Also used in Malta and Cyprus (even in “Turkish” Northern Cyprus IIRC!) – and
then there is Gibraltar.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Mcauley [mailto:john.mcau...@cei.ie]
Sent: 16 July 2018 01:03
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Safety design of shutter opening
Ghery
"Thanks" for that link - seems like we should all stop drinking/using WATER.
Then just die of thirst and/or malnutrition and/or illness due to lack of
basic hygiene! ;)
Just goes to "show" that almost EVERYTHING (including thus EMF!), in "life"
comes with "risks" - but didn't we all
In other words, become an "aquaphibian" (or something like that :) ) – “back to
the Future” J
-Original Message-
From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:oconne...@tamuracorp.com]
Sent: 05 July 2018 22:04
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] EN62311 - Human Exposure to
Hi,
We’re looking for a battery safety expert to join us on a project. They need
to be very current on high performance lithium-ion packs as the current best
practices lead the standards a bit.
Please contact me directly.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen
Product Safety Consulting, Inc
Rich
Steps 1 to 4 are perfectly “sensible” but one needs to formalize the analysis –
and methods like doing a Failure Modes Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) are
not that “simple” when one has to do it in sufficient detail to prove the point
(“been there, done that”)!
John E Allen
Have you tried to isolate the original source of the noise - and then to
supress that?
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: McBurney, Ian [mailto:ian.mcbur...@allen-heath.com]
Sent: 26 April 2018 11:33
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Mains Conducted rf emissions measurements
Hi,
We're in need of a Functional Safety expert to join our project. Please
respond directly to me.
Best Regards,
John
jral...@productsafetyinc.com
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
Brian
Commiserations on yourself "no longer needed" (really?) - but I hope/am
sure that you will soon find a more-realistic company with a rewarding
position J.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
PS: I can say, with relative certainty, that before retiring a few years
ago, I had "been
Head in hands - and liability insurance paper in back pocket (hopefully)!
From: James Pawson (U3C) [mailto:ja...@unit3compliance.co.uk]
Sent: 30 August 2018 13:18
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] CE marking - mixture of responsibilities
Charlie, John, thanks for the
FWIW, I was always deeply skeptical of the “(Pass, Fail, N/A)” criteria in the
TRF’s because those were, and generally still are, almost totally dependent on
“the eye of the beholder”, i.e. whoever does the compliance assessment! An
(absolutely terrible!) example of that was what I found (in a
Tom
Ref those 200V products: are they single phase 2-wire (Neutral + Live) +
Ground, OR split-phase (100V on each of 2 Live legs) + Neutral return?
(IIRC, it is the latter - probably introduced as a result of North American
influence where that configuration is common for high consumption
: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Japanese manis leads
John,
On Fri, 7 Dec 2018 14:40:26 -,
"John Allen" wrote:
> Ref those 200V products: are they single phase 2-wire (Neutral + Live) +
> Ground, OR split-phase (100V on each of 2 Live legs) + Neutral
"Been there, seen that" OH SO many times ! L
Emphasises the need for a defined "cradle to grave" Project Lifecycle which
includes the Project Compliance targets at each stage, and with the
responsibilities laid out in some detail so that progress can be accurately
forecast and monitored - and
I've had several probably "nasty" emails from sources that appeared to have
spoofed some of the email addresses used by myself and several people that I
know, but please don't confuse me with John R Allen of Product Safety Inc.
FWIW, I don't think the data breach in question was specific to
Don't forget NAFTA-related issues (especially in the "DJT Wall" context!) as
Mexico probably cannot afford to be "too liberal" in what it can accept with
the minimum of "bureaucratic rules" whilst still trying to protect its
in-house labs & certification bodies as far as it legally can!
John E
Doug
As I am sure that many others will confirm, that CEE 7 socket does NOT have any
defined polarity for the Live/Line and Neutral contact tubes, and thus the
Line/Live and Neutral wires to those contact tubes can & are connected either
way around according to the “wim” of the installer –
anyone here know?
