A most excellent blog. His other posts are worth reading as well.
Go do a search for pentaborane.
-Pete
On Aug 25, 2012, at 9:18 AM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, dave wrote:
SNIP
Someplace out there ...
On 08/26/2012 07:29 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
I am thinking about lining my ways with this product any
thoughts?
Tormach has a nice whitepaper about the design of their PCNC1100 that
has me salivating to get one for myself. In it they have this quote:
There is a problem with it, however.
On Sun, 26 Aug 2012 11:14:15 +0100, you wrote:
Jeremy/Steve/Chris
Chris is correct
1. When reading the U, W words they are reserved for axis movements only.
2. Some lathes are XZ/UW - so the UW words are required for the second tool.
As far as I know Fanuc don't use UW for axis in lathes or
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I want somma that Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane stuff...
ROFL! I'd only accept it in the correct containment system. ;-)
I think
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/things_i_wont_work_with/
My favorite thing from this blog was a compound that is stabilized by
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Peter Loron pet...@standingwave.org wrote:
A most excellent blog. His other posts are worth reading as well.
Go do a search for pentaborane.
-Pete
Nice nasty stuff. The F-16's EPU used hydrazine. More good stuff.
Mark
On Monday 27 August 2012 05:16:06 dave did opine:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 00:06 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
On Monday 27 August 2012 00:02:53 jeremy youngs did opine:
a spray on product would be great? oh I could use my new chemistry
knowledge, make custom nozzles on my machine and solve
On Monday 27 August 2012 05:27:17 dave did opine:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 00:42 -0400, jeremy youngs wrote:
rofl thems is my friend tems is, when i get them they will cost me
more than the mill and the controls combined. the moglice web site
showed how to use the product to reline the
Ben,
it's a creative idea, I like it. The semantics of the 'profile block' is a bit
shaky wrt normal execution logic of rs274ngc, but let's see if we can mutate
this into common ground so it can be easily done with a remap.
what you have is a cycle which in essence refers to a datastructure,
On Monday 27 August 2012 06:09:04 cogoman did opine:
On 08/26/2012 07:29 PM, jeremy youngs wrote:
I am thinking about lining my ways with this product any
thoughts?
Tormach has a nice whitepaper about the design of their PCNC1100 that
has me salivating to get one for myself. In it
Check McMaster-Carr. They sell PTFE filled Delrin in small quantities. Even
plain Delrin without PTFE is pretty slick and would likely work. I doubt your
garage windows are Delrin as I've never seen it in clear, only black and white.
Most likely they're polycarbonate.
The script I have is actually an old Dos EXE that was written for us a long
long time ago. I do not have the source code for it nor do I know who the
author was.
- Original Message -
Am 27.08.2012 um 03:18 schrieb Todd Zuercher:
This thread lately about g-code remapping, has brought
I have wished for a long time for a general mechanism for
defining a path (profile) once, then using that path multiple
times in functions. This reinvention of G71/G70 looks like
a good opportunity to create such a mechanism. I use G71/G70
often in code for our Mori Seiki lathe (Fanuc 0i
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012, Ralph Stirling wrote:
I have wished for a long time for a general mechanism for
defining a path (profile) once, then using that path multiple
times in functions. This reinvention of G71/G70 looks like
a good opportunity to create such a mechanism. I use G71/G70
often
*Dear,
*I found this statement in classicladder manual:
*Indexed or vectored variables* - These are variables indexed by another
variable. Some might call this vectored variables. Example: %W0[%W4] = if
%W4 equals 23 it corresponds to %W23
Can be this done also with %Bxx bit Example: %B0[%W4]
I'm not sure if this would work for you, I haven't tried it myself, but it may
be worth a look:
http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/threads/43645-Making-Acetal-leadscrew-nuts-the-easy-way
Martin
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 00:42:00 -0400
From: jcyoungs
rofl thems is my friend tems is, when i
On 8/27/2012 9:16 AM, Ralph Stirling wrote:
I have wished for a long time for a general mechanism for
defining a path (profile) once, then using that path multiple
times in functions. This reinvention of G71/G70 looks like
a good opportunity to create such a mechanism. I use G71/G70
often
thanx for sharing very interesting and appears the easiest fastest
solution ive come acrorss so far
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Martin Dobbins tu...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure if this would work for you, I haven't tried it myself, but it
may be worth a look:
massive snip
Ay! My brain if failing. Months ago I tried steel filled epoxy as a
coating.out of sight, out of mind.
Procedure:
Remove lathe carriage, degrease slide contact areas, coat with epoxy,
cover lathe ways with vinyl kitchen wrap carefully smoothed out.
Reposition carriage
I've done that by writing a subroutine that traces the path. The
subroutine takes a single argument that represents the offset from the
path. Then call it in a loop with appropriate values.
Another variation on the theme, similar to the above, I published a set
of ngcui subroutines to carry
Hi Guys,
I'm new here, and this is my second post, so I'm sorry up front if
I'm stepping on any toes.
