On 06/30/2017 11:45 AM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
This does show that a relatively small quadrature error
causes a large velocity modulation is the relative time
between edge changes so much
Good encoders have very close to 50% duty cycle on the
individual A and B outputs, at least when new.
users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
> >
> > On Friday 30 June 2017 12:45:55 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> Dat
Dammit, for some reason when I reply to messages on this list they often
end up going to the author of the message rather than to the list. Sorry
Gene, you'll probably end up receiving two copies of this.
Les, when I have something like that, I often ask myself if it was worth
chewing thru
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:59:19 -0400
From: Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
<emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ro
users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
> >
> > On Friday 30 June 2017 09:27:29 Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Les Newell wrote:
> >>> Date:
it
the same even though it Just Works(TM) now?
>
> On 29/06/2017 22:29, Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Les Newell wrote:
> >> Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:59:46 +0100
> >> From: Les Newell <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
> >> Reply-To: &quo
Years ago Jon Elson convinced me you almost could not too many
counts/rev.
Going from 5000 c/in (glass scale) to 40K c/in made a huge difference
in how easy it was
to tune.
I agree with Jon but changing the encoder is a pain and once I got past
the noise issues, tuning it was pretty
On 06/30/2017 04:11 AM, Les Newell wrote:
I think it is time to put a scope on the encoder. it sounds like
there may be a big duty cycle or phase angle error in that encoder. In
other words, at constant speed, the 4 quadrature transitions are not
evenly spaced, but at least one of them is
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Gene Heskett wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:22:24 -0400
From: Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net>
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
<emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ro
On 06/29/2017 06:42 AM, Les Newell wrote:
I tried using Buildbot on a fresh install of Stretch amd64 and got a
bunch of missing dependencies:
python-gst0.10 (Stretch has python-gst1.0)
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
hostmot2-firmware-all
Thanks for reporting this problem.
We've removed the
users@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
> >
> >> I think it is time to put a scope on the encoder. it sounds like
> >> there may be a big duty cycle or phase angle error
r (EMC)"
<emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Do you have and raw-write encoder filter tweaking stuff in the hal
file:
No. For testing purposes I am running the barest minimum needed to
achieve motion u
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Les Newell wrote:
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 12:11:09 +0100
From: Les Newell <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
<emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ro
May I opine that noise on one of the encoder lines may cause a zero speed
estimation. If you get two of the same channel edges in a row the encoder
logically must have reversed direction. It must go through zero speed to
change direction. Since a third edge (one on the other channel) is not yet
On Friday 30 June 2017 07:11:09 Les Newell wrote:
> > I think it is time to put a scope on the encoder. it sounds like
> > there may be a big duty cycle or phase angle error in that encoder.
> > In other words, at constant speed, the 4 quadrature transitions are
> > not evenly spaced, but at
I think it is time to put a scope on the encoder. it sounds like
there may be a big duty cycle or phase angle error in that encoder. In
other words, at constant speed, the 4 quadrature transitions are not
evenly spaced, but at least one of them is out of time.
I can see the phase angle
On 06/29/2017 03:59 PM, Les Newell wrote:
Do you have and raw-write encoder filter tweaking stuff
in the hal file:
No. For testing purposes I am running the barest minimum
needed to achieve motion using a config generated by pncconf.
After spending a lot of time playing with halscope I
On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Les Newell wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 21:59:46 +0100
From: Les Newell <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
<emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Ro
Do you have and raw-write encoder filter tweaking stuff in the hal file:
No. For testing purposes I am running the barest minimum needed to
achieve motion using a config generated by pncconf.
After spending a lot of time playing with halscope I have some
interesting findings. Most of what
On 06/29/2017 10:20 AM, Les Newell wrote:
Well, some progress figuring out what is going on.
I just ran some more tests using Ubuntu 16.04 with a
freshly built preempt-rt kernel and freshly built Git
master. No surprise, it still shows the fault. I took a
Halscope log from the original
@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Well, some progress figuring out what is going on.
I just ran some more tests using Ubuntu 16.04 with a freshly built preempt-rt
kernel and freshly built Git master. No surprise, it still shows the fault. I
took
Well, some progress figuring out what is going on.
I just ran some more tests using Ubuntu 16.04 with a freshly built
preempt-rt kernel and freshly built Git master. No surprise, it still
shows the fault. I took a Halscope log from the original setup. The
encoder velocity is rather noisy but
I tried using Buildbot on a fresh install of Stretch amd64 and got a
bunch of missing dependencies:
python-gst0.10 (Stretch has python-gst1.0)
gstreamer0.10-plugins-base
hostmot2-firmware-all
Les
On 28/06/2017 19:37, Todd Zuercher wrote:
If you install from buildbot, both linuxcnc and
; <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:52:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Hi Todd,
Does buildbot go back to 10.04 times? I though
Hi Peter,
As far as I can tell the spikes are in the feedback velocity. It can be
a little difficult to tell cause and effect.
