Thomas,
Check the equipment list on http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rtte/listeq.htm
Amund, Oslo/Norway
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:52:11 -0500 Courtland Thomas ctho...@patton.com
wrote:
Hello Group,
I would like to know if there is a list of equipment that falls under the
RTTE Directive.
This is in a non-accessible area at the rear of a 19 rack-mount power
supply. Only service or maintenance people can access. Also, the knock out
cannot be pushed inward on the chassis, only outward when the top cover is
removed.
-doug
=
Douglas E. Powell
Hello Group,
I have yet another question. Does anyone know what R2D certification is? I
was asked if our equipment has Bulgarian certification for R2D. I am not
familiar with the term.
Thanks,
Courtland Thomas
Patton Electronics
---
This message is
To the Ferrite discussion:
I've refrained from responding to the ferrite question because of being away
but I would confirm what Amand states. I use powdered iron FT240-43 from
Fair-Rite as they make them for Amidon and have the properties desired to
reduce common mode signals appearing on
Hello group,
I have a product that uses optional 1/2 half-shear electrical knock outs
for conduit connections. Can anyone direct me to specific requirements on
how much or how little force is required to remove these knock outs? Is a
tool required or not if it only pushes outward?
thanks,
ad.82daed6.27e25...@aol.com, peterh...@aol.com inimitably wrote:
I have been told by a customer that there are PFC filter available
commercially
off the shelf just like the EMI filter that I can buy and put it in front of
my
power supply and the PFC filter will cure most of the harmonic
Div 1 = normally hazardous. Div 2 = only hazardous in the event of a failure
(e.g. ventilation breakdown, pipe/tank rupture). For that reason, Div 2
hardware need only pass in the normal operating state, no circuit faults are
considered. The logic being applied is that two unrelated faults
Hi Peter,
Try Ro Associates Inc. http://www.roassoc.com
or Vicor http://www.vicr.com
or Motorola
Regards,
Carmen, Leitch
-Original Message-
From: peterh...@aol.com [SMTP:peterh...@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 12:06 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject:
If it is passive check its effect on power factor. I saw one yesterday that
reduced power factor to - 0.33.
on 3/15/01 11:05 AM, peterh...@aol.com at peterh...@aol.com wrote:
Hello All,
I have been told by a customer that there are PFC filter available
commercially off the shelf just
Robert,
Check out the National Electric Code (NFPA 70) Article 500-7(a) and 500-7(b)
for your answer, but simply stated, In a Division 1 location, the hazardous
atmosphere is assumed to be present under normal conditions, and a Division
2 location, the hazardous atmosphere is present under
Robert:
To my best recollection, the essential difference is that Div. 2 is an
environment subject to occasional presence (leaks) of flammable/explosive
gases, while Div. 1 is where this stuff is always present or potentially
present. I suppose this is a simplification, but I think it expresses
Hello All,
I have been told by a customer that there are PFC filter available commercially
off the shelf just like the EMI filter that I can buy and put it in front of my
power supply and the PFC filter will cure most of the harmonic problems. Is
this ture? If so can anyone let me have some
Hello Robert,
A visit to the Safety Link www.safetylink.com and an in-page search on
the term hazloc will deliver you to a spot within the Safety Link with
several very good tutorials and other resources on this topic.
Regards, Art Michael
Int'l Product Safety News
A.E. Michael, Editor
166
abejkckdfonelaipofhnmebiecaa.cet...@cetest.nl, CE-test - Ing. Gert
Gremmen - ce-marking and more... cet...@cetest.nl wrote:
Last week I mentioned the introduction of new
regulations for the power limitation of small power supplies.
I looked up the document and can tell you the following:
In view of recent postings, I hope no one minds me posting the
following which arrived in my in-box today
Nick
_
An engineer dies and reports to the pearly gates. St. Peter checks
his dossier and says, Ah, you're an engineer--you're in the wrong
place.
So the engineer reports
Hello Group,
I need some education on Classified/Hazardous locations.
What is the difference between a product that is certified to Class I
Division 1 versus Class I Division 2?
If I had a product that was certified to Division 2, what would be needed to
make it pass Division 1 requirements?
