On 3-Aug-08, at 3:38 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
I won't help if it's LGPL. I also won't link to it in my code as I
won't fix bugs in it.
People like Cedric and Gustavo and their companies are more open
minded than you. Their companies work with and on the efl. With he
BSD licence, their
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems the license question is still very much discussed. Until
now I
didn't say much about it. But now I like to add my 2 cents to that
topic.
At work
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems the license question
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 7:31 AM, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It seems the license question
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:27 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:07 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:30 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:04 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:56 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 12:43 PM
On 3-Aug-08, at 2:50 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 1:46 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 3-Aug-08, at 1:27 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Hey, but that's ok for _YOU_, isn't it?! You already said it's fine
and that's exactly the purpose to use BSD
On 3-Aug-08, at 4:28 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:46 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
People contributing to the community? Sure that's ok for me. That's
ok for
everyone I believe. I think that's kinda the point. People
contributing
On 3-Aug-08, at 4:31 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 2:48 PM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yes, and it's up to the company to decide what they need to keep
private to
make money. That's how companies work. I don't see any reason why
we should
put
On 3-Aug-08, at 10:07 PM, Nick Hughart wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:33:34 -0500 Nick Hughart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
Ian Caldwell wrote:
Yup, I'd like to eliminate submenus completely One navigation on
all pages
that has links to pretty
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:18 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:53 AM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:40 AM, Nick Hughart wrote:
Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
I'd say you're so eager to release something you're
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:42 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 00:12:00 -0500 Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:46 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oh of course. details! :) we can dot the i's and cross
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:12 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
As I said, it already happened, don't hide under the we did not
official 1.0 yet.
No, it hasn't. If a company jumped on _alpha_ level software and
started to develop around it they have to expect that changes are
coming. Hence the
We've tried this about 3 times. Someone comes along and says if we
have a CMS non-technical people will write articles. We implement a
CMS. No-one writes articles. We drop the CMS.
If you want to write news releases put them on blogs. Or write a news
blurb for the front page. If longer
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:55 PM, Sthithaprajna Garapaty wrote:
I'm not saying having a CMS will suddenly bring people to write.
That's a separate problem.
I think it will not BLOCK people from writing. There's a difference.
There are various avenues we can pursue to attract writers.
Bounties,
On 2-Aug-08, at 2:58 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sun, 3 Aug 2008, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:03:41 +0200 Andreas Volz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
I vote to use LUA for scripting too. I've embedded it into several
commercial products in the past. It was
On 2-Aug-08, at 7:59 PM, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
License
As most of the code on efl-research project (and most of *my* code) it
does not have COPYING file, it was left out on purpose, basically to
Leaving out a COPYING file basically makes the code proprietary. No-
one can use it
On 2-Aug-08, at 9:41 PM, Blake Barnett wrote:
On Aug 1, 2008, at 10:53 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
It all comes down to when you're doing the 2.0 release. If you do a
2.0 release in a few months it looks like we just rushed a 1.0 out
the
door to say we had a 1.0. Major releases should last
That's true, and it is bad. If we want to use it we have to clean up
the aggregated feeds. In fact planet is just a feed aggregator, a very
good feed aggregator, but imho it could be good to have an official E
blog.
I really don't see the point of a blog. Why not just put your blog
entry in
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:34 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
2. E planet!?! Developers and power users should few lines on e
status of
developement. This involves.
right now, e planet has not a lot of topics related to development
You'll also notice that about 90% of planet.e.o content is myself and
On 1-Aug-08, at 10:40 AM, Matteo wrote:
because raster did it like that :-D
I'm not sure why people don't want to use a cms, but I've being told
that they want to keep like that (cvs based).
If you keep it CVS-based, it's hard to develop and hard to update
with news,
topic and more.
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:49 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Friday, 01 August 2008, at 20:38:46 (+0200),
Vincent Torri wrote:
I have no design, but i have already complained about the web site
on the ML. I'm not a good designers, but i think that there are some
things that MUST appear on a web
On 1-Aug-08, at 3:41 PM, Veli Ogla Sungutay wrote:
Articles friends. We need lots of them. Even a small tutorial, small
usage
examples would do.
Saying we need articles is fine. Finding people to write good articles
is hard.
dan
On 1-Aug-08, at 2:04 PM, Ian Caldwell wrote:
What would you like to see on the new website? What goals do you
think it
should have.
