Il giorno mer, 07/09/2005 alle 15.38 -0400, Robert May ha scritto:
> Made the change and still no change. Well my cpu usage is being shown
> as 240% now instead of 254% :)
>
is it the actual CPU load to 100%? (you can cross-check with top, for
example)
--
Ciro Mattia Gonano
Winged.it Master
Made the change and still no change. Well my cpu usage is being shown
as 240% now instead of 254% :)
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 14:52 -0400, Mike Russo wrote:
> It's been observed that if your PC does not have a wireless interface,
> and the wireless part of the monitor module is set to "check fast"
It's been observed that if your PC does not have a wireless interface,
and the wireless part of the monitor module is set to "check fast" then
this will happen. Set the check interval for "check very slow". The
developers are working on modularizing this module.
Robert May wrote:
I h
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
> On Fri, July 29, 2005 1:14 am, Mathieu said:
>> "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
>>
>>> This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly.
>>> It
>>> is built against CVS as of 7/2
On Fri, July 29, 2005 1:14 am, Mathieu said:
> "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
>
>> This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly.
>> It
>> is built against CVS as of 7/28/05 @ 01:45AM CST and adds all of the
>> features of the previous patc
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait dernièrement que :
> This patch addresses a SEGV when configuration fails to load correctly. It
> is built against CVS as of 7/28/05 @ 01:45AM CST and adds all of the
> features of the previous patches.
>
> Please try it out and let me know how it works
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 18:45:00 +0200 FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Hello everyone; it's my first mail on this list ;)
I've been in the computer world for a long time now - 20 years or so. and KB =
kilobyte = 1024 bytes. MB = megabyte = 1024x1024 bytes. ie power of 2's always
for memor
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 05:21:04 -0500 (CDT) "Edward Presutti"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Here's another update for the monitor module in e_modules.
>
> ADDED : Configuration Menus!
> ADDED : Support for Interval Changing. Intervals for CPU, Memory, and
> Network are all adjustable.
> ADDED : Sup
I have a proposition:
Why not make it a configurable option? That way everyone will be happy. yay!!
Long live the freedom of choise!
Daniel
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to fo
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 19:00:11 (+0200),
Martin Geisler wrote:
> I guess it comes down to personal preferrence then... I like the
> idea of having prefixes with a fixed meaning: M = 10^6, Mi = 2^20,
> always.
If something more reasonable comes along, I might reconsider. But
saying "Kiba-
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If we allow learning curve to dictate our modus operandi, why aren't
> we all using MacOS and an iMac?
:-)
I guess it comes down to personal preferrence then... I like the idea
of having prefixes with a fixed meaning: M = 10^6, Mi = 2^20, always.
I
Learning something in school in France does not make it a standard.
And saying somebody MUST use something in HIS OWN program is just
inappropriate. If you want a version with MiB, you can patch the
sources :)
On 7/21/05, FORT Yannick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone; it's my first mail
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 18:45:00 (+0200),
FORT Yannick wrote:
> I really think the MiB standard MUST be used, if you don't respect
> standards, you surely want people to use .doc, .xls for office use,
> MSN as a chat protocol, THIS is stupid ...
Your conclusion is not supported by your stat
Hello everyone; it's my first mail on this list ;)
I really think the MiB standard MUST be used, if you don't respect
standards, you surely want people to use .doc, .xls for office use, MSN
as a chat protocol, THIS is stupid ...
When i read MiB, i'm sure it's 1024*1024 B, but when i read MB,
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 15:50:20 (+0200),
Martin Geisler wrote:
> Well, reading through the Usage Notes section on Wikipedia is
> interesting. We're dealing with bytes in all six cases, but there are
> differences:
>
> * A MB of RAM is 1024 * 1024 bytes.
Agreed.
> * A MB on a harddisk is
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200),
> Martin Geisler wrote:
>
>> Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of
>> KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB?
>
> Boy I hope not. Such nonsense has no
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 15:22:14 (+0200),
Jackob McRose wrote:
> Well, it IS a nonsense, but everyone already get used for 1024
> multiplies, I think it is a bit too late for changing this. Only
> effect will be more clueless people.
Resistance is NOT futile. You do not have to be assimila
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:00:55 -0400
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200),
> Martin Geisler wrote:
>
> > Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of
> > KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB?
>
>
On Thursday, 21 July 2005, at 11:59:54 (+0200),
Martin Geisler wrote:
> Would you consider changing the texts to reflect the IEC standard of
> KiB for 1024 bytes, MiB for 1024 KiB, and GiB for 1024 MiB?
Boy I hope not. Such nonsense has no place in Enlightened software.
> I think it makes thing
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 04:27:51 -0600
Tres Melton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 11:07 +0200, gimpel wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200
> > gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Oh heh. BUG BUG!
> > > It currently still shows KB in memory module where it
> > > sh
gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200
> gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Oh heh. BUG BUG!
>> It currently still shows KB in memory module where it
>> should be MB :)
>>
>> cheers!
>
> To answer myself
> i edited the mem_swap_get() and mem_real_get()
>
On Thu, July 21, 2005 3:42 am, gimpel said:
> On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:00 +0200
> gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Oh heh. BUG BUG!
> It currently still shows KB in memory module where it
> should be MB :)
>
> cheers!
>
heh, oops. That's what I get for excessive copy/paste. I'm about to f
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:42:51 +0200
gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh heh. BUG BUG!
> It currently still shows KB in memory module where it
> should be MB :)
>
> cheers!
To answer myself
i edited the mem_swap_get() and mem_real_get()
stuff in e_mod_main.c line 488ff : MB to GB, KB to MB
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:33:00 +0200
gimpel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:52:57 -0500 (CDT)
> "Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Please disregard that first patch I sent out earlier. This one is an
> > updated version. It has been tested against current an
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:52:57 -0500 (CDT)
"Edward Presutti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please disregard that first patch I sent out earlier. This one is an
> updated version. It has been tested against current anon-CVS as of
> 19:40 CST.
>
> This patch has configuration save/load as well as t
On Wed, July 20, 2005 7:03 am, Sebastian Dransfeld said:
> Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to
use :)
>
> Or preferably e_config, since it is an e-module.
>
> Sebastian
>
>
Mostly because I didn't really have any idea where to
Bertrand Jacquin wrote:
Hi,
Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to use :)
Or preferably e_config, since it is an e-module.
Sebastian
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
Hi,
Why don't you use ecore_config to save configuration ? It's simple to use :)
++
Beber
On 7/20/05, Edward Presutti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's another update for the monitor module in e_modules.
>
> ADDED : Configuration Menus!
> ADDED : Support for Interval Changing. Intervals for C
28 matches
Mail list logo
