Re: [e-users] Terminology problem when 10 bits color is used

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 21:07:03 +0100 daniel antoine said: > Hi > from a UXterm > > export ELM_ACCEL=gl > terminology > >it works > > all the .desktop files related to enlightenment in /usr/share/applications > are affected but work with ELM_ACCEL=gl > > This means that in elementary

Re: [e-users] Terminology problem when 10 bits color is used

Hi from a UXterm export ELM_ACCEL=gl terminology it works all the .desktop files related to enlightenment in /usr/share/applications are affected but work with ELM_ACCEL=gl This means that in elementary configuration rendering OpenGL/OpenGL-ES must be set, does it ? Thanks and best

Re: [e-users] Terminology problem when 10 bits color is used

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:02:02 + Carsten Haitzler said: > On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:37:37 +0100 daniel antoine said: > > > Hi > > > > My laptop is an AMD hybrid graphic model and by default the depth is 24 > > bits stored in 4 bytes. In archlinux they explain how to set 10 bpc colors, > > 30

Re: [e-users] Terminology problem when 10 bits color is used

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 19:37:37 +0100 daniel antoine said: > Hi > > My laptop is an AMD hybrid graphic model and by default the depth is 24 > bits stored in 4 bytes. In archlinux they explain how to set 10 bpc colors, > 30 bits stored in 4 bytes. > I have created the file

[e-users] Terminology problem when 10 bits color is used

Hi My laptop is an AMD hybrid graphic model and by default the depth is 24 bits stored in 4 bytes. In archlinux they explain how to set 10 bpc colors, 30 bits stored in 4 bytes. I have created the file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-amdgpu.conf Section "Screen" Identifier "asdf" DefaultDepth 30

Re: [e-users] terminology rejects shortcut keys'

On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:07:45AM +0100, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:36:19 -0700 Ross Vandegrift said: > > Sometimes I have a terminology window get into a weird state where > > shortcut keys are rejected. I can't switch tabs, open tabs, scroll > > back, etc. > > > > I've

Re: [e-users] terminology rejects shortcut keys'

On Thu, 31 Aug 2023 14:36:19 -0700 Ross Vandegrift said: > Hi folks, > > Sometimes I have a terminology window get into a weird state where > shortcut keys are rejected. I can't switch tabs, open tabs, scroll > back, etc. > > I've noticed a tab gets a little link icon next to the title. > >

[e-users] terminology rejects shortcut keys'

Hi folks, Sometimes I have a terminology window get into a weird state where shortcut keys are rejected. I can't switch tabs, open tabs, scroll back, etc. I've noticed a tab gets a little link icon next to the title. Is this a mode or a bug? If it's a mode, how do I exit it? Ross

Re: [e-users] terminology 1.21.1 ignores AltGr keys sequences

On 22-09-21 19:17, dabicho wrote: > I just upgraded enlightenment and now I cannot input AltGr characters > into the command line with terminology. > Like ~ > My keyboard has latin key distribution and to get ~ I use AltGr-+ > anywhere else, but it stopped working with terminology after upgrading

[e-users] terminology 1.21.1 ignores AltGr keys sequences

I just upgraded enlightenment and now I cannot input AltGr characters into the command line with terminology. Like ~ My keyboard has latin key distribution and to get ~ I use AltGr-+ anywhere else, but it stopped working with terminology after upgrading Anyone has any clue how could I change it?

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

On 22-01-15 10:46, Conrad Knight wrote: […] > seems to imply that in addition to an installed theme, you can have > another edj file that overrides certain elements. How do you tell > terminology to also use this extra file besides the chosen theme? Or > does the new theme begin with an "include"

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

> From: J?r?my Zurcher > the themes are in INSTALL_DIR/share/terminology/themes/ > should be /usr/share/terminology/themes/ on most systems > you'll find the 2 installed themes : default.edj and nyanology.edj Yes, that's what i was doing. But this: > > > From: Carsten Haitzler > > > you can

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

Hi, the themes are in INSTALL_DIR/share/terminology/themes/ should be /usr/share/terminology/themes/ on most systems you'll find the 2 installed themes : default.edj and nyanology.edj add your own ! On Friday 14 January 2022 10:05, Conrad Knight wrote : > > From: Carsten Haitzler > > change

