A-t/m vs A-t/cm

1999-11-23 Thread Lou Gnecco
Group: I want to make sure I did this right. I was trying to determine the permeability of this material. The B-H curve shows Flux density B in Teslas. (1 tesla = 10,000 Gauss, ) But the Field Strength H is in A/cm. How do I convert this into something I can use

Re: A-t/m vs A-t/cm

1999-11-23 Thread Robert Macy
The tricky part is making sure that the conversion is the right direction. 1 A/m = 0.01 A/cm If you have oersteds and want amperes per meter, multiply by 79.577 If you have amperes per meter and want oersteds, multiply by 0.01257 - Robert -

RE: A-t/m vs A-t/cm

1999-11-23 Thread UMBDENSTOCK
Notice that the multiplier is 4*pi and a power of 10 if you are looking for precision. I use 79.6 for meaningful engineering work that I deal with. -- From: Robert Macy[SMTP:m...@california.com] Reply To: Robert Macy Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 10:45 PM To:

Re: FCC part 15 class B, testing

1999-11-23 Thread Ken Javor
anechoic or semi-anechoic? -- From: ron_cher...@densolabs.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Subject: FCC part 15 class B, testing Date: Tue, Nov 23, 1999, 10:29 AM I would like to know if I can take compliance data for FCC part 15 class B in an anechoic chamber if I can't vary

Re: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Tac Pham
Hello all, Would the NRTL program be a big plus for the ITE certified component, such as power supply??? Tac Pham HC Power, inc. I tried to recall NRTLs that were approved for asessments of ITE to UL1950. I did not overlook MET (listed in my note), but may have missed NTS which may fit

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
Vitaly, Allow me to try and clear some confusion over NRTLs and marks. NRTL is not a mark. An NRTL is an OSHA Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory accredited to evaluate products to specific standards for the U.S. Each NRTL can authorize the use of its own mark for use on U.S. products,

EN60950 3rd Edition?

1999-11-23 Thread Ron Pickard/Hypercom/US
Hello out there, I have some questions regarding the adoption if IEC60950 3rd Edition. 1) Now that IEC60950 3rd Ed. is now out and UL60950 3rd Ed. is out for review, when will EN60950 catch up and follow IEC60950 3rd Ed.? 2) And for that matter, how about AS/NZ 3260 and other 950 derivatives?

EMC Automation software

1999-11-23 Thread RON_CHERNUS
I am looking for PC based EMC Automation software for an anechoic chamber for FCC part 15 class B testing. I have HP analyzers. I would also like the software to do automated NSA meaurements. Ron Chernus, Associate Test Engineer, DVT Denso International Carlsbad, California, USA -

FCC part 15 class B, testing

1999-11-23 Thread RON_CHERNUS
I would like to know if I can take compliance data for FCC part 15 class B in an anechoic chamber if I can't vary the receive antenna from 1 to 4 metres?? (The chamber is not tall enough) Or do I need an OATS or GTEM? I would also like to do FCC parts 22 and 24 on AMPS and PCS phones. Any

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
Graham, In the second paragraph, I said CSA is recognized NRTL. Thus, CSA can issue both NRTL and c-NRTL marks (as well as UL and c-UL marks as far as I know). I would appreciate if you would mail me information on these two NRTL marks. My mailing address is: 20600 Prairie Street

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Gorodetsky, Vitaly
George, Do I have to feel sorry about opening this Pandora's Box (I seem to originate this turn in discussion)? I meant to make innocuous remark (referring to Orwell). Everyone benefits from clarification. c-ETL is perfectly OK. As to NRTL mark(s), I know of recent agreement between TUV

RE: Enclosure Units.

1999-11-23 Thread Hunt, Richard
One rack unit is 1.75 inches. The allowable panel size is nU - 0.031. For example, a 3U panel is (3 * 1.75) - 0.031 = 5.25 - 0.031 = 5.219. -Original Message- From: David Monreal [mailto:dmonr...@advancedshielding.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 1999 1:49 AM To:

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Kevin Robinson
Thanks for that link George. That was a quick/concise list that I was looking for. To get the information you mentioned (what the scope of each CO is), you go to the link that I mentioned http://www.scc.ca/search-front/index.html http://www.scc.ca/search-front/index.html , click

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Ned Devine
Hi, For a list of Accredited certification organizations go to http://www.scc.ca/certific/colist.html For the scope of Accredited certification organizations go to http://www.scc.ca/search-front/indexacc.html Ned Devine Entela, Inc. Program Manager III Phone 616 248 9671 Fax 616 574 9752

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
Kevin, Thanks for the website pointer. I found the site nearly impossible to use via the search function. I got no hits for COs no matter what I tried, including UL and Underwriters Laboratories. Somehow I stumbled on to the following site which DOES list all COs.

