...@omnisourceasia.com.hk
[mailto:raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk]
Sent: 23 August 2001 15:13
To: kazimier_gawrzy...@dell.com
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I just found out the notes about the hipot testing. The standard is IEC
60598-1 Page 343 Annex Q Conformity testing
) [mailto:rsto...@lucent.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:34 PM
To: 'raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I don't see where that proves anything ( 1/2 voltage testing)
using voltage applicable
Just a viewpoint from one of those commercial test houses.
In Europe the requirements of the Low Voltage Directive are that a product
must be safe, be constructed in accordance with good engineering practice
and comply with the principal elements of the safety objectives detailed.
It does not
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclaren.com
wrote (in AE0F4BD08FEAD211895900805FE67B1FD6CAC5@CAT) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Thu, 23 Aug 2001:
ps there's no need to shout :)
Since it was the third time that I'd made the point, I felt that some
emphasis could
Raymond,
I've been in such a position where we contested hi-pot
testing each and every AC power cable which was sent
with every product during production line testing. There
were two basic reasons: one, for the reason you've suggested
possibly introducing a failure. Second, the time
I read in !emc-pstc that raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk wrote (in
of5099731c.c8b3ec7a-on48256ab0.004e0...@omnisourceasia.com.hk) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Wed, 22 Aug 2001:
I have read one BSEN standard suggesting not to perform hipot testing at
the test voltage, 3kV, 1.25kV or
...@omnisourceasia.com.hk
[mailto:raymond...@omnisourceasia.com.hk]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:26 AM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Cc: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Dear All,
I have read one BSEN standard suggesting not to perform hipot testing at
the test
:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
o.ieee.org
I read in !emc-pstc that Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclaren.com
wrote (in AE0F4BD08FEAD211895900805FE67B1FD6CAC3@CAT) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Wed, 22 Aug 2001:
Well, you have come to the right conclusion but for two wrong
reasons.
In Europe, there are no longer any
Well, you have come to the right conclusion but for two wrong
reasons.
In Europe, there are no longer any 'national approvals' like the old
SEMKO etc. There is ONLY the Low Voltage Directive, and the European
Standards (ENs) that have been 'notified' in the Official Journal as
I read in !emc-pstc that Doug McKean dmck...@corp.auspex.com wrote (in
001001c12a54$2b315f80$3e3e3...@corp.auspex.com) about 'Manufacturing
Hipot Testing', on Tue, 21 Aug 2001:
IMHO, if I were to address the initial question regarding
manufactoring
testing of a product bound for Europe - unless
The following is strictly opinion ...
I may be sticking my neck way out here, but it is my understanding
that any required manufacturing hi-pot test, with regard to UL-1950,
is contractual between the mfr of said device and the testing NRTL.
To my knowledge, there is no *requirement* within the
by: To: emc-p...@ieee.org
owner-emc-pstc@majordomcc:
o.ieee.org Subject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
...@majordomo.ieee.org
Sent by: cc:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: RE:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
:
owner-emc-pstc@majordomSubject: Re:
Manufacturing Hipot Testing
o.ieee.org
Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:49 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian pmerguer...@itl.co.il wrote
(in 2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50202D5CD4@ITLLTD01) about
'Manufacturing Hipot
I read in !emc-pstc that Peter Merguerian pmerguer...@itl.co.il wrote
(in 2D1037012914D4118DB8204C4F4F50202D5CD4@ITLLTD01) about
'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on Mon, 20 Aug 2001:
Production - Line Tests (usually Dilectric Strength and Earth Continuity and
in some cases like medical equipment,
-(0)54-838175
-Original Message-
From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 1:47 PM
To: don_macart...@selinc.com; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: Manufacturing Hipot Testing
Hi Don,
I'm curious
Which safety standard to you use
Don,
IEC 60950, section 5.3, is specific regarding electric strength
testing. It does not require testing between secondary circuits,
as it is the primary to secondary, and primary to ground insulation
that provides protection against electric shock. Type testing is
performed for 1 minute,
Don,
I do not believe that circuit-to-circuit testing is required between
low-voltage circuits. The test is intended to prevent shock hazards caused
by insulation leakage between high-voltage circuits and low-voltage
circuits. I would group the circuits for production testing and only test
them
I read in !emc-pstc that don_macart...@selinc.com wrote (in 88256AAB.00
640e1a...@edison.selinc.com) about 'Manufacturing Hipot Testing', on
Fri, 17 Aug 2001:
A Hipot standard which we must run for CE compliance requires that
circuit-to-circuit and circuit-to-ground testing be performed on a
21 matches
Mail list logo