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

> From: Carsten Haitzler > change your theme ... :) I simply replaced terminology's default.edj with the one from 1.11.0. That visual bell was just WAY too much, and I preferred the old cursor, too. But i did like the handles to adjust the text selection in the new theme. > you can make a theme

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 22:41:44 -0800 Ross Vandegrift said: > Hi Boris, > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Boris Faure wrote: > > == > > “It ends when you're ready > > for a new

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

Hi Boris, On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 08:13:38PM +0100, Boris Faure wrote: > == > “It ends when you're ready > for a new beginning.” > Adrienne Posey >

[e-users] Terminology 1.12.1

== “Oops” Boris Faure == Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! Yesterday's release was not done

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

On 22-01-03 12:14, Conrad Knight wrote: > > From: Boris Faure > > == Additions == > > * New default theme! > > Is there supposed to be a Default.eet? I see a Default.ini with the > other colour schemes, but the meson.build file doesn't include it. > When i run terminology, i get the

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

I had not noticed the above error but I also am getting it. And I also noticed that the version info was not changed in the meson.build file so I also am getting the wrong version as well. On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 12:16 PM Conrad Knight wrote: > > From: Boris Faure > > == Additions == > > *

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

> From: Boris Faure > == Additions == > * New default theme! Is there supposed to be a Default.eet? I see a Default.ini with the other colour schemes, but the meson.build file doesn't include it. When i run terminology, i get the following error: $ terminology --version

[e-users] Terminology 1.12.0

== “It ends when you're ready for a new beginning.” Adrienne Posey == Hello fellow Terminology

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.11.0

Thank you, but it is just the preflight check which should only report the additional library missing when it would actually be required. It does not break the build process itself, just confuses a bit when actually checking the output before starting the ninja build, because such a NO normally

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.11.0

You can try out the below command before (re)building Enlightenment and related applications. sudo ln -sf /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/preloadable_libintl.so /usr/lib/libintl.so On Debian/Ubuntu, I get: (...) Run-time dependency intl found: NO (tried pkgconfig and cmake) Library intl found: YES

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.11.0

Hi, I did a git pull on the sources just now. There is one thing I find a bit strange, that is when doing meson . build, it says [...] Project version: 1.11.0 C compiler for the host machine: cc (gcc 10.2.1 "cc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110") C linker for the host machine: cc ld.bfd

[e-users] Terminology 1.11.0

== “You cannot swim for new horizons until you have courage to lose sight of the shore.” William Faulkner

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

Hi, great, I cloned it from https://github.com/borisfaure/terminology.git. Version says 1.10.99. Opening the file works correctly now, many thanks Regards Peter On Sat, 23 Oct 2021, Boris Faure wrote: Hi! I hope to have fixed the issue in current git. Would you be able to test it?

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

On 21-10-15 18:53, Peter Koellner wrote: > Hi, I have upgraded to devuan 4.0 chmimaera, which is based on debian 11. I > have installed the enlightenment 0.24.2-8 packages, switched my desktop to it > and also installed the terminology 1.9.0-2 packages. I have the same emacs > problem with this

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

Hi Peter, On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:42:57PM +0200, Peter Koellner wrote: > I am not sure if this helps somehow. I have also done an strace of > terminology 1.10 up to the point where the *scratch* window waits for input, > but that is a lot of stuff that ends with the snippet below, so

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

Hi, I have upgraded to devuan 4.0 chmimaera, which is based on debian 11. I have installed the enlightenment 0.24.2-8 packages, switched my desktop to it and also installed the terminology 1.9.0-2 packages. I have the same emacs problem with this configuration. the local temrinology 1.6.0

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

On Sat, 9 Oct 2021, Boris Faure wrote: Are you just running `emacs file`? Are you using any plugin? Is there a mode in emacs to run with an empty configuration and if so, do you notice the same issue? Yes, I am just running emacs filename. emacs -q filename has the same effect in terminology

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

On 21-10-09 19:11, Peter Koellner wrote: > Hi, > > I just downloaded and built terminology-1.10.0.tar.xz to replace my old 1.6.0 > installation. I am running it in a xfce environment > on a devuan beowulf. I had to abandon enlightenment as desktop environment in > favour of xfce two years ago