Hello Group,
I would like to know if there is a list of equipment that falls under the
RTTE Directive. My area of concern is converters, such as RS-232 to RS-485,
V.35 to G.704, etc..
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Courtland Thomas
Patton Electronics
Hi Paul,
For wire: CSA/UR Source: type of wire, gauge, rated voltage, max
temperature, flammability rating,
For shrinkable tubing: CSA/UR Source: material, rated voltage, flammability
rating, max temperature, thickness
You should get also a Declaration of Conformity from the cable harnesses'
I would state the requirements (UL Recognized) for the wire, heat shrink,
etc. on the print somewhere. You may want to also set up some sort of
certification process with your supplier, that is, you and your supplier
work up a certification document stating that components used on your
assembly
FAQ: Sources of EMC Safety Compliance Information
This is to let you know that I have just posted in two parts the 59th
issue of the above FAQ to the newsgroup for regulatory/compliance matters
and EMC and safety specifications and testing,
Bob, the Directive does required markings on the packaging, but it does not
define the type of packaging. It is my opinion that the sales package was
intended and not the shipping package. In my case, I only have a shipping
package, so I have applied the markings there. The CE mark must be
Paul -
If you specify on your drawings that the harnesses (cables) are to be UL R/C
(or Listed) and CSA Certified, your vendor should place the required
markings or agency labels on the packaging or product as specified in their
UL agreement. You need to have the packaging available when the FUS
I saw some postings recently to the following question but I was not able
to browse the recent archives so I will ask the question again.
Under the RTTE Directive is there any labeling requirements for the product
packaging or shipping packaging? If so, what is required?
Thanks,
Bob
Welcome to the IEEE EMC Chicago Chapter Website!
The purpose of this site is to inform our local EMC engineers with information
related to the IEEE EMC Chicago Chapter. Please bookmark this page for future
reference, and especially look to this site for news related to
So the real problem lies with the power companies for the power outage in
the first place...(just joking).
=
John Woodgate j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk on 03/14/2001 12:03:56 PM
Please respond to John Woodgate
Hello Steve and All,
For your case (Verification Class A Digital Device) please be advised as
follows:
1. The statement This device ... undesired operation needs to be placed
on the product. If the product is too small, you may place it in:
a. The User Instruction Manual
b. The pamphlet
200103142314.paa04...@epgc196.sdd.hp.com, Rich Nute ri...@sdd.hp.com
inimitably wrote:
I often wonder whether being able to measure a
phenomenon means that we should therefore control
that phenomenon. Phenomena such as flicker and EMC
have been observable long before the advent of suitable
Call out requirements for recognized material VW-1 etc on the drawing. Then
have the vendor mark the cables with their recognition mark, either toe tags
or on the box. Show that to the inspector just like you would any recognized
part. But have control of your vendor - you should have some
yup - digital watch makers about had a cow over this years ago, but I don't
think they define small.
[Gary McInturff] Gary -Original Message-
From: Fleury, Bill [mailto:bi...@artesyncp.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:01 PM
To: 'Peter Merguerian'; 'Steve Austin'; emc pstc
Cc:
My understanding is that the GB-9254-1998 is similar to CISPR 22 and the
GB-4943-1995 is similar to IEC 60950.
Anderson Cheng
-原始郵件-
寄件者: wo...@sensormatic.com [SMTP:wo...@sensormatic.com]
傳送時間: 2001年3月15日 AM 04:18
收件者: emc-p...@ieee.org
主旨: RE: Chinese GB/T17626.6-1998
The Japanese laws about product safety will change from T-mark to PSE-mark,
effective from April 1st, 2001.
As for AC Adapters that already have T-Mark approval, there is a 5 year
period for which they can continue to be sold OR to the point when their
T-Mark license expires. Power Cords and AC
I use an outside vendor to assemble various cable harnesses for my products.
The vendor is recognized by UL and CSA and undergoes quarterly audits. I
supply a drawing that specifies certain components (e.g. Connector X, Line
Filter Y). However, I leave it up to them to use whatever UL/CSA
32 matches
Mail list logo
