[e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Is basically the feedback I get from non-E users most times. Thoughts on this? Recent example - http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/27qt7k/bodhi_linux_300_rc1_released_ubuntu_1404_base/ -- ~Jeff Hoogland http://jeffhoogland.com/ Thoughts on Technology http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/, Tech

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:38:20 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote: Is basically the feedback I get from non-E users most times. Thoughts on this? Recent example - http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/27qt7k/bodhi_linux_300_rc1_released_ubuntu_1404_base/ Tell the people that

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 10/06/2014 16:38, Jeff Hoogland wrote: Is basically the feedback I get from non-E users most times. Thoughts on this? Recent example - http://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/27qt7k/bodhi_linux_300_rc1_released_ubuntu_1404_base/ Jeff, I feel the same way as those posters, just

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread William
First a disclaimer: I Love Enlightenment and use it as my main workstation OS. While I only started using it full-time last year, I have been following it's development since 1997. As things stand, I would not want to use another system. The ugly and awful truth from my perspective: yes,

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Ondřej Svoboda
Jeff, you are right that those guys do not really say anything helpful. I am using the default theme and I find it both beautiful and usable, as well as Enlightenment as a whole. It is very carefully engineered and not getting in the way. To me, the theme is classic, yet very polished,

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Morten Nilsen
On 10/06/14 04:20, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: works for me with a kde app... i don't know what's up with you there, but if you used the e scim setup, it runs the scim core for you on login and sets several env vars: I did use the input method settings in E to configure SCIM;

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Iván Briano
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no wrote: On 10/06/14 04:20, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: works for me with a kde app... i don't know what's up with you there, but if you used the e scim setup, it runs the scim core for you on login and sets several env

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Morten Nilsen
On 10/06/14 18:23, Iván Briano wrote: Is there some efl package I might be missing, or a compile time option the packager may have missed? Maybe, did you have SCIM installed by the time you built the EFL? I didn't build anything, I installed the packages available in this repo:

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Martin Koelewijn
Ugly: matter of taste. I've always liked the default themes a lot, and some others in the old pre-E17 days. The color variations on the old bw theme not so much. Inconsistency with gtk themes is the problem for me. It's very hard to find a good dark gtk theme, that doesn't mess up web browsing in

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
2014-06-10 11:38 GMT-03:00 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com: Thoughts on this? It's a matter of taste. Maybe if developers followed this user's advices, we'd have even more hateful comments on this same thread. My preferred E theme was the grunge theme, but E breaks compat with themes

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 10/06/2014 17:34, William wrote: I have long played with the thought that perhaps there should be a secondary, not so super-scary version of Enlightenment for regular Linux users. This would have to have a default interface with highly refined aesthetics and functional defaults. It

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread William
On 06/10/2014 11:58 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 10/06/2014 17:34, William wrote: I have long played with the thought that perhaps there should be a secondary, not so super-scary version of Enlightenment for regular Linux users. This would have to have a default interface with highly refined

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
everybody know it is ugly :-D what's the news? On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com wrote: Is basically the feedback I get from non-E users most times. Thoughts on this? Recent example -

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Yomi Ogunwumi
I don't worry too much about the Settings Panel horror, because at some point in the future this will be fixed, apparently. ¹ I also don't play around with Settings too much because I get lost. 1 : https://phab.enlightenment.org/T553 -*Yomi* On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:34 AM, William

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread mk
Jeff, Red, orange, brown are not suitable colors for desktop environment. I suspect you used orange as a menu highlight to symbolically indicate that Bodhi is an ubuntu derivative. Not a good choice. Take it out. Mark Shuttleworth is an artistic illiterate. Think of this: why matadors use

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Fan Cris
people complain anyway. if is new then the old was better if keep the way is not modern/ugly/... look at firefox/opera/kde/gnome/... full with heaters :) i dont like your theme but im sure others will like it, keep your way :) On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:31 PM, mk joz_...@yahoo.ca wrote: Jeff,

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Christopher Barry
Agreed. Bhodi's default theme is painful to look at. Read some Johannes Itten, like 'elements of color'. On Jun 10, 2014 3:35 PM, mk joz_...@yahoo.ca wrote: Jeff, Red, orange, brown are not suitable colors for desktop environment. I suspect you used orange as a menu highlight to symbolically

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Hoogland
Chris, These same people complain about the default E theme and the dozens of E17 themes out there. On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:08 PM, Christopher Barry christopher.r.ba...@gmail.com wrote: Agreed. Bhodi's default theme is painful to look at. Read some Johannes Itten, like 'elements of

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Hoogland
It is just beyond frustrating that even here people are just linking abstract ideas. What is a cut and dry solution? Give me hexcodes/RBG values for things that are suppose to look modern and mesh well. I'm not an artist and I don't claim to be. I am just looking for reasonable feedback that