[e-users] Terminology 1.10 problem with emacs

Hi, I just downloaded and built terminology-1.10.0.tar.xz to replace my old 1.6.0 installation. I am running it in a xfce environment on a devuan beowulf. I had to abandon enlightenment as desktop environment in favour of xfce two years ago or so, since I had some obscure difficulties with the

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.10.0

Thanks Boris! Very happy you've fixed the jumping to bottom issue. Didn't want to revert to an older version due to the wonderful colour scheme feature, so I stuck it out with the last version. Cheers, dave.k In the year 2021, of the month of October, on the 3rd day, Boris Faure wrote: >

[e-users] Terminology 1.10.0

== “You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.” Marcus Aurelius, Meditations

[e-users] Terminology 1.9.0

“Shoot for the stars, but if you happen to miss, shoot for the moon instead.” Neil Armstrong

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.9.0

On 21-01-18 22:21, Boris Faure wrote: > > “Shoot for the stars, > but if you happen to miss, > shoot for the moon instead.” >

[e-users] Terminology 1.8.1

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! About two weeks ago, we released Terminology v1.8.0. That release shipped with 2 bugs that are fixed in version 1.8.1 released today. The detailed change log lists them below: == Fixes == * Be stricter on which characters can be considered wide or not

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.8.0

On 20-07-27 22:40, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Thanks, this is awesome! One small bug report: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Boris Faure wrote: > > * Reworked the Settings panel to add one panel on Mouse interactions > > I unchecked "Auto hide the mouse cursor when idle", but it

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.8.0

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:40:24PM -0700, Ross Vandegrift wrote: > Thanks, this is awesome! One small bug report: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Boris Faure wrote: > > * Reworked the Settings panel to add one panel on Mouse interactions > > I unchecked "Auto hide the mouse

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.8.0

Thanks, this is awesome! One small bug report: On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 05:22:45PM +0200, Boris Faure wrote: > * Reworked the Settings panel to add one panel on Mouse interactions I unchecked "Auto hide the mouse cursor when idle", but it didn't affect the open terminology window. Instead,

[e-users] Terminology 1.8.0

“It does not matter how slowly you go as long as you do not stop.” Confucius Hello fellow Terminology

[e-users] Terminology 1.7.0

“The bee collects honey from flowers in such a way as to do the least damage or destruction to them, and he leaves them whole, undamaged and fresh,

[e-users] Terminology 1.6.0

"Adopt the pace of nature: her secret is patience." Ralph Waldo Emerson Hello fellow

Re: [e-users] Terminology: Strange keyboard problems on Mac OS X

On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 17:52:34 +0100 Quelrond Q said: Are you using terminology via X or Cocoa? > Hello, > > After some tweaks I managed to install Terminology 1.5.0 on Mac OS X 10.13.6 > (with EFL 1.22.4 installed by brew). Almost everything is working correctly > (I’ll prepare another mail

[e-users] Terminology: Strange keyboard problems on Mac OS X

Hello, After some tweaks I managed to install Terminology 1.5.0 on Mac OS X 10.13.6 (with EFL 1.22.4 installed by brew). Almost everything is working correctly (I’ll prepare another mail about some other problems), but I have some strange problems with some symbols. I use 'French PC’ keyboard

[e-users] Terminology 1.5.0

"A society grows great when old men plant trees whose shade they know they shall never sit in." Hello fellow Terminology

Re: [e-users] terminology loses focus in case of pasting text via Paste button

On 19-06-07 19:09, Eric wrote: > Hello, > > I am running enlightenment 22.4, efl 1.22.2 and terminology 1.41. > > I recently came across this bug on two different computers, one running arch > linux and one running ubuntu 18.04. > > It seems it is similar if not the same as reported here: > >

[e-users] terminology loses focus in case of pasting text via Paste button

Hello, I am running enlightenment 22.4, efl 1.22.2 and terminology 1.41. I recently came across this bug on two different computers, one running arch linux and one running ubuntu 18.04. It seems it is similar if not the same as reported here: https://phab.enlightenment.org/T6594 but that

[e-users] Terminology 1.4.1

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! A few weeks after having released Terminology v1.4.0, few issues were found and fixed in this new 1.4.1 version. == Fixes == * Decode pasted string as UTF-8, fixing some characters being skipped * Fix theme to ensure default size is 80x24 * Fix focus

