No reason to call anyone a troll, no reason to cause drama either. I
consider both sides to be wrong. However In all opensource projects there
needs to be a core membership in which decisions are made for the best of
the project, and just like any other project E has that. Now let's carry on
to
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Michael Jennings m...@kainx.org wrote:
On Thursday, 01 April 2010, at 21:29:50 (-0400),
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
As you say.. But it's not about who to remove if you want to or
not, (and of course they won't care), it's about saying clearly that
it's you not
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr wrote:
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Michael Jennings m...@kainx.org wrote:
On Thursday, 01 April 2010, at 21:29:50 (-0400),
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
As you say.. But it's not about who to remove if you want to or
not, (and of
Carsten wrote:
i recently found quite a number of accounts we have for svn commit access that
are simply 100% inactive (never used once for anything) or have been inactive
for what i consider a while with no good reason for that. here's the list.
if
you are on it expect your account to
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:56:44 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
don't feed the troll.
Carsten wrote:
i recently found quite a number of accounts we have for svn commit access
that are simply 100% inactive (never used once for anything) or have been
inactive for what i
Bring the axe down I say. Im certain all those people would put the
security of the project over their token SVN access. On that topic, I
hope everyone has changed their passwords lately :) A good password is
one that keeps changing.
Toma.
On 2 April 2010 06:37, Carsten Haitzler
Carsten wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:56:44 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
don't feed the troll.
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who controls what, what the
project's aims and goals are, etc.
Of course most of
On 2 April 2010 08:57, Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com wrote:
Carsten wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:56:44 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
don't feed the troll.
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who controls what, what the
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:57:39 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
Carsten wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 16:56:44 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
don't feed the troll.
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who controls what, what the
project's aims and goals are, etc.
dude. by now, having founded and run this project for over 13 years... i think
i have the right to not have to go explain myself to you,
On Thursday, 01 April 2010, at 21:29:50 (-0400),
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
As you say.. But it's not about who to remove if you want to or
not, (and of course they won't care), it's about saying clearly that
it's you not some ambiguous we.
You can count me in that we as well. I fully support
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:29:50 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who controls what, what the
project's aims and goals are, etc.
dude. by now, having founded and run this project for
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 21:29:50 -0400 Jose Gonzalez jose_...@juno.com said:
No 'trolls' here man. People really should know *clearly*
who the gate-keepers are, who controls what, what the
project's aims and goals are, etc.
dude. by
i recently found quite a number of accounts we have for svn commit access that
are simply 100% inactive (never used once for anything) or have been inactive
for what i consider a while with no good reason for that. here's the list. if
you are on it expect your account to be removed some-time soon,
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:41:00 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
i recently found quite a number of accounts we have for svn commit
access that are simply 100% inactive (never used once for anything)
or have been inactive for what i consider a while with no good
On 03/31/2010 11:37 PM, David Seikel wrote:
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 10:41:00 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
i recently found quite a number of accounts we have for svn commit
access that are simply 100% inactive (never used once for anything)
or have been
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:48:36 -0400 Christopher Michael
cpmicha...@comcast.net wrote:
On 03/31/2010 11:37 PM, David Seikel wrote:
Personally, I've been way to busy with other stuff to do much in the
way of open source coding. I started working on my own linux last
month,
Sounds
17 matches
Mail list logo
