[E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r5

2005-07-29 Thread Edward Presutti
Attached is the latest patch for monitor. This patch includes everything in the previous ones, as well as fixing the loading of an old config. It now implements config_version so the old config bug won't happen in the future. If you upgrade from the older version of monitor, it pops up a Raster-sty

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r4

2005-07-28 Thread Mathieu
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que : > On Fri, July 29, 2005 1:14 am, Mathieu said: >> "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que : >> >>> This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly. >>> It >>> is built against CVS as of 7/2

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r4

2005-07-28 Thread Edward Presutti
On Fri, July 29, 2005 1:14 am, Mathieu said: > "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que : > >> This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly. >> It >> is built against CVS as of 7/28/05 @ 01:45AM CST and adds all of the >> features of the previous patc

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r4

2005-07-28 Thread Mathieu
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que : > This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly. It > is built against CVS as of 7/28/05 @ 01:45AM CST and adds all of the > features of the previous patches. > > Please try it out and let me know how it works

[E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r4

2005-07-27 Thread Edward Presutti
This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly. It is built against CVS as of 7/28/05 @ 01:45AM CST and adds all of the features of the previous patches. Please try it out and let me know how it works. -- Ed Presutti (ekrunch on freenode) -- understand, v.: To re

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:45:00 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Hello everyone; it's my first mail on this list ;) I've been in the computer world for a long time now - 20 years or so. and KB = kilobyte = 1024 bytes. MB = megabyte = 1024x1024 bytes. ie power of 2's always for memor

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2

2005-07-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:21:04 -0500 (CDT) "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Here's another update for the monitor module in e_modules. > > ADDED : Configuration Menus! > ADDED : Support for Interval Changing. Intervals for CPU, Memory, and > Network are all adjustable. > ADDED : Sup

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Daniel Svärd
I have a proposition: Why not make it a configurable option? That way everyone will be happy. yay!! Long live the freedom of choise! Daniel --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to fo

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 19:00:11 (+0200), Martin Geisler wrote: > I guess it comes down to personal preferrence then... I like the > idea of having prefixes with a fixed meaning: M = 10^6, Mi = 2^20, > always. If something more reasonable comes along, I might reconsider. But saying "Kiba-

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Martin Geisler
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we allow learning curve to dictate our modus operandi, why aren't > we all using MacOS and an iMac? :-) I guess it comes down to personal preferrence then... I like the idea of having prefixes with a fixed meaning: M = 10^6, Mi = 2^20, always. I

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Dènis Riedijk
Learning something in school in France does not make it a standard. And saying somebody MUST use something in HIS OWN program is just inappropriate. If you want a version with MiB, you can patch the sources :) On 7/21/05, FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everyone; it's my first mail

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 18:45:00 (+0200), FORT Yannick wrote: > I really think the MiB standard MUST be used, if you don't respect > standards, you surely want people to use .doc, .xls for office use, > MSN as a chat protocol, THIS is stupid ... Your conclusion is not supported by your stat

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread FORT Yannick
Hello everyone; it's my first mail on this list ;) I really think the MiB standard MUST be used, if you don't respect standards, you surely want people to use .doc, .xls for office use, MSN as a chat protocol, THIS is stupid ... When i read MiB, i'm sure it's 1024*1024 B, but when i read MB,

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 15:50:20 (+0200), Martin Geisler wrote: > Well, reading through the Usage Notes section on Wikipedia is > interesting. We're dealing with bytes in all six cases, but there are > differences: > > * A MB of RAM is 1024 * 1024 bytes. Agreed. > * A MB on a harddisk is

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Martin Geisler
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200), > Martin Geisler wrote: > >> Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of >> KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB? > > Boy I hope not. Such nonsense has no

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 15:22:14 (+0200), Jackob McRose wrote: > Well, it IS a nonsense, but everyone already get used for 1024 > multiplies, I think it is a bit too late for changing this. Only > effect will be more clueless people. Resistance is NOT futile. You do not have to be assimila

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Jackob McRose
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:00:55 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200), > Martin Geisler wrote: > > > Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of > > KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB? > >

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Michael Jennings
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200), Martin Geisler wrote: > Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of > KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB? Boy I hope not. Such nonsense has no place in Enlightened software. > I think it makes thing

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread gimpel
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:27:51 -0600 Tres Melton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 11:07 +0200, gimpel wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200 > > gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Oh heh. BUG BUG! > > > It currently still shows KB in memory module where it > > > sh

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Martin Geisler
gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200 > gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Oh heh. BUG BUG! >> It currently still shows KB in memory module where it >> should be MB :) >> >> cheers! > > To answer myself > i edited the mem_swap_get() and mem_real_get() >

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread Edward Presutti
On Thu, July 21, 2005 3:42 am, gimpel said: > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:00 +0200 > gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Oh heh. BUG BUG! > It currently still shows KB in memory module where it > should be MB :) > > cheers! > heh, oops. That's what I get for excessive copy/paste. I'm about to f

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread gimpel
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200 gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh heh. BUG BUG! > It currently still shows KB in memory module where it > should be MB :) > > cheers! To answer myself i edited the mem_swap_get() and mem_real_get() stuff in e_mod_main.c line 488ff : MB to GB, KB to MB

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread gimpel
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:00 +0200 gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:52:57 -0500 (CDT) > "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Please disregard that first patch I sent out earlier. This one is an > > updated version. It has been tested against current an

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-21 Thread gimpel
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:52:57 -0500 (CDT) "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Please disregard that first patch I sent out earlier. This one is an > updated version. It has been tested against current anon-CVS as of > 19:40 CST. > > This patch has configuration save/load as well as t

[E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2-r1

2005-07-20 Thread Edward Presutti
Please disregard that first patch I sent out earlier. This one is an updated version. It has been tested against current anon-CVS as of 19:40 CST. This patch has configuration save/load as well as the features specified in patch 2.0. Here's the complete changelog for this patch. ADDED : Configu

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2

2005-07-20 Thread Edward Presutti
On Wed, July 20, 2005 7:03 am, Sebastian Dransfeld said: > Bertrand Jacquin wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to use :) > > Or preferably e_config, since it is an e-module. > > Sebastian > > Mostly because I didn't really have any idea where to

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2

2005-07-20 Thread Sebastian Dransfeld
Bertrand Jacquin wrote: Hi, Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to use :) Or preferably e_config, since it is an e-module. Sebastian --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies

Re: [E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2

2005-07-20 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
Hi, Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to use :) ++ Beber On 7/20/05, Edward Presutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's another update for the monitor module in e_modules. > > ADDED : Configuration Menus! > ADDED : Support for Interval Changing. Intervals for C

[E-devel] Monitor Module Patch 2

2005-07-20 Thread Edward Presutti
Here's another update for the monitor module in e_modules. ADDED : Configuration Menus! ADDED : Support for Interval Changing. Intervals for CPU, Memory, and Network are all adjustable. ADDED : Support for Network Interface changing. Monitor now scans for network interfaces on load and provides a