I've got a question about smartProbe.ngc, if anyone's got any
experience with it. In 2.4, it didn't work for me, and I used
gridProbe.ngc a lot. Worked fine but was slow. Now that 2.5 is
Jason,
I'm not around my machine right now, and I could be totally off base:
One of the probing routines, after it found the side, but before moving back, I
had to give the probe a nudge into the object by about 0.02mm so that, on the
return, the Gxx command would not start with the probe
Ah, got ya, John. Thanks - I'll give that a try tonight
jason
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:06 AM, John Stewart alex.stew...@crc.ca wrote:
Jason,
I'm not around my machine right now, and I could be totally off base:
One of the probing routines, after it found the side, but before moving
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 15:36:03 +0200
From: klemen.oze...@gmail.com
To: Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-users] Indexed or vectored variables
*Dear,
*I found this statement in classicladder manual:
*Indexed or vectored variables* - These are variables indexed by
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 08:48 -0500, Martin Dobbins wrote:
I'm not sure if this would work for you, I haven't tried it myself, but it
may be worth a look:
http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/threads/43645-Making-Acetal-leadscrew-nuts-the-easy-way
Martin
I tend to prefer a more traditional
On 27 August 2012 07:11, dave dengv...@charter.net wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 00:42 -0400, jeremy youngs wrote:
rofl thems is my friend tems is, when i get them they will cost me
more than the mill and the controls combined. the moglice web site
showed how to use the product to reline
Michael,
I'll have to think about this a bit, but on first reading I like it. My
initial impressions are:
1) If I'm reading you right, the profile block would need to be defined
before any call to it. That said, it wouldn't actually execute it, merely
store it.
2) No C++ maintenance to worry
Dual turret (or spindle) machines do seem to come in an incredible variety
of languages. I remember one particularly awkward machine that used z_[1]x
through z_[5]x to define which spindle you were moving, followed by a g-code
to tell it to actually move the Z-axis. Normal Xn Yn Zn moves would
On 8/27/2012 12:03 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 08:48 -0500, Martin Dobbins wrote:
I'm not sure if this would work for you, I haven't tried it myself, but it
may be worth a look:
http://bbs.homeshopmachinist.net/threads/43645-Making-Acetal-leadscrew-nuts-the-easy-way
Mark Wendt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I want somma that Hexanitrohexaazaisowurtzitane stuff...
ROFL! I'd only accept it in the
Am 27.08.2012 um 18:35 schrieb Ben Potter:
Michael,
I'll have to think about this a bit, but on first reading I like it. My
initial impressions are:
1) If I'm reading you right, the profile block would need to be defined
before any call to it. That said, it wouldn't actually execute it,
Run from line works pretty good on my Mori's Fanuc, but
I would sure never try to start on a line in the middle of a G71
profile block. I'd rather not find out what it would try to do in
that case. I guess I could live with the G200/1/2/3 versions of
the G0/1/2/3, but it doesn't seem like a real
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 12:53 -0400, Kenneth Lerman wrote:
On 8/27/2012 12:03 PM, Kirk Wallace wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-27 at 08:48 -0500, Martin Dobbins wrote:
I'm not sure if this would work for you, I haven't tried it myself, but it
may be worth a look:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Mark Wendt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com wrote:
I want somma that
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:28PM +0100, Ben Potter wrote:
7) Completely different method to other controllers
Like others I don't have a problem with this when other controllers
are excessively weird or contrary to how ngc works.
I am curious which, if either, approach (C or remap) would
In a single direction (read: type 1 cycle) - either. The moves generated in
either case are the same, it's simply the syntax which they are called with
(and what bugs it may introduce elsewhere).
I have only ignored it so far since it reduces the number of things to worry
about at one time.
For
Am 27.08.2012 um 20:22 schrieb Chris Radek:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:35:28PM +0100, Ben Potter wrote:
7) Completely different method to other controllers
Like others I don't have a problem with this when other controllers
are excessively weird or contrary to how ngc works.
I am
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:45:23 +0100, you wrote:
Dual turret (or spindle) machines do seem to come in an incredible variety
of languages. I remember one particularly awkward machine that used z_[1]x
through z_[5]x to define which spindle you were moving, followed by a g-code
to tell it to actually
On Monday 27 August 2012 19:09:30 Greg Bernard did opine:
Check McMaster-Carr. They sell PTFE filled Delrin in small quantities.
Even plain Delrin without PTFE is pretty slick and would likely work. I
doubt your garage windows are Delrin as I've never seen it in clear,
only black and white.
I am very new to this, so please pardon the dumb questions.
Do I add these if/else commands in both the forward and inverse kinematics
sections of the new kins.c?
Is there any problems with having the tran.pos-z tied to both the joint[2] in
one line and joint[8] in the else line (or do both of
40 matches
Mail list logo
