On 29 April 2013 19:16, Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com wrote:
I feel the need to defend the Pi, Cubie, Olimex, et al boards, since it
appears that no one else will :)
Something else that is already out there (and a few of us were given
samples of) is:
http://www.roboard.com/ncbox-189.html
--- On Sun, 4/28/13, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
I dont think the case for servo systems is very good without
some additional hardware. The BBB has just three possible
hardware encoder counters. Software encoder counters could
be done by the PRU but they would not be comparable
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gregg Eshelman g_ala...@yahoo.com
Reply-To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC) emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:55:17 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I feel the need to defend the Pi, Cubie, Olimex, et al boards, since it
appears that no one else will :)
Several areas of concern are worthy of our attention,
Gentlemen,
Am 29.04.2013 um 20:16 schrieb Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:55:17 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I feel the need to defend the Pi, Cubie, Olimex, et al boards, since it
appears
--- On Mon, 4/29/13, Peter C. Wallace p...@mesanet.com wrote:
From: Gregg Eshelman g_ala...@yahoo.com
What about the network port? Don't use the video and
use network for control.
Could you multiplex encoder data to make two work like
four, albeit at a slower rate?
You could
On 4/29/2013 1:16 PM, Matt Shaver wrote:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:55:17 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I feel the need to defend the Pi, Cubie, Olimex, et al boards, since it
appears that no one else will :)
Excellent
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 21:05:41 +0200
Michael Haberler mai...@mah.priv.at wrote:
Am 29.04.2013 um 20:16 schrieb Matt Shaver m...@mattshaver.com:
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 12:55:17 -0500
Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I feel
As promised, I have prepared an SD card image for the beaglebone ready-to-run.
README:
http://static.mah.priv.at/public/beaglebone/starterkit/README.beaglebone-sd
download from: http://static.mah.priv.at/public/beaglebone/starterkit/
Please understand this as a 'raw hide, some assembly
Michael,
Thank you! This is like getting a an unexpected new toy :-)
Dave
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:09:37 +0200
From: Michael Haberlermai...@mah.priv.at
Subject: [Emc-users] Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD
cardimage
To: Enhanced Machine
Michael Haberler wrote:
As promised, I have prepared an SD card image for the beaglebone ready-to-run.
Fantastic work, many thanks!
partition 2 - ext4, size 3.8GB or greater,
In a number of places, ext4 has been reported to be associated with
early failure
of SD cards. I'm not sure
you again to Michael and helpers.
-- Ralph
From: Jon Elson [el...@pico-systems.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 10:55 AM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD card
image
Michael
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I think it's a no-brainer myself. I have a Raspi, but I just don't see it
competing with the bbb
Beaglebone -- TI chip. Intended for industrial use. Family will be
available forever. The boards are open source.
Raspberry Pi -- Broadcom chip. Intended for cell phone use. A new model
every year. The boards are open source -- you just can't buy the chips
for them.
The PRU on the Beaglebone
Eric Keller wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I think it's a no-brainer myself. I have a Raspi, but I just don't see it
competing with the bbb
OK, this was my take on the
On 4/28/2013 5:15 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Eric Keller wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I think it's a no-brainer myself. I have a Raspi, but I just don't see it
competing with
I have some RPIs and I think the BBBs will run rings around the RPIs...
The PRUs seem to be the clincher.
RPIs are fine for some things, but I just ordered a couple Beaglebone
Blacks from Mouser. They are suppose to ship this week.
The capes in the works are impressive..
The fact that
On Sunday 28 April 2013 17:29:54 Jon Elson did opine:
Eric Keller wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs. Raspberry Pi?
I think it's a no-brainer myself. I have a Raspi, but I just don't
see it
From: Gene Heskett ghesk...@wdtv.com
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD
card image
On Sunday 28 April 2013 17:29:54 Jon Elson did opine
Kenneth Lerman wrote:
I think if you look at the capabilities of the Bone, it might be hard to
justify adding your board. (Note that I haven't looked at the detailed
specs.)
The Bone has multiple encoders support. How does the rate supported
compare with the rate of your boards? The Bone
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD
card image
On Sunday 28 April 2013 17:29:54 Jon Elson did opine:
Eric Keller wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 10:41:46 -0700, you wrote:
Thank you! This is like getting a an unexpected new toy :-)
Agreed, fantastic work by Michael.
I, like many others, would love to build a small footprint controller
with no PC involvement, but there are still those niggling long term
bugs and
] Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD
card image
On Sunday 28 April 2013 17:29:54 Jon Elson did opine:
Eric Keller wrote:
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, Jon Elsonel...@pico-systems.com
wrote:
Is there a consensus about BeagleBone vs
So this setup for the BeagleBone Black runs LinuxCNC and a small web server, to
control it you login via Ethernet?
Interesting setup, that. I do that quite often with HP laser printers and I've
remotely updated and operated Portmasters hundreds of miles away.
For the control peripheral board
is
pinned out and configured.
Regards,
Steve Stallings
www.PMDX.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:e...@dc9.tzo.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 9:23 PM
To: Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] ?Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit:
ready-to-run SD card image
I
Dave wrote:
I disagree.
If you want a killer product for the BeagleBone Black, you need to toss
the EPP port concept entirely and have the BeagleBone Plug into the
Breakout board - similar to a cape.
Yes, I mostly agree with this. What I had in mind was to put an 8-bit
plus control
From: Gene Heskettghesk...@wdtv.com
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2013 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] ??Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit: ready-to-run SD
card image
On Sunday 28 April 2013 17:29:54 Jon Elson did opine:
Eric Keller
Controller (EMC)
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] ?Beaglebone LinuxCNC starterkit:
ready-to-run SD card image
I disagree.
If you want a killer product for the BeagleBone Black, you
need to toss
the EPP port concept entirely and have the BeagleBone Plug into the
Breakout board - similar to a cape
Another plan might be to make an FPGA board specific for the Bone, but what
do I do
with all the inventory I already have, here?
Obviously you are not the only one in that boat!
But I don't think the PC based CNC market is going to vanish overnight even
if the BeagleBone is wildly
29 matches
Mail list logo