My personal views are this is what we need to see differently. Feel
free to
chime in and add to what you'd like to see on the new site
*1. Create
On 1-Aug-08, at 4:47 PM, dan sinclair wrote:
*5. weekly or biweekly articles*
Ditto to 1. They can also write the articles on the Wiki which is
probably a better choice. Makes them easier to maintain in the long
run. They can then be linked from the main site.
This is what we did
The COPYING file for this is currently blank. What license is this
work under? Can someone please fill in the COPYING file.
Thanks,
dan
On 30-Jul-08, at 8:46 AM, Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : cedric
Project : e17
Module : proto/eina
Dir :
On 1-Aug-08, at 7:40 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
I can do that. I've been reading the CVS logs, E-devel discussions
and stuff
for years, so I think I can post news and blog about the major
events in the
community/changes in the E(FL). The problem is, I am quite tech-
interested,
but
On 1-Aug-08, at 6:17 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
yeah. i agree we need releases. it's probably our biggest issue.
right now in
lib-space i'd want to clean up 2 major thnigs that are currently
underway:
1. eina - move fully to using it. remove all data stuff from ecore/
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant posts appear we can
add news items about them that point back to the blog.
http://enlightenedjournal.wordpress.com/
This
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:46 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
There is also a bug in Edje that has bitten us in Ewl a few times
where re-using Edje objects seems to cause strange things to hang
around. I believe pfritz was the last person to look into this so he
might have some more
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:55 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:53 AM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 1-Aug-08, at 8:38 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
Setup a blog on one of the many blogging platforms around and we can
syndicate the feed to planet.e.org. As relevant
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:33 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Guys, maybe you're forgetting about it, maybe you're hiding behind the
we have not released a stable version for this reason, but the fact
is that this will happen even now. Since there was not a release,
people just assumed that CVS
On 2-Aug-08, at 12:52 AM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:39 AM, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
You're releasing something before it should be released just to
give the
impression of a 1.0 for something that isn't 1.0. That leaves a
worse taste
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:03 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
This is probably better to do before we release. If we put out Edje
with Embryo support and then remove Embryo with Edje2 we'll be
pissing
off a lot of people that create themes and applications. Better to
bite the bullet and deal with it
On 2-Aug-08, at 1:51 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008, dan sinclair wrote:
How does our changing now affect them any different then if we
changed in 6 months?
As I said, you think that we will release the next major release
(with api changes, etc..) in 6 months and I
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC and on forums saying, E17 is good,
but its just not finished/has bits missing. Some lusers go as far to
On 31-Jul-08, at 4:14 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31-Jul-08, at 3:48 PM, Bruno wrote:
On Thu, 31 July 2008 Toma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anything, it might be an idea to ask people, what 'needs' to be
done? I see a few people on IRC
On 27-Jul-08, at 5:54 AM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
As you never cared about building a large community of foss
developers,
you have thus helped to create a largely dysfunctional project
starved of
resources. That's as much a part of E's legacy as anything good it
may have
stood for
On 25-Jul-08, at 7:48 PM, Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Peter wrote:
to it and the original code was LGPL. But would you share code with
someone, that doesn't share code with you?
Good point. And that's precisely why many people don't like to
contribute to bsd licensed projects. In the
On 24-Jul-08, at 5:26 PM, Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri schrieb:
One thing I'd like to see here is the opinion of those that do most
of
the code these days, guys like englebass, dj2, pfritz and raster. You
wrote lots of code already, and continue to do, what do you think
On 22-Jul-08, at 3:58 PM, Dan Kronstal wrote:
I don't know if I'm missing the point here, but it sounds like
OpenID is
redundant. What we've got here is three subdomains with three
logins/accounts when they could all be using one instead. bugtracker/
trac
are their own sites with their
Your code marked Dead code is actually code used to shut up compiler
warnings about unused variables. So, not dead.
dan
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : ravenlock
Project : e17
Module : libs/ecore
Dir
Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 16 June 2008, at 15:33:23 (+0200),
Cedric BAIL wrote:
On this topic, I believe we have two choice, libtomcrypt
(http://libtom.org/?page=featuresnewsitems=5whatfile=crypt) and
openssl. My opinion on this subject is certainly biased as I already
use
Why did you comment out all the printfs for invalid files? Those can be
useful if the .ini file is actually screwed up.
dan
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : raster
Project : e17
Module : libs/efreet
Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
Modified Files:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : dj2
Project : e17
Module : libs/efreet
Dir : e17/libs/efreet/src/lib
Modified Files:
efreet_ini.c
Log Message:
- if we can't parse the INI file we can't set ini-data so return NULL
instead of an invalid ini
andres wrote:
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 14:57:04 The DarkMaster escribió:
Andre's idea looks very interesting to me (I never mentioned, by the way,
that EWl or anything else should be reduced to something like GTK.