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Vinícius dos Santos Oliveira
2014-06-10 18:33 GMT-03:00 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com: It is just beyond frustrating that even here people are just linking abstract ideas. What is a cut and dry solution? Give me hexcodes/RBG values for things that are suppose to look modern and mesh well. What about using

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread meine
Is basically the feedback I get from non-E users most times. Thoughts on this? lots of people still don't understand that you are _not_ forced to drive a Trabant/Volkswagen/Opel/stupid car for the rest of your life if you don't want to. fancy a Viper, Ferrari, Tesla, Dacia or 2CV? be our

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread William
While I admit that I never installed any, all of the e17 themes strike me as highly individualistic, rather than something I would associate with mass appeal. It is just beyond frustrating that even here people are just linking abstract ideas. What is a cut and dry solution? Give me

[e-users] Has enlightenment stopped supporting Ubuntu?

2014-06-10 Thread E F
The latest Ubuntu LTS release (trusty) has been out for two months now, but the latest distribution in the PPA is saucy. The packages in the PPA have broken dependencies in trusty, and cannot be installed even after modifying the PPA URL to use saucy instead of trusty. There is a working e17

Re: [e-users] Has enlightenment stopped supporting Ubuntu?

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Hoogland
You can easily add Bodhi's E19 desktop to any 14.04 install - http://jeffhoogland.blogspot.com/2014/03/howto-add-bodhis-enlightenment-desktop.html On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:53 PM, E F orobo...@hotmail.com wrote: The latest Ubuntu LTS release (trusty) has been out for two months now, but the

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread William
the beauty of Linux is that you can change distro, desktop environment or/and window manager. and if you still don't like it, you can build your own theme or get the source code and make it the way you like it best. at no cost, without loss of data or productivity. This is the sort of

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 18:31:05 +0200 Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no said: On 10/06/14 18:23, Iván Briano wrote: Is there some efl package I might be missing, or a compile time option the packager may have missed? Maybe, did you have SCIM installed by the time you built the EFL? I

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Morten Nilsen
On 11/06/14 00:30, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: is there an scim ecore_imf module installed? /usr/lib/ecore_imf/modules for you i guess (adjust /usr as appropriate). There does seem to be, I have this file; /usr/lib64/ecore_imf/modules/xim/v-1.10/module.so -- Cheers, Dr. P :wq

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:15:58 +0200 Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no said: On 11/06/14 00:30, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: is there an scim ecore_imf module installed? /usr/lib/ecore_imf/modules for you i guess (adjust /usr as appropriate). There does seem to be, I have this

Re: [e-users] Has enlightenment stopped supporting Ubuntu?

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 21:53:29 + E F orobo...@hotmail.com said: enlightenment never supported ubuntu. some individuals dod some packaging at some point and made ppas or voulunteered to be official package maintainers and put them into debian and/or ubuntu. a lot of the core devs now have

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Iván Briano
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:15:58 +0200 Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no said: On 11/06/14 00:30, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: is there an scim ecore_imf module installed? /usr/lib/ecore_imf/modules for you

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 09:38:20 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com said: i'm going to respond here and include some stuff put into the thread so far. before i do that note that several efl devs you'd want to talk to are not subscribed to this mailing list, so expect you are seeing a subset

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread Morten Nilsen
On 11/06/14 04:21, Iván Briano wrote: There does seem to be, I have this file; /usr/lib64/ecore_imf/modules/xim/v-1.10/module.so then... i'm not sure why it doesn't work. ecore_imf can't find it's modules? that'd be odd. That's the plain XIM module, not SCIM. Okay, so the package

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014 23:21:03 -0300 Iván Briano sachi...@gmail.com said: On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote: On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 01:15:58 +0200 Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no said: On 11/06/14 00:30, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: is

Re: [e-users] Terminology and SCIM

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 05:47:20 +0200 Morten Nilsen mor...@runsafe.no said: On 11/06/14 04:21, Iván Briano wrote: There does seem to be, I have this file; /usr/lib64/ecore_imf/modules/xim/v-1.10/module.so then... i'm not sure why it doesn't work. ecore_imf can't find it's modules? that'd

[e-users] engage

2014-06-10 Thread mik firestone
My understanding is that engage hasn't compiled for a while, due to changes in the compositing layer. I really miss engage. I miss it enough I will attempt to fix it. I can code and I have some experience with graphics toolkits. I also have a week or so in the near future where I can focus on

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread Jeff Hoogland
They aren't just talking about the Bodhi theme. They are talking about E in general. That web update thread goes back to a point where we don't have a default Bodhi theme - we have a selection of themes at startup which includes your dark default theme. What doesn't look consistent and/or

Re: [e-users] Enlightenment is Ugly and Awful

2014-06-10 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 00:22:08 -0500 Jeff Hoogland jeffhoogl...@linux.com said: They aren't just talking about the Bodhi theme. They are talking about E in general. i read the thread - the reddit one, and they are. when they are specific: Looks like a baby took a shit on your screen as you were