On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:19:06 -0500, you wrote:
I've had a number of problems when plugging into industrial devices that
have a USB interface. The lack of isolation is oftentimes a problem.
Othertimes my laptop will confuse the industrial device with another
common USB device like a stick
On 2014-03-02 00:40, Sven Wesley wrote:
One can also use http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Emcrsh or
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Halrmt for remote controlling. It's
an
easy thing to use telnet socket in and Android app.
I guess you havn't tried out my example.
--
In
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 01.03.2014 um 18:19 schrieb W. Martinjak mats...@play-pla.net:
It seems the thrill of joy has gone ;)
not for me - in fact I think it as reassuring to see we to converge on the
same concept: Web UI
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Sven Wesley svenne.d...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-03-01 21:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at:
Am 01.03.2014 um 18:19 schrieb W. Martinjak mats...@play-pla.net:
It seems the thrill of joy has gone ;)
not for me - in fact I think it as
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Steve Blackmore st...@pilotltd.net wrote:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 18:15:29 +0100, you wrote:
When I've learned something about hardware interfaces and reliability in
the past two or three years then it is to stay as far away from USB as
possible whenever
On 03/02/2014 01:14 PM, Mark Wendt wrote:
One can also use http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Emcrsh or
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Halrmt for remote controlling.
It's an easy thing to use telnet socket in and Android app.
Telnet is extremely unsecure, with no encryption.
On 2014-03-02 13:11, Mark Wendt wrote:
I take it this WebUI implementation would require a web server running on
the local linux machine with all the included overhead and security
concerns that web servers have? Or is there some small, really safe,
really secure subset of apache that
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Bertho Stultiens ber...@vagrearg.orgwrote:
On 03/02/2014 01:14 PM, Mark Wendt wrote:
One can also use http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Emcrsh or
http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Halrmt for remote controlling.
It's an easy thing to use telnet
Am 02.03.2014 um 13:11 schrieb Mark Wendt wendt.m...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 01.03.2014 um 18:19 schrieb W. Martinjak mats...@play-pla.net:
It seems the thrill of joy has gone ;)
not for me - in fact I think it as
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:37 AM, W. Martinjak mats...@play-pla.net wrote:
On 2014-03-02 13:11, Mark Wendt wrote:
I take it this WebUI implementation would require a web server running on
the local linux machine with all the included overhead and security
concerns that web servers have? Or
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
I take it this WebUI implementation would require a web server running on
the local linux machine with all the included overhead and security
concerns that web servers have? Or is there some small, really
Hi Steve, hi everyone!
On 03/02/2014 12:41 AM, Steve Blackmore wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2014
18:15:29 +0100, you wrote:
When I've learned something about hardware interfaces and reliability
in the past two or three years then it is to stay as far away from USB
as possible whenever something else
On 2014-03-01 21:04, Michael Haberler wrote:
not for me - in fact I think it as reassuring to see we to converge on the
same concept: Web UI interaction will happen over Websockets, and with JSON
objects mapped to internal representation at the boundary; it is the approach
taken by Peter
On 2014-03-02 14:42, W. Martinjak wrote:
I think it's a easy task for jeff and/or axel. (I wasn't saying anything ;)
Alex, sorry for this typo.
--
In der Wissenschaft siegt nie eine neue Theorie,
nur ihre Gegner sterben nach und nach
Max Planck
I agree!
And this is why USB has issues! :-(
Dave
On 3/2/2014 8:37 AM, Philipp Burch wrote:
Hi Steve, hi everyone!
On 03/02/2014 12:41 AM, Steve Blackmore wrote: On Sat, 01 Mar 2014
18:15:29 +0100, you wrote:
When I've learned something about hardware interfaces and reliability
in the
On 3/2/2014 3:20 AM, Steve Blackmore wrote:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2014 21:19:06 -0500, you wrote:
I've had a number of problems when plugging into industrial devices that
have a USB interface. The lack of isolation is oftentimes a problem.
Othertimes my laptop will confuse the industrial device
For most purposes I can immediately for see, I would keep this LinuxCNC
to remote web server / monitor network off the WWW anyway. Other than
perhaps a wireless link via an AP which can use standard security
protocols.
These devices are so cheap now, if I want web access near my
mill/machine
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dave Cole linuxcncro...@gmail.com wrote:
For most purposes I can immediately for see, I would keep this LinuxCNC
to remote web server / monitor network off the WWW anyway. Other than
perhaps a wireless link via an AP which can use standard security
protocols.
In my other recent reply I mentioned my security concerns. These small,
light weight web servers just don't seem to have much security built into
Ah, the great security debate ;) that opens a rich subject for exchange. You're
opening a can of worms - with some pretty old existing worms,
On 3/2/2014 9:47 AM, Mark Wendt wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dave Cole linuxcncro...@gmail.com wrote:
For most purposes I can immediately for see, I would keep this LinuxCNC
to remote web server / monitor network off the WWW anyway. Other than
perhaps a wireless link via an AP
Michael,
As for an architectural discussion: I am sorry, but I will not abandon the
work towards web-based UI support based on your argument,
Please don't stop!No apology necessary, or desired..
