HI Richard,
UL CCS in Fremont, CA has an MRA in place with a Certification Body in
Mexico. The MRA has been notified to COFETEL and our testing is
accepted.
Happy Holidays,
Barbara
__
Barbara L. Judge, Vice President
UL CCS
Manager,
Amund,
The testing that would be required would be completely dependant upon the
changes that have been made to the product. The requirements for a Grant of
Equipment Authorization through a TCB would be identical to those required by
the FCC.
Best Regards,
Barbara
Hi Chuck,
The device in question would fall under 15.247, which has no extreme
temperature requirement in the U.S. If the WLAN device was tested for use in
the EU the European Norm (EN 300 328) does involve extreme temperature testing
of -20 to +55 C, unless it is for indoor use or controlled
Hi Amund,
Some equipment types falling under Parts 15 and 18 do not require
certification; most notably would be Part 15 Subpart B Unintentional
Radiators, the list of how those devices are treated under the Equipment
Authorization requirements may be found in the pdf attachment. A recent
Compliance Certification Services, a TCB, CAB, and independent test lab
specializing in domestic and international Wireless regulatory compliance
testing and certification, has an opening for a Sales Professional. The
person we are looking for will have, at a minimum:
*
TWO years
Bob,
Attached please find current DRAFT of the revised EMC Directive as well as a
report produced as the result of a critical review of the EMC
standardization system by CEN, CENELEC, and ETSI. The Commission was
seeking comments from Industry/Trade Associations and governments. I am
also
Randy,
See pertinent sections below for FCC CE, as well as a url for Australian
info. I hope that this is helpful.
EMC Directive Article 10:
1. In the case of apparatus for which the manufacturer has applied the
standards referred to in Article 7 (1), the conformity of apparatus with
this
Hi Charles,
Both the US and China are signatories to the APEC MRA. Unfortunately that
doesn't help you. The APEC MRA covers Telecommunications devices, both
wireline and wireless. It does not cover Part 15 Subpart B equipment under
its umbrella. The US and Taiwan, by separate agreement have
Neil,
Try http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_01/47cfrv1_01.html From
there you can access Part 2.902, 2.906, and 2.907 which describe each of
those processes. You should also check out Part 15.101 which provides a
table explaining which process you must follow for all Unlicensed
Paul,
Forgive me, but you are incorrect in your description of the services that
TCBs perform.
TCBs may be authorized by the FCCto provide certification services under any
one or all of 9 categories. Those categories are:
A. Unlicensed Radio Frequency Devices
1. Low power transmitters
Pierre,
If the lab at which your testing was conducted is designated as a Conformity
Assessment Body(CAB) under the EMC Sector of the US - EU Mutual Recognition
Agreement then you need not submit anything at all to the FCC. You may
simply issue a Declaration of Conformity and ship your product
Hi,
Compliance Certification Services, an independent third party
EMC/RFI/SAR/Safety test facility in Silicon Valley is seeking the services
of test technicians with 3 - 5 years experience in EMC/RFI. Preference will
be given to those with experience with wireless communications devices.
Please
Bill didn't take over Art's responsibilities. He is currently working with
Art. Neither of them are the source for answers regarding Pt. 15, Pt. 18.
or Pt. 68 though.
For questions relating to Pt. 15 18 contact Ray La Forge rlafo...@fcc.gov
Question relating to Terminal Equipment Attachment
No, Art has not retired. He will retire by the end of 2003 I think. He
recently moved his office back to the lab in Columbia. His email address is
unchanged.
BJ
-Original Message-
From: Gary McInturff [mailto:gary.mcintu...@worldwidepackets.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 11:50
Hi Fred,
Is that an official translation of CNS 13438? By the way in visiting your
website I notice that you stipulate that In-country testing is required for
most equipment Under the APEC Mutual Recognition Arrangement, both Taiwan
and the US being signatories, it is not required that testing
We got our copy of the standard itself yesterday and there is no DOW listed
in the standard either.
