[PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread Crane, Lauren
I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based on IEC ed. 3) is released. I see that this standard does not (directly) give presumption of conformance to the EMC directive (i.e., it is 'unlisted'), but a standard that *is* listed (61000-6-2) references it as an

Re: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread Crane, Lauren
] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective? I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based on IEC ed. 3) is released. I see that this standard does not (directly) give presumption of conformance to the EMC directive (i.e., it is 'unlisted

Re: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread Pettit, Ghery
standard (or generic if that applies). Ghery S. Pettit From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:58 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective? I received

Re: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread John Woodgate
In message 4549afb45ed147fbaa0be15a57b4b...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com , dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes: I received an offline reply (thanks) that pointed me to the Cenelec site and particularly expansion of the ?dop? acronym as ?date of

[PSES] More Tangled.... RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread Crane, Lauren
, September 08, 2014 12:33 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective? I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based on IEC ed. 3) is released. I see

Re: [PSES] More Tangled.... RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread John Woodgate
In message a0454f8a72d94cf2a0e4fca9a863a...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com , dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes: And then cites IEC 61000-4-5 as an undated reference (which indeed has a new ?published? edition available), it seems I must use that

Re: [PSES] More Tangled.... RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread Crane, Lauren
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 3:12 PM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] More Tangled RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective? In message a0454f8a72d94cf2a0e4fca9a863a...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com , dated Mon

Re: [PSES] More Tangled.... RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread John Woodgate
In message a79213fd871f4f47900f8ffaa5b5c...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com , dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes: I guess the sensible approach is to consider the CENLEC's dop to dow dates as a defacto transition period. They are as far as CENELEC

[PSES] FW: [PSES] More Tangled.... RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective?

2014-09-08 Thread itl-emc user group
- From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:06 AM To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG Subject: Re: [PSES] More Tangled RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references immediately effective? In message a79213fd871f4f47900f8ffaa5b5c