies?
Chuck McDowell
Compliance Specialist
Meyer Sound Laboratories Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Nyffenegger, Dave [mailto:dave.nyffeneg...@bhemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:28 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking
a DoC/DoI and technical
file to back it up.
-Dave
-Original Message-
From: Carl Newton [mailto:emcl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 8:39 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly Components
Group,
I'm dealing with a scenario
I never said they did not need to be compliant. That wasn't the question or was
it?
-Original Message-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 2:03 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE Marking on Packaging of Assembly
on the same
contract to produce a final product for a UK customer outside the scope
of the CE Marking directive or not? That is does it have to be CE
Marked or not?
None of these items, including the control box, are 'placed on the
market' but they are 'taken into service'. However, IF they do
Dear List Members
I am looking your guidance on whether the EU CE Marking Directive requirements
are applicable or not to products build during the development lifecycle for
its the design verification and qualification testing. These development
versions of the product will not be put
PSNetters:
Looking to clarify the CE marking requirements for handheld powered
tools - such as I've seen roofers use for nailing down shingles. Could be
either electrical or pneumatic powered but hand positioned then triggered to
work.
Thanx in advance for your comments
...@ieee.org]
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2015 11:14 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] CE marking for handheld powered tools
PSNetters:
Looking to clarify the CE marking requirements for handheld
powered tools - such as I've seen roofers use for nailing down shingles
61029 might also be worth a look. TC 116 is also working on a similar 62841 series. MikeSent from Xfinity Connect Mobile App-- Original Message --From: Ted EckertTo: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGSent: June 5, 2015 at 3:46 PMSubject: Re: [PSES] CE marking for handheld powered tools
Hello
a range of other basic standards for other EMC
phenomena.
Anybody who knows which will be the next standard to be included for CE
marking?
The Generics have only recently been revised, so no change is likely
there. This practically means no new emission standards. For immunity
standards, it is up
Today, the basic standards 61000-4-2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -8, -11 are referred
to in Cenelec generic standards or various product standards.
But, there exist a range of other basic standards for other EMC phenomena.
Anybody who knows which will be the next standard to be included for CE
marking
Colleagues,
I just published a couple of new articles on the Machinery Safety 101 blog on
CE Marking of wire and cable products. Thanks go to those that contributed to
the research on this topic. As always comments, questions and corrections are
welcomed!
http://machinerysafety101.com/2013/12
and are
therefore NOT subject to CE Marking. In addition to this, a quick search for
Declarations of Conformity on a number of wire and cable web sites turned up NO
DECLARATIONS.
With the withdrawal of much of the HD 21 and HD 22 series of harmonization
documents and their replacement with the EN 50525 series
The RoHS directive may well apply, and since the start of this year, that's
been a CE-marking directive. The D of C will tell you which directives they
are claiming to meet.
_
From: Douglas Nix [mailto:d...@mac.com]
Sent: 03 December 2013 17:12
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject
Doug,
I was recently doing some searching for requirements for equipment being used
in Marine applications and came across some chemical restriction requirements
for wiring. I believe what you might be seeing is CE marking according to the
RoHS2 directive based on the info that I ran
Hello Doug,
The RoHS 2 Directive, 2011/65/EU is now a CE marking directive. Its scope
covers some wires and cables defined as cables rated less than 250 V that serve
as a connection or extention to electronic equipment, either to the outlet or
between pieces of equipment. As such, affected
In message 869e769f-4e11-4d74-b7f1-7a7a5eb25...@mac.com, dated Tue, 3
Dec 2013, Douglas Nix d...@mac.com writes:
For many years it was not possible to CE Mark wire and cable products
because they did not meet the basic definitions for apparatus under the
LVD. I am seeing increasing numbers of
1 - 100 of 549 matches
Mail list logo