Best Regards,
Barbara
___
Barbara L. Judge
Vice President
Compliance Certification Services
Designated TCB and CAB
561F Monterey Road
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
Hello Again,
We are looking for a broadband linear power amplifier ~50W covering a
minimum frequency range of 1GHz - 2.5GHz, a broader range would be fine. RF
Input Signal Format capability: CW/AM/FM/PM/Pulse. If anyone out there has
or knows of any used equipment, or specific recommendations
Hi Folks,
CCS is seeking the services of an RF/EMC Engineer or Technician with
experience in testing wireless devices as well as ITE, TM, etc. to
international standards. This is a permanent, full-time staff position;
competitive salary commensurate with knowledge and experience. CCS is an
Brian,
Perhaps he was referring to the fact that the standard has not yet been
published in the Official Journal of the European Communities. Attached is
the url for you to check. It will provide you with the list of all
harmonized standards that have been published in the Journal in support
http://oasforum.oas.org/citelituv3.nsf/5251d4eedd16b13285256919007e38dd/df68
655663c1382e85256924004ed6e7/$FILE/allocationE11.rtf
John,
The above link is through the CITEL Website and will take you directly to
the Argentine Allocation table. It starts at 10GHz but if you just scroll
down the
Designated TCB and CAB
561F Monterey Road
Morgan Hill, CA 95037
408-463-0885 ext.104
Fax: 408-463-0888
e-mail: bju...@ccsemc.com
http://www.ccsemc.com
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kwok [mailto:dk...@intetron.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 7:09 PM
To: Barbara Judge
Cc: emc-p
Dan,
Please note excerpts from RTTE Directive:
Article 20
Repeal
1. Directive 98/13/EC is hereby repealed as from 8 April 2000.
2. This Directive is not a specific directive within the meaning of Article
2(2) of Directive 89/336/EEC. The provisions of Directive 89/336/EEC shall
not apply to
John,
I would agree that the ability to have face to face meetings with the
Competent Body is of key importance. There are a number of bodies
designated in the United States at this time, called Conformity Assessment
Bodies, which hold equal status in the EU to any Competent Body in the EU.
Stuart,
The Directive itself stipulates what must be contained in the TCF and the
Guidance notes go into greater detail. Attached please find website for
Guidance Notes.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/electr_equipment/emc/guides/english.pdf
Compliance Certification Services (CCS) is an independent test lab in
Silicon Valley. CCS has been designated as a Telecommunications
Certification Body (TCB) by NIST and the FCC; as a Conformity Assessment
Body (CAB) for the EMC and RTTE Directives by NIST under the US - EU MRA;
and as a CAB
Mike,
The transition period under both the EMC and Telco sectoral texts of the MRA
has indeed ended. Lists of the confirmed CABs under each sector are
published on both the NIST and the official EU websites. Both are attached.
http://ts.nist.gov/ts/htdocs/210/216/mra.htm
Courtland,
For equipment covered by harmonized standards you are correct, no Notified
or Conformity Assessment Body involvement is needed. This is the situation
that most terminal equipment manufacturers find themselves in currently. On
the other hand, there are a number of RF standards that
Ron,
I downloaded 57 documents on Tuesday and Wednesday of this week with no
trouble whatsoever. Perhaps I was monopolizing the servers time!!!
Best Regards,
Barbara Judge
-Original Message-
From: Ron Pickard [mailto:rpick...@hypercom.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 8:01 AM
OK, so this time I'll really attach it.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg03/publicat/guides/emcgen.pdf
Best Regards,
Barbara
-Original Message-
From: Barbara Judge
Sent: Monday, December 20, 1999 7:17 PM
To: 'wo...@sensormatic.com'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: RE: TCF DOC
Richard,
Attached please find a URL for the Guidelines on Applying the EMC
Directive. On page 44, you will find the components of a TCF. I trust
that this will be of help.
Best Regards,
Barbara
-Original Message-
From: wo...@sensormatic.com [mailto:wo...@sensormatic.com]
Sent:
Barry,
We are an independent test facility with 4 OATS. We spend a fair amount
of time each day in doing daily confidence checks on all of our
equipment. Would the instrument you mentioned, the Site Master, be
applicable in maintaining an OATS? I look forward to your response.
Best Regards,
Hi Ron,
The exchange of letters took place last fall. The MRA entered into
force on December 1, 1998. We are actually in the Transition Phase of
the agreement. The US has nominated CAB's in accordance with the
specific sectoral texts, as have the Europeans. There are workshops
scheduled for
will be departing from
requiring EMC
testing only at approved labs to accepting test data from labs in
countries
where an MRA exists. These labs must have NVLAP or similar
accreditations. I
have also heard that a US-Taiwan MRA is now in place.
Barbara Judge, Compliance Certification
Hi Steve,
The standard does not come in a bilingual format but there is an
official English language version of the standard. You may obtain a
copy from the National Bureau of Standards in Taipei.
I know that there is alot of frustration in dealing with BCIQ but our
experience has been that
34 matches
Mail list logo
