Good reference to identify baseline features that could be in a Plone Social
distro/buildout.
Sharepoint's available social features:
http://www.nonlinearcreations.com/blog/index.php/2010/02/18/enterprise-social-computing-features-comparison-moss-2007-vs-sharepoint-2010/
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at
On 20/05/2010, at 7:43 AM, David Bain wrote:
Good reference to identify baseline features that could be in a
Plone Social distro/buildout.
Sharepoint's available social features:
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:36 AM, Nate Aune na...@jazkarta.com wrote:
...
What would it take to bundle up some Plone add-ons and release it as a
PloneSocial distro? What add-ons should be included? Would you want to
lead the charge to put something together?
That could be as simple as
What would it take to bundle up some Plone add-ons and release it as a
PloneSocial distro? What add-ons should be included? Would you want to
lead the charge to put something together?
That could be as simple as creating a buildout extension configuration.
In a sense, we now have included
+1
The buildout approach was exactly what I was thinking when reading
Nate's last email too, Steve :)
Niche/Type-of-Site/Industry-specific Distros are something we've talked
about for a long time. I recall a few of us on this list doing so at a
BoF at the Seattle Conference.
But we didn't
Re: PloneEdu distribution, that is something we (PloneEdu steering team, see
http://weblion.psu.edu/ploneedu/community/steering-team) are hoping to do. Our
first step is to gather up and evaluate products that are going to be of
interest to education organizations, and eventually put them
Dries opinion on why it's important: Plus, large organizations that are
about to invest hundreds of thousands of dollars in a website project, don't
want to make the wrong technology choice. Instead, those large businesses
call Gartner, or any of the other analyst firms, to get advice on what
On 24 Nov 2009, at 04:36, Dylan Jay wrote:
... Acquia have shown up on a few 'Magic Quadrant' type lists from
Analysts. Not Drupal, but Acquia. Now Plone is not listed there at
all as it is just an Open Source 'project' and not a 'vendor' in
the traditional analyst sense. That said I
Matt,
+1 on your final idea, but perhaps instead set this up on World Plone
Day and in various countries/locations/online. Recorded sessions that
could be watched later on UStream, YouTube, etc. would be invaluable, I
think.
Thanks for the insight on the ZEA arrangement - I was thinking
On 25/11/2009, at 2:28 AM, Ken Wasetis \[Contextual Corp.\] ken.wase...@contextualcorp.com
wrote:
Thanks for the insight on the ZEA arrangement - I was thinking
something like this could be a possibility, but it sounds as if there
-1
I agree with matt that this won't work and isn't good
On 25/11/2009, at 2:26 AM, Dylan Jay wrote:
On 24/11/2009, at 9:46 PM, Matt Hamilton wrote:
On 24 Nov 2009, at 04:36, Dylan Jay wrote:
... Acquia have shown up on a few 'Magic Quadrant' type lists
from Analysts. Not Drupal, but Acquia. Now Plone is not listed
there at all as it is just
On 23 Nov 2009, at 08:07, Dylan Jay wrote:
All great points, and agree with you... one point specifically I have
been noticing recently...
8) The party line on Acquia is that what's good for Acquia and
Dries is good for Drupal. I saw not a hint of discomfort with that.
I think this is
Steve,
Thanks for the valuable write-up. Following up on Matt's point, why
couldn't the 'Plone Foundation' be the organization/vendor rated by the
analysts? Let them analyze the staying power of the Foundation, the
project, the CMS - that has to be a strength of Plone that we're not
Steve - this is fantastic. Thanks!
Next Wednesday (12/2) I'll be sitting on a panel at Gilbane Boston entitled
Open Source CMS Powwow, as the Plone representative. Others on the panel
will include Mitch Pirtle, the founder of Joomla, Jay Batson, a co-founder
of Acquia, and Ian Howells, the CMO
Scott,
This is an amazing panel discussion. There was meant to be
something similar at IMS this year, but it got dropped, which was a
shame. I'm still not entirely sure the organisers themselves 'get'
Open Source. Having a quick look at the OSS vendors/projects listed
for IMS there will
Hi Scott,
I wanted to make sure we linked up at Gilbane; maybe we can discuss in
more depth some pros/cons of Plone versus other systems and you can
determine the best way to position that in the panel discussion without
it being so us-versus-them. We have a small pedestal display area for
This is very helpful - thanks!
One can cite that the Royal Bank of Scotland, FBI, CIA and NASA are
using Plone, and Plone is on the list of approved and secure platforms
for use at NASA.
I know one of the questions that will come up is examples of sites where the
platform is used in the
Scott,
Regarding the different approaches, I think it's worth mentioning and
possibly getting some input/material from Chris Johnson at ifPeople on
the concept of 'Social Sourcing'. He's made some presentations at Plone
conferences on the topic and this is how the PloneGetPaid.com
Scott,
Can I please ask you to try and record the audio of the panel
discussion. Even if they are doing an official recording, it would be
good to get a copy just recorded from laptop/iPhone.
-Matt
On 23 Nov 2009, at 07:39 PM, Scott Paley sc...@abstractedge.com wrote:
This is very
On 23/11/2009, at 11:17 PM, Matt Hamilton wrote:
On 23 Nov 2009, at 08:07, Dylan Jay wrote:
All great points, and agree with you... one point specifically I
have been noticing recently...
8) The party line on Acquia is that what's good for Acquia and
Dries is good for Drupal. I saw
While at the Non-Profit SW Dev Summit, I had the opportunity to attend a
couple of Drupal panels (new to Drupal, and what's new with Drupal). Drupal
had their A team at the summit (a couple of core devs and several
evangelists) to do the talks. I wanted to pass on a few things on what I
observed.
21 matches
Mail list logo