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-02-22 20:23, John Allen wrote:
John
Regardless of whether or not a CEE 7 plug is (and, apart from that particular
version of the CEE 7 plug, almost, if not all
ible in France and Belgium.
Best wishes
John Woodgate OOO-Own Opinions Only
J M Woodgate and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-02-22 18:13, John Allen wrote:
Doug
As I am sure that many others will confirm, that CEE 7 socket does NOT have any
defined polarity for the Live/
Safety and Compliance
https://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pses/index.html
John Allen | President | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department®
630-238-0188
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com/>
Although PSC maintains the highest level of
IMHO, the subject of “tamper-proofing devices” will be around for a “long time”
because, once a “new” device is introduced, then “someone” will (pretty soon!)
come up with a “workaround” – it’s just a case of when the workaround becomes
available, and then when will someone find and use it, and
upt dealings, especially in order to influence
improperly (usually followed by with )
The example provided by John Allen (UK) is not tampering as he did not take the
unit apart for any of the above reasons. Using the above definitions, the
reasons for using any “tamperproof” construct
.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 09 April 2019 09:40
To: John Allen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Tamper-proof Hardware
I think that the major point is that Clause 0 is purely advisory. It seems
reasonable
An interesting question, and, from the text of Schedule 1, I would guess
that these are technically excluded (though, for why, I have no idea).
In addition, that same exclusion would appear to include all the power line
comms devices which use the mains supply network and also any BS1362
ld never have been included in the first place.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@woodjohn.uk]
Sent: 09 April 2019 09:40
To: John Allen; EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Tamper-proof Hardware
I think that the major point is that Cl
An “easy one” for us “oldies” but I’m sure that John Woodgate will quickly
reply “in detail” – the frequency limit relates directly to the “old” Long
Wave” frequency band, which starts at 150kHz! J
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: 06cee064502d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org
And don’t forget about the work on mobile robots -R15.08 American National
Standard for Industrial Mobile Robots and Robot Systems
Best Regards,
John
John Allen
Product Safety Consulting, Inc
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com>
On Jul 27, 2019, at 10:08 PM, Richar
Which is possibly why there a "few" phone fires, especially when charged
from the host of "cr*p"/dangerously poor 3rd-party chargers that are widely
available (I am very careful with both the phones and the chargers that -
occasionly, every 3-4 years - I buy).
John E Allen
W. London, UK
Ted
Just a very minor clarification regarding appliance couplers – non-filtered
ones don’t provide direct Ground connections to the chassis. Obvious I know,
but could be overlooked.
John E Allen
W. London, UK
From: Ted Eckert [mailto:07cf6ebeab9d-dmarc-requ...@ieee.org]
Sent: 24
Quick search on “80/80 rule history” yields (for a start!):
“It was named after it's founder, the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, back
in 1895. He noticed that people in society seemed to divide naturally into what
he called the “vital few,” or the top 20 percent in terms of money and
and Associates www.woodjohn.uk
Rayleigh, Essex UK
On 2019-11-18 20:02, John Allen wrote:
Quick search on “80/80 rule history” yields (for a start!):
“It was named after it's founder, the Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto, back
in 1895. He noticed that people in society seemed to divide naturally
Yup
Old electrolytics need “time” and, IIRC, a gradually increasing voltage to
reform before one applies the “full voltage”!
I’ve probably told this story before, but, when at school “some decades” ago I
built a valve/tube oscillator from stuff in a “junk pile” that I had bought
from
?
Thanks,
John Allen
PSC - USA
-
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable
Thanks John!
Here's the link to the subject site -
https://codebookdownload.com/
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department(r)
630-238-0188
John Allen-Past President - IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
Thanks Derek!!