Please proceed. :-)
And THANK YOU and the other developers for all of the effort !! :-)
Best
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.atwrote:
In my other recent reply I mentioned my security concerns. These small,
light weight web servers just don't seem to have much security built into
Ah, the great security debate ;) that opens a rich subject for
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Dave Cole linuxcncro...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
Depends on the network. If your ethernet is all copper, and there's no
access to the world, it's probably okay. But, if you can get out,
somebody
can get in. If the reason for adding something like this
On 2014-03-02 14:20, Mark Wendt wrote:
In my other recent reply I mentioned my security concerns. These small,
light weight web servers just don't seem to have much security built into
them. Yes, SSL is a good thing, but that only encrypts that single data
stream, while not really securing
Am 02.03.2014 um 14:42 schrieb W. Martinjak mats...@play-pla.net:
The current implementation uses a Websockets proxy server based on
libwebsockets (http://libwebsockets.org/trac/libwebsockets). That is a
relatively low level bridge, but it is very fast, has a stable API, and the
package
On Sunday 02 March 2014 13:44:17 Mark Wendt did opine:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Dave Cole linuxcncro...@gmail.com
wrote:
For most purposes I can immediately for see, I would keep this
LinuxCNC to remote web server / monitor network off the WWW anyway.
Other than perhaps a
On Sunday 02 March 2014 14:01:20 Michael Haberler did opine:
In my other recent reply I mentioned my security concerns. These
small, light weight web servers just don't seem to have much security
built into
Ah, the great security debate ;) that opens a rich subject for exchange.
You're
On 03/02/2014 01:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And while, in the early days, I was entertained by
watching its logs as the Chinese and NK folks as they
hammer away at a dictionary attack, but so far no one has
had the patience to get through a 20+ character pw.
The most successful thing I
On Sunday 02 March 2014 15:24:02 Jon Elson did opine:
On 03/02/2014 01:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
And while, in the early days, I was entertained by
watching its logs as the Chinese and NK folks as they
hammer away at a dictionary attack, but so far no one has
had the patience to get
2014-03-02 16:42 GMT+01:00 Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at:
In my other recent reply I mentioned my security concerns. These small,
light weight web servers just don't seem to have much security built into
Ah, the great security debate ;) that opens a rich subject for exchange.
On 2014-03-02 21:30, Sven Wesley wrote:
Talking telnet down as a security issue and at the same time talk
*about*security and bring in web sockets, a Python web server and
Node.js is at
Please undeceive me.
What is on a http server per se unsecure ?
No matter if it is coded in python,
Greetings;
leds are something I'll have to plead less than a full understanding of.
So, if I connect these 2 channels of this sparkfun kit such that the anode
of one is connected to the cathode of the other, effectively placing them
in parallel, add a current limiter in series with the common
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:10:23 -0500
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-users] This
On Sunday 02 March 2014 17:21:41 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 16:10:23 -0500
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you have a 5V push-pull output, another way would be to connect this
output to Cathode1 and Anode2 and connect Anode1 to 5V through a
resistor and Cathode2 to ground through another resistor.
Thanks Peter, that will solve the single ended signal
On Sunday 02 March 2014 18:12:42 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you have a 5V push-pull output, another way would be to connect
this output to Cathode1 and Anode2 and connect Anode1 to 5V through
a resistor and Cathode2 to ground through another
On Sunday 02 March 2014 18:12:42 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you have a 5V push-pull output, another way would be to connect
this output to Cathode1 and Anode2 and connect Anode1 to 5V through
a resistor and Cathode2 to ground through
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, John Kasunich wrote:
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2014 19:39:35 -0500
From: John Kasunich jmkasun...@fastmail.fm
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] This sparkfun opto kit,
On Sunday 02 March 2014 20:04:14 John Kasunich did opine:
On Sunday 02 March 2014 18:12:42 Peter C. Wallace did opine:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Gene Heskett wrote:
If you have a 5V push-pull output, another way would be to
connect this output to Cathode1 and Anode2 and connect Anode1 to
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014 07:17:32 -0500, you wrote:
Leave it to Windoze to turn off important hardware. About the only time
that should apply is on a laptop when not plugged in or docked. If that's
a default setting, that's just stupid.
Yup
How do they implement wake-on-lan if they power down the
On 03/02/2014 02:26 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Yup, but with DD-WRT watching the door, they never get close enough to this
or any machine on my network to make an entry in the denyhosts log.
Portsentry is another such very useful tool, check it out.
It depends on your needs for access to the
41 matches
Mail list logo
