I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based
on IEC ed. 3) is released.
I see that this standard does not (directly) give presumption of conformance to
the EMC directive (i.e., it is 'unlisted'), but a standard that *is* listed
(61000-6-2) references it as an
] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references
immediately effective?
I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based
on IEC ed. 3) is released.
I see that this standard does not (directly) give presumption of conformance to
the EMC directive (i.e., it is 'unlisted
standard (or generic
if that applies).
Ghery S. Pettit
From: Crane, Lauren [mailto:lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 10:58 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references
immediately effective?
I received
In message
4549afb45ed147fbaa0be15a57b4b...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
I received an offline reply (thanks) that pointed me to the Cenelec
site and particularly expansion of the ?dop? acronym as ?date of
, September 08, 2014 12:33 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORGmailto:EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that are undated references
immediately effective?
I recently received notice that a new version of EN IEC 61000-4-5:2014 (based
on IEC ed. 3) is released.
I see
In message
a0454f8a72d94cf2a0e4fca9a863a...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
And then cites IEC 61000-4-5 as an undated reference (which indeed has
a new ?published? edition available), it seems I must use that
...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 3:12 PM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] More Tangled RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that
are undated references immediately effective?
In message
a0454f8a72d94cf2a0e4fca9a863a...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Mon
In message
a79213fd871f4f47900f8ffaa5b5c...@blupr03mb119.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
, dated Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Crane, Lauren lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com
writes:
I guess the sensible approach is to consider the CENLEC's dop to dow
dates as a defacto transition period.
They are as far as CENELEC
-
From: John Woodgate [mailto:j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 12:06 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] More Tangled RE: [PSES] Are unlisted EN standards that
are undated references immediately effective?
In message
a79213fd871f4f47900f8ffaa5b5c
9 matches
Mail list logo