On 07/15/2014 11:22 PM, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
>> If both things were clearly visible, someone searching for me
>> could easily see that one key was revoked and not signed by anyone,
>> while the other was valid and signed by numerous people. Picking
>> the right key would be easy.
>
> Revoked
> What I have always found interesting about the debate is that there
> seems to be an overwhelming feeling on the part of PGP/MIME advocates
> that it is the One Right Way To Do Things. I've never understood that
> zeal, but I do have a sort of respect for it. :)
My own position is "urgh, please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15.07.14 21:00, Otto de Voogd wrote:
>
> Actually, I'd like Enigmail to either show clearly that a key is
> revoked (as one would see when querying the keyserver), or not show
> revoked keys at all.
Performing a keyserver search, revoked keys ar
On 07/15/2014 12:18 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote:
It's not a flame war if you're talking facts, and leave the personal
insults out of it. :)
When writing the GnuPG FAQ, I received more flamemail about this than
any other subject. Honestly, it reached a point where I put my head in
my hands and g
> So please, folks, keep it classy and polite. :)
Incidentally ... that message, like this one, was sent with an S/MIME
signature.
The mailing list stripped it.
Case in point. ;)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
enigmail-u
On 07/15/2014 03:00 PM, Otto de Voogd wrote:
> Actually, I'd like Enigmail to either show clearly that a key is revoked
> (as one would see when querying the keyserver), or not show revoked keys
> at all.
The keyservers do not check whether the revocation is cryptographically
correct, so their "(r
> MTAs are at least as likely to break inline message signatures as
> PGP/MIME-signed messages...
PGP/MIME has a failure mode that is commonplace and hard to prevent --
MTAs that automatically strip attachments. Look at PGP-Basics on Yahoo!
Groups as an example.
It's easy to say, "well, they sho
> It's not a flame war if you're talking facts, and leave the personal
> insults out of it. :)
When writing the GnuPG FAQ, I received more flamemail about this than
any other subject. Honestly, it reached a point where I put my head in
my hands and gave serious thought to abandoning the endeavor.
On 07/15/2014 02:42 PM, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
>
> On 14.07.14 23:43, Otto de Voogd wrote:
>> (...) However it doesn't make a difference to my problem. On
>> Enigmail I searched on gpg.mozilla.org anyway (where it was
>> revoked) and it always shows the revoked key first.
>
>> If I search for
On 07/15/2014 01:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> For example, it's a fact that inline signatures work better with a wide
> variety of software (MTAs, mailing lists, etc.). That's the chief "pro"
> in terms of using inline.
>
> The chief "con" is that for people who receive the message who are not
> u
On 07/15/2014 10:34 AM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On 07/15/2014 01:23 PM, Martin Vegter wrote:
What is the recommendation, then?
Should inline-PGP be used preferably, when sending plain messages
(without attachments) ?
that's for your correspondents to decide, and not something you have
contr
On 07/15/2014 01:23 PM, Martin Vegter wrote:
> What is the recommendation, then?
> Should inline-PGP be used preferably, when sending plain messages
> (without attachments) ?
that's for your correspondents to decide, and not something you have
control over there are much better arguments (in both
> On 07/15/2014 05:37 PM, Patrick Brunschwig wrote:
>
>> However, when I select an encrypted/signed message, the OpenPGP
>> prompt pops up and asks me for my password anyway.
>
>> This is extremely annoying, because it makes it impossible to
>> scroll down the list of my emails. Every time I hit o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 14.07.14 20:55, Martin Vegter wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Enigmail 1.6 and Thunderbird (Icedove) 24.6.0.
>
> In the main menu on the top, I have following option deactivated:
>
> OpenPGP -> Automatically Decrypt/Verify messages
>
> However,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks very much :)
On 07/15/2014 03:24 PM, Ludwig Hügelschäfer wrote:
> On 15.07.14 01:13, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote:
>> I want to encrypt a part of message and not full message .. how
>> to do that with enigmail ?
>
> This is not possible w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 15.07.14 01:13, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote:
> I want to encrypt a part of message and not full message .. how to
> do that with enigmail ?
This is not possible with respect to the normal message text. Enigmail
always takes the full message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 14.07.14 23:43, Otto de Voogd wrote:
> (...) However it doesn't make a difference to my problem. On
> Enigmail I searched on gpg.mozilla.org anyway (where it was
> revoked) and it always shows the revoked key first.
>
> If I search for ruben.gar
17 matches
Mail list logo
