On 1/24/2012 8:27 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi Brent,
On 1/24/2012 9:47 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/24/2012 6:08 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi John,
1. I see the Big Bang theory as a theory, an explanatory model that attempts to
weave together all of the relevant observational facts togeth
Hi Brent,
On 1/24/2012 9:47 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/24/2012 6:08 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi John,
1. I see the Big Bang theory as a theory, an explanatory model
that attempts to weave together all of the relevant observational
facts together into a scheme that is both predictive and
On 1/24/2012 6:08 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hi John,
1. I see the Big Bang theory as a theory, an explanatory model that attempts to
weave together all of the relevant observational facts together into a scheme that is
both predictive and explanatory. It has built into it certain ontologi
Hi John,
1. I see the Big Bang theory as a theory, an explanatory model that
attempts to weave together all of the relevant observational facts
together into a scheme that is both predictive and explanatory. It has
built into it certain ontological and epistemological premises that I
have
On Jan 24, 11:41 am, John Clark wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > Identical twins have the same genetics and they can disagree with each
> > other."
>
> That tells you nothing, a copy of you that was exact down to the limit
> imposed by Heisenberg would disagree with you
On Jan 23, 2:12 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 23 Jan 2012, at 14:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > Part I...I'll have to get back to this later for Part II
>
> > On Jan 21, 4:32 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> Craig,
>
> >> I assume comp all along.
>
> > Then why say that you are agnostic about comp?
On 1/22/2012 1:04 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 21.01.2012 22:03 Evgenii Rudnyi said the following:
On 21.01.2012 21:01 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/21/2012 11:23 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 21.01.2012 20:00 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/21/2012 4:25 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Stephen, you wrote to another John - I barge in with my sidelines.
1. I do not 'believe' in the Big Bang, the theory has flaws and errors as
concerning past lit already worked it out. My main objection is *not* the
linearity in going back to zero in an expansion that is non-linear and
*not*the phan
Part II
On Jan 21, 4:32 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> >> Locally it looks like that. But I want an explanation of where such
> >> things come from.
> >> Your "theory" takes too much as granted.
>
> > I want an explanation of where non-locally is and how it comes to
> > influence us locally.
>
> N
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 Craig Weinberg wrote:
> Identical twins have the same genetics and they can disagree with each
> other."
>
That tells you nothing, a copy of you that was exact down to the limit
imposed by Heisenberg would disagree with you about all sorts of things,
like who was your wife
On 24 Jan 2012, at 13:23, ronaldheld wrote:
Since there was a thread on Turing:arXiv:1201.4504v1 [math.LO]
Here is the abstract:
We discuss historical attempts to formulate a physical hypothesis from
which Turing’s thesis may be derived, and also discuss some related
at-
tempts to establish th
On Jan 24, 7:21 am, ronaldheld wrote:
> Not certain if this goes here
> What about Data from TNG? He could pass the Turing test, and with his
> emotion chip on, act like many huminoids. Is he intelligent,
> conscious, self aware, etc?
> Ronald
>
On Jan 23, 11:25 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:20:28AM -0800, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > Besides, any such quantitative measure does not take sequence into
> > account. A book or file which is completely scrambled down to the
> > level of characters or pixels has the sa
Since there was a thread on Turing:arXiv:1201.4504v1 [math.LO]
Here is the abstract:
We discuss historical attempts to formulate a physical hypothesis from
which Turing’s thesis may be derived, and also discuss some related
at-
tempts to establish the computability of mathematical models in
physic
Not certain if this goes here
What about Data from TNG? He could pass the Turing test, and with his
emotion chip on, act like many huminoids. Is he intelligent,
conscious, self aware, etc?
Ronald
On Jan 23, 5:38 pm, Craig Weinberg wrote:
> On Ja
15 matches
Mail list logo