*To:* Crane, Lauren
*Cc:* EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
*Subject:* Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
** **
Lauren --
A similar thread is currently running on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CISPR-22-24-compliance-update-2278131.S.269600494?view=gid
or attachment(s) are free from computer virus or other defect. Thank you.
From: ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen [mailto:g.grem...@cetest.nl]
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2013 4:31 AM
To: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
John Wrote
In message 003f01cea8c7$d1886be0$749943a0$@pctestlab.com, dated Tue, 3
Sep 2013, Dward dw...@pctestlab.com writes:
If nothing in the standard changed the way a previous test was or was
not applied, then no new testing would be required. If however the
standard did change in an area that
@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A174@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
Are you still sure about your new Signature ??
Yes
-
Van: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] Namens John Cotman
Verzonden: Monday, September 02, 2013 11:44 AM
Aan: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Onderwerp: RE: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
John Woodgate states the legal position entirely correctly (for the EEA, I
don't know
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A182@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Mon, 2 Sep 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
And John, data ports do not exist in EMC world, they are (most often)
called I/O ports,
That's just nitpicking.
--
OOO - Own
I have had to justify changes as remaining compliant with a standard, a
similar case to the standard changing, and i too have been reluctant to
do so without tests to show that this assertion is correct.
This has often been where, due to the nonavailability of a part years or
decades old and
John Wrote:
The EMC Directive doesn't demand ANY testing.
Maybe, but it demands EVIDENCE of compliance. Annex IV - 1
Two Definitons of Evidence
Law: The documentary or oral statements and the material objects admissible as
testimony in a court of law.
Law: information drawn from
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A173@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
John Wrote:
The EMC Directive doesn't demand ANY testing.
Maybe, but it demands EVIDENCE of compliance. Annex IV - 1
We cannot read anything but evidence here,
there is no but : if one applies harmonized standards, you need evidence, and
that is the case in this discussion.
Within the chapter of technical documentation, that means written evidence ,
not a witness :)
If you have evidence about
In message FCA549BE3ECF9D4CB8CB8576837EA48920A174@ZEUS.cetest.local,
dated Sat, 31 Aug 2013, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl writes:
Are you still sure about your new Signature ??
Yes. But I'm now not sure of the point you are making. There is nothing
in my
Truth from the lab. When January 12, 2014 rolls around any product you place
on the market in the EU to which EN 61000-6-4 applies will have to have been
shown to meet the standard with amendment A1:2011. Now, you need to know what
the amendment changed. I don't know your product, nor do I
: EMC-PSTC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
Lauren --
A similar thread is currently running on LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CISPR-22-24-compliance-update-2278131.S.269600494?view=gid=2278131type=memberitem=269600494trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd
Lauren,
According to EU Directives all products to be placed on the market must
comply with current regulations and applicable standards. There are 2 major
sides to your question: did the product change? Did the requirements change?
You must evaluate and access your product vs new/updated
:05:28 PM
Subject: [PSES] Retest because of supersded standard?
Dear Experts,
A test lab is suggesting that because EN61000-6-4:2007 will be superseded in
2014, all conforming products must be retested to the new standard, even if no
changes have occurred in the product
Dear Experts,
A test lab is suggesting that because EN61000-6-4:2007 will be superseded in
2014, all conforming products must be retested to the new standard, even if no
changes have occurred in the product.
Is this a fair claim?
Regards,
Lauren Crane
KLA-Tencor
-
In message
617eb8c8634c9149aa66c853d7b8ac5322b70...@ch1prd0310mb392.namprd03.prod.o
utlook.com, dated Fri, 30 Aug 2013, Crane, Lauren
lauren.cr...@kla-tencor.com writes:
A test lab is suggesting that because EN61000-6-4:2007 will be
superseded in 2014, all conforming products must be retested
17 matches
Mail list logo
