I would just like to share some information that I obtained this morning
concerning the above conferences.
Telcordia and Bell Atlantic will be hosting the NEBS conference in Baltimore
on October 4-5, 2000. The preliminary agenda and key speakers are shown at
the following website:
You could contact our Notified Body - TUV Product Services at 1-651-638-0261
or http://www.tuvps.com Dennis Swanson is the EMI Engineer I deal with. I
know they do quite allot of EMI work on pacemakers/defibrillators and the
like as we have some of the big boys up here in Mpls/St.Paul (i.e.
The telephone number to ITS, Menlo Park is 650-463-2959. The number
provided below is their fax line. My mistake.
Sorry,
Bandele
Jetstream Communications, Inc.
badep...@jetstream.com
-Original Message-
From: Bandele Adepoju
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 2:46 PM
To: TREG (E-mail);
Paul,
Try ITS (Intertek Testing Services). It is my understanding
that they have local representation in Mexico and can
assist in obtaining the NOM mark. They should be able to
provide you with the correct answer to your question. The
telephone number of their office in Menlo Park, California
Dear List members:
Can anyone provide the Regulatory and Industry Network and CPE requirements
(e.g., equivalence of Product Safety (UL 1950) , FCC Part 15, Part 68,
470-B, etc.) and approval authority contact(s) for Mexico?
Thanks in advance.
Paul A. Lubeski
Project Manager, Telephone
Dear List members:
Can anyone provide the Product Safety and Industry/Regulatory Network
requirements and approval authority contact(s) for Mexico?
Thank you.
Paul A. Lubeski
Project Manager, Telephone Technology Center
Wyle Laboratories, Inc.
7800 HWY 20 W.
Huntsville, AL 35806
(256)
I'm looking for reference to any standard which may provide specifics for
using lead shot for dielectric strength testing. I know this done for
insulation system qualifications, just have not identified a standard for
the test set up.
Thanks,
Barry Marks
Hello Martin,
I don't have the answer to your question, but do caution that the First
Test to be run (if the DUT is grounded) is the Ground Continuity Test (for
test-operator protection).
Regards, Art Michael
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
*
Group,
A reader asked about the order of performing safety tests.
Should he perform insulation resistance tests before or after
hipot tests? The reader didn't say what type of product he's
testing, but I can ask.
Thanks,
/\
| Martin Rowe | / \
|
Could someone enlighten me on what is meant by NEBS 2000 requirements? Is
there some sort of standards work going on here?
Thanks,
Jim
Jim Wiese
NEBS Project Manager/Compliance Engineer
ADTRAN, INC.
901 Explorer Blvd.
P.O. Box 14
Huntsville, AL 35814-4000
256-963-8431
256-963-8250 fax
Contact ISMAEL MARTINEZ NCE/NCT 210-522-3631 imarti...@swri.org
SwRI EMCR group does a large amount of work in this area for government and
civilian applications.
JOHN E. STUCKEY
EMC Engineer
Micron Technology, Inc.
Integrated Products Group
Micron Architectures Lab
8455 West
Both Telecordia and UL are test houses that can deal with
NEBS testing. Telcordia has probably been at it longer than UL and used to
be a part of MA Bell, and then Bell Labs. UL in the last couple of years has
been putting on NEBS seminars at which all of the RBOC's Bell Atlantic,
Dear Edward,
I concur with your comments regarding central differences between sales and
compliance expertise. It is clear to me that Russians have learned to speak
with sales people in their own language. However, I respectfully disagree
with your opening statement. The better one gets
I attended one of the very first NEBS seminars held, a few years back. It
was hosted by
Bellcore (now known as Telcordia). They are the ones who wrote the specs.,
with input from the RBOCs (although some of the RBOCs may have additional
requirements, and some also make the 'objective' specs in
Are you speaking of Telefonica and Spain ? If yes, part of the answer
...
