Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 March 2018 22:58:09 John Kasunich wrote: > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 04 March 2018 20:23:01 Chris Albertson wrote: > > > I'm not contributing to EMC development so I have no say in how to > > > do it. But I'd suggest a move to Github. Not ju

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread John Kasunich
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018, at 10:40 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 04 March 2018 20:23:01 Chris Albertson wrote: > > > I'm not contributing to EMC development so I have no say in how to do > > it. But I'd suggest a move to Github. Not just because they are > > stable but because Git offers a be

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread MC Cason via Emc-users
If you are considering GitHub, then how they fended off a massive DDOS attack may be of interest: https://www.wired.com/story/github-ddos-memcached/ BTW, SF was fending off it's own DDOS attack during a migration: https://meta.slashdot.org/story/18/03/04/0428237/slashdot-outage-update On 03/04

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 March 2018 20:23:01 Chris Albertson wrote: > I'm not contributing to EMC development so I have no say in how to do > it. But I'd suggest a move to Github. Not just because they are > stable but because Git offers a better way to work > > On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:36 AM, andy pugh w

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 March 2018 20:22:47 Chris Albertson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Friday 16 February 2018 06:16:00 Chris Albertson wrote: > > > > > > That I have figured out finally Chris, its moving close to 100 ipm > > with a 32 to 42 pulley set in the z on

Re: [Emc-users] email failures.

2018-03-04 Thread Kurt Jacobson
I have not experienced any email failures here, but then I don't write to this list often. I have noticed lately that several old SourceForge and Yahoo list are moving to groups.io, so I guess others are either having trouble with SF or think it is not going to be around for much longer. I did spen

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Chris Albertson
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Friday 16 February 2018 06:16:00 Chris Albertson wrote: > > That I have figured out finally Chris, its moving close to 100 ipm with a > 32 to 42 pulley set in the z on my Sheldon but its noisy as can be in > the 7 to 20 ipm box. Its noise

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Chris Albertson
I'm not contributing to EMC development so I have no say in how to do it. But I'd suggest a move to Github. Not just because they are stable but because Git offers a better way to work On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 10:36 AM, andy pugh wrote: > On 4 March 2018 at 18:00, Peter Blodow wrote: >> This mai

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread andy pugh
On 4 March 2018 at 18:00, Peter Blodow wrote: > This mail has been sent to sourceforge this morning and was returned without > reason. Yes, Sourceforge is having problems. -- atp "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuse

Re: [Emc-users] Bringing the saw beveler back to life

2018-03-04 Thread andy pugh
On 4 March 2018 at 12:53, Mark wrote: > There was something Andy talked about that he wrote, but I don't remember > what that was. It was something in hal code if I remember correctly. Sounds like a job for the external_offsets branch, and either a distance sensor of some sort or the "lincurve"

Re: [Emc-users] non-contact position sensors, surprisingly good performance.

2018-03-04 Thread Peter Blodow
This mail has been sent to sourceforge this morning and was returned without reason. Therefore, I forward this to your own mail address. P. Andy, better keep fingers off that sort of thread (Panzergewinde, Sta-Pa-Rohrgewinde). It was widely used, but only for unimportant purposes (like protect

Re: [Emc-users] Bringing the saw beveler back to life

2018-03-04 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 04 March 2018 07:53:59 Mark wrote: > Fellas, > > > Took me two years from the start of the shop building to bringing the > machinery back to life.  A short description of the machine in > question.  A relatively simple two axis (X & Z) saw beveler that cuts > tapered triangles of bamboo

[Emc-users] Bringing the saw beveler back to life

2018-03-04 Thread Mark
Fellas, Took me two years from the start of the shop building to bringing the machinery back to life.  A short description of the machine in question.  A relatively simple two axis (X & Z) saw beveler that cuts tapered triangles of bamboo out of bamboo flat stock.  Has two saws on the cuttin