[e-users] Terminology 1.4.0

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! In the northern hemisphere, it is already spring. The flowers are starting to bloom again, trees are budding… It is also a time to start fresh and release those 250+ commits written during long winter nights. I am thus proud to release Terminology 1.4.0

[e-users] Terminology 1.3.2

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! While working on Terminology 1.3.1, I introduced a regression: clicking on links had no longer any effect. Release 1.3.2 fixes that issue. Here is the ChangeLog: == Fix == * Clicking on links works again Due to issues with enlightenment.org

[e-users] Terminology 1.3.1

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! I was made aware of a security issue in Terminology this morning ( https://phab.enlightenment.org/T7504 ). I acknowledged the issue and worked on a fix that is now provided in Terminology 1.3.1. The issue is a Remote Code Execution vulnerability caused by

[e-users] Terminology 1.3.0

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! On this Black Friday, I am pleased to release Terminology 1.3.0! This release introduces the following changes: Additions: * Hyperlink escape code support Improvements: * Optimize escape code parsing by improving cell copies Fixes: * Fix issues

[e-users] Terminology + Matterhorn backspace issues

Ive tried to use Matterhorn (https://github.com/matterhorn-chat/matterhorn) in Terminology, only to find that backspace does not work Ive tried setting my stty erase = ^V ^H and ^? to no avail Backspace does work in xterm. this is what i get from stty -a in xterm: speed 38400 baud; rows 41;

Re: [e-users] Terminology Settings Not Sticking

On Wed, 30 May 2018 13:01:52 -0700 Drew said: > E 0.22.1-3 and Terminology 1.2.1-1 installed from Debian-Testing repo, > running on an ASUS X200CA laptop. > > > > Right click in window Themes: > > File Align: > > > > In both cases the selection won't stick and reverts to default

[e-users] Terminology Settings Not Sticking

E 0.22.1-3 and Terminology 1.2.1-1 installed from Debian-Testing repo, running on an ASUS X200CA laptop. Right click in window Themes: File Align: In both cases the selection won't stick and reverts to default setting when Terminology is closed and then re-opened. Solution?

[e-users] Terminology 1.2.1

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! I am pleased to release Terminology 1.1.1! This release introduces the following changes: Fixes: - Fix focus issues when input was not registering - User-defined tab titles stay even when terminal wants change it - Themes no longer have glow when

Re: [e-users] Terminology 1.2 and window problems

On 18-05-10 10:03, Esteban Monge wrote: > Hello: > > I have installed enlightenment 0.22.3 with terminology 1.2. > > If I am using terminology and open a new window, when return to > terminology I can't write from keyboard, I need to hit on title bar for > write from keyboard again, I deleted

[e-users] Terminology 1.2 and window problems

Hello: I have installed enlightenment 0.22.3 with terminology 1.2. If I am using terminology and open a new window, when return to terminology I can't write from keyboard, I need to hit on title bar for write from keyboard again, I deleted $HOME/.config/terminology to determine if is a config

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 22/04/18 14:26, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: [...] Everything is working fine. then explain the meson error you pasted. I already have, about three times. It was because I typed the wrong package name. id meson install? can you install it? Yes, once I retyped the apt

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Sun, 22 Apr 2018 11:21:44 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 22/04/18 06:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > [...] > > our job is to provide the source code that gets compiled, so out > > instructions will be for that. :) the general instructions on our > > download

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 22/04/18 06:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: [...] our job is to provide the source code that gets compiled, so out instructions will be for that. :) the general instructions on our download page where the downloads are source at any rate. :) Yep. I used to rely on it in the days

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Sat, 21 Apr 2018 22:09:35 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 21/04/18 06:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > you didn't even have to install meson if it's already compiled > > binaries. meson is needed to compile terminology and enlightenment > > Right. I was

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 21/04/18 06:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: you didn't even have to install meson if it's already compiled binaries. meson is needed to compile terminology and enlightenment Right. I was installing meson because the web site said so. But it turned out (thanks to your help) that

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Fri, 20 Apr 2018 21:51:04 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 20/04/18 07:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > [...] > > umm but: > > > > meson : Depends: ninja-build (>= 1.6) but it is not going to be installed > > > > that says that there should be a ninja-build

