On 19.05.12 13:47, Terry Christophersen wrote:
LMC or LNC sounds good to me
LMC says National Semiconductor CMOS op-amps to me, e.g. LMC662,
but if you added two pen strokes, we'd have: EMC :-)
If LinuxCNC really is too long to type, what about: LC ?
(Does that resonate at all? ;-)
Erik
E to L seemed good to me. EWC is roughly a mirror of EMC. gammaWC, but theres
no business roman english character for that. Z*M3, but the closest would be
Z)M3 or Z]M3, both of which i already have staked out as my homestead in the
race to hoard intellectual and physical property and collect
On Sat, 19 May 2012 22:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote:
three letters is only 17576 choices. good bet they are all taken.
four alphanumeric is only 1.6 million choices. eemmcc22? llmmcc,
llnncc?? ellemcee. anLanMaC.
--- On Sat, 5/19/12, Mark Cason
On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:42:22 +0100
andy pugh bodge...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 May 2012 02:40, Terry Christophersen tcninj...@yahoo.com
wrote:
I forgot that it says [xx.xxx] pnpbios: dev_node_info function
not supported [xx.xxx] pnpbios: unable to get node info
Is this you:
on a hunch, im going to fault the landlords of any involved intellectual
propriety.
--- On Sun, 5/20/12, dave dengv...@charter.net wrote:
From: dave dengv...@charter.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Intel Board issues
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Sunday, May 20, 2012, 7:09 AM
On
LCNC is statistically bound to be an infringement. licenced chiropractic
nurses cooperative is sure to apply litigial pressure at every irrelevant point.
give up, queue up, recieve the predetermined designation in due order, and
forget any troubles.
--- On Sun, 5/20/12, dave
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size? Besides power, it's not clear to me how
many data lines for sensors, encoders, motor control, etc. are needed in
general.
Is it preferable to carry power and handful of control signals to
On 20 May 2012 17:07, charles green xxzzb...@yahoo.com wrote:
LCNC is statistically bound to be an infringement. licenced chiropractic
nurses cooperative
You can always rely on chiropractors to abuse the legal system and sue.
On 20 May 2012 17:40, Rafael Skodlar ra...@linwin.com wrote:
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size?
The size of the machine is not the most relevant thing, though a
bigger machine will might need bigger power cables to keep the
On 5/20/2012 12:40 PM, Rafael Skodlar wrote:
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size? Besides power, it's not clear to me how
many data lines for sensors, encoders, motor control, etc. are needed in
general.
Is it preferable to
Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Well lets just say the only thing that I am sure about is the drive is
under-damped.
;)
Tuning is proving to be insanely difficult for me, I guess mostly because I
don't really have much of a clue what I am doing. It is also kind of scary
because if I turn a POT on
dave wrote:
The 32016 was a good design as far as I could tell. Orthogonal
instruction set, 8 sets of registers, etc. I understand that National
simply didn't give much support. Most of the boards were VME bus.
The chip seemed to get used more in Europe than here.
National Semi never was
Note that data cables will need to be screened.
I'm using twisted pair, (OK CAT5, because it was lying around) this is working
for my home switches, but when I joined up the Z Y limit switches (I don't
have enough inputs for one each) I could no longer turn the machine on. HAL
scope
andy pugh wrote:
On 20 May 2012 17:40, Rafael Skodlar ra...@linwin.com wrote:
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size?
The size of the machine is not the most relevant thing, though a
bigger machine will might need
On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:09:06 -0500, you wrote:
andy pugh wrote:
On 20 May 2012 17:40, Rafael Skodlar ra...@linwin.com wrote:
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size?
The size of the machine is not the most relevant
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 06:11:51 PM charles green did opine:
LCNC is statistically bound to be an infringement. licenced
chiropractic nurses cooperative is sure to apply litigial pressure at
every irrelevant point.
give up, queue up, recieve the predetermined designation in due order,
and
On 5/20/2012 6:13 PM, gene heskett wrote:
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 06:11:51 PM charles green did opine:
LCNC is statistically bound to be an infringement. licenced
chiropractic nurses cooperative is sure to apply litigial pressure at
every irrelevant point.
give up, queue up, recieve
On May 20, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Jon Elson wrote:
Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Well lets just say the only thing that I am sure about is the drive is
under-damped.
;)
Tuning is proving to be insanely difficult for me, I guess mostly because I
don't really have much of a clue what I am doing.
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Jon Elson el...@pico-systems.com wrote:
dave wrote:
The 32016 was a good design as far as I could tell. Orthogonal
instruction set, 8 sets of registers, etc. I understand that National
simply didn't give much support. Most of the boards were VME bus.
The chip
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:56 PM, Dave e...@dc9.tzo.com wrote:
On 5/20/2012 6:13 PM, gene heskett wrote:
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 06:11:51 PM charles green did opine:
I also don't see any sense in going into the source code and changing
all references of emc to something else.
OK, but then
Jeshua Lacock wrote:
Actually, I really have only been using open-loop mode.
Since we had confusion here, open loop means LinuxCNC does not see movement
when you move the motors.
I am a little confused however because changing the PID settings still seems
to affect the drive.
Yes, even
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
Not to mention the fact that they acquired a reputation for
long-unfixed bugs and difficult interfacing
http://www.os.4uj.org/16032.htm. Still, it was a nice design and a
pity that NS didn't succeed in the effort to match its excellent
analog products with a digital
On 05/20/2012 12:12 PM, Dave wrote:
On 5/20/2012 12:40 PM, Rafael Skodlar wrote:
I wonder what kind of power and data cables would you recommend for use
in X-Y-Z CNC about 1.2mx1m size? Besides power, it's not clear to me how
many data lines for sensors, encoders, motor control, etc. are
I faced the same issue a couple of years ago. The company I work for was
called FDS so this was used in all the class names we created. We were sold
and now trade under a new name. I decided to stick with FDS in existing and
new code as this would be less confusing.
Mike
On 21 May 2012,
Rafael
The wires you need will depend on what motors you are using, the arrangement of
limit/home switches and if encoders are being used. Once you know these things
you can choose the cable.
For example I have built a machine of similar size to yours. It's driven by
three 3.1Nm steppers
25 matches
Mail list logo