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department®
630-238-0188
www.productsafetyinc.com<http://www.productsafetyinc.com/>
John
Rich, et al
AH, now you are getting to the “specifics” J
Whilst I (and many others!) are very well aware of all those other
“contributory factors” (some of which I also outlined to SWMBO’s friend’s
partner!), I didn’t want to “go into that level of detail” in my initial post
>From
John W & Friends
Earlier this afternoon, we were visiting a friend of my wife and her partner –
and, later during a general conversation, the latter and I got around to “risk
assessment” (in the context of the Grenfell tower block fire disaster a couple
of years ago), and so I outlined to
Typo in the email below: - see highlighted words! L
From: John Allen [mailto:john_e_al...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 30 December 2019 21:24
To: 'John Woodgate'; 'EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG'
Subject: RE: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] act of God versus safety
John W & Friends
Ear
ternal to a device where
they are within a fire enclosure and only accessible to service personnel.
This is a bit of an oversimplification, but I hope it helps clear it up a
little.
Regards,
Ted Eckert
The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of my employer or UL.
From:
This is great information, thank you Scott.
And thanks to everyone else who guided an old school compliance guy - We’re
always learning!!
Be safe out there,
John
From: Scott Aldous
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2020 10:47 AM
To: John Allen
Cc: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] UL
Hi,
I hope everyone is good, healthy and being safe.
Does anyone have an accurate explanation of how a fuse can be UL Listed vs UR?
A fuse cannot stand alone as with other UL Listed products.
UL categories are JDYX, JDYX2
Thank you and Be Safe,
John
-
ed in many product categories and have
managed engineers give me a call to discuss the opportunity.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department(r)
630-238-0
I believe most Standards that have a requirement regarding it, require bleed
off within 60 seconds.
From: Pete Perkins <0061f3f32d0c-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 10:48 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] [EXTERNAL] Re: [PSES] electric
Very well put Dan. Where in the risk assessment does it talk about “prudent
avoidance”? A toaster is hot and has uninsulated live parts accessible while
energized with a known shock hazard.
Have a nice weekend!!
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen
President & CEO
Product Sa
Hi,
The Call for Papers for ISPCE 2022 is here. The deadline is April 13th. If
you will be presenting in the Compliance 101 Track, please also contact me as
I'm Chairing the Track.
https://2022.psessymposium.org/
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Pro
they’ll get it into compliance.
I hope that helps.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen
President & CEO
Product Safety Consulting, Inc
www.productsafetyinc.com
On Jul 7, 2022, at 8:53 AM, Lauren Crane
<1afd08519f18-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ieee.org> wrote:
[EXTERNAL
to Wearables that are made of
fabric??
Wearable Technology Standards:
* Wellness or Non-Medical Wearable: IEC/UL 62368-1
https://www.ul.com/services/wearable-technology-testing-and-certification
I would appreciate any input you can provide.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen
Hi everyone,
ISPCE 2023 is in Dallas, TX May 1-3 - https://2023.psessymposium.org/.
I am Chairing the Compliance 101 Track again. If you considering a paper or
presentation let me know. Papers and Presentation are due February 15th.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President
is the function of the push button switch?
2. Why are you removing it?
3. What is the switch rated?
If needed Field Evaluation and Labeling can be done and will confirm if your
changes are in compliance.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting,
Hi everyone,
We are in need of a Functional Safety consultant for contract work. Please
reply as appropriate.
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsou
-5VA/B minimum for permanently connected (to the building) products.
Many Standards also have a flame spread test requirement if the part is of a
certain size.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department®
t possible the UR mark is on the Bulk
packaging that the on-line supplier would have?
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consulting, Inc.
Your Outsourced Compliance Department(r)
630-238-0188, Cell: 630-330-3145
[cid:image001.jpg@01D
Thank you, Rich!
Over 240 have already registered for ISPCE 2024! This is the place to be for
all Product Safety and Certifications knowledge transfer and networking -
https://2024.psessymposium.org/.
Best Regards and Be Safe,
John
John Allen | President & CEO | Product Safety Consul
501 - 552 of 552 matches
Mail list logo