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 20/04/18 07:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: [...] > umm but: > > meson : Depends: ninja-build (>= 1.6) but it is not going to be installed > > that says that there should be a ninja-build package. the meson package you > are > installing depends on it... where is that meson

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 03:07:41 + Stephen Houston said: > Also, the comment that was made about Ubuntu and Fedora not updating meson > (or any other apps as was stated) is very misleading. Both Fedora and > Ubuntu stay well up to date and keep their packages very up to

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 22:45:55 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 19/04/18 03:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > [...] > > anyone can get write access. sign up an account there. it's a wiki. > > I'm not a developer, just an end user, so I don't think I would be in > any

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 19/04/18 10:40, maderios wrote: > On 04/18/2018 09:32 PM, Peter Flynn wrote: >> Sounds good. I've avoided Arch because last time I tried it, it broke >> Emacs, and was several versions behind on a few key (for me) packages. >> But if that's changed I should look at it again. >> > Hi > 'Last

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 19/04/18 03:37, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: [...] > anyone can get write access. sign up an account there. it's a wiki. I'm not a developer, just an end user, so I don't think I would be in any remote way qualified to add anything myself. > but please note that that page is

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 04/18/2018 09:32 PM, Peter Flynn wrote: at last arch has been smooth sailing on this, but it's a rolling distro so it stays relatively up to date :) Sounds good. I've avoided Arch because last time I tried it, it broke Emacs, and was several versions behind on a few key (for me) packages.

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Also, the comment that was made about Ubuntu and Fedora not updating meson (or any other apps as was stated) is very misleading. Both Fedora and Ubuntu stay well up to date and keep their packages very up to date. The meson version included in both distros stable repos work just fine to build e,

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

In the year 2018, of the month of April, on the 19th day, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > Is Meson that neglected in some places? I had sort of assumed it would > > be under heavy support as it's become so popular. > > no - it's that meson has been changing a lot of late i'd say as it gets

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:32:49 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 18/04/18 09:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > >> I know meson is terribly fashionable these days, but I have tried > >> to get it

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 20:58:30 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 18/04/18 20:32, Peter Flynn wrote: > > On 18/04/18 09:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > >>> I know meson is terribly fashionable

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:47:01 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 18/04/18 21:19, Massimo Maiurana wrote: > [...] > > On debian buster (testing) there is no package named ninja, you should > > remove it from the apt command line. Meson should carry out ninja-build > > automatically as

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 17:45:19 -0400 mh said: > > On 4/18/18 4:56 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > > > >> Yes, it looks like a build fail. > >> > >> Thanks, Carsten, for suggesting

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 4/18/18 4:56 AM, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: Yes, it looks like a build fail. Thanks, Carsten, for suggesting dpkg --purge. I had used apt --purge but it seems that doesn't actually purge everything.

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Peter Flynn ha scritto il 18/04/2018 alle 22:47: > On 18/04/18 21:19, Massimo Maiurana wrote: > [...] >> On debian buster (testing) there is no package named ninja, you should >> remove it from the apt command line. Meson should carry out ninja-build >> automatically as it's one of its

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 18/04/18 21:19, Massimo Maiurana wrote: [...] > On debian buster (testing) there is no package named ninja, you should > remove it from the apt command line. Meson should carry out ninja-build > automatically as it's one of its dependencies. Interesting, so it does. Perhaps someone with

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Peter Flynn ha scritto il 18/04/2018 alle 21:58: > On 18/04/18 20:32, Peter Flynn wrote: >> On 18/04/18 09:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: I know meson is terribly fashionable these days, but I have tried

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 18/04/18 20:32, Peter Flynn wrote: > On 18/04/18 09:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: >>> I know meson is terribly fashionable these days, but I have tried >>> to get it to work on at least five Linux distros

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 18/04/18 09:56, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: >> I know meson is terribly fashionable these days, but I have tried >> to get it to work on at least five Linux distros and it's never >> worked properly -- always

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:11:33 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > Yes, it looks like a build fail. > > Thanks, Carsten, for suggesting dpkg --purge. I had used apt --purge but it > seems that doesn't actually purge everything. > > Then reinstalling it worked (with a waning) so now