Oh. I didn't meant to say you wanted that. My point was that complete unity
andres wrote:
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:17:01 dan sinclair escribió:
The thing is, you aren't gaining anything. The themer still has to theme
everything twice. All you have is a basic set of images they reference.
Which they could have, and just copy into the themes anyway.
That depends
andres wrote:
El Tuesday 01 April 2008 18:33:22 dan sinclair escribió:
I think this is a lot of effort to save the themer the extra 20 minutes
it will take to change the images in the 3 theme files instead of just one.
This covers much more than images. Textures are groups for a reason. Most
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
dan sinclair wrote:
To what end? What's the point of tying them together like this? It would
be better, in the long run, to just have a single widget library instead
of 3.
The 'one true way' of widgetry with the one true mechanism for
theming
The DarkMaster wrote:
I think almost everyone is understimating the problem. This is a very bad
issue only Enlightenment has and a lot people asks why does this happen,
even in our OpenGEU FOrums. Even creting EWL, ETK, etc. themes is really
something bad a user has to do. Once you create an
Toma wrote:
I'm not sure, but I think it's possible to place the EWL and ETK theme
inside the e17 theme itself...someone can confirm this?
No you cant. They both have seperate EDJ's and their own theme choosers.
Toma
Actually, you can. At least with Ewl you could combine the themes if
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
However you have it (though rel coords would seem best),
if you really want ewl to be a flexible tool for building
artistic, rich apps, then you'll want a natural way to
arbitrarily position child *widgets* - not just evas objects..
and to allow for
andres wrote:
El Wednesday 19 March 2008 19:26:18 dan sinclair escribió:
Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
I have been giving
Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
This would, hopefully, simplify some of the container code and allow for
more code re-use
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Massimiliano wrote:
Might I suggest exporting the efreet xml parser and use it
instead? Does anyone object? Using strstr to parse xml isn't
very nice.
Sebastian
On my side i don't have any preference, i initially wrote my
parser
performance does it?,
which appears to me a majority of peoples complaints regarding XML use.
Dale.
dan sinclair wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Massimiliano wrote:
Might I suggest exporting the efreet xml parser and use it
instead? Does anyone object? Using strstr to parse
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Dan wrote:
Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
This would, hopefully, simplify some of the
Peter Wehrfritz wrote:
dan sinclair schrieb:
Currently Ewl positions widgets based on absolute coordinates. This
works but isn't unnecessarily optional. Thoughts on changing the
internals of Ewl to use parent relative placement of widgets?
This would, hopefully, simplify some
stellar parsing performance does it?,
which appears to me a majority of peoples complaints regarding XML use.
Dale.
dan sinclair wrote:
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
Massimiliano wrote:
Might I suggest exporting the efreet xml parser and use it
instead? Does anyone object? Using
Jose Gonzalez wrote:
You can do this now with Ewl. The only problem being, everything
is absolute coordinates which is a bit strange for this kind of
widget. If you want to do this, inherit ewl_box, remove configure
event, add your own configure and use ewl_object_place to put the
Jess wrote:
Is there a dedicated person we should send the email to? Or just email the
list? Sorry, not familiar with the etiquette here.
Recording them into wiki.enlightenment.org would probably be the best
bet. A much more stable and easy to use record then the mailing list.
dan
Vincent Torri wrote:
about these suggestions, would it be interesting to add them in the trac
main page ?
I think wiki.enlightenment.org would make more sense then trac.
dan
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
better than in the mailing list :) though trac is also a wiki... :) but as
such
the trac stuff is for more of an official todo list. SoC stuff is right now
just banter :)
Is this were I resist the urge to mention that having two wiki's seems
silly?
On 7-Jan-08, at 10:26 AM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Monday, 07 January 2008, at 09:21:25 (-0600),
Ravenlock wrote:
Either way... the sources are a hodgepodge of formatting. I wonder
what folks would think of a document formalizing the style of the
sources. And possible a set of scripts
There are some documents on the wiki on creating widgets in Edje. You
can also try talking to dresb as he's doing that documentation stuff
at the moment. You can see the wiki at wiki.enlightenment.org.
