On 04.03.13 11:11, Pete Matos wrote:
Ummm..rightwhatever he said. Peace LOL
It's only my translation, but here goes:
In science no new theory ever triumphs, but its opponents die by
degrees. - Max Planck
Erik
On Monday, March 4, 2013, craig cr...@facework.com wrote:
On 3/3/2013
Some education is needed please.
I have upgraded from 2.4 to 2.5 and I have no problems that I know
of.(LinuxCNC that is)
In sources.list I have
deb http://www.linuxcnc.org/lucid base linuxcnc2.5
deb-src http://www.linuxcnc.org/lucid base linuxcnc2.5
but I do not have
deb
On 04.03.13 19:44, TJoseph Powderly wrote:
At the time I got your email,
I was writing oneshots for arduino,
triggered by the beginning of current flow,
an OnTimeShot runs, then a single OffTimeShot.
This makes each tiny crater a uniform size, where a
constant on/off/on/off will vary in
I think more correctly:
In science no new theory ever triumphs, but its opponents slowly die. -
Max Planck
- Original Message -
From: Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2013 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Mar 3,
On 05.03.13 10:39, Belli Button wrote:
I think more correctly:
In science no new theory ever triumphs, but its opponents slowly die. -
Max Planck
Cassell's German - English dictionary says:
nach und nach = gradually, little by little, by degrees.
I think you'll find that slowly is
On 5 March 2013 09:31, Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
Cassell's German - English dictionary says:
nach und nach = gradually, little by little, by degrees.
I think you'll find that slowly is langsam.
But perhaps you have a language reference which backs up your opinion?
I
the new theory and its opponents experience phase changes
--- On Tue, 3/5/13, Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net wrote:
From: Erik Christiansen dva...@internode.on.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Mar 3, 2013: LinuxCNC 2.5.2 released
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Tuesday,
On 05.03.13 09:44, andy pugh wrote:
I suspect that the intention is the sense gradually.
Yes, that was broadly my interpretation too, though nach und nach
gives me the further sense of little by little, and old theories do
die by degrees (i.e. stepwise over time), as they move through
increasing
2013/3/5 Lars Andersson l...@larsandersson.com:
Some education is needed please.
I have upgraded from 2.4 to 2.5 and I have no problems that I know
of.(LinuxCNC that is)
In sources.list I have
deb http://www.linuxcnc.org/lucid base linuxcnc2.5
deb-src http://www.linuxcnc.org/lucid base
I have a BP Discovery 308 with a Simodrive 611 drive and still run the
old DX-32 controller. :( There are many variants of the 611 so do the
search till you find your manuals. I can't wait to convert mine and
ditch the 611 drive as the 611 doesn't like running on a phase converter
at all but
On 03/05/2013 12:57 AM, Lars Andersson wrote:
Some education is needed please.
I have upgraded from 2.4 to 2.5 and I have no problems that I know
of.(LinuxCNC that is)
Great! Always nice to hear a success story :-)
In sources.list I have
deb http://www.linuxcnc.org/lucid base
On 03/05/2013 02:48 AM, Erik Christiansen wrote:
Is that diameter variation with depth, and if it's due to constant
mark/space ratio, are you adjusting the timing ratio of the one-shots to
achieve compensation?
Erik, hello,
Basically, yes :)
The depth and diameter is governed by the
Jeez tomp, that thing got a flux capacitor in it yet? Hell I'd just
piss on the spark plug if I thought it would do any goodLOL that is
some deep stuff you are playing with man glad and amazed that you are able
to do it with linuxcnc. Keep on Merlin's on that is some very
On 5 March 2013 18:17, Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com wrote:
So what I need to do, is to use G2 or G3 to move the follower showed in the
picture following the trajectory of the crankpins combining the two linear
axis simultaneously with the rotary axis of the crankshaft. I
Hello Andy.
Now the machine is turned on and working but when I have a little time I
will try with that configuration.
The program line would be more or less like this right? (movement on X and
Y, C is the rotary axis)
G2 X0 Y0 C360 I10 J10 F10 P2
Would that give a two turn movement on the
On 5 March 2013 19:16, Leonardo Marsaglia leonardomarsagli...@gmail.com wrote:
G2 X0 Y0 C360 I10 J10 F10 P2
Would that give a two turn movement on the rotary axis?
No, that would be 2 rotations in XY and only one in C.
G2 X0 Y0 C720 I10 J10 F10 P2
Is what you would need.
--
atp
If you
On 5 March 2013 19:34, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
G2 X0 Y0 C720 I10 J10 F10 P2
Is what you would need.
I guess you are measuring crankpin roundness?
--
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 04:16:28PM -0300, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote:
G2 X0 Y0 C360 I10 J10 F10 P2
Would that give a two turn movement on the rotary axis? Because I need to
do several turns, or do I need to offset the rotary axis to zero right
after the G2 line and make a loop?
You've got
Andy, from what I know from Leonardo, I druther guess that it's a case
of zonal induction heating for hardening purposes.
Peter
Am 05.03.2013 20:35, schrieb andy pugh:
On 5 March 2013 19:34, andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
G2 X0 Y0 C720 I10 J10 F10 P2
Is what you would need.
I guess
Thanks a lot Andy and Chris!
Very well explained, and it's easier than what I was thinking.
Andy as Peter well said, this is to make a positioning system to do
induction heating on crankshafts. Since all the journals need to be heated,
and we're planning on making a production of at least 100
20 matches
Mail list logo
