In reviewing this, I don’t see that it addresses RoHS and Ecodesign directives.
Would products in scope of these directives still require the UKCA mark by
December 2024?
SAM Davis
Sr. Regulatory Engineering Manager
Customer Engineering Services
www.jabil.com<https://www.jabil.com/>
Yes. If the 0 Ohm resistor needs to be adjusted to higher impedance or removed
based on experimental results, it can be done without spinning the board to
change a trace.
SAM Davis
From: Akhil paul
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 10:28 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES
I'm looking into possibly getting the upgraded UL Product IQ account for my
team, and wondered if anyone had any experience with it?
If so, what of the paid features do you find the most useful?
https://accounts.ulprospector.com/subscriptions/iq/pricing?lang=en=1=annual
---
SAM DAVIS
Howdy all,
I've got a client who heard a rumor of a safety requirement for
semiconductors that entailed having some thermal cutoff. This is a
semiconductor requirement, not an end-product requirement.
Has anyone heard of this in an existing or upcoming requirement?
Thanks,
Sam
This message
www.epa.gov (Environmental Protection Agency) can assist you in finding what
chemicals are restricted by law.
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Knudsen, Patricia
J.
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:29 AM
To: 'Kim Boll Jensen'; EMC
concerns, such as rain and dust, could be evaluated
to 60529, where the electrical safety concerns inherent to computers (shock,
fire, etc.) would be evaluated to 60950.
Hope this helps.
Sam
---
Sam Davis
Product Safety Engineer
Professional Testing Inc.
(512)244-3371 x112
www.ptitest.com
From
Stability.
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Wani, Vijay (V)
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 9:10 AM
To: 'emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org'
Subject: Flat panel display monitor base holder
Hello:
is there any safety/EMC reason for
As far as safety goes, you'll need to meet Hazardous location standards. The
UL standards numbers vary by protection method used, UL 1203, 913, 1604, 2279,
NFPA 496. Canada has similar requirements, in CSA 30, 157, 213, and E79, as
well as incorporating NFPA 496. For the IECEx scheme, see IEC
2. When the unit is in the field, it will have the surge protection
installed,
which will essentially limit any real life hipot voltages to about 500V
(230V
gas tube, 275VAC MOV). In real life, the unit would experience a maximum
500V
hipot. However, in the case of a single fault (surge
I can't confirm or deny the requirement, but I wouldn't say it's a bad idea.
Often, fire suppression systems can be assisted by shutting off airflow.
Chemical or biological agents, when used, will likely target the air
handling system, for maximum effectiveness. It wouldn't save a building
from
In the US, some networks use it in place of the * in their features. For
example, some use a #69 instead of *69. Many PBXs use the # in their codes,
such as #8 (T) for transfer, then the extension.
Hope this helps,
Sam
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical
Thanks to all who responded. All input was helpful.
Thanks,
Sam
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Sam Davis
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2003 4:01 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: mouse heart monitor
All,
I'm trying
All,
I'm trying to work up a quote for testing a product which monitors various
heart functions of living laboratory mice. Would this fall into the Medical
Directive under 60601, or the LVD, under 61010? I'm just looking at the
safety aspects, not EMC.
The question comes up because the
Another interpretation of the question may be Where is the NRTL requirement
strictly enforced? (which is a much larger list than where it is
required.) Where can you get away without a NRTL mark? That depends in
part on the product, the market, and the distribution scheme.
Which brings this
In the US, aren't overhead power lines in the 10 kV range? The power
companies send power down the lines in kV (with relatively low current), and
in the neighborhood of the customer, they have a large transformer which
brings the voltage down to the 120 V range, with 100s of amps for that short
the standard requires it (I
haven't researched it), I would consider it due diligence.
Sam Davis
Regulatory Engineer
Professional Testing Inc.
(512)244-3371 x112
www.ptitest.com
-Original Message-
All -
In consideration of the proliferation of SMPS in electronic
equipment
Another interesting point that can be made is I didn't say it was law, I
said List it or I won't buy it. Depending on the product (basically, if
there's a Listed competitor product on the market), you can make it happen.
In the US, often a Listing mark is enforced by marketing more than law.
Reminds me of when I stuck tweezers into an AC outlet. I guess that was my
start into Product Safety.
Now that I think of it, I also liked to see things explode. It's probably
for the best that I didn't go into Chemical Engineering.
Just my thoughts as I head out for the weekend.
Sam
UL 6500 - Audio/Video and Musical Apparatus for Household, Commercial, and
Similar Use.
IEC 60065 - Audio, Video, and Similar electronic Apparatus - Safety
Requirements.
The UL Standard is based on this, with of course, deviations. I don't have
a copy of it at my desk, so I cannot verify that
this helps,
Sam
---
Sam Davis
Regulatory Engineer
Professional Testing Inc.
(512)244-3371 x112
www.ptitest.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of Peter Merguerian
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:38 AM
To: EMC-PSTC (E
OK, I've avoided jumping in on this exhausted thread, but here's my take on
the situation.
It's obvious that more than a few of the posters have not performed this
test. When you cannot answer a question with more than a theory, don't
throw it out there as fact. You muddle the knowledge pool.
30, 2002. Preface, p8.
BTW, technically, it's based on IEC 61010-1
As far as differences go, if you purchase the standard (www.comm-2000.com)
you will see that the national differences are in bold text.
Hope this helps,
---
Sam Davis
Regulatory Engineer
Professional Testing Inc.
(512)244-3371 x112
is usually too cocky, and can be disarmed fairly
easily with the right moves, where a knife wielder is usually a force to be
reckoned.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: FLOWERDEW, Peter [mailto:peter.flower...@plantronics.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 11:17 AM
To: 'Sam Davis'; Gert Gremmen
Richard, all,
I prefer the HP (now Agilent?) datalogger series over Fluke's. More
channels, (my model has 3 bays of 22 channels each), included software
allows for any normal type of thermocouple, as well as voltage or resistance
measurements. Connects to PC with serial cable, uses minimal
This has nothing to do with EMC or Product safety, but with personal and
public safety.
I'm with Ghery. Gert, your misrepresentation of his statement is ludicrous.
Statistics bear this out. Crime rates drop drastically in nations where
guns are freely owned by the PUBLIC. Look at Australia.
blows or the circuit breaker trips.
Even though my experience comes from my past few employers, my opinions are
my own.
---
Sam Davis
Regulatory Engineer
Professional Testing Inc.
(512)244-3371 x112
www.ptitest.com
-Original Message-
From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-emc-p
He doesn't necessarily need field evaluations, from what I'm reading. Just
because they're custom, doesn't mean the designs cannot be integrated into
one UL/CSA/NRTL report.
I worked at UL for a few years, and performed evaluations on portable lamps
and fixtures (Luminaires now) as well as many
27 matches
Mail list logo