Otherwise, I'd say embed Ewl into your application as it will make
development a lot
This is great. I've had this on my plate for a while but haven't done
it for two reasons. 1) no time and 2) while I was doing the first 3
the header and stylesheet were still in flux so I didn't want to go
too far.
Everything seems to have settled for the website so I think now is a
good
No reason to cvs remove. Just leave the file there. You can cvs update
with new files added. In order to use cvs diff -Nu you have to cvs add
the file first. Otherwise cvs doesn't know it's a new file.
dan
On 6-Dec-07, at 11:01 PM, Dave Andreoli wrote:
Just cvs add the file first.
dan
Sounds like a good idea. We can also stick the docbook source into the
e17/docs directory with the other books if you want.
dan
On 2-Dec-07, at 7:53 AM, andres wrote:
If I combine my two articles:
http://wiki.enlightenment.org/index.php/Development_with_Edje:_Introduction
The e17 theme and the ewl_embed_test theme are totally independent.
There is no shared code, or anything else, between them.
dan
On 30-Nov-07, at 10:25 AM, Martin Zwickel wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:03:40 -0500
Will Keaney [EMAIL PROTECTED] bubbled:
FWIW, I've noticed that when
I'm not seeing this when I have full debug on with Ewl. Can you please
post an example program that shows this behavour? We've been trying to
cleanup as many of the warnings as we can in the system. There are a
few warnings spit but not many.
dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 7:14 PM, Brett Nash
Oh, Evas Errors. Sorry, wasn't paying attention. I thought you were
talking about Ewl warnings. I haven't tried to turn on the Evas stuff
before.
dan
On 19-Nov-07, at 8:18 PM, Brett Nash wrote:
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 19:54 -0500, dan sinclair wrote:
I'm not seeing this when I have full
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
I also like bugzilla completeness, but unless we'll create
hierarchical bug dependencies, it doesn't worth the pain.
We already use bug dependencies in Ewl and we have to keep this
capability. If Trac can't handle this it isn't an option.
dan
The fact that trac has been added as a link on the main title bar makes
it seem pretty official. It also means that anyone coming to the site
will use trac instead of bugzilla which isn't on the main titlebar.
dan
Nick Hughart wrote:
This was not meant to turn into a big deal. Trac is up
Having two systems is going to quickly get out of hand. The longer they
both exist the harder this is going to be to fix it. We currently track
our todo lists and bugs in bugzilla. We just mark todos as enhancements.
You, of course, have the ability to add comments and we have a wiki
setup
to accomodate the reference, a few lines
in Doxyfile, edje.css and the functions I moved around in edje_cc_handlers.c.
http://pastebin.com/m1929ac03
The reference itself, I'm still working on :)
El Tuesday 13 November 2007 03:38:58 Vincent Torri escribió:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, dan sinclair
Did you remove collections.group.parts.part.description.color_class,
color, color2, color3 on purpose? If so, what's the reasoning behind
this? (lines 139-142 and 1620 - 1694)
dan
On 13-Nov-07, at 1:08 AM, Ben Rockwood wrote:
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007
David Seikel wrote:
raster highly recommends that everything get updated at once. I agree
with him.
If by that you mean that the person changing the API fix everything in
cvs, that's the exact opposite of what Raster said. He said it can take
a lot of time to fix, and you should only break
All,
We've had Efreet in CVS for a while now and it seems to be working well.
Taking a look at the other apps in CVS the only one still using
Ecore_Desktop that I noticed was Engage.
Can the Engage maintainer please update the app to use Efreet so we can
move Ecore_Desktop over into proto?
Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote:
On 7/10/07, dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9-Jul-07, at 8:13 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On 7/9/07, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I want to reply before this thread ends discussing only the how
do we
patch projects
They changed the simple search so it requires a keyword. But, you can
click search, Advanced Search tab, then just hit search and it will give
everything. (You can then save this search at the bottom of the list and
it will be added into your footer where you can just click the link)
dan
David Seikel wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 19:29:37 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 20:05:30 -0400 dan sinclair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
babbled:
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Maybe we need to have official
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:40 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
On 7/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, from an outsiders perspective, I thought it might be useful to
pop in a word.