Are you using identical hal files for the system with the
spikes/without spikes?
When I built the 2.6.13 branch on the 2.7.9 ISO I only had to make some
very
to build all of Linuxcnc from
source.
- Original Message -
From: "Les Newell" <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough mo
Did you trace the source of the PID output spikes?
that is, are there glitches in feedback position of feedback velocity?
The whole thing sounds very strange
Are you using identical hal files for the system with the spikes/without
spikes?
Peter Wallace
Mesa Electronics
PS.
Thanks for your contributions that became MB2HAL. I'm using it.
- Original Message -
From: "Les Newell" <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26:52 P
; <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:26:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Hi Todd,
I am building from source. I have tried several distros:
Debian - some
Hi Todd,
I am building from source. I have tried several distros:
Debian - something old, I can't remember what. This has been running
fine for about 8 years but it lacks driver support for modern hardware.
Ubuntu 10.04 LinuxCNC ISO - appears to run smoothly but I can't test
properly until I
-
From: "Les Newell" <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 12:51:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Hi Todd,
I did that but I can't build because i
s Newell" <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:50:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Is there any way to
On 06/28/2017 03:50 AM, Les Newell wrote:
OK, Tried the usual reseating components etc and that PC
does not want to play. I found a Dell SFF PC in the junk
pile. After hacking it to take a full size PCI card I
fired it up. Running my old Debian + LinuxCNC 2.6.0 it
runs smooth. Latency jitter
multiverse
- Original Message -
From: "Les Newell" <les.new...@fastmail.co.uk>
To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)" <emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:50:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
Is there
net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 4:50:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
OK, Tried the usual reseating components etc and that PC does not want
to play. I found a Dell SFF PC in the junk pile. After hacking it to
take a full size PCI card I fired it up. Running my old
OK, Tried the usual reseating components etc and that PC does not want
to play. I found a Dell SFF PC in the junk pile. After hacking it to
take a full size PCI card I fired it up. Running my old Debian +
LinuxCNC 2.6.0 it runs smooth. Latency jitter is 7us,10us. Running the
latest LinuxCNC
On 06/27/2017 03:06 PM, Les Newell wrote:
Hmm, looks like that was a red herring. The problem is
back. I can't do any more testing because the pixies
inside the old computer finally abandoned ship and it now
no longer boots. Doesn't even post. My priority now is
going to be to find a box that
Hmm, looks like that was a red herring. The problem is back. I can't do
any more testing because the pixies inside the old computer finally
abandoned ship and it now no longer boots. Doesn't even post. My
priority now is going to be to find a box that will run my old EMC.
Les
On 27/06/17
150 uS?? YIKES! That is not generally good enough for even a servo
system
I have done a lot of work with PID loops in various non LinuxCNC systems
and in my general experience they generally seem to be very tolerant to
timing variation. After all we are dealing with motors that have a
What version of Linuxcnc (EMC2) were you running before the upgrade?
I think there were some changes in how PIDs were handled between v2.5 and 2.7
that usually require a little servo returning.
- Original Message -
> From: "Les Newell"
> To:
Even though latency run well then I user computer for others at the same time I
sometimes get a latency delay and are on the path to give up ordinary computer
for servo threads. I think a small simpler computer will be more than enough
and then I am free to move display.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017
On 06/27/2017 10:31 AM, Les Newell wrote:
Same PC, same hardware, same settings. The only difference
between the two setups is the hard drive. Changing the PC
(AMD processor VS Intel on the original) had no effect on
the symptoms. I checked latency on the new PC and if I
remember correctly
Hi Dave,
Just ran latency test on the old computer with LinuxCNC 32us servo 54us
base. I moved some windows, opened a few programs etc. As I mentioned
before I had checked on the new computer and although it wasn't great it
was good enough. The fact that the fault is identical on two very
"The computer I am using is showing it's age and the ancient version
of Debian I have been running won't even boot properly on my new
computer." implies some change to us, what?, changing OS will change
the latency too
Dave
Same PC, same hardware, same settings. The only difference between the
two setups is the hard drive. Changing the PC (AMD processor VS Intel on
the original) had no effect on the symptoms. I checked latency on the
new PC and if I remember correctly worst case after a couple of hours
was
On 06/27/2017 09:01 AM, Les Newell wrote:
I have been running my lathe using EMC for many years and
decided to upgrade to the latest LinuxCNC. The computer I
am using is showing it's age and the ancient version of
Debian I have been running won't even boot properly on my
new computer.
The
New PC new possible latency problems?
Dave Caroline
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Les Newell wrote:
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 15:01:34 +0100
From: Les Newell
Reply-To: "Enhanced Machine Controller (EMC)"
To: emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Emc-users] Rough motion with servos
I have
48 matches
Mail list logo