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Yes, it looks like a build fail. Thanks, Carsten, for suggesting dpkg --purge. I had used apt --purge but it seems that doesn't actually purge everything. Then reinstalling it worked (with a waning) so now it's back and on hold. I know meson is terrribly fashionable these days, but I have

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:52:49 +0200 Boris Faure said: > On 18-04-18 12:08, Dave wrote: > > Weird. I've downloaded and unpacked that deb file. It just contains the > > /usr/share/doc/terminology data. No binaries. I'm guessing whoever created > > it has an automated system for

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 18-04-18 12:08, Dave wrote: > Weird. I've downloaded and unpacked that deb file. It just contains the > /usr/share/doc/terminology data. No binaries. I'm guessing whoever created > it has an automated system for building packages, and it's failing on binary > compilation. With Terminology

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 22:07:41 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > On 17/04/18 14:59, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:12:24 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > > > [...] > >> Does anyone know where I can get it in a .deb form that won't vanish

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Weird. I've downloaded and unpacked that deb file. It just contains the /usr/share/doc/terminology data. No binaries. I'm guessing whoever created it has an automated system for building packages, and it's failing on binary compilation. Your old deb files are located in

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

Sorry, this failed to send earlier. On 17/04/18 12:12, Peter Flynn wrote: [...]> 1 not fully installed or removed. > After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used. > E: Internal Error, No file name for terminology:amd64 > > Does anyone know where I can get it in a .deb form that

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On 17/04/18 14:59, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:12:24 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > [...] >> Does anyone know where I can get it in a .deb form that won't vanish at >> an update? > > perhaps remove the pkgs fully (dpkg --purge it) before

Re: [e-users] Terminology deleted by update

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:12:24 +0100 Peter Flynn said: > I recently installed Mint 18 on a desktop system, and added e and > terminology like this: > > sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:niko2040/e19 > sudo apt-get update > sudo apt-get install enlightenment terminology > > All

[e-users] Terminology deleted by update

I recently installed Mint 18 on a desktop system, and added e and terminology like this: sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:niko2040/e19 sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install enlightenment terminology All working nicely. Then this morning I ran my weekly update: peter@oimelc:~/$ sudo apt update

[e-users] Terminology 1.2.0

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! I am pleased to release Terminology 1.2.0! This release introduces the following changes: Additions: * New build system based on Meson * Add Nord theme * Add tysend tool and support escapes for sending single files * Grouped input support

Re: [e-users] Terminology keybind question

terminology-1.0.0-3.fc25.x86_64 efl-1.19.0-3.fc25.x86_64 On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Boris Faure wrote: > On 17-09-05 15:43, Joseph Ghobrial wrote: > > Hi, I'm trying to bind "Focus to the next terminal" to Win+Right. > > Unfortunately, it moves the cursor to the right rather

Re: [e-users] Terminology v1.1.1

On 17-09-05 22:11, Boris Faure wrote: > Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! > > I am pleased to release Terminology 1.1.1! > > This release introduces the following changes: > > Additions: > - Danish translation > > Fixes: > - Fix issues with bottom margins > - No longer add spurious

Re: [e-users] Terminology keybind question

On 17-09-05 15:43, Joseph Ghobrial wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to bind "Focus to the next terminal" to Win+Right. > Unfortunately, it moves the cursor to the right rather than the accept the > input mapping. > > I have "Focus to the previous terminal" bound to Win+Left which is what I > want and that

[e-users] Terminology keybind question

Hi, I'm trying to bind "Focus to the next terminal" to Win+Right. Unfortunately, it moves the cursor to the right rather than the accept the input mapping. I have "Focus to the previous terminal" bound to Win+Left which is what I want and that works. Is this possible? Thanks, Joseph

[e-users] Terminology v1.1.1

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! I am pleased to release Terminology 1.1.1! This release introduces the following changes: Additions: - Danish translation Fixes: - Fix issues with bottom margins - No longer add spurious newlines in selections in the backlog - No longer add space when

[e-users] Terminology v1.1.0

Hello fellow Terminology enthusiasts! I am pleased to release Terminology 1.1.0 today! This release introduces the following changes: Additions: - Double-click on tab title to change it - Add option to disable focus-in/out animations and visuals - Add option to set current window size as

  1   2   3   4   5   >