With regards to being just a WM or being a full desktop
environment or
being a desktop shell - you
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:35 PM, Hisham Mardam Bey wrote:
The question that I will ask again is, why do we have patches that
are several months old on our mailing list that have not been given a
yes or no yet?.
Probably because they got lost in a flood of email and the author
never popped up to
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:43 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 02:35:15 +0300 Hisham Mardam Bey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
On 7/9/07, Виктор Кожухаров [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
One of the options would be to assign a maintainer to each piece of
code in our CVS. That
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:59 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 19:55:08 -0400 dan sinclair
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
i swear i recently cleaned out the patches - like a few weeks back?
Actually.. .I think we need a patches mailing list...?
Can you say bugzilla
On 8-Jul-07, at 7:51 PM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
Maybe we need to have official IRC logs? Maybe add a #ecode channel
whose ONLY
purpose is discussion of code, design, direction ideas etc. No help
questions -
no random discussion. Log it and put that up on-line. If you
We've been trying the new Bug genie bug tracker for a little while now
and I must say, I'm pretty disappointed in it's abilities. It took a lot
of effort to get setup, and we haven't been able to figure out how to do
simple things like change a bugs product or attach patches after the bug
has
yes, you're nuts ;) (sorry you set yourself up for that)
Second point I also think we should use bugzilla it may be a bit
overkill but at least it does wtf we want it to do so I vote we
setup bugzilla and I'm willing to do so, but we know you spent a
lot of time setting this one up
It can't run on evas directly as it needs to know how to receive mouse
and key events. But, the Ewl engines are setup with dependencies. So, if
you take a look at evas_fb at the top you'll see an
ewl_engine_dependencies function that declares evas as it's parent.
It then just implements the
Jochen Schroeder wrote:
Hi all,
I cannot get edje icons to display in my menu, although they display
fine in Ibar and on the borders. I reported that a while ago, but the
problem is still there, both for the debian packages from edevelop and
compiled cvs.
I also noticed I have to specify
Luchezar Petkov wrote:
dan sinclair wrote:
On 25-Apr-07, at 3:05 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
1) Rewrite/update the user guide on get-e.org and move it in the
official site as user documentation. It will cover ONLY e17 itself and
the official modules (ibar, ibox, etc etc)
We can cover
On 25-Apr-07, at 3:05 PM, Luchezar Petkov wrote:
Ok..
As you may noticed, I've putted some content. I need your opinion
on it
- is it nice, are the images nice - are they too big or too small
or are
they nice at all.
I think their a bit on the big side. A few images are fine but I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder though if one can write apps with e's toolkits
that would allow for 'overriding' the toolkit's theme (with an
app-provided edje goup say), for a given toolkit widget? Also, is it
possible to build 'custom widgets' that can be given app-specific
On 21-Mar-07, at 7:10 PM, Simon TRENY wrote:
In Etk, as in Ewl I think, you can change the theme of a specific
widget or change globally the theme used by all the widgets.
About custom widgets, it's indeed possible to build your own widget
directly in the app's code, the only difficulty here
Christopher Michael wrote:
I've been reading through the efreet code and it's not too shabby, so
big (insert your favorite type) cookie to the authors there :) but
before I jump head first into this porting nightmare I have a few
remaining questions
1) Is it really worth the effort
Brian Mattern wrote:
Efreet is pretty much complete, other than being itegrated into e17.
Unfortunately, dan doesn't use e17 on anymore and seb and I have been
pretty busy lately.
I still use e17 at work, but don't have time to do development there. I
just don't use it at home anymore as
Enlightenment CVS wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : davemds
Project : e17
Module : libs/engrave
@@ -452,10 +452,9 @@
font_key = engrave_part_state_text_font_get(eps);
efont = engrave_file_font_by_name_find(ef, font_key);
- font_name =
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
unfortunately - we have issues like fdo menus and icon specs that REQUIRE svg
support... :(:(:( big problems :( i could do something like fork of a child
process that converts via a pipe - at least if it dies the parent won't, and
we
will hit a
Gil Pinheiro wrote:
we have tried to get in for the past few years and been rejected. last time
we
were rejected basically because enlightenment is not relevant and is a dead
project of no interest which is my summary/paraphrasing of what google
thinks
of us. so good luck. i have no
1 - 100 of 277 matches
Mail list logo
