Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread meekerdb
On 9/19/2014 9:58 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I think that the cerebral stem + the cortex plays a key role, from the reading of Hobson theory of mind. I say more on this in "conscience et mécanisme", where I explained also why the Gödelian-Löbian Theatetus "[]p & p" saves machines and humans from

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread meekerdb
On 9/19/2014 9:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Sep 2014, at 03:09, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 5:46 PM, Russell Standish wrote: Consciousness has a state (which we call the observer moment). If that state differs, then the state of the supervened must also differ. Thus consciousness canno

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread meekerdb
On 9/19/2014 8:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Sep 2014, at 02:03, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 4:20 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > We have no way to measure or detect consciousness, That certainly isn't true in my case, there is one particular consciousness that I'm very ve

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread meekerdb
On 9/19/2014 8:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:26, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 7:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 17 Sep 2014, at 23:10, meekerdb wrote: On 9/17/2014 6:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: That does not follow, as thermostat are not universal, and in particular ha

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
The process does seem, if we think of it this way, to be intelligent, yes. But this is a definition of intelligence that most would not consider: An intelligence is the collection of behaviors of a system that tend to increase the number of possible future states. My wording doesn't quite look r

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread LizR
Does this mean evolution is intelligent but (probably) not conscious? On 20 September 2014 03:01, Stephen Paul King wrote: > Dear Bruno, > >I agree, this introduces the possibility that the "inhibiting or > activation of gene" aspect is the "running of the particular algorithm" > while the

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread John Clark
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > In some post you have acknowledge that consciousness is not something > located in a brain. > I don't even know what the location of a consciousness even means. > Two identical brains in different space-time locations will determine > (as

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 15:01, Richard Ruquist wrote: Telmo, Sorry but I cannot elaborate on how Bose-Einstein Condensates BECs act as one particle. It is just how they are described in the literature, yet is is also said that BECs may contain vortices But BECs have amazing properties. At Har

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 10:42, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 4:20 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > We have no way to measure or detect consciousness, That certainly isn't true in my case, there is one particular consciousness that I'm very ver

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 04:53, Russell Standish wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 06:09:56PM -0700, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 5:46 PM, Russell Standish wrote: Consciousness has a state (which we call the observer moment). If that state differs, then the state of the supervened must also differ. T

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 03:09, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 5:46 PM, Russell Standish wrote: Consciousness has a state (which we call the observer moment). If that state differs, then the state of the supervened must also differ. Thus consciousness cannot supervene on the UD* as it doesn't change

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 03:08, spudboy100 via Everything List wrote: Sent from AOL Mobile Mail I think the capability to "think about thinking", would be the ultimate thing to decide if someone or something is truly conscious. And yes I'm Duplainville even though were alive you're not compl

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 02:46, Russell Standish wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 06:05:26PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote: Self-aware means "aware of your self". Hmm... It is a bit ambiguous, because that awareness can be implicit, like I assume for the consciousness of a worm, or explicit, which I a

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 Telmo Menezes wrote: > Yes, I am a product of evolution and I am conscious. > I'm glad we agree on that. > > This does not imply that evolution produces consciousness. > Of course it does. > You can propose a theory on how consciousness emerges from, for example, > brai

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Telmo Menezes
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:33, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:30 PM, John Clark wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> > There might be non relationship between consciousness and smartn

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 19 Sep 2014, at 02:03, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 4:20 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > We have no way to measure or detect consciousness, That certainly isn't true in my case, there is one particular consciousness that I'm very very good at detecting, and although I can't prove it I have

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:26, meekerdb wrote: On 9/18/2014 7:20 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 17 Sep 2014, at 23:10, meekerdb wrote: On 9/17/2014 6:30 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: That does not follow, as thermostat are not universal, and in particular have no universal goal, like do anything to

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
Dear Bruno, I agree, this introduces the possibility that the "inhibiting or activation of gene" aspect is the "running of the particular algorithm" while the mutation and selection aspect might be seen as a process on the space of algorithms. On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wr

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:33, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 7:30 PM, John Clark wrote: On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > There might be non relationship between consciousness and smartness. If there is not a relationship between consciousness and smar

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 18 Sep 2014, at 17:12, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> If there is not a relationship between consciousness and smartness then Darwin was wrong, > Proof? FOR GOD'S SAKE! For the last several years in post after post after post after post

Re: AI Dooms Us

2014-09-19 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 01 Sep 2014, at 17:57, Stephen Paul King wrote: Hi Brent, Have you seen any studies of the "Ameoba dubia" that look into what their genome is expressing? http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2933061/ seems to suggest to me the possibility that the genome is acting as a "br

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Richard Ruquist
Telmo, Sorry but I cannot elaborate on how Bose-Einstein Condensates BECs act as one particle. It is just how they are described in the literature, yet is is also said that BECs may contain vortices But BECs have amazing properties. At Harvard and probably elsewhere, they experimentally can slow

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Telmo Menezes
Hi Richard, > In my papers I have conjectured that consciousness is a BEC effect because > apparently in a BEC of particles, for all these particles to act as one, > each particle must be aware of all others or at least its nearest > neighbors. If so, for consciousness to also be a computation, t

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Richard Ruquist
Telmo, In my papers I have conjectured that consciousness is a BEC effect because apparently in a BEC of particles, for all these particles to act as one, each particle must be aware of all others or at least its nearest neighbors. If so, for consciousness to also be a computation, then BECs must

Re: MGA revisited paper + supervenience

2014-09-19 Thread Telmo Menezes
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:03 AM, meekerdb wrote: > On 9/18/2014 4:20 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > > We have no way to measure or detect consciousness, >>> >> >> That certainly isn't true in my case, there is one particular >> consciousness that I'm very very good at detecting, and although