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread swilliam
I know ETL is one because I used to work there. But, they are not the only ones. I assume reps from all the labs monitor this list and I am sure they can contact you with their accreditation( I think there are many) Please respond to geor...@lexmark.com To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc:

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Kevin Robinson
You can check out the SCC website at www.scc.ca http://www.scc.ca , click on accreditations and then certification orgs and type in the name of your favorite test lab (or your least favorite as the case may be :-) )to see if they are a CO. You can try a general search for

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread georgea
S. William, Thanks for the words on COs and TOs and SCCs. Apparantly UL is one or more of these, as the c-UL mark is legally acceptable in Canada. Now, what other COs has the SCC accredited to issue an approved Canadian mark? Not CSA, but alternatives to CSA? George --

RE: Supply tolerance for Brazil

1999-11-23 Thread Colgan, Chris
Hi Jess I am afraid BSI does not give anything away for free. The publication World Electricity Supplies number TH20338 is available from BSI at a cost of £50. http://www.bsi.org.uk/ Regards Chris -Original Message- From: Jasmine TAN [SMTP:sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com] Sent: 23 November

RE: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Frank West
Hi all! I hope you were referring to Missouri in the best positive light. As you know, the Missouri ethic of denying everything until it is shown to them, hits them upside the head, and sits down to dinner with them makes for the best compliance engineers. Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland

Re: FW: Compressed Air. Pneumatics, Safety requirements

1999-11-23 Thread Frank West
Good Morning Israel! You want to purchase a copy of EN 983:1996. This standard is Safety of Machinery, Safety of Fluid Power Systems, Pneumatics. This standard explains in detail the requirements for pneumatic systems on industrial machinery. Regards, Frank West Sr. Engineer TUV Rheinland NA

Re: Earth Potential Equalizing

1999-11-23 Thread Frank West
Good Morning Janne! It has been my experience that units seperate from the control cabinet that supplies power to them are grounded to the same ground potential as the the cabinet, assuming you are not using an IT type power system (which is what is used in the Nordic countries for example)

RESP: Compressed Air. Pneumatics, Safety requirements

1999-11-23 Thread Peter E. Perkins
Israel and PSNet, Since you've asked about pneumatic controls, you are apparently dealing with a machine - which would invoke the Machinery Directive. The risk assessment which you will do (from EN 292) would flag your assessment of the risks associated with the

Re: NRTL acceptance

1999-11-23 Thread Graham Rae Dulmage
Vitaly, your comment regarding CSA is incorrect. CSA is an NRTL just like the others. CSA has a mark for NRTL approval. Regards G. Rae Dulmage Gorodetsky, Vitaly wrote: George, You have overlooked MET, NTS, WYLE, SWRI and others. For a complete list and the scope of recognition, go to

RE: Supply tolerance for Brazil

1999-11-23 Thread Jasmine TAN
Hi Chris, Is it in the web page which you could direct me to ? Thanks in advance! ...Jess Colgan, Chris chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com on 11/22/99 06:10:13 PM To: 'Jasmine TAN' sb...@ctlsg.creaf.com emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org cc: Subject: RE: Supply tolerance for Brazil Hi

Re: ESD EN 61000-4-2 question

1999-11-23 Thread James Ericson
During a quality inspection in my lab the inspector I've got a non-conformity due to the lack of resistivity check on the 470 Kohm resistor employed to connect the reference plane of the ESD table to the ground. This is required according to EN 61000-4-2 Could anyone give me some hints in order

Safety Listing Required in Canada ?

1999-11-23 Thread Ron Pickard/Hypercom/US
Hello to all, This is focused to the knowledgeable folks in Canada and to others that might know the answer(s) to this query. In the USA, there exists the federal approval/listing requirements found in 29CFR Part 1910 Subpart S. Does anyone know if there is a similar set of rules requiring