* Concerning analog telephone interfaces, you can tests them against
TBR21 in any accredited lab within EU or outside, for the regulatory
part, before april, 8th 2000 (RTTE directive, refer to others
messages on that
To all those who replied to my posting, Thank you.
(I wonder how many deleted it thinking it was on the proposed split.
[A Bad Idea] It was tricky trying to compose a title that would get
through and also go along with the proposal for prefixes of EMC and or
Safety! )
--
Regards
Dave
A long time ago, while I was a member of Uncle Sams Canoe Club, I worked on
a radar system that used D.I. Water. The tubes in the liquid cooler were
copper and the heat exchanger was CRES. The water was circulated
throughout the transmitter group and through a Klystron where it was heated
and
Dear Rene,
It sounds as if you have been offended by my comments.
If this is the case I apologise for this. I did
mention in my reply (without being rude). Any way,
when I said on a daily basis, it was meant as a
example. What it meant that they change frequently.
For example if you want to
Still better, only important chatter should be posted. I have just violated
my suggestion.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: John Coyle [mailto:jco...@norsat.com]
Sent: 10 March, 2000 5:15 PM
To: 'Robert Legg'; 'IEEE EMC-PSTC Forum'
Subject: RE: EMC and product safety split?
A better
Mike, A1:1996 of EN50061:1995 has the EMC requirements for implantable
cardiac pacemakers.
It can be ordered on the web from BSI.
Richard Woods
Sunning in Florida
--
From: Michael Taylor [SMTP:mtay...@hach.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2000 9:19 AM
Greetings all.
An issue came up that needs answers as soon as possible. Does anyone in the
group know if there are any European standards covering pacemaker (and
similar devices) immunity to Electric Magnetic fields. A search of Global
Eng. Documents product list proved fruitless. I'm sure
Thank you Robert for a well detailed response. Even though this issue
seems to come up every year, more clarification is the outcome. Your
response clarifies issues that were not as fully addressed (or at least not
fully understood by me) in previous threads. I'll call this Chapter Three
of my
Dear Chris,
Only one rule is common throughout this region (and you should keep
reminding yourself of it)...
... and it is that there are no rules!
Well okay, there is a framework of rules and Laws that you must operate
within, but these are loosely interpreted and the game is how you
operate
What you need is a list of recommended Certifying Centers that are providing a
service to their non-Russian clients. Please drop me an email describing your
broad
product family and I will dig them out from the files.
Jerry Roberton
Use
,jerryrober...@netscapeonline.co.uk
Bruce Touzel
Hi All
I have recently undertook a study of such software and found two options
that seem to be suprisingly accurate with their predictions: Viewlogic
tools and EMC Workbench. The one thing I realised quickly is that the
cheap and nasty packages do not always give correct and/or accurate
results,
Chris,
I know very little of the category of your product, light industrial test
and measurement equipment. But I have been through numerous product GOST-R
certifications. My clients included Compaq, Applied Materials, HP, etc. I
am afraid that few things have changed since I got out of this
you will also find that some countries will ask for everything that you have on
file, eg. DOC's, Network reports, etc.
simply because they don't know themselves.
r...@twn.tuv.com wrote:
What about
Japan, AustraliaNewZealand, South Africa, Argentina, Mexico...
In many Asian
What about
Japan, AustraliaNewZealand, South Africa, Argentina, Mexico...
In many Asian Countries (Taiwan, China, Korea, Hongkong.) rules are just
being set up. This implies that there are frequent changes, but not on daily
basis.
And changes are implemented according to a
Hello group,
I have a product that uses cooling water and at one point within the system
the water is energized to a high voltage level. There are several
mechanisms used to insure that the water is safe before exiting the system.
I would like to be able to use De-Ionized or Triple Distilled
A well designed antenna will be balanced, i.e., it will be geometry
independent. Looking at the factors for our 3110b, they look very nearly
the same for horizontal and vertical polarization as well as at 3 meters and
10 meters. This suggests we should save the money for this model antenna
and
30 matches
Mail list logo
